A number of studies have reported longer length of hospital stay (LOS) after surgery in patients with higher ASA grades. The impact of Body Mass Index (BMI) on LOS after Total Hip Replacement (THR) remains unclear with conflicting findings in reported literature. In our hospital we strongly encourage all patients with a raised BMI to participate in a weight reduction programme prior to surgery. This prompted us to investigate the impact BMI has on LOS compared to the more established impact of ASA grade. A retrospective analysis was conducted on all elective primary THR patients between 11/2013 to 02/2014. LOS in BMI groups <30, 30–39 and ≥40 and ASA grades 1–2 and 3–4 was compared. Where appropriate, independent t-test and non-parametric Mann-Whitney test were used to predict significance. 122 THR were analysed. Mean LOS in BMI groups <30, 30–39 and ≥40 were 5.6, 6.2 and 8.0 days, respectively. This was not predicted significant (p=0.7). Mean LOS in ASA groups 1–2 and 3–4 were 5.2 and 9.3, respectively. This was predicted significant (p-value < 0.01). In patients undergoing primary THR, ASA grade is a better predictor of LOS than BMI. Our data adds to the evidence that high BMI alone is not a significant factor in prolonging LOS after a primary THR. This should be taken into account when allocating resources to optimise patients for surgery

INTRODUCTION. Utilization of a patient management support system in our clinical pathway has been successfully demonstrated to both reduce the length of hospital stay after primary THA, as well as reducing the number of hospital readmissions. While successful in a general patient population, the ability of a patient management support system to reduce readmissions in subsets of high risk THA patients has not been evaluated. METHODS. We identified all primary THAs performed at a single institution between 2013 and 2015. Patient sex, age at the time of surgery, race, ASA grade, and 120-day readmissions were retrieved from the patient medical record. Similar to previous studies, the patient's home address was used as a proxy for socioeconomic status, with the estimated median income of a given patient being estimated as the median household income for patients of similar ethnicity living within their zip code as reported in the 2014 U.S. Census. A binary regression was used to determine if a model of patient factors (age, sex, race, socioeconomic status, and/or ASA grade) could accurately predict 120-day readmission after primary THA. Age and socioeconomic status were treated as a continuous variable and all other factors were categorical in nature, and the individual effects of each categorical factor on readmissions were also assessed. RESULTS. A sample of 889 primary THAs was identified using the above criteria, of which 754 (84.8%) were Caucasian and 124 (13.9%) were African Americans. Eleven patients (1.2%) either self-reported a different race or race was unknown. Due to the small number of patients in the other/unknown group, this subset was not included in our analysis. With the remaining sample of 878 THAs (475 females, 403 males; age 62.1 ± 13.0 years), a model containing age, sex, race, socioeconomic status, and ASA grade was unable to accurately predict the need for hospital readmission (R2 = 0.02). When assessed individually, the rates of hospital readmission did not differ by sex or race; however, those with ASA grades I or II had significantly lower readmission rates than patients with ASA grades III or IV (Table 1). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION. Despite a comprehensive program, the risk of readmission for patients with greater comorbidity burdens was double that of patients with low ASA grades

Following the recommendation of NICE guidelines (CG124) we have recently started using cemented smooth tapered stem hemiarthroplasty as our standard management of intra-capsular neck of femur fractures. Prior to publication of the above guidelines the standard implant utilised was Thompson Hemiarthroplasty prosthesis. The cost implications of this change have not been fully appreciated and the benefit of these changes in ASA grade 3–4 patients has not previously been analysed. We identified a cohort of 89 patients admitted with displaced intra-capsular neck of femur fracture with an ASA grade 3–4. These underwent hip hemiarthroplaties at our centre over a period of 12 months (before and after guideline implementation). Data regarding in-hospital mortality, dislocation, reoperation and place of discharge were retrospectively collected and analysed. Our cohort included 46 patients who underwent a Thompsons Hemiarthroplasty, 30 patients who had a cemented smooth tapered stem hemiarthroplasty and 13 patients who had an Austin-moore Hemiarthroplasty. In-patient mortality rates were highest in the Austin-moore group, followed by the Thompsons group compared to none in the smooth tapered stem group. However, this was not statistically significant. One patient in the Thompsons group and one patient in the smooth tapered group had multiple dislocations and re-operations, compared with none in the Austin-moore group. In terms of percentage of patients who were discharged home from hospital the smooth tapered stem group had a percentage that was more than twice that of the Thompson's which was in turn higher than that found in the Austin-moore group. In conclusion, our data suggests that in patients with an ASA grade of 3–4 there is no significant benefit from using cemented smooth tapper stems when performing a Hip Hemiarthroplasty compared with a well performed Thompsons and that the cost savings of this is significant. We accept that our current numbers are relatively small and further work is needed

