Computer hexapod assisted orthopaedic surgery (CHAOS) has previously been shown to provide a predictable and safe method for correcting multiplanar femoral deformity. We report the outcomes of tibial deformity correction using CHAOS, as well as a new cohort of femoral CHAOS procedures. Retrospective review of medical records and radiographs for patients who underwent CHAOS for lower limb deformity at our tertiary centre between 2012–2020.Introduction
Materials and Methods
The use of cannulated screws for femoral neck fractures is often limited by concerns of avascular necrosis (AVN) occurring, historically seen in 10–20% of fixed intracapsular fractures. The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of AVN with current surgical techniques within our unit. A single centre retrospective review was performed. Operative records between 1st July 2014 and 31st May 2019 were manually searched for patients with an intracapsular neck of femur fracture fixed with cannulated screws, with minimum one year follow up. Patient records and radiographs were reviewed for clinical and radiographic diagnoses of AVN and/or non-union. Fracture pattern and displacement, screw configuration and reduction techniques were recorded, with radiographs independently analysed by five orthopaedic surgeons.Abstract
Objectives
Methods
There has been an evolution recently in the management of unstable
fractures of the ankle with a trend towards direct fixation of a
posterior malleolar fragment. Within these fractures, Haraguchi
type 2 fractures extend medially and often cannot be fixed using
a standard posterolateral approach. Our aim was to describe the
posteromedial approach to address these fractures and to assess
its efficacy and safety. We performed a review of 15 patients with a Haraguchi type 2
posterior malleolar fracture which was fixed using a posteromedial
approach. Five patients underwent initial temporary spanning external
fixation. The outcome was assessed at a median follow-up of 29 months (interquartile
range (IQR) 17 to 36) using the Olerud and Molander score and radiographs were
assessed for the quality of the reduction.Aims
Patients and Methods
Computer hexapod assisted orthopaedic surgery (CHAOS), is a method
to achieve the intra-operative correction of long bone deformities
using a hexapod external fixator before definitive internal fixation
with minimally invasive stabilisation techniques. The aims of this study were to determine the reliability of this
method in a consecutive case series of patients undergoing femoral
deformity correction, with a minimum six-month follow-up, to assess
the complications and to define the ideal group of patients for
whom this treatment is appropriate. The medical records and radiographs of all patients who underwent
CHAOS for femoral deformity at our institution between 2005 and
2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Records were available for all
55 consecutive procedures undertaken in 49 patients with a mean
age of 35.6 years (10.9 to 75.3) at the time of surgery.Aims
Patients and Methods
The implementation of knee arthrodesis has become synonymous with limb salvage in the presence of chronic sepsis and bone loss around the knee. This can be seen in failed trauma surgery or knee arthroplasty as an alternative to trans-femoral amputation. There is no prior literature assessing which factors affect knee arthrodesis using external fixation devices. Sixteen consecutive patients (four women and twelve men) made up of eleven infected knee implants, three internal fixations of the tibial following fractured tibial plateau as well as 2 infected native joints were identified. The mean age at initial surgery was 56 years (range 25 to 82 years). All procedures were performed under the direct supervision of the limb reconstruction teams using a standard protocol with either a Taylor spatial frame or Ilizarov frame. The patient records, microbiology results and radiographs of all patients who underwent knee arthrodesis at this institution between 1999 and 2010 were reviewed. Of the 16 patients in this study knee fusion occurred in eleven patients (69%). The five patients where arthrodesis failed all had significant bone loss on the pre-operative radiographs and confirmed at surgery. We found a relationship between a significant infection of the knee with MRSA and failure to fuse. Three of the five patients had MRSA isolated from inside the knee at some stage during their treatment. The five patients where fusion failed were on average older (mean age 63 years against 51 years) and had more extensive bone loss. Those who failed to fuse had more co-morbidities. We would conclude that where there is little or no bone loss, arthrodesis of the knee can be reliably achieved with the use of circular frame fixation. A greater number of negative factors also prolongs the amount of time spent in the external fixator. The presence of significant bone loss, infection, increased age and multiple co-morbidities requires careful evaluation and consideration of trans-femoral amputation as an alternative.
