The June 2023 Spine Roundup. 360. looks at: Characteristics and comparative study of thoracolumbar spine injury and dislocation fracture due to tertiary trauma; Sublingual sufentanil for postoperative pain management after lumbar spinal fusion surgery; Minimally invasive bipolar technique for adult neuromuscular scoliosis; Predictive factors for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis; Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and lumbar fusion surgery at level L4/5; Does recall of preoperative scores contaminate trial outcomes? A randomized controlled trial; Vancomycin in fibrin glue for prevention of SSI; Perioperative nutritional supplementation decreases wound healing complications following elective lumbar spine surgery: a randomized controlled trial

The April 2023 Spine Roundup. 360. looks at: Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy versus microendoscopic discectomy; Spine surgical site infections: a single debridement is not enough; Lenke type 5, anterior, or posterior: systematic review and meta-analysis; Epidural steroid injections and postoperative infection in lumbar decompression or fusion; Noninferiority of posterior cervical foraminotomy versus anterior cervical discectomy; Identifying delays to surgical treatment for metastatic disease; Cervical disc replacement and adjacent segment disease: the NECK trial; Predicting complication in adult spine deformity surgery

The April 2024 Spine Roundup. 360. looks at: Lengthening behaviour of magnetically controlled growing rods in early-onset scoliosis: a multicentre study; LDL, cholesterol, and statins usage cause pseudarthrosis following lumbar interbody fusion; Decision-making in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis of L4/L5; Does the interfacing angle between pedicle screws and support rods affect clinical outcomes after posterior thoracolumbar fusion?; Returning to the grind: how workload influences recovery post-lumbar spine surgery; Securing the spine: a leap forward with s2 alar-iliac screws in adult spinal deformity surgery

The August 2023 Spine Roundup360 looks at: Changes in paraspinal muscles correspond to the severity of degeneration in patients with lumbar stenosis; Steroid injections are not effective in the prevention of surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy; A higher screw density is associated with fewer mechanical complications after surgery for adult spinal deformity; Methylprednisolone following minimally invasive lumbar decompression: a large prospective single-institution study; Occupancy rate of pedicle screw below 80% is a risk factor for upper instrumented vertebral fracture following adult spinal deformity surgery; Deterioration after surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy: an observational study from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network

The February 2023 Spine Roundup. 360. looks at: S2AI screws: At what cost?; Just how good is spinal deformity surgery?; Is 80 years of age too late in the day for spine surgery?; Factors affecting the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in robot-assisted surgery; Factors causing delay in discharge in patients eligible for ambulatory lumbar fusion surgery; Anterior cervical discectomy or fusion and selective laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy; Surgery for cervical radiculopathy: what is the complication burden?; Hypercholesterolemia and neck pain; Return to work after surgery for cervical radiculopathy: a nationwide registry-based observational study

The October 2023 Spine Roundup. 360. looks at: Cutting through surgical smoke: the science of cleaner air in spinal operations; Unlocking success: key factors in thoracic spine decompression and fusion for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament; Deep learning algorithm for identifying cervical cord compression due to degenerative canal stenosis on radiography; Surgeon experience influences robotics learning curve for minimally invasive lumbar fusion; Decision-making algorithm for the surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis of L4/L5; Response to preoperative steroid injections predicts surgical outcomes in patients undergoing fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis

The December 2022 Spine Roundup. 360. looks at: Deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis protocol on a Level 1 trauma centre patient database; Non-specific spondylodiscitis: a new perspective for surgical treatment; Disc degeneration could be recovered after chemonucleolysis; Three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus corpectomy- anterior cervical discectomy and fusion “hybrid” procedures: how does the alignment look?; Rivaroxaban or enoxaparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis; Surgical site infection: when do we have to remove the implants?; Determination of a neurologic safe zone for bicortical S1 pedicle placement; Do you need to operate on unstable spine fractures in the elderly: outcomes and mortality; Degeneration to deformity: when does the patient need both?

The December 2023 Spine Roundup. 360. looks at: Does size matter in adolescent pedicle screws?; Effect of lumbar fusion and pelvic fixation rigidity on hip joint stress: a finite element analysis; Utility of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of lumbar spondylolysis in adolescent patients; Rett syndrome-associated scoliosis a national picture

The June 2024 Spine Roundup. 360. looks at: Intraoperative navigation increases the projected lifetime cancer risk in patients undergoing surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Intrawound vancomycin powder reduces delayed deep surgical site infections following posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Characterizing negative online reviews of spine surgeons; Proximal junctional failure after surgical instrumentation in adult spinal deformity: biomechanical assessment of proximal instrumentation stiffness; Nutritional supplementation and wound healing: a randomized controlled trial

The August 2024 Spine Roundup. 360. looks at: Laminectomy adjacent to instrumented fusion increases adjacent segment disease; Influence of the timing of surgery for cervical spinal cord injury without bone injury in the elderly: a retrospective multicentre study; Lumbar vertebral body tethering: single-centre outcomes and reoperations in a consecutive series of 106 patients; Machine-learning algorithms for predicting Cobb angle beyond 25° in female adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients; Pain in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Teriparatide prevents surgery for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture

