Objectives. To date, no study has considered the impact of acromial morphology on shoulder range of movement (ROM). The purpose of our study was to evaluate the effects of lateralization of the centre of rotation (COR) and neck-shaft angle (NSA) on shoulder ROM after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in patients with different scapular morphologies. Methods. 3D computer models were constructed from CT scans of 12 patients with a critical shoulder angle (CSA) of 25°, 30°, 35°, and 40°. For each model, shoulder ROM was evaluated at a NSA of 135° and 145°, and lateralization of 0 mm, 5 mm, and 10 mm for seven standardized movements: glenohumeral abduction, adduction, forward flexion, extension, internal rotation with the arm at 90° of abduction, as well as external rotation with the arm at 10° and 90° of abduction. Results. CSA did not seem to influence ROM in any of the models, but greater lateralization achieved greater ROM for all movements in all configurations. Internal and external rotation at 90° of abduction were impossible in most configurations, except in models with a CSA of 25°. Conclusion. Postoperative ROM following RSA depends on multiple patient and surgical factors. This study, based on computer simulation, suggests that CSA has no influence on ROM after RSA, while lateralization increases ROM in all configurations. Furthermore, increasing subacromial space is important to grant sufficient rotation at 90° of abduction. In summary, increased lateralization of the COR and increased subacromial space improve ROM in all CSA configurations. Cite this article: A. Lädermann, E. Tay, P. Collin, S. Piotton, C-H Chiu, A. Michelet, C. Charbonnier. Effect of critical shoulder angle, glenoid lateralization, and humeral inclination on range of movement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Bone Joint Res 2019;8:378–386. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.88.BJR-2018-0293.R1

Aims. This study aims to evaluate a new home medical stretching device called the Self Treatment Assisted Knee (STAK) tool to treat knee arthrofibrosis. Methods. 35 patients post-major knee surgery with arthrofibrosis and mean range of movement (ROM) of 68° were recruited. Both the STAK intervention and control group received standard physiotherapy for eight weeks, with the intervention group additionally using the STAK at home. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) were collected at all timepoints. An acceptability and home exercise questionnaire capturing adherence was recorded after each of the interventions. Results. Compared to the control group, the STAK intervention group made significant gains in mean ROM (30° versus 8°, p < 0.0005), WOMAC (19 points versus 3, p < 0.0005), and OKS (8 points versus 3, p < 0.0005). The improvements in the STAK group were maintained at long-term follow-up. No patients suffered any complications relating to the STAK, and 96% of patients found the STAK tool ‘perfectly acceptable’. Conclusion. The STAK tool is effective in increasing ROM and reducing pain and stiffness. Patients find it acceptable and adherence to treatment was high. This study indicates that the STAK tool would be of benefit in clinical practice and may offer a new, cost-effective treatment for arthrofibrosis. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-8:465–473

Aims. This study aimed to determine the minimal detectable change (MDC), minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) under distribution- and anchor-based methods for the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) and range of movement (ROM) after open elbow arthrolysis (OEA). We also assessed the proportion of patients who achieved MCID and SCB; and identified the factors associated with achieving MCID. Methods. A cohort of 265 patients treated by OEA were included. The MEPI and ROM were evaluated at baseline and at two-year follow-up. Distribution-based MDC was calculated with confidence intervals (CIs) reflecting 80% (MDC 80), 90% (MDC 90), and 95% (MDC 95) certainty, and MCID with changes from baseline to follow-up. Anchor-based MCID (anchored to somewhat satisfied) and SCB (very satisfied) were calculated using a five-level Likert satisfaction scale. Multivariate logistic regression of factors affecting MCID achievement was performed. Results. The MDC increased substantially based on selected CIs (MDC 80, MDC 90, and MDC 95), ranging from 5.0 to 7.6 points for the MEPI, and from 8.2° to 12.5° for ROM. The MCID of the MEPI were 8.3 points under distribution-based and 12.2 points under anchor-based methods; distribution- and anchor-based MCID of ROM were 14.1° and 25.0°. The SCB of the MEPI and ROM were 17.3 points and 43.4°, respectively. The proportion of the patients who attained anchor-based MCID for the MEPI and ROM were 74.0% and 94.7%, respectively; furthermore, 64.2% and 86.8% attained SCB. Non-dominant arm (p = 0.022), higher preoperative MEPI rating (p < 0.001), and postoperative visual analogue scale pain score (p < 0.001) were independent predictors of not achieving MCID for the MEPI, while atraumatic causes (p = 0.040) and higher preoperative ROM (p = 0.005) were independent risk factors for ROM. Conclusion. In patients undergoing OEA, the MCID for the increased MEPI is 12.2 points and 25° increased ROM. The SCB is 17.3 points and 43.3°, respectively. Future studies using the MEPI and ROM to assess OEA outcomes should report not only statistical significance but also clinical importance. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(2):366–372