There is mixed evidence in the literature regarding increasing age, ASA and BMI as risk factors for surgical site infection in orthopaedic surgery. To investigate the matter further, we examined 1055 wounds in 1008 patients in the Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery at University College London Hospital between 2000 and 2006. All patients with a minimum two-night stay were included. Data was collected by four designated research nurses. The age, height, weight and ASA status of each patient was recorded. All wounds were classified using ASEPSIS. This is a quantitative wound scoring method which is a summation of scores calculated from visual wound characteristics and the clinical consequences of infection. Our results showed a strong linear association between age and ASEPSIS scores. Single variable regression analysis showed a t value of 3.32 and p value of 0.001. A similar linear association was seen between ASA grading and ASEPSIS scores. Single variable regression analysis showed a t value of 2.75 and p value of 0.006. The association between BMI and ASEPSIS scores was markedly different from that seen with age and ASA. The graph was U-shaped with patients with a BMI of 25-30 having the lowest average ASEPSIS scores. Patients with a lower and a higher BMI had higher average ASEPSIS scores. Single variable regression analysis was not significant since the relationship between BMI and ASEPSIS scores is not linear. In conclusion, there are clearly defined patient groups who are at increased risk of developing a surgical site infection: older patients, patients with a higher ASA, and patients with both a low and high BMI. These patients should be targeted to reduce overall infection rates. This can be achieved by ensuring adequate antibiotic prophylaxis, having a low threshold to treat suspected infection and arranging regular follow-up

Introduction. We conducted a study of 312 patients undergoing primary hip and knee arthroplasty in 2005. The aim was to identify the correlation between length of stay, ASA (American society of Anaesthesiologist) grade and BMI (Body Mass Index). Method and materials. 312 patients underwent hip and knee arthroplasty in 2005. ASA grade for surgery was documented by the anaesthetist and BMI by the nurses. 67 patients had inadequate documentation. SPSS software was used for analysis. Results. Of the 245 patients; 35 had ASA grade 1, 144 had ASA grade 2, 64 had ASA grade 3 and 2 had ASA grade 4. Mean length of stay for ASA grade 1 was 6.8 days, ASA grade 2 was 9.75 days, ASA grade 3 was 12.5 days and ASA grade 4 was 13.5 days. There was significant positive correlation (p < 0.01) between the ASA grade and post-operative length of stay. BMI was graded as I (<18.5), II (18.5-24.9), III (25-29.9) and IV (>30). There was no correlation (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.184) between BMI and post-operative length of stay. Conclusion. As the ASA grade increases the length of stay in hospital increases. ‘Cherry picking’ of ASA grade I and II patients by the ISTC will increase the average length of stay in NHS hospitals resulting in increased cost. Length of stay on its own is not a good indicator of hospital performance