Purpose. To question the reliability of Thoracic Spine pain as a red flag and symptoms of a possible cause of Serious Spinal Pathology (SSP). Methods. The clinical notes and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) results of patients presenting to the Sheffield Spinal Service with Thoracic spine symptoms but no signs were retrospectively reviewed over the period of 2 year (September 2008-August 2010). The clinical reason for request of Thoracic MRIs were noted and the patient notes were reviewed to determine their presentation, length of time of symptoms, age and also it was noted whether any other recognized red flag symptoms were present. Exclusion criteria consisted of patients referred with known SSP or myelopathic symptoms. Results. 57 thoracic spine MRI requests were made in total by the orthopaedic spinal teams for patients presenting with thoracic spine pain in the time period. 8 patients were excluded as per criteria as they were referred with known SSP as were 4 other patients with a history of previous cancer. 45 patients presented with thoracic spine pain but no other red flag signs or symptoms of these none had MRI evidence of serious spinal pathology or indeed anything pathological indicating the cause of their symptoms. Conclusion. The majority of those presenting to orthopaedic spinal clinic with thoracic spine pain alone with no other red flag signs have no pathological cause. Thoracic pain is a widely accepted indicator (red flag) of potential serious spinal pathology. The findings from this review would not support thoracic pain alone as an indicator of SSP

Generally, it is considered to be safe in preventing iatrogenic instability if half of the facet joint is left intact during decompression surgeries. By removing half of the facets can we get adequate decompression of the nerve roots? Is there a difference at different levels in the lower lumbar spine? What is the inclination of the facet joint at each level and how does it affect the stability?. Retrospective study. We analysed 200 consecutive magnetic reasonance imaging (MRI) scans of the lumbosacral spine at L3/4, L4/5, and L5/S1 levels. We measured the difference in the distance from midline to the lateral border of the foramen and from midline to the middle of the facet joint at each level on either sides. The angle of the facet joint was also noted. The distance to the foramen from the level of the middle of the facet joints seem to be between 5-6mm lateral at every level. The angle of the facet joints at L3/4 is 35.9°+/−7.4°, while at L4/5 it is 43.2°+/−8.0°, and at L5/S1 it is 49.4°+/−10.1°. In lumbar spine decompression surgeries, after the midline decompression extending up to half of the facet joints, a further undercutting of the facet joints to 5-6mm is therefore required to completely decompress the nerve root in the foramen. The more coronal orientation of the facet joint at L5/S1 conforms better stability than that at L3/4level. Therefore, stabilisation of the spine should be considered if more than 2cm of the posterior elements are removed from midline at L3/4 level

Introduction. The placement of a large interbody implant allows for a larger surface area for fusion, vis a vis, via retroperitoneal direct anterior, antero-lateral and lateral approaches. At the same time, spinal navigation facilitates a minimally invasive fixation for inserting posterior pedicle screws. We report on the first procedures in the United Kingdom performed by a single-surgeon at a single- centre using navigated robot-assisted spine surgery without the need for guide-wires. Materials and Methods. Whilst positioned in the supine or lateral position, a routine supine anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), and/or antero-lateral ALIF (AL-ALIF) and/or lateral lateral interbody fusion (LLIF) is performed. The patient is then turned prone or kept in the single lateral position (SPL) for insertion of the posterior screws performed under robotic guidance. Intraoperative CT scan 3D images captured then are sent to the Robotic software platform for planning of the screw trajectories and finally use again at the end of the procedure to confirm screw accuracy. We identified 34 consecutive patients from October 2019 to January 2020 who underwent robotic assisted spine surgery. The demographic, intraoperative, and perioperative data of all these patients were reviewed and presented. Results. Of the 34 patients, 65 levels were treated in total using 204 screws. Of the 21 patients (60%) who underwent single-level fixation, 14 of them (67%) were treated at the L5/S1 level, 3 at L3/L4, 3 at L4/L5 and 1 at L2/L3 level. The remaining 13 patients (40%) underwent multi-level fixation, of which 4 were adult scoliosis. 15 underwent a supine ALIF approach, 1 underwent AL-ALIF, 8 patients underwent combined LLIF and AL-ALIF approach in a lateral decubitus, whilst 9 underwent pure LLIF approach (of which 3 patients were in the single position lateral) and one patient had previous TLIF surgery. The average estimated blood loss was 60 cc. The average planning time was 10 min and the average duration of surgery was 50 min. The average patient age was 54 years and 64% (22/34) were male. The average BMI was 28.1 kg/m. 2. There were no re-interventions due to complications or mal positioned screws. Conclusion. Minimally invasive spine surgery using robot-assisted navigation yields an improved level of accuracy, decreased radiation exposure, minimal muscle disruption, decreased blood loss, shorter operating theatre time, length of stay, and lower complication rates. Further follow-up of the patients treated will help compare the clinical outcomes with other techniques