Ankle sprains are very common, and usually tear or partly tear one or more of the ligaments on the outer side of the ankle. The ankle joint is only designed to move up and down, whereas there is another joint immediately below the ankle joint, called the subtalar joint, which is designed to do the tilting in and out movement. If the foot tilts over too far, the subtalar joint reaches the end of its movement and then the ankle ligaments stretch and tear. It is possible that variations of subtalar range of movement may contribute to ankle sprains or symptoms of weakness or instability. In particular, if the subtalar joint is unusually restricted in its movement, then the foot does not have to tilt far before the lateral ligaments tear. If on the other hand the subtalar joint is particularly mobile and has excessive movement, then the foot may go right over without actually tearing ligaments and feel insecure or unstable simply as a result of abnormal excessive movement. Recent studies have demonstrated what we have always suspected, that clinical examination and assessment of subtalar range of movement is highly unreliable. In order to accurately assess whether your subtalar range of movement is unusually restricted or excessive, the only standard and accurate method to date has been to obtain a CT scan. We are now undertaking a study to establish whether plain xrays with a small metal clamp applied to the heel might not be a simpler, cheaper, quicker and equally reliable method of assessment of subtalar movement. If you would like to know if your subtalar movement might be a contributing factor to either stiffness or insecurity of your ankle, we invite you to be examined clinically, by plain xrays at SPORTSMED•SA, and by a CT scan at Jones & Partners Radiology at Burnside. The xray and CT investigations would be bulk billed under Medicare so that you would not incur any personal cost and the information could well be helpful in assessing your ankle problem, or at least be reassuring that the subtalar joint has a normal range of movement. The investigations can be arranged through your treating doctor, physiotherapist or podiatrist or by contacting Dr Roger Paterson, Foot and Ankle Surgeon, or Mr Stephen Landers, his Research Assistant, on Ph: 8362 7788. The CT scan would be a very limited investigation resulting in minimum radiation exposure, comparable to the normal xrays. Further information on what is involved in having a CT scan is attached. Neither the CT scan nor the plain xrays should cause any more than minor discomfort as the foot is tilted through its full range of movement, or from the padded pressure of the G clamp. SPORTSMED•SA remains committed to excellence in treating active people of all ages, and through these investigations, we plan to further enhance the quality of assessment and care of people who suffer ankle problems

Objective: To evaluate the impact of soft tissue release on range of movement following total knee replacement. Methods: Sixty four patients underwent PFC sigma total knee replacement through a medial arthrotomy. Range of active movement was measured preoperatively, and maximal flexion was measured after implantation, using the drop test while the patient was under anaesthetic. Soft tissue release was graded from 1 to 5, depending on the structures released. Range of movement was correlated with extent of soft tissue release, to see if release had any impact on increase in range of movement. Results: All patients had an improvement in range of movement following surgery. Post operative range of movement correlated strongly with preoperative ROM. Patients requiring extensive releases tended to have less preoperative ROM, but the gain was independent of medial release. Those requiring extensive posterior release had poorer preoperative movement, and significantly less improvement. In those requiring an extensive medial release, a posterior release improved gain in ROM. Conclusion: Postoperative ROM following TKR is independent of extent of medial release. In patients requiring extensive medial release, a posterior release improves gain in movement

