Purpose. Placement of the acetabular cup in accurate and optimal position is important in total hip arthroplasty (THA) to obtain satisfactory result. On the other hand, inaccurate manual cup placement with conventional cup placement guide was reported. We therefore have been applied the mechanical acetabular alignment guide for accurate cup placement. The purpose of this study was to validate the accuracy of the acetabular alignment guide for total hip arthroplasty. Materials and methods. Between 2003 and 2014, 52 primary THAs were performed in 48 patients with using the acetabular alignment guide by one surgeon (HT). There were 42 female and 6 male with a mean age at operation of 71.1 years old (47 to 91). The original diagnosis were osteoarthritis in 43 patients (46 hips), and avascular necrosis of femoral head in 5 patients (6 hips). Used acetabular implants were Stryker® Trident AD HA cup in 24 hips and Wright medical® Acetabular Cup System in 28 hips. After completion of anesthesia, half pins were inserted at the both anterior superior iliac spine vertically and the frame was attached to the pins horizontally in supine position. Then, the patients were placed in lateral decubitus position. Finally, the alignment rod, which indicated the optimal direction of the cup (abduction angle 40°, ante-version angle 20°), was connected to the frame. All operations were done by postero-lateral approach. Assessment of the cup abduction angle and ante-version angle was performed by Lewinnek's method using postoperative AP radiograph in supine position. Results. The average cup abduction angle was 41.9±6.1° and ante-version angle was 15.2±4.1° (corrected ante-version angle was 20.2±4.1°). In 49 hips (94%) out of 52 hips, cup was placed within safe zone which was described by Lewinnek (from 30° to 50° of abduction angle, from 5° to 25° of ante-version angle). We had only 3 outliers which abduction angles were 25, 27, and 52 degrees. In terms of the ante-version angle, there was no outlier. Discussion. Our study showed that acetabular alignment guide could help accurate cup placement in THA. To hold the patients in true lateral decubitus position during THA is quite difficult and pelvis can tilt intraoperatively, sometimes resulting in malposition of the cup. The acetabular alignment guide used in this study was stabilized firmly to both iliac crests with two half pins of external fixator. Once we attach a cup angle guide to the acetabular guide frame in supine position, we can know the exact direction for cup placement without being affected by change of the pelvic orientation. We conclude that the acetabular alignment guide is useful tool in case of lateral decubitus position for THA

Navigation in total hip arthroplasty has been shown to improve acetabular positioning and can decrease the incidence of mal-positioned acetabular components. The aim of this study was to assess two surgical guidance systems by comparing intra-operative measurements of acetabular component inclination and anteversion with a post-operative CT scan.

We prospectively collected intra-operative navigation data from 102 hips receiving conventional THA or hip resurfacing arthroplasty through either a direct anterior or posterior approach. Two guidance systems were used simultaneously: an inertial navigation system (INS) and optical navigation system (ONS). Acetabular component anteversion and inclination was measured on a post-operative CT.

The average age of the patients was 64 years (range: 24-92) and average BMI was 27 kg/m² (range 19-38). 52% had hip surgery through an anterior approach. 98% of the INS measurements and 88% of the ONS measurements were within 10° of the CT measurements. The mean (and standard deviation) of the absolute difference between the post-operative CT and the intra-operative measurements for inclination and anteversion were 3.0° (2.8) and 4.5° (3.2) respectively for the ONS, along with 2.1° (2.3) and 2.4° (2.1) respectively for the INS. There was significantly lower mean absolute difference to CT for the INS when compared to ONS in both anteversion (p<0.001) and inclination (p=0.02).

Both types of navigation produced reliable and reproducible acetabular cup positioning. It is important that patient-specific planning and navigation are used together to ensure that surgeons are targeting the optimal acetabular cup position. This assistance with cup positioning can provide benefits over free-hand techniques, especially in patients with an altered acetabular structure or extensive acetabular bone loss.