Aims. The aim of this study was to determine the differences in spinal imaging characteristics between subjects with or without lumbar developmental spinal stenosis (DSS) in a population-based cohort. Methods. This was a radiological analysis of 2,387 participants who underwent L1-S1 MRI. Means and ranges were calculated for age, sex, BMI, and MRI measurements. Anteroposterior (AP) vertebral canal diameters were used to differentiate those with DSS from controls. Other imaging parameters included vertebral body dimensions, spinal canal dimensions, disc degeneration scores, and facet joint orientation. Mann-Whitney U and chi-squared tests were conducted to search for measurement differences between those with DSS and controls. In order to identify possible associations between DSS and MRI parameters, those who were statistically significant in the univariate binary logistic regression were included in a multivariate stepwise logistic regression after adjusting for demographics. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported where appropriate. Results. Axial AP vertebral canal diameter (p < 0.001), interpedicular distance (p < 0.001), AP dural sac diameter (p < 0.001), lamina angle (p < 0.001), and sagittal mid-vertebral body height (p < 0.001) were significantly different between those identified as having DSS and controls. Narrower interpedicular distance (OR 0.745 (95% CI 0.618 to 0.900); p = 0.002) and AP dural sac diameter (OR 0.506 (95% CI 0.400 to 0.641); p < 0.001) were associated with DSS. Lamina angle (OR 1.127 (95% CI 1.045 to 1.214); p = 0.002) and right facet joint angulation (OR 0.022 (95% CI 0.002 to 0.247); p = 0.002) were also associated with DSS. No association was observed between disc parameters and DSS. Conclusion. From this large-scale cohort, the canal size is found to be independent of body stature. Other than spinal canal dimensions, abnormal orientations of lamina angle and facet joint angulation may also be a result of developmental variations, leading to increased likelihood of DSS. Other skeletal parameters are spared. There was no relationship between DSS and soft tissue changes of the spinal column, which suggests that DSS is a unique result of bony maldevelopment. These findings require validation in other ethnicities and populations. Level of Evidence: I (diagnostic study). Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(4):725–733

Aims. While previously underappreciated, factors related to the spine contribute substantially to the risk of dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA). These factors must be taken into consideration during preoperative planning for revision THA due to recurrent instability. We developed a protocol to assess the functional position of the spine, the significance of these findings, and how to address different pathologies at the time of revision THA. Patients and Methods. Prospectively collected data on 111 patients undergoing revision THA for recurrent instability from January 2014 to January 2017 at two institutions were included (protocol group) and matched 1:1 to 111 revisions specifically performed for instability not using this protocol (control group). Mean follow-up was 2.8 years. Protocol patients underwent standardized preoperative imaging including supine and standing anteroposterior (AP) pelvis and lateral radiographs. Each case was scored according to the Hip-Spine Classification in Revision THA. Results. Survival free of dislocation at two years was 97% in the protocol group (three dislocations, all within three months of surgery) versus 84% in the control group (18 patients). Furthermore, 77% of the inappropriately positioned acetabular components would have been unrecognized by supine AP pelvis imaging alone. Conclusion. Using the Hip-Spine Classification System in revision THA, we demonstrated a significant decrease in the risk of recurrent instability compared with a control group. Without the use of this algorithm, 77% of inappropriately positioned acetabular components would have been unrecognized and incorrect treatment may have been instituted. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:817–823

Purpose and Background. Both overall spine shape and the size and shape of individual vertebrae undergo rapid growth and development during early childhood. Motor development milestones such as age of walking influence spine development, with delayed ambulation linked with spinal conditions including spondylolysis. However, it is unclear whether associations between motor development and spine morphology persist into older age. Therefore, these associations were examined using data from the MRC National Survey of Health and Development, a large nationally-representative British cohort, followed up since birth in 1946. Methods and Results. Statistical shape modelling was used to characterise spinal shape (L5-T10) and identify modes of variation in shape (SM) from dual energy x-ray absorptiometry images of the spine taken at age 60–64 years (N=1327 individuals; 51.8% female). Associations between walking age in months (reported by mothers at 2 years) and SMs were examined with adjustment for sex, birthweight, socioeconomic position, height, lean mass and fat mass. Later onset of independent walking was weakly associated with greater lordosis (SM1; P=0.05) and more uniform antero-posterior vertebral size along the spine (SM6, P=0.07). Later walking age was also associated with smaller relative anterior-posterior vertebral dimensions (SM3) among women whereas the opposite was found for men (P <0.01 for sex interaction). Conclusions. Spinal morphology in early old age was associated with the age that individuals began walking independently in childhood, potentially due to altered mechanical loading. This suggests that motor development may have a persisting effect on clinically-relevant features of spine morphology throughout life. Conflict of interest: None. Funded by the UK Medical Research Council (Grant MR/L010399/1) which supported FRS, SGM and AVP

