Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

NON-PENETRATING BALLISTIC CHEST TRAUMA – AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE INFLUENCE OF CHEST WALL BIOMECHANICS.



Abstract

Objectives: Behind armour blunt trauma (BABT) to the thorax results from motion of the body wall arising from the defeat of high-energy projectiles by body armour. NATO predicts that BABT will increase in future conflicts. This study aims to define biomechanical tolerance levels for BABT to the lateral thorax.

Methods: Terminally anaesthetised pigs (n=19) were subjected to 4 levels of severity of BABT (Table). Two types of armour plates were used. Group 1 were subjected to a 7.62 mm round (INIBA armour) whilst group 2 was subjected to a 12.7 mm round (EBA armour) the latter group being further subdivided by the presence or absence of two thicknesses of trauma attenuating backing (TAB). Accelerometers were attached to the pleural aspect of ribs 7, 8 and 9 mid-way between the spine and the sternum.

Results: Outcome was assessed by classifying severity of injury, in terms of mortality, into 3 groups – survivors (animals surviving to 6 h post-impact), early (0–30 min) and late deaths (> 30 min–6 h). The peak acceleration values were obtained from the accelerometer closest to the point of impact. Mean peak acceleration was significantly higher in the early death group (1070 km/s2) compared to survivors (591 km/s2) (p< 0.05).

There were 6 early deaths, 5 late deaths and 8 survivors. In terms of outcome Group 1 represented the lowest threat with 5 survivors and 1 late death. The animals in Group 2 with no TAB fared worst with 2 early deaths, one late death and no survivors. Deaths were due to respiratory failure/apnoea (n=4), pneumothorax (n=2), haemothorax (n=1), respiratory failure/pulmonary contusion (n=3) and ventricular fibrillation (n=1).

Conclusions: Peak acceleration of the body wall may be used to rank the outcome following BABT. There is a significant difference in peak acceleration at the extremes of the injury scale.

Correspondence should be addressed to Major S A Adams, Orthopaedic Department, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SA.