Objective: To evaluate the impact of soft tissue release on range of movement following total knee replacement. Methods: Sixty four patients underwent next-gen (Zimmer) posterior stabilising total knee replacement through a medial arthrotomy. Range of active movement was measured preoperatively, and maximal flex-ion was measured after implantation, using the drop test while the patient was under anaesthetic. Soft tissue release was graded from 1 to 5, depending on the structures released. Range of movement (ROM) was correlated with extent of soft tissue release, to see if release had any impact on increase in range of movement. Results: All patients had an improvement in range of movement following surgery. Post operative range of movement correlated strongly with preoperative ROM. Patients requiring extensive releases tended to have less preoperative ROM, but the gain was independent of medial release. Those requiring extensive posterior release had poorer preoperative movement, and significantly less improvement. In those requiring an extensive medial release, a posterior release improved gain in ROM. Conclusion: Postoperative ROM following TKR is independent of extent of medial release. In patients requiring extensive medial release, a posterior release improves gain in movement

We investigated the effect of neck dimension upon cervical range of movement. Data relating to 100 subjects healthy subjects aged between 20 and 40yrs was recorded with respect to age, gender and ranges of movement in three planes. Additionally two commonly used methods of measuring neck motion, chin-sternal distance and uniplanar goniometer, were assessed against a validated measurement tool the CROM goniometer (Performance Attainment Associates, Roseville, MN). Using multiple linear regression analysis it was determined that sagittal flexion (P= 0.0021) and lateral rotation (P< 0.0001) were most closely related to neck circumference alone whereas lateral flexion (P< 0.0001) was most closely related to a ratio of circumference and length. The uniplanar goniometer has some usefulness when assessing neck motion, comparing favourably to chin-sternal distance that has almost no role. Neck dimension should be incorporated into cervical functional assessment. One should be wary about recorded values for neck motion from non-validated measurement tools

Background: The determinants of range of movement following knee replacement may be surgically modifiable (tibial slope, posterior condylar offset or the level of the joint line) or non modifiable (pre-operative range of movement, sex or BMI). We aimed to quantify the influence of these factors upon restoration of flexion in the arthritic knee following knee replacement. Methods: Patients were included from two prospective trials for three different designs of knee replacement. Range of movement was recorded using a standard measuring technique preoperatively and 12 months after surgery. Radiological measurement was done by an independent observer and included the preoperative posterior condylar offset and the postoperative tibial slope, posterior condylar offset, posterior condylar offset ratio, varus-valgus alignment and Insall ratio. Multivariate analysis using stepwise selection was performed to determine the significant predictors of the range of movement at 12 months. Results: The study includes 133 knee replacements performed on 125 patients. Complete clinical and radiographic data for preoperative and 12-month assessment was available for 101 knees and only these were included for the analyses. There was no significant difference between the three groups in terms of postoperative range of movement or the radiological parameters measured. Multivariate analysis after adjusting for age, sex, diagnosis and the type of prosthesis revealed that the only significant correlates of range of movement at 12-months were the difference in posterior condylar offset ratio, tibial slope and preoperative range of movement. Moderate correlation was noted between range of movement at 12 months and posterior tibial slope (R=0.58) and the difference of post femoral condylar offset (that is, post-operative minus preoperative posterior condylar offset, R=0.65). Preoperative range of movement had only a weak correlation with post-operative range of movement (R=0.20). Conclusions: We found that the posterior femoral condylar offset had the greatest impact upon final range of movement. We would encourage the operating surgeon at pre-operative templating to take this into account when choosing size and design of femoral component