Aims. The British Spine Registry (BSR) was introduced in May 2012 to be used as a web-based database for spinal surgeries carried out across the UK. Use of this database has been encouraged but not compulsory, which has led to a variable level of engagement in the UK. In 2019 NHS England and NHS Improvement introduced a new Best Practice Tariff (BPT) to encourage input of spinal surgical data on the BSR. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of the spinal BPT on compliance with the recording of surgical data on the BSR. Methods. A retrospective review of data was performed at a tertiary spinal centre between 2018 to 2020. Data were collated from electronic patient records, theatre operating lists, and trust-specific BSR data. Information from the BSR included operative procedures (mandatory), patient consent, email addresses, and demographic details. We also identified Healthcare Resource Groups (HRGs) which qualified for BPT. Results. A total of 3,587 patients were included in our study. Of these, 1,684 patients were eligible for BPT. Between 2018 and 2019 269/974 (28%) records were complete on the BSR for those that would be eligible for BPT. Following introduction of BPT in 2019, 671/710 (95%) records were complete having filled in the mandatory data (p < 0.001). Patient consent to data collection also improved from 62% to 93%. Email details were present in 43% of patients compared with 68% following BPT introduction. Conclusion. Our study found that following the introduction of a BPT, there was a statistically significant improvement in BSR record completion compliance in our unit. The BPT offers a financial incentive which can help generate further income for trusts. National data input into the BSR is important to assess patient outcome following spinal surgery. The BSR can also aid future research in spinal surgery. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2-3:198–201

The June 2014 Spine Roundup. 360 . looks at: spinal pedicle screws in paediatric patients; improving diagnosis in lumbar spine stenosis; back pain all in the head?; brace three patients, save one scoliosis operation; pedicle screws more often misplaced than one would think; and incidental dural tears usually no problem

The August 2013 Spine Roundup. 360 . looks at: SPECT CT and facet joints; a difficult conversation: scoliosis and complications; time for a paradigm shift? complications under the microscope; minor trauma and cervical injury: a predictable phenomenon?; more costly all round: incentivising more complex operations?; minimally invasive surgery = minimal scarring; and symptomatic lumbar spine stenosis

The October 2013 Spine Roundup. 360 . looks at: Standing straighter may reduce falls; Operative management of congenital kyphosis; Athletic discectomy; Lumbar spine stenosis worsens with time; Flexible stabilisation?: spinal stenosis revisited; Do epidural steroids cause spinal fractures?; Who does well with cervical myelopathy?; Secretly adverse to BMP-2?

The lordosis distribution index (LDI) describes distribution of lumbar lordosis, measured as the % of lower lumbar lordosis (L4-S1) compared to global lordosis (L1-S1) with normal value 50–50%. Maldistributed LDI is associated with higher revision in short lumbar fusions, 4 vertebrae1. We hypothesise maldistributed LDI is also associated with mechanical failure in longer fusions. Retrospective review of 29 consecutive ASD patients, aged 55+, undergoing long lumbar fusion, 4 levels, with >3-years follow-up. LDI, pelvic incidence (PI) and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were measured on pre- and post-op whole spine standing X-rays (Fig A and B). Patients were categorized according to their pelvic incidence (PI) and postoperative LDI: Normal (LDI 50 80), Hypolordotic (LDI < 50), or Hyperlordotic (LDI > 80) and assessed for failure rate compared to normal LDI and PI <60. Mean follow-up 4.5 years. 19 patients had mechanical failures including junctional failure and metalware fracture. PI >60o was associated with higher mechanical failure rates (Chi^2 p<0.05). Hypolordotic LDI was associated with 82% mechanical failure (Chi^2 p<0.001), Hyperlordotic 88% mechanical failure (Chi^2 p<0.001) and Normal 8% mechanical failure (Table 1). Maldistributed LDI, whether Hyperlordotic or Hypolordotic, correlated with 10× greater mechanical failure rate compared to Normal LDI in long fusions. LDI is a useful measurement that should be considered, especially in high PI patients

The August 2012 Spine Roundup. 360. looks at: neural tissue and polymerising bone cement; a new prognostic score for spinal metastases from prostatic tumours; recovery after spinal decompression; spinal tuberculosis; unintended durotomy at spinal surgery; how carrying a load on your head can damage the cervical spine; and how age changes your lumbar spine

Purpose and Background:. Healthy adults with a curvy (lordotic) lumbar spine were shown to lift a load from the floor by stooping, while straight (flat) spines squatted. Since skin-surface motion capture often misrepresents internal curvature this study calculated internal lumbar curvature during lifting in the same cohort and compared lumbosacral motion. Methods:. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in standing and bending forward to 30, 45 and 60°, with markers on the skin at L1, L3, L5 and S1. Lumbar spine shape was characterised using statistical shape modelling and participants grouped into ‘curvy’ and ‘straight’ spine sub-groups (N=8). On a separate day participants lifted a box (6–15 kg) from the floor without instruction while Vicon cameras tracked sagittal movement of L1, L3 and L5 skin markers. Sacral angle (to horizontal) was calculated from pelvic markers. Matching markers during MRI and lifting sessions allowed vertebral centroid positions (L1, L3, L5, S1) during lifting to be calculated using custom MATLAB code. Results:. The curvy group had more internal lumbar lordosis at pick up despite stooping to lift the load. From upright standing motion occurred earlier at the upper lumbar levels (L1–L3) compared with lower lumbar (L3–L5). During lifting straight spines had greater rigid-body motion of the entire lumbar spine compared with curvy spines who demonstrated more varied intersegmental motion with greater sacral flexion. Conclusion:. Individuals with very lordotic spines retained some degree of internal lordosis despite stooping when lifting. The lumbar spine appears more mobile at the upper levels, L1–L3, and constrained motion was seen in those with the least lordosis