Introduction. Neck of femur (NoF) fractures have an inherent 6.5% 30-day mortality as per National hip fracture database(2019). Several studies have demonstrated a higher mortality rate in covid positive NoFs but have been unable to demonstrate whether there are risk factors that contribute to the risk of mortality in this patient group or whether COVID is solely responsible for the higher mortality. Aims. To assess risk factors that are concurrently present in a fracture NoF cohort that may contribute to higher mortality in COVID positive patients. Methods. A cross sectional, retrospective study was performed for a period of 1 year starting from 1st March 2020. All surgically treated neck of femur fracture patients having an isolated intra/extracapsular fracture were included in the study. Data fields recorded- patient demographics, date and time of admission, ward discharge, surgery, mode of surgery (fixation/arthroplasty), prehospital AMTS score, residential status and mobility, ASA grade as per anaesthetist's records, date of death (if deceased), cause of death (as per death certificate/ postmortem / coroner's report). Analysis of mortality was carried out by creating a matched comparison group for each risk factor as well as some combinations. Results. 344 patients were surgically treated for a neck of femur fracture in our DGH during the period of 1st March 2020 to 28th February 2021. 46 patients did not receive a COVID swab (reasons unknown) and were excluded from the study. 35 patients had a COVID-19 RT PCR positive test during their hospital stay and 264 patients remained negative. There were 12 deaths in COVID positive patients (34%) and 53 deaths in COVID negative patients (20%) within the time frame of the study. For each risk factor matched group COVID was seen to confer higher mortality in general. There was no mortality in ASA 1 or 2 patients. Mortality rates in matched groups for age and ASA revealed 23.8% mortality in COVID positive as opposed to 17.3% in COVID negative for ASA 3 and 33.3% mortality in COVID positive vs. 28% in ASA 4. 11 out of the 12 COVID positive patients who died had an AMTS score >6. No correlation was seen between COVID positive deaths and preinjury residential status, type of fracture or surgery offered, or preinjury mobility. The average length of hospital stay was much higher for COVID positive patients (19.5days) as compared to 9.5 days for COVID negative patients. Conclusion. Matched group analysis show that there is a 37.5% increase in COVID positive neck of femur fracture mortality in ASA 3 patients, the same number falls to 17.8% for ASA 4 patients. These figures are much lower compared to other studies in the UK. There is a need to understand the real cause of death in this subset and to improve death certification so that we can differentiate between patients whose mortality is ‘due to’ or ‘With’ COVID

Aims. As the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic passes, the challenge shifts to safe resumption of routine medical services, including elective orthopaedic surgery. Protocols including pre-operative self-isolation, COVID-19 testing, and surgery at a non-COVID-19 site have been developed to minimize risk of transmission. Despite this, it is likely that many patients will want to delay surgery for fear of contracting COVID-19. The aim of this study is to identify the number of patients who still want to proceed with planned elective orthopaedic surgery in this current environment. Methods. This is a prospective, single surgeon study of 102 patients who were on the waiting list for an elective hip or knee procedure during the COVID-19 pandemic. Baseline characteristics including age, ASA grade, COVID-19 risk, procedure type, surgical priority, and admission type were recorded. The primary outcome was patient consent to continue with planned surgical care after resumption of elective orthopaedic services. Subgroup analysis was also performed to determine if any specific patient factors influenced the decision to proceed with surgery. Results. Overall, 58 patients (56.8%) wanted to continue with planned surgical care at the earliest possibility. Patients classified as ASA I and ASA II were more likely to agree to surgery (60.5% and 60.0%, respectively) compared to ASA III and ASA IV patients (44.4% and 0.0%, respectively) (p = 0.01). In addition, patients undergoing soft tissue knee surgery were more likely to consent to surgery (90.0%) compared to patients undergoing primary hip arthroplasty (68.6%), primary knee arthroplasty (48.7%), revision hip or knee arthroplasty (0.0%), or hip and knee injections (43.8%) (p = 0.03). Conclusion. Restarting elective orthopaedic services during the COVID-19 pandemic remains a significant challenge. Given the uncertain environment, it is unsurprising that only 56% of patients were prepared to continue with their planned surgical care upon resumption of elective services. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-6:267–271