We performed a randomised, prospective study of 80 mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties (80 knees) in order to measure the effects of varus-valgus laxity and balance on the range of movement (ROM) one year after operation. Forty knees had a posterior-cruciate-ligament (PCL)-retaining prosthesis and the other 40 a PCL-sacrificing prosthesis. In the balanced group (69 knees) in which the difference between varus and valgus was less than 2°, the mean ROM improved significantly from 107.6° to 117.7° (p < 0.0001). By contrast, in the 11 knees which were unbalanced and in which the difference between varus and valgus laxity exceeded 2°, the ROM decreased from a mean of 121.0° to 112.7° (p = 0.0061). We conclude that coronal laxity, especially balanced laxity, is important for achieving an improved ROM in mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty

When performing the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement (STAR), the positioning of the talar component and the selection of mobile-bearing thickness are critical. A biomechanical experiment was undertaken to establish the effects of these variables on the range of movement (ROM) of the ankle. Six cadaver ankles containing a specially-modified STAR prosthesis were subjected to ROM determination, under weight-bearing conditions, while monitoring the strain in the peri-ankle ligaments. Each specimen was tested with the talar component positions in neutral, as well as 3 and 6 mm of anterior and posterior displacement. The sequence was repeated with an anatomical bearing thickness, as well as at 2 mm reduced and increased thicknesses. The movement limits were defined as 10% strain in any ligament, bearing lift-off from the talar component or limitations of the hardware. Both anterior talar component displacement and bearing thickness reduction caused a decrease in plantar flexion, which was associated with bearing lift-off. With increased bearing thickness, posterior displacement of the talar component decreased plantar flexion, whereas anterior displacement decreased dorsiflexion

We report a prospective study, using multivariate analysis, of the factors which influence the range of movement after total knee arthroplasty in 74 patients with 83 arthroplasties at a mean follow-up of 23.6 months (12 to 41). All the patients had a diagnosis of osteoarthritis, a severely disabled knee with a Knee Society system score of less than 60, varus deformity, no previous surgery to the knee, identical prostheses implanted with a similar surgical technique, and no postoperative complications which may have affected the range of movement. The most important factors which influenced the range of movement after arthroplasty were the preoperative range of flexion and the body-weight of the patient. There was a significant improvement in flexion and reduction of flexion contracture at each successive review up to 12 months after operation. Patients with restricted movement before operation showed a satisfactory gain at final review

We have attempted to quantify the influence of clinical, radiological and prosthetic design factors upon flexion following knee replacement. Our study examined the outcome following 101 knee replacements performed in two prospective randomized trials using similar cruciate retaining implants. Multivariate analyses, after adjusting for age, sex, diagnosis and the type of prosthesis revealed that the only significant correlates for range of movement at 12-months were the difference in posterior condylar offset ratio (p< 0.001), tibial slope (p< 0.001) and preoperative range of movement (p=0.025). We found a moderate correlation between 12-month range of movement and posterior tibial slope (R=0.58) and the difference of post femoral condylar offset (that is, post-operative minus preoperative posterior condylar offset, R=0.65). Posterior condylar offset had the greatest impact upon final range of movement highlighting this as an important consideration for the operating surgeon at pre-operative templating when choosing both the design and size of the femoral component

We have investigated those factors which influence the range of movement after total knee arthroplasty, including sex, age, preoperative diagnosis and preoperative flexion deformity and flexion range. We also compared cemented and cementless tibial fixation, the influence of collateral ligament and lateral parapatellar releases and of replacement of the patella, and of the period of postoperative immobilisation. We reviewed 516 Johnson-Elloy (Accord) knee arthroplasties performed between 1982 and 1989, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. The most important factors in the range of flexion achieved after arthroplasty are the diagnosis and the preoperative range of flexion. In patients with osteoarthritis there was a mean loss of flexion; in rheumatoid arthritis there was a mean gain. In both groups, the stiffer knees gained motion and the more mobile knees lost it. Post-operative range of motion was not influenced significantly by cement fixation, collateral ligament or patellar retinacular releases, prolonged immobilisation or patellar replacement

