Aims

Cone beam CT allows cross-sectional imaging of the tibiofibular syndesmosis while the patient bears weight. This may facilitate more accurate and reliable investigation of injuries to, and reconstruction of, the syndesmosis but normal ranges of measurements are required first. The purpose of this study was to establish: 1) the normal reference measurements of the syndesmosis; 2) if side-to-side variations exist in syndesmotic anatomy; 3) if age affects syndesmotic anatomy; and 4) if the syndesmotic anatomy differs between male and female patients in weight-bearing cone beam CT views.

Introduction:. Fibular malreduction is a common and important cause of pain after surgical fixation following a syndesmosis injury, but it is unclear which components of malreduction correspond to clinical outcome. Plain radiographs have been shown to be unreliable at measuring malreduction when compared to CT scans. A number of published methods for measuring fibular position rely on finding the axis of the fibula. Elgafy demonstrated that fibular morphology varies greatly, and some studies have demonstrated difficulty finding the fibular axis. Methods:. We developed a new method of measuring the distal fibular position on CT images. We used CT studies in 16 normal subjects. Two assessors independently measured the ankle syndesmosis using the Davidovitch method, and our new protocol for fibular AP position, diastasis and fibular length. Results:. We demonstrated that after statistical analysis (Pearson Product Moment Correlation) our method showed improved inter-observer reliability (r = 0.99 and 0.95 vs 0.59 and 0.78 respectively) for diastasis and AP translation, and improved intra-observer reliability (r = 0.99 and 0.99 vs 0.91 and 0.97 respectively). We found inter and intra observer reliability of 0.80 and 0.91 respectively for fibular length, but were unable to find a novel, accurate method for measuring fibular rotation. Conclusions:. Our method is a new, simple, accurate and reproducible system for measuring the ankle syndesmosis. We believe that this method could be used to assess fibular reduction after obtaining CT images of the uninjured side for comparison

The best method of stabilisation of the ankle syndesmosis remains a topic of debate; a relatively recent development is the ankle tightrope – a tensionable fibrewire suture device. Despite over 30,000 successful surgeries reported, evidence supporting its use when compared with screw fixation remains extremely limited. We retrospectively compared two consecutive groups of patients whose syndesmotic injuries were stabilised either with a tightrope or screws. The aim of our study was to compare complications arising after insertion of these devices. All patients undergoing tightrope stabilisation of the syndesmosis between January 2006 and February 2009 were included as the treatment group. The control group was made up of a similar number of consecutive patients who underwent screw stabilisation between November 2010 and January 2011. Data was obtained through theatre records, case notes and from the local PACS X-ray system. Eighteen eligible cases were identified in the tightrope group compared with sixteen eligible cases treated with screws. Both groups had similar baseline demographics with respect to distribution of age and gender. Twenty two percent (n = 4) of tightropes were removed secondary to wound breakdown or knot prominence. Other complications included persistent syndesmotic widening (n = 2, 11%), knot prominence without removal (n = 1, 5.5%) and synostosis (n = 1, 5.5%). In comparison, only 1 patient (6.3%) experienced a complication (pain and decreased RoM) in the control group. A total of 14 screws were removed. Thirteen screws were removed uneventfully. One patient was discharged to another hospital for a planned removal of screw, but was lost to follow-up. The remaining two patients elected not to have their screws removed. Discussion. Our study demonstrates that in our hands a relatively high complication rate exists with tightrope stabilisation, whereas few problems are seen with screw fixation

Aims

The ideal management of acute syndesmotic injuries in elite athletes is controversial. Among several treatment methods used to stabilize the syndesmosis and facilitate healing of the ligaments, the use of suture tape (InternalBrace) has previously been described. The purpose of this study was to analyze the functional outcome, including American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, knee-to-wall measurements, and the time to return to play in days, of unstable syndesmotic injuries treated with the use of the InternalBrace in elite athletes.

This study investigated athletes presenting with grade II syndesmosis injuries and identified the clinical and radiological factors important in differentiating a stable from dynamically unstable injury and those findings associated with a longer recovery and return to sport. Sixty-four athletes were prospectively assessed with an average follow-up of 37 months (range 24–66 months). Athletes with an isolated distal syndesmosis (+/− medial deltoid ligament) injury were included. Those athletes with a concomitant ankle fracture were excluded. Those considered stable (grade IIa) were treated conservatively with a boot and progressive rehabilitation. Those with clinical signs of instability underwent arthroscopy and if instability was confirmed (grade IIb) the syndesmosis was stabilized surgically. The clinical assessment of injury to individual ligaments of the ankle and syndesmosis were recorded along with MRI findings, complications and time to return to play. All athletes returned to the same level of professional sport – 28 with IIa injuries returned at a mean of 45 days whereas the 36 with grade IIb injuries returned to play at a mean of 64 days (p< 0.001). Clinical assessment of injury to the ligaments of the syndesmosis correlated well with MRI findings. Those with a positive squeeze test were 9.5 times as likely and those with a deltoid injury 11 times more likely to have an unstable syndesmosis confirmed arthroscopically. The combination of injury to the AITFL and deltoid ligament was associated with a delay in return to sport. Concomitant injury to the ATFL indicated a different mechanism of injury with the syndesmosis less likely to be unstable and was associated with an earlier return to sport. Clinical and MRI findings may differentiate stable from dynamically unstable grade II injuries and identify which athletes may benefit from early arthroscopic assessment and stabilization. It also suggests the timeframe for expected return to play