In conclusion, both ONS and INS allowed for adequate acetabular positioning as measured on postoperative CT, and thus provide reliable intraoperative feedback for optimal acetabular component placement.

Background. The cementless acetabular component fixed with several screws is one of the most widely used approaches in THA. These screws rely on contact pressure and the resultant friction between the screw head and the cup to control translation and angulation of the prosthesis. However, intraoperative change of the acetabular component alignment during screw fixation should be hardly detected. Acetabular component alignment can be assessed using computer-assisted navigation systems with realtime adjustments for component position. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate intraoperative change of acetabular component alignment during screw fixation using navigation system. Patients and Methods. Primary THAs were performed in 74 hips using CT based fluoroscopic matching navigation system (VectorVision, BrainLAB). The patients were 18 men and 56 women with a mean age of 64.4 years (range, 47–78 years) at operation. Intraoperative acetabular component inclination and anteversion were measured at the time of press-fit, and after screw fixation using the cup verification function in the system. Mean of the absolute difference between at the time of press-fit and after screw fixation was evaluated as intraoperative change of acetabular component. We measured the distance from the center of the femoral head to the inter-teardrop line as a horizontal and vertical reference on the postoperative radiograph. The number of screws was also investigated. Results. Mean inclination and anteversion at the time of press-fit were 40.6° ± 3.6° and 14.6° ± 9.3°, respectively. Mean inclination and anteversion after screw fixation were 40.7° ± 4.4° for inclination and 14.5° ± 9.6° for anteversion. Mean intraoperative change of acetabular component was 1.9° ± 1.7° for inclination and 1.9° ± 1.9° for anteversion. The use number of the screw was an average of 1.46 (1 to 4). The intraoperative change of acetabular component anteversion correlated with number of screws (r = 0.381, p = 0.017), and vertical distance(r = 0.265, p = 0.05). The intraoperative change of acetabular component inclination also correlated with horizontal distance (r = 0.313, p = 0.02). Discussion. Many studies have shown that multiple bone screws are very helpful aids for cementless acetabular cup fixation. The multiple-screw fixation could have an effect on micromotion of the acetabular component. However, the change of acetabular alignment during inserting screws has not been clearly reported. The current study showed mean intraoperative change of acetabular component was 1.9° for inclination and 1.9° for anteversion. However, maximum change of acetabular component was 5° for inclination and 13° for anteversion. These findings suggest that the alignment of acetabular component could change during screw fixation, and the change might cause malalignment of the acetabular component, and could increase the risks of impingement, dislocation, and accelerated wear. The change of acetabular alignment correlated with number of screws and radiographycal measurements in this series. Therefore, bone quality and bone stock could affect stability of acetabular component. In conclusion, navigation can show potential to help quantify intraoperative acetabular component alignment change during screw fixation and potentially reduce the risk for malpostion of acetabular components

Introduction. Navigation of acetabular component orientation is still not commonly performed despite repeated studies that show that more than ½ of acetabular components placed during hip arthroplasty are significantly mal-positioned and that intra-operative radiographic assessment is unreliable. The current study uses postoperative CT to assess the accuracy of a smart mechanical navigation instrument system for cup alignment. Patients and Methods. Thirty seven hip replacements performed using a smart mechanical navigation device (the HipXpert System) had post-operative CT studies available for analysis. These post-operative CT studies were performed for pre- operative planning of the contralateral side, one to three years following the prior surgery. An application specific software module was developed to measure cup orientation using CT (HipXpert Research Application, Surgical Planning Associates Inc., Boston, Massachusetts). The method involves creation of a 3D surface model from the CT data and then determination of an Anterior Pelvic Plane coordinate system. A multiplaner image viewer module is then used to create an image through the CT dataset that is coincident with the opening plane of the acetabular component. Points in this plane are input and then the orientation of the cup is calculated relative to the AP Plane coordinate space according to Murray's definitions of operative anteversion and operative inclination. The actual cup orientation was then compared to the goal of cup orientation recorded when the surgery was performed using the system for acetabular component alignment. Results. For the thirty seven hips replacements, mean operative anteversion error was 1.1 degrees (SD 3.6, range −5.5 to 8.2). Mean operative inclination error was − 1.7 degrees (SD 3.0, range −8.0 to 5.6). There were no outliers in either anteversion or inclination. Conclusion. The current study demonstrates that the mechanical navigation system produces accurate cup alignment results as measured by post-operative CT and confirms the prior accuracy study performed using 2D/3D matching. This improved accuracy compared to robotic systems may be due to the wide-based nature of the docking mechanism and the elimination of the cumulative errors of registration and tracking inherent to more complex systems

