Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 47 - 47
1 Feb 2012
Kumar VS Kinmont C Day A Bircher M
Full Access

Crescent fractures are represented by a spectrum of morphological fracture patterns, sharing a common mechanism of injury. We propose three distinct types according to the extent of Sacroiliac (SI) joint involvement and the size of the crescent fragment, which enables a pragmatic choice of surgical approach and stabilisation technique.

Crescent fractures are fracture dislocations of the SI joint in which there is variable amount of disruption of the SI ligaments extending proximally as a fracture of the posterior iliac wing. We identified three groups of Crescent fractures according to the extent of SI joint involvement, relationship of the fracture line to the S1 and S2 nerve root foramina on anteroposterior and outlet plain radiograph views, and CT films. Type I involves the less than inferior third of the SI joint with a large posterior iliac fragment left attached to the sacrum. This is best approached anteriorly for stabilisation. Type II has between one-third to two-thirds involvement of the SI joint and is treated according to Helfet's technique. Type III has a very small crescent fragment left attached to the sacrum and the inferior two-thirds of the SI joint is disrupted. This is treated with percutaneous SI screws, but will need anterior open reduction in delayed presentations. Based on this, we treated sixteen patients and followed them for at least two years. There were four Type I, four Type II and eight Type III fractures. Fifteen had anatomical reduction and stabilisation of the SI joint with good functional results. Delayed referral, the presence of significant soft tissue injury posteriorly and infected external fixator pins.

From our experience we would like to propose this functional classification of crescent fractures which we find useful in making a choice of surgical approach and stabilisation technique to achieve satisfactory reduction and stabilisation of sacroiliac joint.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 89-B, Issue 5 | Pages 651 - 658
1 May 2007
Day AC Kinmont C Bircher MD Kumar S

Crescent fracture dislocations are a well-recognised subset of pelvic ring injuries which result from a lateral compression force. They are characterised by disruption of the sacroiliac joint and extend proximally as a fracture of the posterior iliac wing. We describe a classification with three distinct types. Type I is characterised by a large crescent fragment and the dislocation comprises no more than one-third of the sacroiliac joint, which is typically inferior. Type II fractures are associated with an intermediate-size crescent fragment and the dislocation comprises between one- and two-thirds of the joint. Type III fractures are associated with a small crescent fragment where the dislocation comprises most, but not all of the joint. The principal goals of surgical intervention are the accurate and stable reduction of the sacroiliac joint. This classification proves useful in the selection of both the surgical approach and the reduction technique. A total of 16 patients were managed according to this classification and achieved good functional results approximately two years from the time of the index injury. Confounding factors compromise the summary short-form-36 and musculoskeletal functional assessment instrument scores, which is a well-recognised phenomenon when reporting the outcome of high-energy trauma.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 81-B, Issue 3 | Pages 392 - 397
1 May 1999
Tennant S Kinmont C Lamb G Gedroyc W Hunt DM

Conventional methods of imaging in the investigation of developmental dysplasia of the hip all have disadvantages, either in definition or in exposure to radiation. We describe a new open-configuration MR scanner which is unique in that it allows anaesthesia and access to the patient within the imaging volume for surgical procedures and application of casts. We performed 13 scans in eight anaesthetised infants. Dynamic imaging revealed two dislocated hips which were then visualised during reduction. Hip spicas were applied without removing the patient from the scanner. In one hip, an adductor tenotomy was carried out. In all patients, stressing the hips during dynamic imaging allowed an assessment of stability. This was particularly useful in two hips in which an analysis of stability in different positions facilitated the planning of femoral osteotomies. This method of imaging provides new and important information. It has great potential in the investigation of developmental dysplasia of the hip and, with ultrasound, may allow management without the need for radiography.