We reviewed 15 consecutive patients, 11 women and four men, with a mean age of 48.7 years (37.3 to 62.6), who between July 2004 and August 2007 had undergone percutaneous sacroiliac fusion using hollow modular anchorage screws filled with demineralised bone matrix. Each patient was carefully assessed to exclude other conditions and underwent pre-operative CT and MR scans. The diagnosis of symptomatic sacroiliac disease was confirmed by an injection of local anaesthetic and steroid under image intensifier control. The short form-36 questionnaire and Majeed’s scoring system were used for pre- and post-operative functional evaluation. Post-operative radiological evaluation was performed using plain radiographs. Intra-operative blood loss was minimal and there were no post-operative clinical or radiological complications. The mean follow-up was for 17 months (9 to 39). The mean short form-36 scores improved from 37 (23 to 51) to 80 (67 to 92) for physical function and from 53 (34 to 73) to 86 (70 to 98) for general health (p = 0.037). The mean Majeed’s score improved from 37 (18 to 54) pre-operatively to 79 (63 to 96) post-operatively (p = 0.014). There were 13 good to excellent results. The remaining two patients improved in short form-36 from a mean of 29 (26 to 35) to 48 (44 to 52). Their persistent pain was probably due to concurrent lumbar pathology. We conclude that percutaneous hollow modular anchorage screws are a satisfactory method of achieving sacroiliac fusion

Introduction. We report the outcomes of minimally invasive technique for posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) procedure using Hollow Modular Anchorage (HMA) screws supplemented by routine pedicle screw fixation (Dynesis). Patients and Methods. Seventy-nine patients, who had undergone PLIF procedure using HMA screws supplemented by pedicle screw fixation, were included. Patients deemed suitable for surgery following discography under sedation, with Marcaine instillation establishing reducibility of the listhesis and temporary relief of symptoms. Clinical outcome included visual analogue scale scores for leg pain and back pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and SF-36 questionnaires. Results. Average age was 59 (range: 27-85). Mean follow- up was 5 years (range: 1-10). All cases went into union. None were lost to follow-up. Average length of stay was 24 hours (18-72 hours). All clinical parameters improved except SF-36. Mean ODI improved from 54 (range: 44-89) preoperatively to 33 (17-55) postoperatively (statistically significant, p=0.004). Back pain relief improved in visual analogue scale from average of 68 (range: 60-100) preoperatively to 37 postoperatively (range: 8:46) (statistically significant, p= 0.022). Leg pain relief improved from 53 (range: 31-100) preoperatively to 28 postoperatively (range: 4:60) (statistically significant, p= 0.007). Although mean SF-36 score improved from 37 (range: 10-41) preoperatively to 47 (range: 53-94) postoperatively (statistically insignificant, p=0.592). Complications included: one infection required removal of implant; two temporary motor weaknesses related to L5 nerve root; four required removal of the pedicle screw due to pain or loosening. Discussion. Our results are encouraging. Interbody HMA screws are porous hollow titanium screws with favourable biomechanical characteristics. Rather than square cages, they permit accurate placement of implant. Dynesys offers the option of extension and flexible support for the adjacent segment. Conclusion. PLIF supplemented with pedicle fixation is a reliable and safe procedure for degenerative spondylolisthesis. SF-36 is less sensitive for assessing spinal surgery outcome

Aims. Anchorage of pedicle screw rod instrumentation in the elderly spine with poor bone quality remains challenging. Our study aims to evaluate how the screw bone anchorage is affected by screw design, bone quality, loading conditions, and cementing techniques. Methods. Micro-finite element (µFE) models were created from micro-CT (μCT) scans of vertebrae implanted with two types of pedicle screws (L: Ennovate and R: S. 4. ). Simulations were conducted for a 10 mm radius region of interest (ROI) around each screw and for a full vertebra (FV) where different cementing scenarios were simulated around the screw tips. Stiffness was calculated in pull-out and anterior bending loads. Results. Experimental pull-out strengths were excellently correlated to the µFE pull-out stiffness of the ROI (R. 2. > 0.87) and FV (R. 2. > 0.84) models. No significant difference due to screw design was observed. Cement augmentation increased pull-out stiffness by up to 94% and 48% for L and R screws, respectively, but only increased bending stiffness by up to 6.9% and 1.5%, respectively. Cementing involving only one screw tip resulted in lower stiffness increases in all tested screw designs and loading cases. The stiffening effect of cement augmentation on pull-out and bending stiffness was strongly and negatively correlated to local bone density around the screw (correlation coefficient (R) = -0.95). Conclusion. This combined experimental, µCT and µFE study showed that regional analyses may be sufficient to predict fixation strength in pull-out and that full analyses could show that cement augmentation around pedicle screws increased fixation stiffness in both pull-out and bending, especially for low-density bone. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(12):797–806

Objective. From our series of 570 Dynesys flexible stabilisation procedures, we studied two prospective series of patients with a minimum one-year follow-up comparing uncoated and hydroxyapatite-coated (HA) screws. Methods. Patients were entered prospectively and followed up at 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter. Plain radiographs were obtained annually. 58 patients who underwent Dynesys stabilisation with HA coated screws (312 screws) were evaluated. The data was compared with 71 patients who underwent Dynesys stabilisation with non-coated pedicle screws (366 screws). Outcome measures were screw loosening, breakage, implant removal or revision. Follow up was 96 %. Results. In the HA coated group there were five screw breakages in three patients, all affecting S1 screws. There was evidence of loosening in one patient. In the non-HA coated group there were two cases of infection, both had their implants removed. Further 11 patients had screw loosening and required implant removal. There was a significant improvement of anchorage of the HA coated screws. There was no correlation between numbers of level stabilised, or previous surgery and screw loosening. Average time to revision surgery for loosening was 23 months in the non-coated group. Screw fractures occurred at 11 months in the HA coated group. There was no correlation between screw loosening or fracture and gender or age. Conclusions. Change to HA coating was investigated because of high loosening in plain screws. Secure pedicle screw fixation is crucial in dynamic stabilisation as the implant remains under constant load. This study demonstrated the significant improved anchorage of HA coated pedicle screws in dynamic posterior stabilisation of the lumbar spine. HA coating has eliminated the problem of screw loosening irrespective of gender, age, number of level stabilised or whether there was previous lumbar surgery

