Unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) is growing in popularity with an increase in utilisation. As a less invasive, bone preserving procedure suitable for knee osteoarthritic patients with intact cruciate ligaments and disease confined to one compartment of the knee joint. The long term survival of a UKA is dependent on many factors, including the accuracy of prosthesis implantation and soft tissue balance. Robotic assisted procedures are generally technically demanding, can increase the operation time and are associated with a learning curve. The learning curve for new technology is likely to be influenced by previous experience with similar technologies, the frequency of use and general experience performing the particular procedure. The purpose of this study was to determine the time to achievement of a steady state with regards to surgical time amongst surgeons using a novel hand held robotic device. This study examined consecutive UKA cases which used a robotic assistive device from five surgeons. The surgeons had each performed at least 15 surgeries each. Two of the surgeons had previous experience with another robotic assistive device for UKA. All of the surgeons had experience with conventional UKA. All of the surgeons have used navigation for other knee procedures within their hospital. The system uses image free navigation with infrared optical tracking with real time feedback. The handheld robotic assistive system for UKA is designed to enable precision of robotics in the hands of the surgeon. The number of surgeries required to reach ‘steady state’ surgical time was calculated as the point in which two consecutive cases were completed within the 95% confidence interval of the surgeon's ‘steady state’ time. The average surgical time (tracker placement to implant trial acceptance phase) from all surgeons across their first 15 cases was 56.8 minutes (surgical time range: 27–102 minutes). The average improvement was 46 minutes from slowest to quickest surgical times. The ‘cutting’ phase was reported as decreasing on average by 31 minutes. This clearly indicates the presence of a learning curve. The surgeons recorded a significant decrease in their surgical time where the most improvement was in the process of bone cutting (as opposed to landmark registration, condyle mapping and other preliminary or planning steps). There was a trend towards decreasing surgical time as case numbers increase for the group of five surgeons. On average it took 8 procedures (range 5–11) to reach a steady state surgical time. The average steady state surgical time was 50 minutes (range 37–55 minutes). In conclusion, the average operative time was comparable with clinical cases reported using other robotic assistive devices for UKA. All five surgeons using the novel handheld robotic-assisted orthopaedic system for UKA reported significant improvement in bone preparation and overall operative times within the first 15 cases performed, reaching a steady state in surgical times after a mean of 8 cases. Therefore, this novel handheld device has a similar learning curve to other devices on the market.
Primary bony tumours of the elbow account for approximately 1% of all osseous tumours. The delayed diagnosis is commonly reported in the literature as a result of lack of clinician familiarity. We present the largest series of primary bone tumours of the elbow in the English literature. We sought to identify characteristics specific to primary elbow tumours and compare these to the current literature. We discuss cases of misdiagnosis and reasons for any delay in diagnosis. The authors also recommend a collaborative protocol for the diagnosis and management of these rare tumours. A prospectively collected national database of all bone tumours is maintained by an independent clerk. The registry and case notes were retrospectively reviewed from January 1954 until June 2013. Eighty cases of primary osseous elbow tumours were studied. Tumours were classified as benign or malignant and then graded according to the Enneking spectrum. There were no benign latent cases in this series. All cases in this series required surgical intervention. These cases presented with persistent rest pain, with or without swelling. The distal humerus was responsible for the majority and most aggressive of cases. The multidisciplinary approach at a specialist centre is integral to management. Misdiagnosis was evident in 12.5 % of all cases. Malignant tumours carried a 5-year mortality of 61%. Benign tumours exhibited a 19% recurrence rate and in particular, giant cell tumour was very aggressive. The evolution in treatment modalities has clearly benefited patients. Clinicians should be aware that elbow tumours can be initially misdiagnosed as soft tissue injuries or cysts. The suspicion of a tumour should be raised in the patient with unremitting, unexplained non-mechanical bony elbow pain. We suggest an investigatory and treatment protocol to avoid a delay to diagnosis. With high rates of local recurrence, we recommend regular postoperative reviews.
With an ageing population and increasing pressures on all orthopaedic services, it is vital that we are able to develop efficient and acceptable means to streamline the patient journey. Our department uses telephone review appointments for selected patients to reduce the need for additional visits to the outpatient clinic. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of this approach, and to determine whether it was acceptable to patients. We identified all patients who had received a first-time telephone review appointment within a four month period. Using a short structured telephone questionnaire they were asked about their experiences of the process, whether they had subsequently required a clinic visit, and whether they would have preferred to be seen in person in the clinic. 50 of the 55 (91%) patients were successfully contacted, and all gave consent to participate. Reasons for follow-up included post-operative discectomy and lumbar decompression, post-nerve root injection, and MRI results. All patients (100%) were satisfied with the telephone consultation. Only 8 (16%) would have preferred a clinic appointment with 5 of these subsequently visiting the clinic. 32 (64%) of the patients did not require a further clinic appointment for the same problem. 32 (64%) of patients stated that they were very satisfied with the overall follow-up process with the remaining 18 (36%) being satisfied. Our study has shown that using telephone review follow-up for selected patients is effective at reducing the number of clinic visits, and is acceptable to patients.
Post-operative pain is well recognised in patients undergoing shoulder surgery. With the recent advances in arthroscopic shoulder surgery over the last decade, a larger number of cases are being performed in day surgery units. These procedures are generally performed under general anaesthetic with either an interscalene or suprascapular nerve block or local anaesthetic infiltration. The aim of our prospective audit was to investigate the adequacy of analgesia provided for patients, undergoing day case arthroscopic shoulder procedures in a rural district general hospital, to ensure best medical care and to tailor certain procedures to appropriate analgesic pathways in the future. Fifty consecutive patients, who underwent day case arthroscopic shoulder surgery, were contacted by telephone one week post surgery, to assess their post-operative pain scores and analgesic requirements. Patients who received a nerve block were found to have a significantly longer duration of pain relief (p < 0.001). These patients also had significantly less pain performing their usual activities of daily living in the immediate post-operative period (p = 0.05), compared to patients who only had local anaesthetic infiltration. There was no trend found between the type of procedure and post-operative pain scores. Our audit has confirmed that nerve blocks provide longer pain relief, but has also highlighted the need to take into consideration pre-operative pain and pain perception to enable analgesia to be tailored.
Mid-shaft humeral fractures in adults are common these days and often present with a management dilemma between operative and non-operative treatment. This study evaluates the outcome of such fractures treated non-operatively over a span of 10 years. In this retrospective study, a review of case notes and radiographs of patients whose mid-shaft humerus fractures were treated non-operatively between 1994 and 2004 was done. Those younger than 16 years and/or who had surgery primarily were excluded. Various factors including patient demographics, mechanism of injury, AO fracture classification and time to union were studied. Mean patient follow-up was 4 years and 6 months. The Oxford shoulder score was used for functional assessment. There was a total of 43 patients, mostly men with involvement of the dominant arm. 5 patients required open reduction and internal fixation with bone grafting for non-union. The average Oxford shoulder score was 18. The majority of patients could resume their jobs and the average time to union was 9 weeks. We conclude from this study that there is a high union rate in the mid-shaft humeral fractures in adults treated non-operatively, with an acceptable functional outcome.
At our institution, a well-documented and structured program of non-operative or opeartive management of Achilles tendon rupture with use of either casts or operation has been devised based on Ultrasound findings of the ‘Gap/distance between the two ends of the Tear’.