The June 2012 Spine Roundup. 360. looks at: back pain; spinal fusion for tuberculosis; anatomical course of the recurrent laryngeal nerve; groin pain with normal imaging; the herniated intervertebral disc; obesity’s effect on the spine; the medicolegal risks of cauda equina syndrome; and intravenous lidocaine use and failed back surgery syndrome

Aims. The aim of the study was to compare measures of the quality of life (QOL) after resection of a chordoma of the mobile spine with the national averages in the United States and to assess which factors influenced the QOL, symptoms of anxiety and depression, and coping with pain post-operatively in these patients. Patients and Methods. A total of 48 consecutive patients who underwent resection of a primary or recurrent chordoma of the mobile spine between 2000 and 2015 were included. A total of 34 patients completed a survey at least 12 months post-operatively. The primary outcome was the EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) anxiety, depression and pain interference questionnaires. Data which were recorded included the indication for surgery, the region of the tumour, the number of levels resected, the status of the surgical margins, re-operations, complications, neurological deficit, length of stay in hospital and rate of re-admission. Results. The median EQ-5D-3L score was 0.71 (interquartile range (IQR) 0.44 to 0.79) which is worse than the national average in the United States of 0.85 (p < 0.001). Anxiety (median: 55 (IQR 49 to 61), p = 0.031) and pain (median: 61 (IQR 56 to 68), p < 0.001) were also worse than the national average in the United States (50), while depression was not (median: 52 (IQR 38 to 57), p = 0.513). Patients who underwent a primary resection had better QOL and less anxiety, depression and pain compared with those who underwent resection for recurrent or residual disease. The one- and five-year probabilities were 0.96 and 0.74 for survival, 0.07 and 0.25 for tumour recurrence, and 0.02 and 0.16 for developing distant metastasis. A total of 25 local complications occurred in 20 patients (42%), and there were 50 systemic and other complications in 25 patients (52%) within 90 days. Conclusion. These patient reported outcomes and oncological and surgical outcomes can be used when counselling patients and to aid decision-making when planning surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:979–86

Purpose and Background. Low birth weight is related to decreased lumbar spine vertebral canal size and bone mineral content later in life, suggesting that antenatal factors affect spine development. The purpose of this study was to explore associations between antenatal factors and lumbar spine morphology in childhood. Methods. Antenatal data and supine MR images of the lumbar spine were available for 161 children. Shape modelling, using principle components analysis, was performed on mid-sagittal images to quantify different modes of variation in lumbar spine shape. Previously collected measures of spine canal dimensions were analysed. Results. Almost 75 % of all of the variation in lumbar spine shape was explained by just three modes. Modes 1 and 3 described the total amount and the distribution of curvature along the spine, respectively. Mode 2 (M2) captured variation in vertebral shape and size; increasing mode scores represented flatter vertebral bodies with increasing anterior-posterior dimensions. We saw no significant associations between mode scores and birth weight z-scores, placental weight, gestation length and no effect of maternal smoking (P>0.05). Controlling for gestation length revealed a positive correlation between birth weight and M2 (P=0.02). Males, longer babies and those from heavier mothers had higher M2 scores (P<0.05). This sex difference remained even when controlling for the other factors (P<0.001). Modes 1 and 2 correlated with spine canal dimensions (P<0.05). Conclusions. Our results suggest that antenatal factors have some effect on vertebral body morphology but not overall lumbar spinal shape. Perhaps environmental factors during growth and genetics play a larger role in determining the overall spine shape. This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented previously at a national meeting. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: This work was supported by a studentship granted to the University and awarded to AVP

The August 2014 Spine Roundup. 360 . looks at: rhBMP complicates cervical spine surgery; posterior longitudinal ligament revisited; thoracolumbar posterior instrumentation without fusion in burst fractures; risk modelling for VTE events in spinal surgery; the consequences of dural tears in microdiscectomy; trends in revision spinal surgery; radiofrequency denervation likely effective in facet joint pain and hooks optimally biomechanically transition posterior instrumentation