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is performed under general anesthesia (GA) or spinal anesthesia (SA). The first objective of this study was to determine which patient factors are associated with receiving SA versus GA. The second objective was to discern the effect of anesthesia type on short-term postoperative complications and readmission. The third objective was to elucidate factors that impact the effect of anesthesia type on outcome following arthroplasty. This retrospective cohort study included 108,905 patients (median age, 66 years; IQR 60-73 years; 56.0% females) who underwent primary THA for treatment of primary osteoarthritis in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database during the period of 2013-2018. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate variables associated with anesthesia type and outcomes following arthroplasty. Anesthesia type administered during THA was significantly associated with race. Specifically, Black and Hispanic patients were less likely to receive SA compared to White patients (White: OR 1.00; Black: OR 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-0.75; Hispanic: OR 0.81; CI, 0.75-0.88), while Asian patients were more likely to receive SA (OR 1.44, CI 1.31-1.59). Spinal anesthesia was associated with increased age (OR 1.01; CI 1.00-1.01). Patients with less frailty and lower comorbidity were more likely to receive SA based on the modified frailty index ([mFI-5]=0: OR 1.00; mFI-5=1: OR 0.90, CI 0.88-0.93; mFI-5=2 or greater: OR 0.86, CI 0.83-0.90) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class (ASA=1: OR 1.00; ASA=2: OR 0.85, CI 0.79-0.91; ASA=3: OR 0.64, CI 0.59-0.69; ASA=4-5: OR 0.47; CI 0.41-0.53). With increased BMI, patients were less likely to be treated with SA (OR 0.99; CI 0.98-0.99). Patients treated with SA had less post-operative complications than GA (OR 0.74; CI 0.67-0.81) and a lower risk of readmission than GA (OR 0.88; CI 0.82-0.95) following THA. Race, age, BMI, and ASA class were found to affect the impact of anesthesia type on post-operative complications. Stratified analysis demonstrated that the reduced risk of complications following arthroplasty noted in patients treated with SA compared to GA was more pronounced in Black, Asian, and Hispanic patients compared to White patients. Furthermore, the positive effect of SA compared to GA was stronger in patients who had reduced age, elevated BMI, and lower ASA class. Among patients undergoing THA for management of primary osteoarthritis, factors including race, BMI, and frailty appear to have impacted the type of anesthesia received. Patients treated with SA had a significantly lower risk of readmission to hospital and adverse events within 30 days of surgery compared to those treated with GA. Furthermore, the positive effect on outcome afforded by SA was different between patients depending on race, age, BMI, and ASA class. These findings may help to guide selection of anesthesia type in subpopulations of patients undergoing primary THA

Aims. The COVID-19 pandemic drastically affected elective orthopaedic services globally as routine orthopaedic activity was largely halted to combat this global threat. Our institution (University College London Hospital, UK) previously showed that during the first peak, a large proportion of patients were hesitant to be listed for their elective lower limb procedure. The aim of this study is to assess if there is a patient perception change towards having elective surgery now that we have passed the peak of the second wave of the pandemic. Methods. This is a prospective study of 100 patients who were on the waiting list of a single surgeon for an elective hip or knee procedure. Baseline characteristics including age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, COVID-19 risk, procedure type, and admission type were recorded. The primary outcome was patient consent to continue with their scheduled surgical procedure. Subgroup analysis was also conducted to define if any specific patient factors influenced decision to continue with surgery. Results. Overall, 88 patients (88%) were happy to continue with their scheduled procedure at the earliest opportunity. Patients with an ASA grade I were most likely to agree to surgery, followed by patients with ASA grades II, then those with grade III (93.3%, 88.7%, and 78.6% willingness, respectively). Patients waitlisted for an injection were least likely to consent to surgery, with just 73.7% agreeing. In all, there was a large increase in the proportion of patient willingness to continue with surgery compared to our initial study during the first wave of the pandemic. Conclusion. As COVID-19 lockdown restrictions are lifted after the second peak of the pandemic, we are seeing greater willingness to continue with scheduled orthopaedic surgery, reinforcing a change in patient perception towards having elective surgery. However, we must continue with strict COVID-19 precautions in order to minimize viral transmission as we increase our elective orthopaedic services going forward. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(10):865–870

Same day home (SDH) discharge in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has increased in popularity in recent years. The objective of this study was to evaluate the causes and predictors of failed discharges in planned SDH patients. A consecutive cohort of patients who underwent total knee (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) that were scheduled for SDH discharge between April 1, 2019 to March 31, 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, causes of failed discharge, perioperative variables, 30-day readmissions and 6-month reoperation rates were collected. Multivariate regression analysis was undertaken to identify independent predictors of failed discharge. The cohort consisted of 527 consecutive patients. One hundred and one (19%) patients failed SDH discharge. The leading causes were postoperative hypotension (20%) and patients who were ineligible for the SDH pathway (19%). Two individual surgeons, later operative start time (OR 1.3, 95% CI, 1.15-1.55, p=0.001), ASA class IV (OR 3.4, 95% CI, 1.4-8.2; p=0.006) and undergoing a THA (OR 2.0, 95% CI, 1.2-3.1, p=0.004) were independent predictors of failed SDH discharge. No differences in age, BMI, gender, surgical approach or type of anesthetic were found (p>0.05). The 30-day readmission or 6-month reoperation were similar between groups (p>0.05). Hypotension and inappropriate patient selection were the leading causes of failed SDH discharge. Significant variability existed between individual surgeons failed discharge rates. Patients undergoing a THA, classified as ASA IV or had a later operative start time were all more likely to fail SDH discharge

