Prolonged length of stay (LOS) is a significant contributor to the variation in surgical health care costs and resource utilization after elective spine surgery. The primary goal of this study was to identify patient, surgical and institutional variables that influence LOS. The secondary objective is to examine variability in institutional practices among participating centers.

This is a retrospective study of a prospectively multicentric followed cohort of patients enrolled in the CSORN between January 2015 and October 2020. A logistic regression model and bootstrapping method was used. A survey was sent to participating centers to assessed institutional level interventions in place to decrease LOS. Centers with LOS shorter than the median were compared to centers with LOS longer than the median.

A total of 3734 patients were included (979 discectomies, 1102 laminectomies, 1653 fusions). The median LOS for discectomy, laminectomy and fusion were respectively 0.0 day (IQR 1.0), 1.0 day (IQR 2.0) and 4.0 days (IQR 2.0). Laminectomy group had the largest variability (SD=4.4, Range 0-133 days). For discectomy, predictors of LOS longer than 0 days were having less leg pain, higher ODI, symptoms duration over 2 years, open procedure, and AE (p< 0.05). Predictors of longer LOS than median of 1 day for laminectomy were increasing age, living alone, higher ODI, open procedures, longer operative time, and AEs (p< 0.05). For posterior instrumented fusion, predictors of longer LOS than median of 4 days were older age, living alone, more comorbidities, less back pain, higher ODI, using narcotics, longer operative time, open procedures, and AEs (p< 0.05). Ten centers (53%) had either ERAS or a standardized protocol aimed at reducing LOS.

In this study stratifying individual patient and institutional level factors across Canada, several independent predictors were identified to enhance the understanding of LOS variability in common elective lumbar spine surgery. The current study provides an updated detailed analysis of the ongoing Canadian efforts in the implementation of multimodal ERAS care pathways. Future studies should explore multivariate analysis in institutional factors and the influence of preoperative patient education on LOS.

In 2011 health policy dictated a reduction in iatrogenic infections, such as Clostridium difficile (C. diff), this resulted in local change to antimicrobial policy in orthopaedic surgery. Previous antimicrobial policy was Cefuroxime, this was changed to Flucloxacillin and Gentimicin. Following this change an increased number of patients appeared to suffer from acute kidney injury (AKI). We initially evaluated the incidence of AKI pre and post antibiotic change and found a correlation between the Flucloxacillin and AKI. We then made changes to antibiotic policy to mitigate the increased rates of AKI and proceeded to evaluate the outcomes.

In this prospective study all patients admitted with fracture neck of femurs were identified from the National Hip Fracture database and data obtained. The degree of AKI was classified according to the validated RIFILE criteria.

Evaluation showed a 4 fold decrease, from 13% to only 3%, in AKI after introduction of the modified antibiotic policy. C.difficile continues to be non-existent since this change.

Flucloxacillin obviously had a significant impact on this patient group. However, we have shown that with appropriate changes to antibiotic policy AKI associated morbidity can be significantly reduced. Dose dependent antibiotics will now be given based on weight and eGFR.

Osteochondral lesions (OCL) of the talus occur in 38% of the patients with supination external rotation type IV ankle fractures and 6 % of ankle sprains. Osteoarthritis is reported subsequently in 8–48% of the ankles. Several marrow stimulation methods have been used to treat the symptomatic lesion, including arthroscopic debridement and micro fracture. Encouraging midterm results have been reported, but longterm outcome is unknown in relation to more invasive treatments such as transfer of autologous osteoarticular tissue from the knee or talus (OATS), autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), frozen and fresh allograft transplantation.

The use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) of function is increasing in popularity. Self reported outcome instruments are used to measure change in health status over time allowing for the collection of accurate and relevant data on the quality of healthcare services. With recent changes outlined by the government, it will become increasingly important for surgeons to be able to demonstrate, with quantitative data, positive benefit of the surgery they perform. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of, and issues involved with setting up a PROMs database in a busy orthopaedic unit.

We have previously shown that a high proportion of our orthopaedic patients have access to the Internet. Suitable patients were identified at foot and ankle clinics or from surgical lists, and the well validated Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) regional scoring system was used. The FAAM is a self-reported, region specific, instrument consisting of 21-item activities of daily living (ADL) subscale and an eight-item sports subscale. This was completed pre-operatively and also online at six-months post operatively, using limesurvey, a free online survey with internet/email based responses.

The software was simple to use and took about 4 hours to develop. 77% of the patient cohort for the period of study had email access and the majority of patients without email were happy to have the questionnaire completed over the phone. This took approximately ten minutes per survey. Patients who did not conduct the study prior to their admission were able to fill it in on the ward using a laptop.

This project has demonstrated that the initiation and continuation of a PROMs data collection system is feasible in a busy orthopaedic unit, producing reliable data which will enable us to monitor and improve standards of clinical practice. We discuss the issues involved with its introduction and usage.

Introduction

Mortality rates following hip fracture are high. There are several scoring systems which aim to predict morbidity and mortality in hospital in-patients. The Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) was devised to predict 30 day mortality following hip fracture. Methods: All patients with hip fractures admitted over a 6 month period were reviewed. The NHFS was calculated for each patient and any associations between patient factors, NHFS, and outcome were investigated.