Background. The aim of the Groningen Spine Center (GSC) is to provide personalized and effective interventions to patients with spine-related disorders. The GSC comprises a multidisciplinary team to triage and treat patients most optimally. Aim. To investigate the patient reported clinical results of the treatments of the GSC during seven years of its existence. Patients and methods. The basis of this study is a natural cohort of all patients admitted to the GSC. Treatments existed of rehabilitation, surgery, anesthesiology, medication, referral to else, advice and self-management, or any combination of the above. Baseline characteristics, pain (Numeric Rating Scale; NRS), disability (Pain Disability Index; PDI) and quality of life (Euroqol 5-D;EQ5D) were obtained at baseline and discharge. Per calendar year, effects will be presented. Descriptive statistics, effect sizes and t-tests were calculated. Results are compared to the minimal clinically important change (MCIC) of the corresponding scales. Results. In total, 9.897 patients (43% male, mean age 49.2±16.1 yrs) were analyzed on T0, of whom 1.373 filled in a discharge questionnaire. All measures showed statistically significant changes (p<0.01), but for pain and disability mean changes were not always higher than the clinical important change. Effect sizes (d) for pain ranged between 0.44 and 1.01, for disability between 0.40 and 0.80, and for quality of life between 0.41 and 0.76. Conclusion. The Groningen Spine Center provides positive patient reported results over the past 7 years Effect sizes are moderate to high. The results are considered to be clinically important to patients. Non-response and regression to the mean may be sources for bias and should be topic for further research. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained

The April 2014 Spine Roundup. 360 . looks at: medical treatment for ankylosing spondylitis; unilateral TLIF effective; peg fractures akin to neck of femur fractures; sleep apnoea and spinal surgery; scoliosis in osteogenesis imperfect; paediatric atlanto-occipital dislocation; back pain and obesity: chicken or egg?; BMP associated with lumbar plexus deficit; and just how common is back pain?

The February 2015 Spine Roundup. 360 . looks at: Paracetamol use for lower back pain; En-bloc resection of vertebra reported for the first time; Spinopelvic disassociation under the spotlight; Hope for back pain; Disc replacement and ACDF equivalent in randomised study; Interspinous process devices ineffective

The December 2013 Spine Roundup. 360 . looks at: Just how common is lumbar spinal stenosis?; How much will they bleed?; C5 palsy associated with stenosis; Atlanto-axial dislocations revisited; 3D predictors of progression in scoliosis; No difference in outcomes by surgical approach for fusion; Cervical balance changes after thoracolumbar surgery; and spinal surgeons first in space

The December 2014 Spine Roundup. 360 . looks at: surgeon outcomes;. complications and scoliosis surgery; is sequestrectomy enough in lumbar disc prolapse?; predicting outcomes in lumbar disc herniation; sympathectomy has a direct effect on the dorsal root ganglion; and distal extensions of fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

The October 2014 Spine Roundup. 360 . looks at: microdiscectomy is not exactly a hands-down winner; lumbar spinal stenosis unpicked; Wallis implant helpful in lumbosacral decompression; multidisciplinary rehabilitation is good for back pain; and understanding the sciatic stretch test

Background. The factors influencing normal spine curvature in midlife are unknown. We performed an MR and plain radiograph study on well characterised, unselected twin volunteers from the TwinsUK register (. www.twinsuk.ac.uk. ) to determine the relative contributions of genetic and environmental factors to spine curve. Methods. T2 weighted MR scans and long spine standing radiographs were obtained at the same morning visit on twin pairs. Midline sagittal MR images were coded for 4 degenerative features. SpineviewTM software was applied plain films and calculated the angles of curvature. A classical twin study was performed. Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the association between spine curves, LDD and confounders (age, body mass index). Results. Data were available on 110 monozygotic (MZ) and 136 dizygotic (DZ) female twins. Mean age was 64.3 years (range 40.1–79.3); age was associated with increasing lumbar lordosis (p=0.02). The AE model (comprising additive genetic and unique environmental factors) was the most suitable model for both lumbar lordosis and thoracic kyphosis (as determined by Akaike information criterion). Heritability estimates = 59% (42–71%) for lumbar lordosis; and 61% (46–74%) for thoracic kyphosis. After adjusting for age and BMI, lumbar lordosis was significantly associated with a number of features of LDD (p<0.001) including disc signal intensity and osteophytes. Conclusion. The twins are known to be representative of women in the general population. Lumbar lordosis and thoracic kyphosis of the spine have considerable heritable component in females suggesting that a search for individual gene variants would be a reasonable next step. This abstract was presented at 14th Congress of the International Society for Twin Studies. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: No funding obtained