Introduction. Navigation of acetabular component orientation is still not commonly performed despite repeated studies that show that more than ½ of acetabular components placed during hip arthroplasty are significantly malpositioned. 1. The current study uses postoperative CT to assess the accuracy of a smart mechanical navigation instrument system for cup alignment. Patients and Methods. Thirty seven hip replacements performed using a smart mechanical navigation device (the HipXpert System) had post-operative CT studies available for analysis. These post-operative CT studies were performed for pre-operative planning of the contralateral side, one to three years following the prior surgery. An application specific software module was developed to measure cup orientation using CT (HipXpert Research Application, Surgical Planning Associates Inc., Boston, Massachusetts). The method involves creation of a 3D surface model from the CT data and then determination of an Anterior Pelvic Plane coordinate system. A multiplaner image viewer module is then used to create an image through the CT dataset that is coincident with the opening plane of the acetabular component. Points in this plane are input and then the orientation of the cup is calculated relative to the AP Plane coordinate space according to Murray's definitions of operative anteversion and operative inclination. The actual cup orientation was then compared to the goal of cup orientation recorded when the surgery was performed using the system for acetabular component alignment. Results. For the thirty seven hips replacements, mean operative anteversion error was 1.1 degrees (SD 3.6, range −5.5 to 8.2). Mean operative inclination error was −1.7 degrees (SD 3.0, range −8.0 to 5.6). There were no outliers in either anteversion or inclination. Conclusion. The current study demonstrates that the mechanical navigation system produces accurate cup alignment results as measured by post-operative CT and confirms the prior accuracy study performed using 2D/3D matching. This improved accuracy compared to robotic systems. 4. may be due to the wide-based nature of the docking mechanism and the elimination of the cumulative errors of registration and tracking inherent to more complex systems

