Initial treatment of traumatic spinal cord injury remains as controversial in 2023 as it was in the early 19th century, when Sir Astley Cooper and Sir Charles Bell debated the merits or otherwise of surgery to relieve cord compression. There has been a lack of high-class evidence for early surgery, despite which expeditious intervention has become the surgical norm. This evidence deficit has been progressively addressed in the last decade and more modern statistical methods have been used to clarify some of the issues, which is demonstrated by the results of the SCI-POEM trial. However, there has never been a properly conducted trial of surgery versus active conservative care. As a result, it is still not known whether early surgery or active physiological management of the unstable injured spinal cord offers the better chance for recovery. Surgeons who care for patients with traumatic spinal cord injuries in the acute setting should be aware of the arguments on all sides of the debate, a summary of which this annotation presents. Cite this article:
Despite advances in treating
Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess whether the use of high dose methylprednisolone (MPS) given to trauma patients with
Introduction. While there is a desperate need for effective treatments for
The NASCIS studies reported improved long-term neurological recovery when high dose methylprednisolone was administered following spinal cord injury. To determine if there is correct implementation of the NASCIS protocols. Prospective observational study. The admission Frankel grade and ASIA neurological classification were recorded. 100 patients with complete or incomplete spinal cord injuries were studied during a 24 month period. Outcome Measures: Correct administration of methyprednisolone. The mean ASIA score was 192 and median Frankel grade was C. Only 25% of the patients received methyl-prednisolone according to the NASCIS regime. “Evidence Based Medicine” is not being adopted.
Spinal infections with and without aSCI represent a severe disease with a high lethality rate of up to 17%. The current treatment recommendations include an antimicrobial therapy and if necessary in combination with operative procedures. Aims of this study are the analysis of risk factors and treatment concepts and to compare the outcome of patients suffering a spinal infection with and without an aSCI. Monocentric prospective case study from 2013 – 2015. Patients were examined using a diagnostic algorithm (CT-thorax/abdomen, MRI total-spine, blood cultures, dental chart, echocardiogram). A calculated antimicrobial therapy was initially administered and later changed according to the antibiotic resistance. Additional operative procedures were performed with respect to the clinical and radiological findings.Aim
Method
Aims. The aim of this study was to determine whether early surgical treatment results in better neurological recovery 12 months after injury than late surgical treatment in patients with
To determine the current practice and to review the literature regarding administration of high dose Methylprednisolone for
To analyse the causes and factors associated with mortality in patients admitted to ASCI unit in a low- or middle-income country. The study was performed at a Tertiary Hospital at Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town South Africa. Data between 1996 –2022 were retrospectively collected from hospital records of patients admitted to the ASCI Unit. There was approximately 3223 admissions for the study period. 682 patients were confirmed dead 87% were male and 64% were unemployed. The mean age was 46 years (ranging from 14 – 87 years). A 1/3 of injuries were caused by a MVA, a ¼ by a fall (low energy and from a height), and 1/5 by a gunshot wound. Average length of stay was 47 days (SD = 52 days), ranging from as short as 1 day to 512 days for one patient. Majority (65%) were admitted for more than a week but less than 2 months 32% were ventilated, and 17% with a CPAP facemask. 10% of patients had a pre-existing ulcer prior to admission. 65% of patients had surgery via the posterior approach, 33% via the anterior approach. On average patients died within 5 years of being admitted to hospital, ranging from dying in the same year as the injury to 20 years later. 73% of the deaths were classified as natural deaths and 20% as unnatural. There is a high mortality in patients with
Increased bone turnover and fracture healing is associated with
Introduction: Apoptosis, or secondary cell death, has been demonstrated in a number of neurological conditions, including Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and brain ischaemia. It is well established from studies of
INTRODUCTION: Apoptosis, or secondary cell death, has been demonstrated in a number of neurological conditions, including Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and brain ischaemia. It is well established from studies of
