Introduction

The same cup orientation is classically applied to all cases of hip replacement (45° abduction, 20° anteversion). We hypothesize that this orientation must be adapted to the patient's hip range of motion. We tested this hypothesis by means of an experimental study with respect to hip range of motion, comparing the classical orientation (45° and 20°), and the orientation obtained with computer-assisted navigation.

Introduction

The prosthetic impingement occurs if the range of motion of the hip exceeds implant mobility or in case of component malorientation. This retrieval study was designed to assess the frequency and the risk factors of this phenomenon.

Introduction: The prosthetic impingement occurs if the range of motion of the hip exceeds implant mobility or in case of component malorientation. This phenomenon is rarely studied in the literature and most data have come from sporadic cases. This study was designed to assess the frequency and the risk factors of this phenomenon.

Material: The frequency and the severity of the impingement were calculated from a continuous series of 413 cups retrievals. These cups were examined macroscopically twice by two independent observers. The cam effect was noted as: absent, grade 1 (visible at gross inspection but measuring < 1 mm), grade 2 (notch measuring 1–3 mm), grade 3 (notch measuring > 3 mm). The risk factors were analyzed for 298 retrievals that had complete clinical charts.

Results: Among the 413 cups explants, the frequency of impingement was 51.3 percent (grade 3 in 12% and grade 2 in 24%). The impingement was the reason for removal in only 1.7 percent (only for hard bearings), meaning that impingement was mainly an unexpected event (98.3 percent). The impingement was more frequent when revisions were performed because of instability (80 percent; odd-ratio 4.2 (1.1–16.2)) than for loosening (52%) osteolysis (59%) or infection (38%) (p =.002). Likewise, impingement was more frequent when the sum of hip motion exceeded 200 degrees (sum of motion in the 6 degrees of freedom of the hip) (66% versus 45% if the sum was below 200°). The other risk factors were: use of heads with skirts (78% versus 55%), liner with an elevated rim (73% versus 55%), and head-neck ratio below 2.

Discusssion and conclusion: This study underlines the impingement is common when assessing cup retrievals (over 50 percent). One should be aware of impingement when performing hip replacement in patients having a high range of motion. This situation may require prostheses with a high head-neck ratio, as well as use of computer-assisted surgery. One should avoid liners with elevated rim as well as heads with skirts to prevent dislocation, particularly when other risk factors are detected.