Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XL | Pages 212 - 212
1 Sep 2012
Walker P Kahn H Zuckerman J Slover J Jaffe F Karia R Kim J
Full Access

INTRODUCTION

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is a durable procedure which allows most patients to achieve a satisfactory functional level, but there can be instability under stressful conditions. Instability is one cause of early revision, often due to misalignment or inadequate ligament balancing. Persistent instability may cause elevated polyethylene wear. Lower levels of instability may cause patient discomfort with certain stressful activities. Hence quantifying instability may have an important role in the functional evaluation of TKA. Several previous studies showed that accelerometers have advantages in kinematic studies including low cost, ease of application, and application to any activity. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the use of an accelerometer attached to the anterior of the tibia, as an evaluation of knee stability of TKA patients. It was postulated that accelerations between TKAs and normal controls will be different, which could indicate abnormal TKA kinematics involving instability, especially for high intensity activities.

METHODS & MATERIALS

We tested 38 TKA knees in 27 patients, in the age range of 50–80 years, with a minimum follow up of 6 months; and 25 knees in 16 shoulder patients, who had no known knee pathology as age-matched controls. A tri-axial accelerometer was firmly attached to the anterior proximal tibia to measure 3-axis accelerations with a sample rate of 100 Hz. Four activities were tested;

Starting with the test leg, walk 3 steps then come to a sudden stop

Take one step forward with the non-tested leg and make a tight 90∗∗∗∗∗ turn towards the non- tested knee direction

Sit down for 3–4 seconds then stand back up

Step up on a 7″ inches high box with the test leg, followed by the non-test leg. Then step down from the box with the test leg, followed by the non-test leg.

During the activities, the patients responded to a questionnaire on instability and pain for each activity. For each test at the time of foot impact, there was a high/low peak acceleration, the peak-to-valley being taken as the indicator. The mean total magnitude of the acceleration was compared between the TKA and control groups in the anterior-posterior direction using the Student's t-test. Statistical significance was at p-value < 0.05.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 2 | Pages 405 - 410
1 Feb 2021
Leo DG Perry DC Abdullah B Jones H

Aims

The reduction in mobility due to hip diseases in children is likely to affect their physical activity (PA) levels. Physical inactivity negatively influences quality of life and health. Our aim was to objectively measure PA in children with hip disease, and correlate it with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Mobility Score.

Methods

A total of 28 children (12 boys and 16 girls) with hip disease aged between 8and 17 years (mean 12 (SD 3)) were studied between December 2018 and July 2019. Children completed the PROMIS Paediatric Item Bank v. 2.0 – Mobility Short Form 8a and wore a hip accelerometer (ActiGraph) for seven consecutive days. Sedentary time (ST), light PA (LPA), moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA), and vigorous PA were calculated from the accelerometers' data. The PROMIS Mobility score was classified as normal, mild, and moderate functions, based on the PROMIS cut scores on the physical function metric. A one-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to assess differences among mobility (normal; mild; moderate) and measured PA and relationships between these variables were assessed using bivariate Pearson correlations.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 568 - 568
1 Oct 2010
Starks I Henderson B Hill R Wade R
Full Access

The Quebec Task Force defined whiplash as “an acceleration–deceleration mechanism of energy transfer to the neck”. It is logical that the lower the velocity change following impact, the lower the risk of injury. The accepted velocity change (delta-v) for whiplash injuries following rear impact has been quoted as 5 mph. There is some debate as whether this is valid in the clinical setting. We aimed to investigate this further. A series of low speed controlled crash simulations were undertaken. There were a total of 27 runs on 23 individuals. Accelerometers were placed on the head and chest of the volunteers. Video recordings were analysed to assess relative displacement of the head and chest. The presence of symptoms was documented over a period of 7 days. The volunteers consisted of 23 males and 1 female with an average age of 38 (range 20–56). The average delta-v achieved was 2.3 mph (range 1.8–3.1 mph). The average maximum accelerations recorded were 3.46g at the chest and 2.93g at the head. The average difference was 0.53g. There was no significant displacement between the head and body. No symptoms were reported beyond 1 hour. Whiplash is triggered if the disparity between movements of the head and neck is of sufficient magnitude. It seems logical that there is a threshold below which whiplash will not occur. Our results have shown that below a delta-v of 3 mph there is little difference in the magnitude and timing of the movements of the head and chest. Therefore the whiplash mechanism of injury does not occur at these changes of velocity


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 263 - 263
1 May 2006
Hinsley D Tam W Evison D
Full Access

Objectives: Behind armour blunt trauma (BABT) to the thorax results from motion of the body wall arising from the defeat of high-energy projectiles by body armour. NATO predicts that BABT will increase in future conflicts. This study aims to define biomechanical tolerance levels for BABT to the lateral thorax. Methods: Terminally anaesthetised pigs (n=19) were subjected to 4 levels of severity of BABT (Table). Two types of armour plates were used. Group 1 were subjected to a 7.62 mm round (INIBA armour) whilst group 2 was subjected to a 12.7 mm round (EBA armour) the latter group being further subdivided by the presence or absence of two thicknesses of trauma attenuating backing (TAB). Accelerometers were attached to the pleural aspect of ribs 7, 8 and 9 mid-way between the spine and the sternum. Results: Outcome was assessed by classifying severity of injury, in terms of mortality, into 3 groups – survivors (animals surviving to 6 h post-impact), early (0–30 min) and late deaths (> 30 min–6 h). The peak acceleration values were obtained from the accelerometer closest to the point of impact. Mean peak acceleration was significantly higher in the early death group (1070 km/s. 2. ) compared to survivors (591 km/s. 2. ) (p< 0.05). There were 6 early deaths, 5 late deaths and 8 survivors. In terms of outcome Group 1 represented the lowest threat with 5 survivors and 1 late death. The animals in Group 2 with no TAB fared worst with 2 early deaths, one late death and no survivors. Deaths were due to respiratory failure/apnoea (n=4), pneumothorax (n=2), haemothorax (n=1), respiratory failure/pulmonary contusion (n=3) and ventricular fibrillation (n=1). Conclusions: Peak acceleration of the body wall may be used to rank the outcome following BABT. There is a significant difference in peak acceleration at the extremes of the injury scale


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 3 | Pages 3 - 7
1 Jun 2019
Patel NG Waterson HB Phillips JRA Toms AD