Fixation of posterior malleolar fragments associated with ankle fractures aims to stabilise the syndesmosis and prevent posterior subluxation. Haraguchi described 3 types of posterior malleolar fractures, with type 2 being a medial extension injury, these fractures often involve medial and posterior fragments. We describe the techniques and outcomes for a double window posteromedial approach allowing optimal reduction and stabilisation. A retrospective review was performed at 2 units, Bristol Royal Infirmary and QE Hospitals Birmingham, between August 2014 and April 2016. Inclusion criteria were all patients having this posteromedial approach for closed ankle fracture fixation. Patients were assessed for complications and postoperative ankle function with the Olerud and Molander scoring system.Introduction
Methods
Percutaneous grafting of non-union using bone marrow concentrates has shown promising results, we present our experience and outcomes following the use of microdrilling and marrowstim in long bone non-unions. We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing a marrowstim procedure for non-union in 2011–12. Casenotes and radiographs were reviewed for all. Details of injury, previous surgery and non-union interventions together with additional procedures performed after marrowstim were recorded for all patients. The time to clinical and radiological union were noted. We identified 32 patients, in sixteen the tibia was involved in 15 the femur and in one the humerus. Ten of the 32 had undergone intervention for non-union prior to marrowstim including 4 exchange nailings, 2 nail dynamisations, 3 caption graftings, 2 compression in circular frame and 1 revision of internal fixation. Three underwent adjunctive procedures at the time of marroswstim. In 18 further procedures were required following marrowstim. In 4 this involved frame adjustment, 5 underwent exchange nailing, 4 revision internal fixation, 2 additional marrowstim, 2 autologous bone grafting and 3 a course of exogen treatment. In total 27 achieved radiological and clinical union at a mean of 9.6 months, of these ten achieved union without requiring additional intervention following marrowstim, at a mean of 5.4 months. There were no complications relating to marrowstim harvest or application. Marrowstim appears to be a safe and relatively cheap addition to the armamentarium for treatment of non-union. However many patients require further procedures in addition to marrowstim to achieve union. Furthermore given the range of procedures this cohort of patients have undergone before and after marrowstim intervention it is difficult to draw conclusions regarding it efficacy.
Total hip replacement (THR) is NICE recommended for a group of patients with neck of femur fracture (NOF) and guidance published in 2011. In our institution a Hip Fracture Program was established at this time to improve patient care. An audit of the Hip Fracture Program, appropriateness of THR and management following THR was undertaken and compared to NICE standards, set at 100%, and National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) results The case-notes for 53 patients (38 female, 15 male) undergoing THR for NOF between 2011 and 2013 were reviewed: median age 70 yrs (34–87), follow-up 28 months (3–57). All patients were initiated on a Hip Fracture Program. 92% were eligible for THR according to NICE guidance. Pre-operative pain management (67%), hourly assessment of pain in ED (4%), surgery with 48 hours (32%), pre-operative orthogeriatric review (58%) and intra-operative nerve block (38%) are areas for development, but most results are comparable to NHFD. Post-operative care is satisfactory with daily mobilisation (87%) and post-operative pain management (100%). No post-operative dislocation or infection was recorded. There was one case of post-operative DVT. This study highlights areas for improvement in hip fracture management and emphasises the benefits in implementing a Hip Fracture Program in this vulnerable patient population.
We would like to present this case series of 10 adolescent patients with displaced, closed diaphyseal tibial fractures managed using the Taylor Spatial Frame. Management options for these injuries include non-operative treatment, antegrade nailing, flexible nailing systems, plating and external circular fixation. External circular fixation allows anatomical reduction avoiding potential complications such as growth arrest associated with antegrade nailing and retained metal work with plating. Flexible nailing system and cast immobilisation are unreliable for precise anatomical reduction. With limited evidence as to the extent of post-traumatic deformity that is acceptable, combined with the limited remodeling potential that this patient group possess, the precision of percutaneous fixation with the Taylor Spatial Frame system has clear advantages. This is a retrospective analysis of 10 adolescent patients with a mean age of 14.5 years (range 13 to 16 years). Data collected includes fracture configuration, deformity both pre and post operatively compared to post frame removal, length of time in frame and complications. The data was gathered using the patient case notes and the Picture Archiving and Communications System. The mean time in frame was 15.5 weeks (range 11 to 22 weeks). One non-union in a cigarette smoker was successfully managed with a second Taylor Spatial Frame episode. Our conclusion was that with careful patient selection the Taylor Spatial Frame allows successful treatment of closed tibial fractures in adolescents, avoiding complications such as growth arrest and post-traumatic deformity as well as avoiding retained metalwork.
