Introduction. The degeneration of the adjacent segment in lumbar spine with spondylodesis is well known, though the exact incidence and the mechanism is not clear. Several implants with semi rigid or dynamic behavior are available to reduce the biomechanical loads and to prevent an adjacent segment disease (ASD). Randomized controlled trials are not published. We investigated the biomechanical influence of dynamic and semi rigid implants on the adjacent segment in cadaver lumbar spine with monosegmental fusion (MF). Materials and Methods. 14 fresh cadaver lumbar spines were prepared; capsules and ligaments were kept intact. Pure rotanional moments of ±7.5 Nm were applied with a Zwick 1456 universal testing machine without preload in lateral bending and flexion/extension. The intradiscal pressure (IDP) and the range of motion (ROM) were measured in the segments L2/3 and L3/4 in following situations: in the native spine, monosegmental fusion L4/5 (MF), MF with dynamic rod to L3/4 (Dynabolt), MF with interspinous implant L3/4 (Coflex), and semi rigid fusion with PEEK rod (CD Horizon Legacy) L3-L5. Results. Under flexion load all implants reduced the IDP of segment L2/L3, whereas the IDP in the segment L3/4 was increased using interspinous implants in comparison to the other groups. The IDP was reduced in extension in both segments for all semi rigid or dynamic implants. Compared under extension to the native spine the MF had no influence on the IDP of the adjacent disc. The rod instrumentation (Dynabolt, PEEK rod) lead to a decreased IDP in lateral bending tests. The ROM in L3 was reduced in all groups compared to the native spine. The dynamic and semi rigid stabilization in the segment L3/4 limited the ROM more than the MF. Discussion. The MF reduced the ROM in all directions, whereas the IDP of the adjacent segment remained unaffected. The support of the adjacent segment by semi rigid and dynamic implants decreased the IDP of both segments in extension mainly. This fact is an agreement with other studies. Compared to our data, no significant effect on the
Introduction. Current artificial discs include 1 or 2 bearing surfaces, providing 3 or 5 degrees of freedom. The ESP® is a one-piece e implant made of silicon and polycarbonate -urethane securely fixed to titanium endplates. It allows limited rotation and translation with elastic return. This cushion without fixed rotation center achieves 6 degrees of freedom including shock absorption. This objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the concept in a prospective nonrandomized trial. Material and methods. Prior to clinical implantations, the device was endurance tested at least 40 millions cycles. The polymer core weight and properties, the geometrical characteristics and cohesion of the implants remained stable. A prospective trial was initiated in 2004 for L3L4, L4L5 and L5S1 levels. Total disc replacements have been performed in 153 lumbar levels through extra-peritoneal mini-invasive anterior approach with a minimum 2 years follow-up. Results. There was no clinical or radiological device related complication, except 2 early revisions for post-traumatic implant migrations (8, 17 days post-op.). When comparing the device to other implants, clinically relevant improvements in VAS, SF-36 and ODI scores were observed. At ultimate follow-up, the index level was mobile in 83% of the cases (5,3 ° ± 4.1). The mean centre of rotation was in the physiological area in 78% of cases without relevant modification of