Introduction. This study aimed to assess the relationship between preparation times and operative procedures for elective orthopaedic surgery. A clearer understanding of these relationships may facilitate list organisation and thereby contribute to improved operating theatre efficiency. Methods. Two years of elective orthopaedic theatre data was retrospectively analysed. The hospital medical information unit provided de- identified data for 2015 and 2016 elective orthopaedic cases, from which were selected seven categories of procedures with sufficient numbers to allow further analysis - primary hip and knee replacement, spinal surgery, shoulder surgery (excluding shoulder replacement), knee surgery, foot and ankle surgery (excluding ankle replacement), Dupuytrens surgery and general orthopaedic surgery. The data analysed included patient age, ASA grade, operation, operation time, and preparation time (calculated as the time from the start of the anaesthetic proceedings to the patient's admission to Recovery, with the operating time [skin incision to skin closure] subtracted). Statistical analysis of the data was undertaken. Results. A total of 1596 procedures performed over the two year period were analysed. Preparation times for the different procedures were assessed, along with the relationship to the procedure complexity. Neither age nor ASA correlated strongly with preparation times. Spine procedures had greater preparation times than hip and knee arthroplasty. Greater uniformity in preparation times for hip and knee arthroplasty was seen across the anaesthetic group than operative times across the surgeon group. Discussion. Preparation times are just one aspect that may be evaluated with regard to theatre utilisation. This study did not address the theatre turn-over time between cases, which includes transfer of the patient from the admitting/pre-operative area into the theatre. Conclusion. Preparation times for elective procedures follow a pattern which may be used to inform list planning, with the potential for greater theatre efficiencies with regard to list utilisation and staff allocation

This study aimed to examine the changing trends in the reasons for total hip replacement (THR) revision surgery, in one country over a twenty-one year period, in order to assess whether changes in arthroplasty practices have impacted revision patterns and whether an awareness of these changes can be used to guide clinical practice and reduce future revision rates. The reason for revision THR performed between January 1999 and December 2019 was extracted from the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR). The results were then grouped into seven 3-year periods to allow for clearer visualization of trends. The reasons were compared across the seven time periods and trends in prosthesis use, patient age, gender, BMI and ASA grade were also reviewed. We compared the reasons for early revision, within one year, with the overall revision rates. There were 20,740 revision THR registered of which 7665 were revisions of hips with the index procedure registered during the 21 year period. There has been a statistically significant increase in both femoral fracture (4.1 – 14.9%, p<0.001) and pain (8.1 – 14.9%, p<0.001) as a reason for hip revision. While dislocation has significantly decreased from 57.6% to 17.1% (p<0.001). Deep infection decreased over the first 15 years but has subsequently seen further increases over the last 6 years. Conversely both femoral and acetabular loosening increased over the first 12 years but have subsequently decreased over the last 9 years. The rate of early revisions rose from 0.86% to 1.30% of all revision procedures, with a significant rise in revision for deep infection (13-33% of all causes, p<0.001) and femoral fracture (4-18%, p<0.001), whereas revision for dislocation decreased (59-30%, p<0.001). Adjusting for age and gender femoral fracture and deep infection rates remained significant for both (p<0.05). Adjusting for age, gender and ASA was only significant for infection. The most troubling finding was the increased rate of deep infection in revision THR, with no obvious linked pattern, whereas, the reduction in revision for dislocation, aseptic femoral and acetabular loosening can be linked to the changing patterns of the use of larger femoral heads and improved bearing surfaces