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) using minimally invasive surgeries (MIS) now become popular operative procedures. It is not easy to understand geometric information of pelvis and femur in the restricted operative fields during MIS-THA. Recently, THA in supine position comes into the limelight again to place acetabular cups in an optimum position because we can minimise the intra-operative pelvic motion during THA in supine position. To verify the usefulness of supine position, we measured the angels of acetabular trial cups intra-operatively using the CT-based navigation system. The trial cup positions were placed according to a conventional acetabular cup alignment guide. We compared the angles of acetabular trial cups between supine and lateral positions through the same MIS antero-lateral (AL) surgical approach. Thirty eight hips underwent THA in lateral position (the AL group; average age: 63.9 years old, female: 29 cases, 33 hips, male: 5 cases, 5 hips) and 40 hips underwent THA in supine position (the AL Supine group; average age: 62.2 years old, female 40 cases, 40 hips) were subjected in this study. The single surgeon (the first author) performed all surgeries. We used the Roettinger's modified Watson-Jones approach in both groups. The pelvic registration for navigation was carried out using the CT-fluoro matching procedure with VectorVision Hip (BrainLAB, Germany). After acetabular reaming, the acetabular trial cups were placed into the reamed acetabulum to be at 45 degrees of operative inclination (OI) and at 20 degrees of operative anteversion (OA) using a conventional acetabular cup alignment guide. These angles of the trial cups were measured intra-operatively using the CT-based navigation system, VectorVision Hip. After removing the acetabular trial cup, the acetabular cups were placed using the navigation system. Trilogy cups (Zimmer, USA) and AMS HA shells (JMM, Japan) were used in this study. The average angles of OI were 45.7 degrees (SD 5.5 degrees) in the AL group and 46.3 degrees (SD 4.6 degrees) in the AL Supine group. The average angles of OA were 30.0 degrees (SD 13.5 degrees) in the AL group and 23.5 degrees (SD 8.2 degrees) in the AL Supine group. The hip numbers whose errors were less than 10 degrees were 13 hips in the AL group and 26 hips in the AL Supine group, respectively. There was significant difference in hip numbers whose errors of angles were less than 10 degrees between the AL and Supine groups. The hip numbers whose errors were less than 5 degrees were 7 hips in the AL group and only 6 hips in the AL Supine group, respectively. There was no significant difference in hip numbers whose errors of angles were less than 5 degrees between the AL and Supine groups. The error values of OI were less than 10 degrees except one hip in both groups. However, the error values of 25 hips in the AL group were more than 10 degrees. In lateral position, the pelvis easily rotated when the affected lower extremity was extended, externally rotated, and adducted during the femoral preparation in the AL group, which resulted in malalignment of acetabular OA. In contrast, most hips could be set with the error values less than 10 degrees in the AL Supine position because the pelvis could be stabilised on the operative table. In addition, landmarks, such as bilateral antero-superior iliac spines and the symphysis pubis, were palpable in supine position. However, the hips with error values less than 5 degrees were only 6 out of 40 hips even though in supine position. Using MIS techniques, we can provide more stable hip joint just after surgery since the muscles surrounding hip joints can be preserved. We have to place acetabular cups in an optimum position to achieve wide range of hip motion to prevent dislocation and to provide limitation-free daily activities for patients. These data suggests that we should use more accurate guide systems for acetabular cup replacement such as navigation systems, patient specific templates, and patient specific mechanical instruments to place acetabular cups in an optimum position

Introduction. Navigation of acetabular component orientation is still not commonly performed despite repeated studies that show that more than ½ of acetabular components placed during hip arthroplasty are significantly malpositioned1. The current study uses postoperative CT to assess the accuracy of a smart mechanical navigation instrument system for cup alignment. Patients and Methods. Twenty nine hip replacements performed using the HipXpert Navigation System had post-operative CT studies available for analysis. These post-operative CT studies were performed for pre-operative planning of the contralateral side, one to three years following the prior surgery. The patients included 17 men and 11 women. An application specific software module was developed to measure cup orientation using CT (HXR Application 1.3 Surgical Planning Associates Inc., Boston, Massachusetts). The method involves creation of a 3D surface model from the CT data and then determination of an Anterior Pelvic Plane coordinate system. A multiplaner image viewer module is then used to create an image through the CT dataset that is coincident with the opening plane of the acetabular component. Points on this plane are input and then the orientation of the cup is calculated relative to the AP Plane coordinate space according to Murray's definitions of operative anteversion and operative inclination. The actual cup orientation was then compared to the goal of cup orientation recorded when the surgery was performed using the HipXpert navigation system for acetabular component alignment. Results. Mean operative anteversion error was 1.7 degrees (SD 3.4, range −6.5 to 8.5). Mean operative inclination error was −2.3 degrees (SD 3.1, range −8.9 to 3.9). There were no outliers in either anteversion or inclination. Conclusion. The current study demonstrates that the mechanical navigation system produces accurate cup alignment results as measured by post-operative CT and confirms the prior accuracy study performed using 2D/3D matching. This accuracy, compared to traditional navigation and robotic systems, may be due to the wide-based nature of the docking mechanism and the elimination of the cumulative errors of registration and tracking inherent to more complex systems

