Abstract
Introduction
The same cup orientation is classically applied to all cases of hip replacement (45° abduction, 20° anteversion). We hypothesize that this orientation must be adapted to the patient's hip range of motion. We tested this hypothesis by means of an experimental study with respect to hip range of motion, comparing the classical orientation (45° and 20°), and the orientation obtained with computer-assisted navigation.
Material and Methods
The experimental model included a hemipelvis equipped with a femur whose mobility was controlled for three configurations: stiff (60°/0°, 15°/10°, 10°/10°), average (80°/10°, 35°/30°,35°/25°), mobile (130°/30°, 50°/50°, 45°/35°). The hemipelvis and the cup holder were equipped with an electromagnetic system (Fastrack ™) to measure cup orientation. The Pleos™ navigation system (equipping the hemipelvis, the femur, and the cup holder) guided the cup orientation by detecting the positions risking impingement through a kinematic study of the hip. Nine operators each performed 18 navigation-guided implantations (162 hip abduction, anteversion, and range of movement measurements) in two series scheduled 2 months apart.
Results
The model used herein showed intra and interobserver reliability. Compared to the navigation-assisted surgery, the arbitrary orientation gave a mean anteversion error of only 1° ± 6° (−12 to +19°) but 5° ± 8° (−26° to +13°) for abduction. However, 16% of the errors were more than 10° in anteversion (1/2 in the mobile configuration) and 11% of the errors were more than 15° in abduction (for the most part in the mobile configuration). With arbitrary orientation, the errors consisted in excess anteversion and insufficient abduction.
Discussion and Conclusion
The experimental model developed was reliable and can be used to evaluate different prosthetic configurations. This study emphasizes that the ideal arbitrary cup orientation cannot be applied to all hips. All the surgeons are very reproducible but the only way to integrate the range of motion in there ‘own way to do’ in vitro, is to use a navigation system witch can guide the surgeon so as to reduce the risk of impingement and instability.