Post-traumatic arthritis is the commonest cause of arthritis of the ankle. Development of arthritis is dependent on the restoration of pre-injury anatomy. To assess the effect of grade of lead surgeon on the accuracy of surgical reduction, we performed a retrospective radiographic analysis of all ankle fractures undergoing open reduction and internal fixation, in a single institution. All patients treated by surgical intervention in an 11 month period (January to November 2011) were included, with the grade of lead surgeon performing the operation recorded.105 patients, 48 males and 53 females, were included with a mean age of 41 years (range: 17–89). Standard antero-posterior (AP) and mortise views were analysed for tibiofibular overlap, ankle clear space and talocrural angle and compared to standardised values from the literature. Lead surgeon grade was stratified as either, trauma consultant, senior registrar (years 4+) or junior registrar (years 1–3).Introduction
Method
The aim of this study was to document our experience of acute forearm compartment syndrome, and to determine the risk factors for requiring split skin grafting (SSG) and developing complications post fasciotomy. We identified from our trauma database all patients who underwent fasciotomy for an acute forearm compartment syndrome over a 22-year period. Diagnosis was made using clinical signs and/or compartment pressure monitoring. Demographic data, aetiology, management, wound closure, complications and subsequent surgeries were recorded. Outcome measures were the use of SSG and the development of complications following forearm fasciotomy. 90 patients were identified with a mean age of 33 yrs (range, 13–81 yrs) and a significant male predominance (n=82, p<0.001). A fracture of one or both of the forearm bones was seen in 62 (69%) patients, with soft tissue injuries causative in 28 (31%). The median time to fasciotomy was 12hrs (2–72). Delayed wound closure was achieved in 38 (42%) patients, with 52 (58%) undergoing SSG. Risk factors for requiring a SSG were younger age and a crush injury (both p<0.05). Complications occurred in 29 (32%) patients at mean follow-up of 11 (3–60) months. Risk factors for developing complications were a delay in fasciotomy of >6 hrs (p=0.018), with pre-operative motor symptoms approaching significance (p=0.068). Forearm compartment syndrome requiring fasciotomy predominantly affects males and can occur following either a fracture or soft tissue injury. Age is an important predictor of undergoing SSG for wound closure. Complications occur in a third of patients and are associated with an increasing delay in the time to fasciotomy.
Optimal utilisation of operating theatres has a significant impact on the ability of an institution to deliver productive, value for money surgical services. With the recent introduction of the national ‘Productive Theatres’ programme and in the current economic climate it is receiving increasing attention. In addition, it improves patient satisfaction and outcomes, reduces adverse events and has positive influences on staff morale. The aim of this study was to highlight factors influencing trauma theatre utilisation in general, whilst also addressing any problems identified with a view to improving trauma services locally. We conducted a prospective analysis of activity in the trauma theatre at our institution over 1 month. Direct observation was performed by a single independent observer. In the absence of any published guidelines, all theatre lists were assessed against pre-determined standards for each component of the theatre pathway. Overall end utilisation (combined time utilised for anaesthesia and surgery) was found to be low at 65%. A number of factors were found to contribute to inefficiencies including delay in sending for patients (mean 42mins, range 0-105), prolonged patient transit times to theatre (mean 22% of all sessions), late starts to lists (mean 43 mins, range 15-105 mins) waiting for x-ray availability (mean 21mins, range 10-45) and knock on delay from previous lists. Surgeons and anaesthetists were found to be, overall, arriving on time or early for all lists. Strategies for maximising trauma theatre productivity are essential. This study has identified common issues, of potential benefit to numerous institutions when planning trauma services.
A series of 49 pilon fractures in a tertiary referral centre treated definitively with open reduction and internal fixation have been assessed examining the complications associated with such injuries. A retrospective analysis of casenotes, radiographs and computerised tomographs over a seven year period from 1999–2006 was performed. Infection was the most common post operative problem. There were 7 cases of superficial infection. There was a single case of deep infection requiring intravenous antibiotics and removal of metalwork. Other notable complications were those of secondary osteoarthritis (three cases) and malunion (one case). The key finding of this paper is the 2% incidence of deep infection following the direct operative approach to these fractures. The traditional operative approach to such injuries (initially advocated by Ruedi and All-gower) consisted of extensive soft tissue dissection to gain access to the distal tibia. Our preferred method is to gain access to via the “direct approach” which involves direct access to the fracture site with minimal disturbance of the soft tissue envelope. We therefore believe open reduction and internal fixation of pilon fractures via the direct approach to be an excellent technique in the treatment of such injuries.