Introduction. Computer-assisted methods for acetabulum cup navigation have shown to be able to improve the accuracy of the procedure, but are time-consuming and difficult to use. The goal of this project was to develop an easy-to-use navigation technique, requiring minimal equipment for acetabular cup alignment. Material. A preoperative CT scan was obtained, a 3D model of the acetabulum was created, the pelvic plane determined and the cup orientation planned. A registration area, which included the accessible part of the acetabular fossa and the surrounding articular surface, was chosen for the individualised guide. A guidance cylinder, aligned along the planned cup orientation, was attached in the centre of the guide. To transfer the planned alignment information from the registered guide to the impacting of the cup, we developed an intraoperative guidance method based on inertia sensors. The sensors were aligned orthogonal to the central cylinder of the patient-specific guide and the orientation was recorded. At the time of impacting the cup, the sensors were attached to the impactor and the surgeon used the recorded information for the alignment of the impactor. Results. To measure the accuracy of the proposed registration method, we performed an in-vitro trial on three fresh-frozen hemipelves with seven participants. The deviation between the planned and registered inclination averaged 3.01° (StDev 5.7). In anteversion, we measured an average error of 4.33° (StDev 2.8). We tested the feasibility of the proposed method in a clinical trial. The postoperative radiographic measured angles in this trial were 45° anteversion (planned 45°) and 25° inclination (planned 20°). Discussion. We introduce a novel method for computer-assisted cup alignment, which is easy to integrate into the surgical workflow. Our preliminary results suggest that this method is accurate. However, further clinical studies are necessary to verify its clinical feasibility and accuracy

The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of the acetabular component introducer as a tool to intra-operatively predict implant inclination in total hip arthroplasty. This study investigated (1) the correlation between intra-operative photographic assessment of cup inclination using the acetabular introducer and that measured on post-operative radiograph; and (2) the accuracy of intra-operative prediction of abduction angle. For this study, we prospectively recruited 56 patients scheduled to receive primary hip arthroplasty from one of two senior surgeons. During the procedure, the lead surgeon provided a prediction of the abduction angle based on the alignment of the impactor attached to the cup in its final seated position. A standardized anteroposterior (AP) photograph was then taken of the acetabular impactor in situ. Abduction angles were measured by two observers on the photographs and post-operative AP pelvis radiographs. Linear regression was used to determine the correlation between the angle of the guide measured on the photographs and the actual position of the implant measured on the radiograph. Descriptive statistics were further used to analyze the accuracy of the intra-operative prediction as compared with the abduction angle measured on the photographs. Measurements of cup position made from post-operative radiographs were significantly correlated with the measurements as assessed by intra-operative photographs (r = 0.34, p = 0.00). Our findings demonstrate that radiological abduction angles tend to be greater than that assessed by intra-operative photographs by a mean of 5.6 degrees (SD = 6.6 degrees; 95% CI = 7.3 to 3.9 degrees). Conversely, surgeon prediction of cup inclination based on the acetabular introducer differed from the radiographic measurements by a mean of 6.8 degrees (SD = 8.7 degrees). There was good agreement between the two observers in both photographic and radiographic measurement (k = 0.95, k = 0.96, respectively). In conclusion, we found that the intra-operative photographic assessment of acetabular cup inclination by acetabular impactor alignment tends to underestimate the abduction angle by a mean of approximately 5 degrees. In addition, intra-operative surgeon estimation of acetabular inclination did not appear accurate in this study demonstrating that cup position should rely on additional visual cues beyond that captured in the anteroposterior view of the cup introducer