Aims. Now that we are in the deceleration phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, the focus has shifted to how to safely reinstate elective operating. Regional and speciality specific data is important to guide this decision-making process. This study aimed to review 30-day mortality for all patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery during the peak of the pandemic within our region. Methods. This multicentre study reviewed data on all patients undergoing trauma and orthopaedic surgery in a region from 18 March 2020 to 27 April 2020. Information was collated from regional databases. Patients were COVID-19-positive if they had positive laboratory testing and/or imaging consistent with the infection. 30-day mortality was assessed for all patients. Secondly, 30-day mortality in fracture neck of femur patients was compared to the same time period in 2019. Results. Overall, 496 operations were carried out in 484 patients. The overall 30-day mortality was 1.9%. Seven out of nine deceased patients underwent surgery for a fractured neck of femur. In all, 27 patients contracted COVID-19 in the peri-operative period; of these, four patients died within 30 days (14.8%). In addition, 21 of the 27 patients in this group had a fractured neck of femur, 22 were over the age of 70 years (81.5%). Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade > 3 and/or age > 75 years were at significantly higher risk of death if they contracted COVID-19 within the study period. Conclusion. Overall 30-day postoperative mortality in trauma and orthopaedic surgery patients remains low at 1.9%. There was no 30-day mortality in patients ASA 1 or 2. Patients with significant comorbidities, increasing age, and ASA 3 or above remain at the highest risk. For patients with COVID-19 infection, postoperative 30-day mortality was 14.8%. The reintroduction of elective services should consider individual patient risk profile (including for ASA grade). Effective postoperative strategies should also be employed to try and reduce postoperative exposure to the virus. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-7:392–397

Aim. Acute post-surgical infection is one of the most serious complications after instrumented thoracolumbar fusion with an incidence of 0.7%-12%. Acute infection can lead to an increase in morbidity, mortality, and economic costs for the healthcare system. The main objective of our study was to determine the variables associated with a higher risk of acute infection after thoracolumbar instrumentation in our center. Methods. We conducted an observational case-control study including instrumented fusions of the thoracolumbar spine performed between 2015 and 2021 at our institution. We included patients with thoracolumbar fusions after a fracture or for the treatment of degenerative pathology. We analyzed demographic variables related to the surgical procedure, the causative microorganism of infection, the outcome of infection treatment, and complications. We performed a descriptive analysis of all variables and a univariate comparison of cases and controls. The dichotomous variables were compared using the Fisher test, while the quantitative variables were compared using the Student's T-test. A p-value of <0.05 is taken into account to consider the statistical significance. SPSS v25 Windows program was used for statistical analyses. Results. 455 patients were included, 53% were male with a mean age of 60 years. 35% of patients had a BMI (Body Mass Index) >30, 21.1% were classified as ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) >3, 15.8% were diabetic, and 2.6% were under chronic corticosteroid treatment. In 34.1% of the fusions, the procedure lasted more than 3 hours. We identified 26 post-surgical acute infections (5.7%). Patients with an infection had a higher prevalence of diabetes (14.7% vs 34.6% p=0.012), chronic corticosteroid treatment (2.1% vs 11.5% p=0.026), and a higher percentage of surgeries with duration > 3 hours (32.4% vs. 61.1%, p=0.019). A trend towards significance was also observed in patients classified as ASA >3 (20.3% vs. 34.6%, p=0.088), and BMI >30 (33.8% vs. 53.8%, p=0.054). No significant differences were observed in the rest of the variables studied. The most frequent causative microorganism was S.epidermidis (38%), followed by S.aureus (34%) and polymicrobial infections (34%). Conclusions. There is a significant increase in infection in diabetic patients, patients with chronic corticosteroid treatment, and in surgeries lasting > 3 hours