Introduction. A minority of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) account for a majority of disability and costs. This subgroup has potentially most to gain from effective treatment. The Groningen Spine Cohort will provide a 10-year prospective insight into the burden of CLBP for patients referred to multispecialty tertiary spine care in the Netherlands. This study reports first baseline results. Objective. To study the personal and societal impact of CLBP in patients visiting the UMCG tertiary spine center. Patients. Adult patients with CLBP. Methods. Patient-reported baseline questionnaire and health insurance costs one year prior to visiting the Spine Center. Primary outcomes: NIH minimal dataset Impact Stratification score (range 8–50), functioning (Pain Disability Index, PDI; 0–70), quality of life (EuroQol-5D, EQ5D; -0.33–1.00), work ability (single-item Work Ability Score, WAS; 0–10), work participation (absenteeism, disability), and health insurance costs. Descriptive statistics were applied. Results. N=1503 patients (age m=46.3, sd=12.8 years, 57% female) were included. NIH Impact Stratification m=35.2±7.5; severe impact (≥35) for 58% of patients. PDI = 38.2±14.1; EQ5D = 0.44±0.30; WAS = 3.8±2.9. Absenteeism: 43% of workers. Permanent work disability: 17%. Health insurance costs: med= €2432, IQR €4739. Discussion And Conclusions. In patients seeking multispecialty tertiary spine care, the personal and societal impact of CLBP is very high. Costs are substantially higher than what is already known about the burden of the average patient with CLBP. Clinical Message. More effective personalized stepped and matched care is urgently needed to reduce the burden of CLBP in a subgroup of patients seeking multispecialty tertiary spine care. No conflicts of interest. Sources of Funding: Funding from the University Medical Center Groningen

The October 2012 Spine Roundup. 360. looks at: a Japanese questionnaire at work in Iran; curve progression in degenerative lumbar scoliosis; the cause of foot drop; the issue of avoiding the spinal cord at scoliosis surgery; ballistic injuries to the cervical spine; minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion; readmission rates after spinal surgery; clinical complications and the severely injured cervical spine; and stabilising the thoracolumbar burst fracture

Background and Aim. Low back pain is highly prevalent, particularly in manual occupations. We previously showed that the lumbar spine has an intrinsic shape, identifiable in lying, sitting and standing postures, that affects the spine's response to load. Its effects on motion are unknown. Here we investigate whether intrinsic spinal shape is detectable throughout a greater range of postures and its effect on how healthy adults lift a weighted box. Methods. The lumbar spine was imaged using a positional MRI with participants (n=30) in 6 postures ranging from extension to full flexion. Active shape modelling was used to identify and quantify ‘modes’ of variation in lumbar spine shape. 3D motion capture analysed participants' motion while lifting a box (6–15 kg, self-selected). Results. Two modes accounted for 89.5% of variation in spinal shape, describing the overall curvature (mode 1) and distribution of curvature (mode 2). Within the first 9 modes, scores were significantly correlated between all six postures (r = 0.4−0.97, P<0.05), showing that intrinsic shape was partially maintained throughout. Individuals with straighter spines lifted with greater knee flexion (r = 0.4, P = 0.03) typical of squatting. Knee flexion negatively correlated with lumbar (r = −0.5 to −0.86, P<0.01) and pelvic flexion (r = −0.81, P<0.001). Those with curvier spines flexed significantly more at the back (r = −0.79, P=0.02) typical of stooping. Conclusion. In summary, individuals with straight spines squatted to lift while those with curvy spines stooped, indicating that the way we move to pick up a load is associated with the shape of our spine

The February 2013 Spine Roundup. 360 . looks at: complications with anterior decompression and fusion; lumbar claudication and peripheral vascular disease; increasing cervical instability in rheumatoids; kyphoplasty; cervical stenosis; exercise or fusion for chronic lower back pain; lumbar disc arthroplasty and adjacent level changes; and obese disc prolapses

AO Spine Guideline for Using Osteobiologics in Spine Degeneration project is an international collaborative initiative to identify and evaluate evidence on existing use of osteobiologics in spine degenerative diseases. It aims to formulate clinically relevant and internationally applicable guidelines ensuring evidence-based, safe and effective use of osteobiologics. The current focus is the use of osteobiologics in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgeries. The guideline development is planned in three phases. Phase 1- Evidence synthesis and Recommendation; Phase 2- Guideline with osteobiologics grading and Validation; Phase 3- Guideline dissemination and Development of a clinical decision support tool. The key questions formulating the guidelines for the use of osteobiologics will be addressed in a series of systematic reviews in Phase 1. The evidence synthesized by the systematic reviews will be assessed by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) methodology, including expert panel discussions to formulate a recommendation. In Phase 2, osteobiologics will be graded based on evidence and the grading will be integrated with the recommendation from Phase 1, and thus formulate a guideline. The guideline will be further validated by prospective clinical studies. In the third phase, dissemination of the proposed guideline and development of a decision support tool is planned. AO-GO aims to bridge an important gap between quality of evidence and use of osteobiologics in spine fusion surgeries. With a holistic approach the guideline aims to facilitate evidence-based, patient-oriented decision-making process in clinical practice, thus stimulating further evidence-based studies regarding osteobiologics usage in spine surgeries