Many studies exist that assess intramedullary and extra-medullary fixation of these fractures, but few exist that compare the two. We performed a retrospective cohort study to compare the above implants in the management of subtrochanteric femoral fractures. 100 fractures in 95 patients were studied, with 47 in the recon nail group and 53 in the DCS group, with 33 male and 62 females, average age 68 years (16–98 years). Data was obtained by review of case notes and x-rays of all cases. The following information was obtained :- age, sex, energy/mechanism of injury, fracture classification (AO &
Russell-Taylor, single observer), grade of surgeon, duration of surgery, ASA grading, co-morbidity (using Covinsky score), pre-operative mobility, postoperative mobility (using D’Aubigne &
Postel score), mortality, intra-operative complications, post-operative complications, revision surgery/implant failure, follow-up and radiological assessment of reduction/implant position(single observer). Statistical analysis of the data was performed using chi-squared, Fisher’s, Mann-Whitney U and unpaired t-tests. Results showed no significant differences in co-morbidity, complications, mortality, duration of surgery, hospital stay, sex, surgical grade or pre-operative mobility. There were significant differences in age, fracture classification, radiological assessment of reduction/implant position, mechanism of injury and post-operative mobility. Overall 28-day mortality was 8%, post-op complications were seen in 54% and 19 cases required further surgery (detailed breakdown to be presented). Certain areas of bias were identified, in that the DCS had a higher number of complex fracture patterns, thus affecting post-op mobility, whereas the recon nail group had a higher proportion of pathological fractues.
This study aimed to determine the prevalence of osteoporosis in patients awaiting hip and knee replacement for osteoarthritis and to review them two years later to determine the changes in bone density following joint replacement. Patients aged between 65 and 80 years awaiting total hip or knee replacement were invited to participate. Lumbar spine, bilateral femoral and forearm bone mineral density (BMD) measurements were obtained using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. BMD values were standardised using previously published T-scores and Z-scores. To assess clinical status, patients completed a questionnaire including the Western Ontario and McMaster University OA Index (WOMAC). All measurements were repeated at two-years. Participants included 199 patients (84 hips and 115 knees) with a mean age of 72 years (SD 4.0) and were predominantly female (hips 67%, knees 50%). At baseline 46/199 (23%) patients (39 females) had evidence of osteoporosis (WHO definition) at one or more sites with the highest prevalence at the forearm (14%). At two-years 144 patients attended for review with 128 having undergone hip (56) or knee (72) replacement. At this review 39/144 (27%) patients (33 females) had evidence of osteoporosis at one or more sites with the highest prevalence at the forearm (22%). The greatest bone loss occurred at the forearm with median BMD change of minus 4% for females (25th percentile minus 7.3%, 75th percentile minus 1.9%) and minus 2.9% for males (25th percentile minus 4.6%, 75th percentile minus 1.1%). There was a significant difference in WOMAC Pain scores at follow-up between the osteo-porotic and non-osteoporotic knee patients (67 versus 81, p=0.002) indicating that osteoporotic patients had greater knee pain. We have identified the forearm as not only the site with the highest prevalence of osteoporosis but also the greatest bone loss at follow-up. Further evaluation of forearm bone density measurements in the preopera-tive assessment and follow-up of patients awaiting joint replacement for hip and knee OA is required. Larger studies are needed to confirm our finding that the presence of osteoporosis is predictive of worse patient-reported outcomes of knee replacement.
Day case surgery is commonplace in the field of orthopaedic surgery, being suitable for a wide range of both trauma &
elective procedures. It became apparent within our unit that an unacceptably high number of cases were being cancelled for a variety of reasons. We set out to identify these reasons and thereby develop a simple screening process to reduce the number of cancellations. Initial audit over a 1 year period showed 25% of the 907 day case patients were being cancelled. We subdivided the reasons for these cancellations at both pre-operative assessment and on the day of surgery into avoidable [e.g. no carer / telephone, uncontrolled BP, high BMI and ischaemic heart disease] and unavoidable [e.g. surgery no longer required, patient unwell, list cancelled for emergencies, patient DNA]. The majority of our cancellations fell into the “avoidable” category, predominantly at pre-operative assessment. Accordingly, we devised a simple screening questionnaire to be used by clinicians in out-patients at the time of listing for surgery, based on the RCS guidelines (1985). If any of the questions were answered “Yes”, the patient was not suitable for day case surgery. The patient information letter was also changed, informing patients that non-attendance would result in their removal from the waiting list. Re-audit of 727 patients over the next 12 months showed a fall in cancellations to only 11%, with the majority of these being for unavoidable reasons. Cancellations are a source of inconvenience, distress and frustration to both clinician and patient, are a waste of hospital time and resources, and lead to an increase in waiting lists. Our study demonstrates the value of closing the loop in audit, leading to a dramatic reduction in cancellations. Audit is a useful tool to improve patient care, and is not merely a “number-crunching” exercise.