Aims. The primary aim of this study was to assess the independent association of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on postoperative mortality for patients undergoing orthopaedic and trauma surgery. The secondary aim was to identify factors that were associated with developing COVID-19 during the postoperative period. Methods. A multicentre retrospective study was conducted of all patients presenting to nine centres over a 50-day period during the COVID-19 pandemic (1 March 2020 to 19 April 2020) with a minimum of 50 days follow-up. Patient demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, priority (urgent or elective), procedure type, COVID-19 status, and postoperative mortality were recorded. Results. During the study period, 1,659 procedures were performed in 1,569 patients. There were 68 (4.3%) patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19. There were 85 (5.4%) deaths postoperatively. Patients who had COVID-19 had a significantly lower survival rate when compared with those without a proven SARS-CoV-2 infection (67.6% vs 95.8%, p < 0.001). When adjusting for confounding variables (older age (p < 0.001), female sex (p = 0.004), hip fracture (p = 0.003), and increasing ASA grade (p < 0.001)) a diagnosis of COVID-19 was associated with an increased mortality risk (hazard ratio 1.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14 to 3.12; p = 0.014). A total of 62 patients developed COVID-19 postoperatively, of which two were in the elective and 60 were in the urgent group. Patients aged > 77 years (odds ratio (OR) 3.16; p = 0.001), with increasing ASA grade (OR 2.74; p < 0.001), sustaining a hip (OR 4.56; p = 0.008) or periprosthetic fracture (OR 14.70; p < 0.001) were more likely to develop COVID-19 postoperatively. Conclusion. Perioperative COVID-19 nearly doubled the background postoperative mortality risk following surgery. Patients at risk of developing COVID-19 postoperatively (patients > 77 years, increasing morbidity, sustaining a hip or periprosthetic fracture) may benefit from perioperative shielding. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(12):1774–1781

Abstract. Background. This study aims to estimate the risk of acquiring a medical complication or death from COVID-19 infection in patients who were admitted for orthopaedic trauma surgery during the peak and plateau of pandemic. Unlike other recently published studies, where patient-cohort includes a more morbid group and cancer surgeries, we report on a group more akin to those having routine elective orthopaedic surgery. Methods. The study included 214 patients who underwent orthopaedic trauma surgeries in the hospital between 12th March and 12th May 2020 when the COVID-19 pandemic was on the rise in the United Kingdom. Data was collected on demographic profile including comorbidities, ASA grade, COVID-19 test results, type of procedures and any readmissions, complications or mortality due to COVID-19. Results. There were 7.9% readmissions and 52.9% of it was for respiratory complications. Only one patient had positive COVID-19 test during readmission. 30-day mortality for trauma surgeries was 0% if hip fractures were excluded and 2.8% in all patients. All the mortalities were for neck of femur fracture surgeries and between ASA Grade 3 and 4 or in patients above the age of 70 years. Conclusion. This study suggests that presence of COVID-19 virus in the community and hospital did not adversely affect the outcome of orthopaedic trauma surgeries or lead to excess mortality or readmissions in patients undergoing limb trauma surgery. The findings also support resumption of elective orthopaedic surgeries with appropriate risk stratification, patient optimization and with adequate infrastructural support amidst the recovery phase of the pandemic

Aims. There is little published on the outcomes after restarting elective orthopaedic procedures following cessation of surgery due to the COVID-19 pandemic. During the pandemic, the reported perioperative mortality in patients who acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection while undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery was 18% to 20%. The aim of this study is to report the surgical outcomes, complications, and risk of developing COVID-19 in 2,316 consecutive patients who underwent elective orthopaedic surgery in the latter part of 2020 and comparing it to the same, pre-pandemic, period in 2019. Methods. A retrospective service evaluation of patients who underwent elective surgical procedures between 16 June 2020 and 12 December 2020 was undertaken. The number and type of cases, demographic details, American society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, BMI, 30-day readmission rates, mortality, and complications at one- and six-week intervals were obtained and compared with patients who underwent surgery during the same six-month period in 2019. Results. A total of 2,316 patients underwent surgery in 2020 compared to 2,552 in the same period in 2019. There were no statistical differences in sex distribution, BMI, or ASA grade. The 30-day readmission rate and six-week validated complication rates were significantly lower for the 2020 patients compared to those in 2019 (p < 0.05). No deaths were reported at 30 days in the 2020 group as opposed to three in the 2019 group (p < 0.05). In 2020 one patient developed COVID-19 symptoms five days following foot and ankle surgery. This was possibly due to a family contact immediately following discharge from hospital, and the patient subsequently made a full recovery. Conclusion. Elective surgery was safely resumed following the cessation of operating during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Strict adherence to protocols resulted in 2,316 elective surgical procedures being performed with lower complications, readmissions, and mortality compared to 2019. Furthermore, only one patient developed COVID-19 with no evidence that this was a direct result of undergoing surgery. Level of evidence: III. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(1):42–53