Aim:. To determine if patients with coronal plane deformity in the lumbar spine have a higher grade of lumbar spine subtype compared to controls. Method:. This was a retrospective case/control study based on a review of radiological investigations in 250 patients aged over 40 years who had standing plain film lumbar radiographs with hips present. Measurements of lumbar coronal plane angle, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, pelvic tilt and pelvic incidence were obtained. “Cases” with degenerative scoliosis (n=125) were defined as patients with a lumbar coronal plane angle of >10°. Lumbar spine subtype was categorised (1–4) using the Roussouly classification. Lumbar spine subtype was dichotomised into low (type 1,2) or high (type 3,4). Prevalence of lumbar spine subtype in cases versus controls was compared using the Chi squared test. Pelvic incidence was compared using an unpaired T-test. Predictors of lumbar coronal plane angle were identified using stepwise multiple regression. Significance was accepted at P<0.05. Results:. The prevalence of type 1–4 lumbar spine subtypes in the case group were 12.8%, 20.8%, 30.4% and 36% respectively and in the control group were 10.4%, 38.3% and 28% and 23.3% respectively. Types 3 and 4 lumbar spine subtypes were more prevalent in the cases group (66.4% vs 51.2% respectively, P=0.0207). Pelvic incidence was not significant different between groups (P=0.0594). No significant predictors of lumbar coronal plane angle were determined. Lumbar spine subtype (P=0.969), pelvic incidence (P=0.740), sacral slope (P=0.203) pelvic tilt (P=0.167) and lumbar lordosis (P=0.088) were not significant. Discussion:. Results show that neither the lumbar spine subtype nor pelvic parameters appear to have a significant influence on determining the coronal plane angle in the degenerative lumbar spine. Conflict Of Interest Statement: No conflict of interest

Purpose. To investigate associations between sagittal thoracolumbar spine shape with sex and measures of adiposity throughout adulthood. Methods. Thoracolumbar spine shape was characterised using statistical shape modelling on lateral dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry images, recorded for vertebral fracture analysis, of the spine from 1529 participants of the MRC National Survey of Health and Development, acquired at age 60–64 years. Associations between spine shape modes (SM) and 1) sex, 2) contemporaneous measures of overall and central adiposity (indicated by body mass index and waist circumference, respectively), 3) changes in total and central adiposity during earlier stages of adulthood and age at onset of overweight, were investigated. Results. Four of the first eight spine modes (SM) describing lumbar spine shape differed by sex; on average, women had more lordotic spines than men with relatively smaller but caudally increasing anterior-posterior (a-p) vertebral diameters. Greater BMI and waist circumference and earlier onset of overweight were associated with uneven (or snaking) spinal curvatures (SM2) and larger a-p vertebral diameters (SM3). Central adiposity was also associated with larger caudal disc heights (SM4) in women, especially increases between 36–43 years. Conclusions. Sagittal spine shapes differed by sex and associations with overall and central adiposity also differed. Overweight and greater central adiposity earlier in adulthood were particularly important, and were associated with a straighter but more unevenly curved spine with larger vertebrae and caudal discs heights, possibly explained by a chronic effect of increased mechanical loading on the spine. Conflicts of interest: None. Funding received from MRC

The June 2013 Spine Roundup. 360 . looks at: the benefit of MRI in the follow-up of lumbar disc prolapse; gunshot injury to the spinal cord; the link between depression and back pain; floating dural sack sign; short segment fixation at ten years; whether early return to play is safer than previously thought; infection in diabetic spinal patients; and dynesis

The December 2012 Spine Roundup. 360. looks at: the Japanese neck disability index; adjacent segment degeneration; sacroiliac loads determined by limb length discrepancy; whether epidural steroids improve outcome in lumbar disc herniation; spondylodiscitis in infancy; total pedicle screws; and iliac crest autograft complications

The February 2014 Spine Roundup. 360 . looks at: single posterior approach for severe kyphosis; risk factors for recurrent disc herniation; dysphagia and cervical disc replacement or fusion; hang on to your topical antibiotics; cost-effective lumbar disc replacement; anxiolytics no role to play in acute lumbar back pain; and surgery best for lumbar disc herniation

Traditionally, spinal surgeons placed radiographs on viewing boxes in a manner (PA) to replicate the view they would have at surgery. The introduction of digital Picture Archiving and Communications System (PACS) appears to have had marked impact upon this convention. Some Units have the ability to lock digital radiographs such that they are always viewed in the same manner and cannot be reversed. Following ‘two near misses’ we carried out a survey to confirm the previous practice with radiographs; to ascertain the current practice with PACS and to find out whether the variation in practice could lead to clinical mishaps and harm to patients. Questionnaires were completed by practicing spinal surgeons. Previous and current practice of viewing radiographs. Either actual or potential wrong side surgery. Opinions as to whether a single convention was important were recorded. 78 % Spine surgeons used to flip radiographs over prior to introduction of PACS. With PACS, 56 % spine surgeons flip the radiographs over in clinic and 72 % in theatre so to resemble viewing spine from behind. 56% Surgeons had nearly operated on the wrong side of the spine while 94 % have seen or heard of a patient operated on the wrong side. 72 % Spine surgeons agree that the radiographs should be flipped over so as to resemble the spine as viewed intraoperatively. There is need for a single convention in spine surgery to view radiographs to avoid potential clinical mistakes