1. The range of variation in the movements at the metatarso-phalangeal and interphalangeal joints of the big toe in fifty males has been investigated by means of lateral radiographs. 2. In the "neutral" position the proximal phalanx is dorsiflexed on the metatarsal and the distal phalanx dorsiflexed on the proximal. Sometimes the distal phalanx is plantar flexed on the proximal but this is not associated with any obvious abnormality of function. 3. There is a wide variation between individuals in the amount of movement found at these joints. 4. At the metatarso-phalangeal joint dorsiflexion is much more free than plantar flexion. The opposite is the case at the interphalangeal joint. 5. There is no significant difference between the right and left sides. Only in plantar flexion at both joints are there significant reductions in the range of movement in older age groups. These reductions are not functionally important. 6. There is an inverse relationship between active and passive dorsiflexion: the greater the range of active dorsiflexion, the less is the range of additional passive dorsiflexion. 7. In lateral radiographs the head of the metatarsal is always rounded

The amount of anteroposterior laxity required for a good range of movement and knee function in a cruciate-retaining total knee replacement (TKR) continues to be debated. We undertook a retrospective study to evaluate the effects of anteroposterior laxity on the range of movement and knee function in 55 patients following the e-motion cruciate-retaining TKR with a minimum follow-up of two years. The knees were divided into stable (anteroposterior translation, ≤ 10 mm, 38 patients) and unstable (anteroposterior translation, > 10 mm, 17) groups based on the anteroposterior laxity, measured using stress radiographs. We compared the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scores, the Western Ontario MacMasters University Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) index, weight-bearing flexion, non-weight-bearing flexion and the reduction of flexion under weight-bearing versus non-weight-bearing conditions, which we referred to as delta flexion, between the two groups at the final follow-up. There were no differences between the stable and unstable groups with regard to the mean HHS and WOMAC total scores, as well as weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing flexion (p = 0.277, p = 0.082, p = 0.095 and p = 0.646, respectively). However, the stable group had a better WOMAC function score and less delta flexion than the unstable group (p = 0.011 and p = 0.005, respectively). Our results suggest that stable knees with laxity ≤ 10 mm have a good functional outcome and less reduction of flexion under weight-bearing conditions than unstable knees with laxity > 10 mm following an e-motion cruciate-retaining TKR

Dislocation is the most frequent serious complication following total hip replacement for subcapital femoral fracture. We report a prospective study, using matched groups, which compared the range of hip movement following hip replacement for arthritis and for fracture. The range of movement was significantly greater in the fracture group. We suggest that this is a predisposing factor for dislocation

To determine whether resection of osteophyte at TKR improves movement, 139 TKRs were performed on knees with pre-operative posterior osteophyte. Randomisation was to have either resection of distal femoral osteophyte guided by a custom made ruler or no resection. After preparation of the femoral bone cuts the ruler measuring 19 mm was placed just proximal to the posterior chamfer cut. The proximal end of this ruler marked the bone to be resected and this was performed using an osteotome at 45 degrees. Knees randomised to no resection had no further femoral bony cuts. Three months after implantation the patients had range of motion assessed. One hundred and fourteen suitable knees were assessed, with 59 knees (57 patients) in the resection group and 55 knees (54 patients) in the no resection group. Full extension was more likely in the resection group (62%) than the group without resection (41%)(p=0.08). Flexion to at least 110 degrees was, however, less in the resection group (37%) than the no resection group (54%) (p=0.09). Our study failed to show a statistically significant difference if the bony osteophyte is removed. There were however sharp trends, with statistically a one in ten chance these results would be different if the trial was repeated. Although there is no indication as to the cause of improved extension this could be explained by the release of the posterior capsular structures allowing full extension. The reduction in flexion is harder to explain and this may be due to increase in perioperative trauma and resultant swelling, possibly with fibrosis. Range of movement, particularly flexion, is known to improve up to 1 year post-operatively and assessment of these groups at that stage would be beneficial