Objective. Carpal tunnel release surgery is a commonly performed procedure for alleviating symptoms of median nerve compression and restoring hand function. With pressure on theatre time these procedures are now commonly performed in a step-down out-patient facility under local anaesthetic. The choice of suture for skin closure in this procedure can impact the quality of wound healing, patient outcomes and the follow-up required however the question of the best type of suture remains unanswered. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of absorbable and non-absorbable sutures using a randomised control trial design. Methods. Eighty patients diagnosed with bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome were enrolled and underwent outpatient carpal tunnel release surgery under local anaesthetic in a staged fashion. Random number generation was used to assign each hand to receive interrupted nylon or Vicryl Rapide sutures. Pre-operative data collection included patient demographics, ASA, inflammatory conditions, smoking status as well as a Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) for each hand. Patients were followed up at 2 and 6 weeks after each operation and the BCTQ was repeated along with the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale and the VAS score for wound discomfort. This study has approval from the DHB ethics committee, Local Iwi, HDC and ANZ Clinical Trials:ACTRN12623000100695. Results. Statistical analysis assessed patient preference and the scores between the groups. Multi-variate analysis was performed to assess the factors that may be contributing to patient choice. Conclusion. Insights into patient preference and clinical outcomes associated with absorbable sutures and non-absorbable sutures in the setting of out-patient surgery are discussed

Deep infection is a devastating complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to determine if there was a relationship between surgeon volume and the incidence of revision for infection after primary TKA. Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) from 1 September 1999 to 31 December 2020 for primary TKA for osteoarthritis that were revised for infection. Surgeon volume was defined by the number of primary TKA procedures performed by the surgeon in the year the primary TKA was performed and grouped as <25, 25-49, 50-74, 75-99, >100 primary TKA procedures per year. Kaplan Meir estimates for cumulative percent revision (CPR) and Cox Proportional Hazard Ratios were performed to compare rates of revision for infection by surgeon volume, with sub-analyses for patella and polyethylene use, age <65 years and male gender. 5295 of 602,919 primary TKA for osteoarthritis were revised for infection. High volume surgeons (>100 TKA/year) had a significantly lower rate of revision for infection with a CPR at 1 and 17 years of 0.4% (95% CI 0.3, 0.4) and 1.5% (95% CI 1.2, 2.0), respectively, compared with 0.6% (95% CI 0.5, 0.7) and 2.1% (95% CI 1.8, 2.3), respectively, for low volume surgeons (<25 TKR/year). Differences between the high-volume group and the remaining groups remained when sub-analysis for age, gender, ASA, BMI, patella resurfacing and the use of cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE). High volume surgeons have lower rates of revision for infection in primary TKA

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and osteosynthesis-associated infections (OSIs) present significant challenges in trauma and orthopaedic surgery, substantially impacting patient morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. This concern is heightened in patients with pre-existing comorbidities, such as diabetes mellitus, which are not always modifiable at presentation. A novel intraoperative strategy to prevent these infections is the use of Defensive Antibacterial Coating (DAC), a bio-absorbable antibiotic-containing hydrogel applied to implant surfaces at implantation, acting as a physical barrier to prevent infection. The purpose of this study is to assess the use of a commercially available hydrogel (DAC), highlighting its characteristics that make it suitable for managing PJIs and OSIs in orthopaedics and traumatology. Twenty-five patients who underwent complex orthopaedic procedures with intraoperative application of DAC between March 2022 and April 2023 at a single hospital site were included. Post-operative assessment encompassed clinical, laboratory, and radiographic examinations. In this study, 25 patients were included, with a mean age of 70 ± 14.77 years and an average ASA grade of 2.46 ± 0.78. The cohort presented an average Charleston Comorbidity score of 5.45 ± 2.24. The procedures included 8 periprosthetic fractures, 8 foot and ankle surgeries, 5 upper limb surgeries, and 4 elective hip and knee surgeries. Follow-up assessments at 6 weeks and 6 months revealed no evidence of PJI or OSI in any patients, nor were any treatments for PJI or OSI required during the interim period. DAC demonstrated efficacy in preventing infections in high-risk patients undergoing complex orthopaedic procedures. Our findings warrant further investigation into the use of DAC in complex hosts with randomized control trials