Problem-based learning medical courses are now in the majority in the UK. This type of teaching, based on research by Barrow in the 1960s, seeks to integrate basic sciences and clinical teaching, leading to the acquisition of an integrated knowledge base that is readily recalled and applied to the analysis and solution of problems. We noticed an apparent difference in the core anatomical knowledge in a group of 4th year medical students during their orthopaedic placement, some of whom had been taught a traditional course and some a PBL course. We set out to quantify this difference. 60 simple anatomy questions were asked, with 30 minutes allowed, and no negative marking. 33 students were PBL taught, and 27 by a traditional course, with a roughly equal male: female ratio. The average score in the PBL group was 39.2% (range 11–52%), whereas the traditional group averaged 73.7% (range 63–79%). A second study was undertaken on two groups of 80 second year medical students, at 2 different UK universities with comparable teaching standards and entry requirements, both being well-established courses. Again, a simple 50-question anatomy paper was used, without negative marking. The traditional course students scored a mean of 37.5 (25–46), and the PBL group scored a mean of 32.3 (18–45). The results were statistically significant (p<
0.0001). Our results suggest that the difference between the two groups with regard to core anatomical knowledge increases with progression through training. This has significant implications due to PBL courses being in the majority. During the usually short orthopaedic attachment, it will become increasingly difficult for clinicians to teach effectively due to the lack of this knowledge.
37 patients were suspected clinically of having a deep venous thrombosis, 10 of which were confirmed radiologically, giving a rate of 4%. Nine patients had a suspected pulmonary embolism, 2 of which were confirmed radiologically and one of whom died of pulmonary embolism, giving an overall rate of fatal pulmonary embolism of 0.4%. All patients with thromboembolic events had lower extremity tumours and all were surgical patients. However, the majority of thromboembolic events (6 of 10 deep venous thromboses and 2 of 3 pulmonary embolisms) occurred prior to surgery.
Operation notes were analysed to confirm the type of procedure, underlying diagnosis, and thickness of tibial insert. Information was derived from patient records and postal questionnaire to all surviving patients, which included: WOMAC, SF-36, satisfaction scale and history of revision surgery.
As at September 2003 there were 153 patients (25%) still alive, using revision as an endpoint survivorship was 59.3% at a mean time since implantation of 17 years 8 months. Pain and function portions of the WOMAC questionnaire revealed mean scores of 37 and 47 out of 100.
Survival was significantly better in females, no effect from pre-operative diagnosis was seen. 73% of these patients had 6mm tibial inserts, we postulate that the deterioration in survival is related to accelerated poly-ethylene wear beyond 10 years.
To compare the current practice of ACL reconstruction in a District General Hospital against the recently produced BOA best practice guidelines, we have reviewed all ACL reconstructions performed at our institute from 1997 – 2001. We have assessed the interval from injury to reconstruction and the role of pre-operative assessment and education. We have assessed the standard of documentation regarding the in-patient stay and the surgery itself, including the grade of operating surgeon. Post-operatively, we have assessed the position of the grafts radiologically, and whether original levels of sporting activity were regained. The average time from injury to first consultation in an orthopaedic clinic was 23.6 months. In respect of the admission notes, 77% had the history of injury and symptoms documented, and although all had a general pre-operative cardio-respiratory examination documented, none had evidence of examination of the relevant knee joint. Furthermore, none of the patients had the risks and benefits of the procedure documented at admission, and only one patient had been consented by the operating surgeon. Peri-operatively, all patients received both antibiotics and thromboprophylaxis, although only 21% had daily entries in the notes. The average post-operative follow-up was 9.1 months. From this audit of our current practice, we have highlighted the following points :-
There is still an unacceptable delay in the diagnosis of ACL rupture. Documentation must be improved, with regard to admission examination, daily note entries and recording the findings at EUA. The specific risks and benefits of surgery must be documented either at out-patient assessment or at the time of consent. Consent is not obtained by the operating surgeon.