Introduction. There is great interest in technologies to improve the accuracy and precision in placing implants for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Malik et al. (J Arthroplasty, 2010) showed that an imageless navigation system could be used to produce accurate measures of acetabular cup alignment compared to a CT-based alignment method using an imaging phantom. In this study we sought to compare the precision of an image-based navigation system with post-operative CT scans in a clinical patient cohort who received navigation-assisted THA. Methods. Eighteen patients with 20 hips consented to this IRB-approved analysis of intra- and post-operative THA cup alignment. All patients received THA with image-assisted alignment (MAKO Surgical, Fort Lauderdale). Nominal cup placement, subject to intraoperative surgeon adjustment and approval, was 40° radiographic inclination (RI) and 20° radiographic anteversion (RA) according to the definitions of Murray (JBJS-Br, 1993). Intraoperative cup alignment was measured by collecting five points on the cup rim with an optically tracked stylus. Postoperative cup alignment was measured by registering pre- and post-operative pelvic models generated from CT scans, and determining the postoperative cup orientation relative to the pre-operative pelvis coordinate system (Figure 1). Repeated measures testing of the CT-based measurements on 10 patient scans showed precision and bias of 0.7° and 0° for radiographic inclination, and 0.6° and 0.1° for radiographic anteversion. Results. Mean cup alignment with navigation and CT was within 1° of the nominal target values (Figure 2). There was not a significant difference in the cup inclination measure between intraoperative and CT-based measures, while the intraoperative measure of anteversion showed a 2° bias compared to the CT-based measures. Using a 5° difference between the intraoperative and postoperative measures as the definition for cup placement outliers, 2 cups (10%) were outliers for inclination and 3 cups (15%) were outliers for anteversion (Figure 3). No cup in this series was an outlier for both inclination and anteversion. Discussion. Optical navigation to confirm cup placement appears to result in relatively few alignment outliers, with no outliers for both angles and no single difference greater than 10°. Although differences between intraoperative and CT-based measures were small, it appears acquisition of a larger number of points on the cup rim could further enhance the precision of the navigation-based surgeon feedback. Consistent with previous studies, cup alignment using optical navigation is more precise than cup alignment using traditional manual methods

Background:. While more than ½ of acetabular components placed during hip arthroplasty are significantly malpositioned, traditional surgical navigation and robotoics have not been widely adopted. This may be due to the additional time, expense, and complexity associated with this technology. As an alternative, smart mechanical navigation instruments, adjusted on a patient-specific basis, have been introduced to address the problem of cup malorientation. The current study assesses the accuracy of acetabular component alignment using a mechanical navigation instrument. Patients and Methods:. The acetabular component was aligned in 58 consecutive hips in 58 patients using the HipSextant Mechanical Navigation System (Surgical Planning Associates, Inc. Boston, MA). The technique involves using a patient-specific plan and associated software. In planning for surgery, CT data are used to create a 3D model and to define the anterior pelvic plane (APP). A patient-specific HipSextant docking coordinate system is then determined by three points: one just behind the posterior acetabular rim, a second on the lateral side of the ASIS, and a third on the surface of the ilium (Figure 1). The HipSextant itself has two adjustable orthogonal protractors (in-plane and off-plane angle) and two adjustable arms so that the instrument is adjusted for each patient based on their specific anatomy. The instrument docks directly to the pelvis so the recommended orientation of the acetabular component is based on the actual position of the pelvis at the time of component implantation. A direction indicator points in the direction of the planned cup orientation (Figure 2). Cup alignment was further enhanced with the use of a parallel guide to improve parallel visualization (Figure 3). Postoperative cup orientation was measured using a validated two-dimensional/three-dimensional matching method [3,5]. Results:. Cup orientation measurements of the series of 58 THA's performed in the current study using the mechanical navigation instrument showed an error of inclination of 0.63° ± 2.3° [range, −5.3° to 6.0°] and an error of anteversion of 1.0° ± 2.7° [range, −5.3° to 7.0°]. There were no outliers in either anteversion or inclination. Conclusion:. The current study demonstrates that the mechanical navigation instrument shows excellent cup alignment accuracy in a consecutive series of patients. This accuracy, compared to traditional navigation and robotic systems, may be due to the wide-based nature of the docking mechanism and the eliminate of the cumulative errors of registration and tracking inherent to more complex systems