The purpose of this study was to develop a quality appraisal tool for the assessment of laboratory basic science biomechanical studies.

Materials andScore development comprised of the following phases: item identification/development, item reduction, content/face/criterion validity, weighting, test-retest reliability and internal consistency. For item identification/development, the panel was asked to independently list criteria and factors they considered important for cadaver study and generate items that should be used to appraise cadaver study quality. For content validity, the content validity ratio (CVR) was calculated. The minimum accepted content validity index (CVI) was set to 0.85. For weighting, equal weight for each item was 6.7% [15 items]. Based on these figures the panel was asked to either upscale or downscale the weight for each item ensuring that the final sum for all items was 100%. Face validity was assessed by each panel member using a Likert scale from 1–7. Strong face validity was defined as a mean score of >5. Test-retest reliability was assessed using 10 randomly selected studies. Criterion validity was assessed using the QUACS scale as standard. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha.

Five items reached a CVI of 1 and 10 items a CVI of 0.875. For weighting five items reached a final weight of 10% and ten items 5%. The mean score for face validity was 5.6. Test-retest reliability ranged from 0.78–1.00 with 9 items reaching a perfect score. Criterion validity was 0.76 and considered to be strong. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to be 0.71 indicating acceptable internal consistency.

The new proposed quality score for basic science studies consists of 15 items and has been shown to be reliable, valid and of acceptable internal consistency. It is suggested that this score should be utilised when assessing basic science studies.

This study investigated concurrent talar dome injuries associated with tibial pilon fractures, mapping their distribution across the proximal talar dome articular surface. It compared the two main mechanisms of injury (MOI), falling from a height and motor vehicle accident (MVA), and whether the fractures were open or closed.

From a previously compiled database of acute distal tibial pilon fractures (AO/OTA 43B/C) in adults of 105 cases, 53 cases were identified with a concurrent injury to the talar dome with a known mechanism of injury and in 44 it was known if the fracture was open or closed. Case specific 2D injury maps were created using a 1x1mm grid, which were overlayed in an Excel document to allow for comparative analyses. A two-way ANOVA was conducted that examined the effect of both MOI and if the fracture was open or closed on what percentage of the talar dome surface was injured.

There was a statistically-significant difference between the average percentage of injured squares on the talar dome by both whether the fracture was open or closed (f(1)=5.27, p= .027) and the mechanism of injury (f(1)=8.08, p= .007), though the interaction between these was not significant (p= .156). Open injuries and injuries that occurred during an MVA were more likely to increase the surface area of the talar dome injuries.

We have identified both MOI and if the fracture was either open or closed impacts the size of the injury present on the talar dome. Future research will investigate the aetiology of the differences noted, highlighting the clinical implications.

Surgeons treating tibial pilon fractures caused by either a MVA or an open fracture, should be aware of an increased risk of large injuries to the surface of the talar dome.