Background Context: Total disc replacement (TDR) gained enormous popularity as a treatment option for symptomatic degenerative disc disease in the last few years. But the impact of the prosthesis design on the segmental biomechanics in most instances still remains unclear. As TDR results in a distraction of the capsuloligamentous structures, the disc height seems to be of crucial importance for the further biomechanical function of the operated level. Yet the biomechanical role of disc height after TDR still remains unclear.

Purpose: The purpose of study was to evaluate the influence of prosthesis height after total disc replacement on: 1) the sagittal balance and 2) the range of motion.

Study design: A radiological and an in-vitro biomechanical study.

Method: 6 human, lumbar spines L4–L5 were tested in vitro.The segmental lordosis of the specimen were measured on plain radiographs and the range of motion was measured for all six degrees of freedom with a previously described spine tester. The segmental lordosis and the range of motion at level L4–L5 was evaluated for following settings: 1) intact state 2) after implantation of a prosthesis with 5mm endplate 3) after implantation of a prosthesis with 7mm endplate.

The prosthesis used was a prototyp and had a constrained design with a ball and socket principle.

Results: Even the implantation of the lowest possible prosthesis height (5mm endplate) resulted in an increase of segmental lordosis (intact: 6.9; 5mm endplate: 8.8; p=0,027). Using a higher prosthesis (7mm endplate) further increased the segmental lordosis (10.5, p=0.041). The implantation of the lowest prosthesis resulted in significant increase of movement capability compared to the intact status for flexion-extension (8.6 vs 11.4; p=0.046) and axial rotation (2.9 vs 5.1; p=0.028). Lateral bending did not changed significantly (9.4 vs 8.6; p=0.345). The implantation of the higher prosthesis (7mm endplate) resulted in similar movement capability compared to intact status for flexion-extension (8.4 vs 8.6; p=0.116) and axial rotation (3.3 vs 2.9; p=0.600). Lateral bending decreased significantly compared to the intact status (5.1 vs 8.6; p=0.028).

Conclusion: Total disc replacement with the lowest prosthesis height inherently increases segmental lordosis. Further increase of disc height results in a significant enhancement of segmental lordosis by decreasing the range of motion for all three degrees of freedom. Yet, methods for scheduling the ideal disc height preoperatively, to provide a physiological lordosis thereby maintaining physiological range of motion postoperatively, seems not to be established already.

Fusion is the main goal in the surgical management of the injured and unstable spine. A wide variety of implants is available to enhance this. Our study was performed to evaluate the stabilising characteristics of several anterior, posterior and combined systems of fixation. Six thoracolumbar (T11 to L2) spines from 13-week-old calves were first tested intact. Then the vertebral body of T13 was removed and the defect replaced and supported by a wooden block to simulate bone grafting. Dorsal implants consisting of a Universal Spine System (USS) fracture system and an AO Fixateur interne (AOFI), and ventral implants comprising of a Kaneda Classic, a Kaneda SR, a prototype of the VentroFix single clamp/single rod construct (SC/SR) and the VentroFix single clamp/double rod construct (SC/DR) were first implanted individually to stabilise the removal of the vertebral body. Simulating the combined anteroposterior stabilisations, all ventral implants were combined with the AOFI. The range of motion (ROM) was measured under loads of up to 7.5 Nm. The load was applied in a custom-made spine tester in the three primary directions while measuring the intervertebral movements using a goniometric linkage system.

The dorsal systems limited ROM in flexion below 0.9° and in extension between 3.3° and 3.6° (median values). The improved Kaneda System SR yielded a mean ROM of 1.8° in flexion and in extension. The median rotation found with the VentroFix (SC/DR) was 3.2° for flexion and 2.8° for extension. Reinforcement of the ventral constructs with a dorsal system reduced the ROM in flexion and extension in all cases to 0.4° and lower.

In rotation, the median ROM of the anterior systems ranged from 2.7° to 5.1° and for the posterior systems from 3.9° to 5.7°, while the combinations provided a ROM of 1.2° to 1.9°. In lateral bending, the posterior implants restricted movement to 1.1°, whereas the anterior implants allowed up to 5.2°. The combined systems provided the highest stability at less than 0.6°.

Our study revealed distinct differences between posterior and anterior approaches in all primary directions. Also, different stabilisation characteristics were found within the anterior and posterior groups. Combinations of these two approaches provided the highest stability in all directions.

To study the effect of ligament injuries and surgical repair we investigated the three-dimensional kinematics of the ankle joint complex and the talocrural and the subtalar joints in seven fresh-frozen lower legs before and after sectioning and reconstruction of the ligaments. A foot movement simulator produced controlled torque in one plane of movement while allowing unconstrained movement in the remainder.

After testing the intact joint the measurements were repeated after simulation of ligament injuries by cutting the anterior talofibular and calcaneofibular ligaments. The tests were repeated after the Evans, Watson-Jones and Chrisman-Snook tenodeses. The range of movement (ROM) was measured using two goniometer systems which determined the relative movement between the tibia and talus (talocrural ROM) and between the talus and calcaneus (subtalar ROM).

Ligament lesions led to increased inversion and internal rotation, predominantly in the talocrural joint. The reconstruction procedures reduced the movement in the ankle joint complex by reducing subtalar movement to a non-physiological level but did not correct the instability of the talocrural joint.