Introduction. Regular, repeated stretching increases joint range of movement (RoM), however the physiology underlying this is not well understood. The traditional view is that increased flexibility after stretching is due to an increase in muscle length or stiffness whereas recent research suggests that increased flexibility is due to modification of tolerance to stretching discomfort/pain. If the pain tolerance theory is correct the same degree of micro-damage to muscle fibres should be demonstrable at the end of RoM before and after a period of stretch training. We hypothesise that increased RoM following a 3 weeks hamstrings static stretching exercise programme may partly be due to adaptive changes in the muscle/tendon tissue. Materials and Methods. Knee angle and torque were recorded in healthy male subjects (n=18) during a maximum knee extension to sensation of pain. Muscle soreness (pain, creatine kinase activity, isometric active torque, RoM) was assessed before knee extension, and 24 and 48 hours after maximum stretch. An exercise group (n=10) was given a daily home hamstring stretching programme and reassessed after 3 weeks and compared to a control group (n=8). At reassessment each subject's hamstring muscles were stretched to the same maximum knee extension joint angle as determined on the first testing occasion. After 24 hours, a reassessment of maximum knee extension angle was made. Results. At the start of the study RoM was 71.3 ± 10.0 degrees and there was no significant difference between groups. After 3 weeks stretching RoM increased significantly (p=0.01) by 9 degrees; the control group showed no change. Stiffness did not differ for either group. Pain score and RoM were the most sensitive markers of muscle damage and were significantly changed 24 and 48 hours after the initial stretch to end of range, (p<0.005) and (p=0.004) respectively. Discussion. The results show that a 3 week stretching programme causes muscle adaptation resulting in an increase in the extensibility of the hamstring muscle/tendon unit but no change in stiffness. The lack of evidence of muscle damage suggests that participants in the stretching group are likely to have undergone a physical change/adaptation rather than simply an increase in pain threshold

Background: The main aim of this study is to compare the difference between early mobilisation versus non weight bearing in patients post ankle fracture fixation in terms of pain and functional outcome. Methods: We recruited 60 patients and were divide into two equal groups. Patients in Group A were treated with a below knee cast post ankle fracture fixation and remained non weight bearing for six weeks while groub B were patients that were treated with a backslab for two weeks post fixation. The backslab was removed and once their radiographs were deemed satisfactory, They were referred to the physiotherapy service in our unit for range of motion exercises while still remaining non-weight bearing. All patients were allowed to weight bear at six weeks time post fixation. The inclusion criteria included patients within the age of 18 to 40 years of age and all the fractures are classified using the Weber classification. Patients that were excluded from theses studies are those with unstable fractures and have high co-morbid conditions. All these patients were followed up at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 9 months post ankle fracture fixation. Pain and functional outcome were scored using the AOFAS scoring system. Results: We found that patients in both these groups scored almost equally during the 2 week follow up but at 6 week, group B showed much better range of movement with less pain and a much higher satisfaction rate with their range of movement. However, at 9 months, patients in both group were able to return to their normal physical activity. Conclusion: Our conclusion is that early mobilisation has an definite advantage over non weight bearing post ankle fracture with regards to functional outcome, pain scoring and patient satisfaction. Patient selection and compliance play a role in the outcome of the study

A new generation of knee prostheses has been introduced with the intention of improving post-operative knee flexion. In order to evaluate whether this goal has been achieved we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic literature searches were conducted on MEDLINE and EMBASE from their inception to December 2007, and proceedings of scientific meetings were also searched. Only randomised, clinical trials were included in the meta-analysis. The mean difference in the maximum post-operative flexion between the ‘high-flex’ and conventional types of prosthesis was defined as the primary outcome measure. A total of five relevant articles was identified.

Analysis of these trials suggested that no clinically relevant or statistically significant improvement was obtained in flexion with the ‘high-flex’ prostheses. The weighted mean difference was 2.1° (95% confidence interval −0.2 to +4.3; p = 0.07).