Patients with spinal cord injuries have been seen to have increased healing of attendant fractures. This for the main has been a clinical observation with laboratory work confined to rats. While the benefits in relation to quicker fracture healing are obvious, this excessive bone growth (heterotopic ossification) also causes unwanted side effects, such as decreased movement around joints, joint fusion and renal tract calculi. However, the cause for this phenomenon remains unclear. This paper evaluates two groups with spinal column fractures – those with neurological compromise (n=10) and those without (n=15), and compares them with a control group with isolated long bone fractures (n=12). Serum was taken from these patients at five specific time intervals post injury (1 day, 5 days, 10 days, 42 days (6 weeks) and 84 days (12 weeks)). These samples were then analysed for levels of Transforming Growth Factor-Beta (TGF-β using the ELISA technique. This cytokine has been shown to stimulate bone formation after both topical and systemic administration. Results show TGF-β levels of 142.79+/-29.51 ng/ml in the neurology group at 84 days post injury. This is higher than any of the other time points within this group (p=0.009 vs. all other time points, ANOVA). Furthermore, this level is also higher than the levels recorded in the no neurology (103.51+/-36.81 ng/ml) and long bone (102.28=/-47.58 ng/ml) groups at 84 days post-injury (p=0.009 and p=0.04 respectively, ANOVA). In conclusion, the results of this work, carried out for the first time in humans, offers strong evidence of the causative role of TGF-β in the increased bone turnover and attendant complications seen in patients with
Patients with spinal cord injuries have been seen to have increased healing of attendant fractures. While the benefits are obvious, this excessive bone growth also causes unwanted side effects, such as decreased movement around joints, joint fusion and renal tract calculi. However, the cause for this phenomenon remains unclear. This paper evaluates two groups with spinal column fractures – those with neurological compromise (n=10) and those without (n=15), and compares them with a control group with isolated long bone fractures (n=12). Serum was taken from these patients at five specific time intervals post injury (1 day, 5 days, 10 days, 42 days (6 weeks) and 84 days(12 weeks)). These samples were then analysed for levels of Transforming Growth Factor-Beta (TGF-.) using the ELISA technique. This cytokine has been shown to stimulate bone formation after both topical and systemic administration. Results show TGF-.; levels of 142.79±29.51 ng/ml in the neurology group at 84 days post injury. This is higher than any of the other time points within this group (.0.009 vs. all other time points, ANOVA). Furthermore, this level is also higher than the levels recorded in the no neurology (103.51±36.81 ng/ml) and long bone (102.28±47.58 ng/ml) groups at 84 days post injury (p=0.009 and p=0.04 respectively, ANOVA). In conclusion, the results of this work, carried out for the first time in humans, offers strong evidence of the causative role of TGF-.; in the increased bone turnover and attendant complications seen in patients with
Introduction and Aims: The aim of this paper is to review C1-C2 facet screw use in paediatric patients and to demonstrate that the technique plays an important role in patients with underlying anatomic abnormalities, which are common in children with cervical instability. Method: A chart review was conducted of all patients managed with C1-C2 facet screws from January 1, 1996 until July 30, 2003 present in the case database. All radiographs were obtained and reviewed. Post-operative and follow-up films were assessed for acceptable screw position and evidence of fusion. Results: C1-C2 facet screws were utilised in nine patients at British Columbia’s Children’s Hospital. The youngest patient treated was five years of age with a mean age for the group of 12. The group consisted of three Down syndrome patients and six with Os Odontoidium, two of which failed previous C1-C2 fusion. Two patients presented with an
The current work compares, in the patients with
Patients with spinal cord injuries have been seen to have increased healing of attendant fractures. This for the main has been a clinical observation with laboratory work confined to rats. While the benefits in relation to quicker fracture healing are obvious, this excessive bone growth (heterotopic ossification) also causes unwanted side effects, such as decreased movement around joints, joint fusion and renal tract calculi. However, the cause for this phenomenon remains unclear. This paper evaluates two groups with spinal column fractures – those with neurological compromise (n=10) and those without (n=11), and compares them with a control group with isolated long bone fractures (n=10). Serum was taken from these patients at five specific time intervals post injury (1 day, 5 days, 10 days, 42 days (6 weeks) and 84 days(12 weeks)). These samples were then analysed for levels of Transforming Growth Factor-Beta (TGF-b) using the ELISA technique. This cytokine has been shown to stimulate bone formation after both topical and systemic administration. Results show TGF-b levels of 142.79+/−29.51 ng/ml in the neurology group at 84 days post injury. This is higher than any of the other time points within this group (p<
0.001 vs. day 1, day 5 and day 10 and p=0.005 vs. 42 days, ANOVA univariate analysis). Furthermore, this level is also higher than the levels recorded in the no neurology (103.51+/−36.81 ng/ml) and long bone (102.28=/−47.58 ng/ml) groups at 84 days post injury (p=0.011 and p=0.021 respectively, ANOVA univariate analysis). There was statistically significant difference in TGF-b levels seen between the clinically more severely injured patients i.e. complete neurological deficit and the less severely injured patients i.e. incomplete neurological deficit. In conclusion, the results of this work, carried out for the first time in humans, offers strong evidence of the causative role of TGF-b in the increased bone turnover and attendant complications seen in patients with