Pedicle screws as the principal anchors of instrumentation in correction of scoliosis as described by Suk 15 years ago have now gained a wide acceptance among deformity surgeons. Pedicles in the concavity of the major as well as compensatory curves are often dysplastic making screw placement occasionally problematic. In cases of dural ectasia with dystrophic pedicles, the transpedicular screw anchorage is sometimes impossible. In 2009 Gardner et al. presented a case of NF-1 with a troublesome cervico-thoracic kyphosis where they created distal anchors by means of laminar screw fixation. In the presentation of this case, the idea is further developed. Case. A 14 year old girl without any obvious syndromic feature underwent surgery for a 70 degree thoracic scoliosis. A preoperatively MRI showed a dural ectasia. A preoperative low dose–CT revealed dystrophic pedicles from Th4 to L4, making transpedicular screw placement problematical. The operation was performed with the aid of an O-arm. At all levels from Th2 – L2 laminar screw fixation was used. Postoperatively, low-dose CT showed excellent screw positioning with the exceptiuon of one proximal screw which compromised a foramem but, without any symptoms. The postoperative course was quite uneventful and the patient was discharged at day 5days postoperatively. The correction rate was 70%. Conclusion. In cases of scoliosis with severe dystrophic pedicles, the use of laminar screws is a good alternative to problematic transpedicular screw placement

We have studied two matching cohorts of patients treated by Dynesys flexible stabilisation with and without hydroxyapatite (HA) coating of the pedicle screws. From our series of 570 Dynesys procedures, we studied patients with HA coated screws with a minimum one year follow-up. Patients were entered prospectively and followed up at 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter. Plain radiographs were obtained annually. 58 patients (26 males, 32 females, mean age 55 years at surgery) underwent Dynesys stabilisation with HA coated screws. The data was compared with 69 patients who underwent Dynesys stabilisation with non-coated pedicle screws between 2004 and 2006 (26 male, 53 female, mean age 54 years). Outcome measures were screw loosening, breakage, implant removal or revision. A total of 320 HA coated pedicle screws were inserted. 12 patients were lost to follow-up. 2 patients underwent subsequent level extension, and 2 had their implants removed. There were four screw breakages in three patients, all affecting S1 screws. There was no evidence of screw loosening in any patient. In the non-HA coated group 354 pedicle screws were inserted. 5 patients required revision or subsequent surgery. 12 patients had screw loosening and required implant removal. There was a significant improvement of anchorage of the HA coated screws. Change to HA coating was investigated because of high loosening in plain screws. The improvement has been highly significant. Flexible stabilisation is a better model than fusion because the implant remains under constant load. Disclosure: The authors did not receive any outside funding in support of preparation of this work

Objectives

Cement augmentation of pedicle screws could be used to improve screw stability, especially in osteoporotic vertebrae. However, little is known concerning the influence of different screw types and amount of cement applied. Therefore, the aim of this biomechanical in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of cement augmentation on the screw pull-out force in osteoporotic vertebrae, comparing different pedicle screws (solid and fenestrated) and cement volumes (0 mL, 1 mL or 3 mL).

We describe the results of a prospective case series of patients with spondylolysis, evaluating a technique of direct stabilisation of the pars interarticularis with a construct that consists of a pair of pedicle screws connected by a U-shaped modular link passing beneath the spinous process. Tightening the link to the screws compresses bone graft in the defect in the pars, providing rigid intrasegmental fixation. We have carried out this procedure on 20 patients aged between nine and 21 years with a defect of the pars at L5, confirmed on CT. The mean age of the patients was 13.9 years (9 to 21). They had a grade I or less spondylolisthesis and no evidence of intervertebral degeneration on MRI. The mean follow-up was four years (2.3 to 7.3). The patients were assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and a visual analogue scale (VAS). At the latest follow-up, 18 patients had an excellent clinical outcome, with a significant (p < 0.001) improvement in their ODI and VAS scores. The mean ODI score at final follow-up was 8%. Assessment of the defect by CT showed a rate of union of 80%. There were no complications involving the internal fixation.

The strength of the construct removes the need for post-operative immobilisation.

Fracture of a pedicle is a rare complication of spinal instrumentation using pedicular screws, but it can lead to instability and pain and may necessitate extension of the fusion. Osteosynthesis of the fractured pedicle by cerclage-wire fixation and augmentation of the screw fixation by vertebroplasty or temporary elongation of the fixation, allows stabilisation without sacrifice of the adjacent healthy segment. We describe three patients who developed a fracture of the pedicle in the most caudal instrumented vertebra early after lumbar spinal fusion.

During revision surgery the pedicles were reduced and secured by a soft cerclage wire bilaterally. Fusion was obtained at the site of the primary instrumentation and healing of the pedicles was achieved. Cerclage wiring of the fractured pedicle seems to be safe and avoids permanent extension of the fusion without the sacrifice of an otherwise healthy segment.