header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXI | Pages 165 - 165
1 May 2012
D. W C. I L. L B. M
Full Access

The 2004 United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS) Improvement Plan stated that: “By 2008, no one will have to wait longer than 18 weeks from GP referral to hospital treatment.” Over the same time period, on the other side of the Atlantic, the provincial government of British Columbia (BC) allocated funding for a specialist centre accommodating 2 new operating rooms and a 38 bed inpatient ward. The centre was designed to augment existing surgical capacity for hip and knee joint replacement by 1600 cases per year to help achieve the Canadian waiting time target of 26 weeks. Core design principles were:

to improve patient flow through a centralised joint clinic designed to assess patients with osteoarthritis and related disorders;

to maintain the connection between patient and surgeon throughout the entire care pathway;

to ‘ring-fence’ dedicated operating room capacity and ward space in order to minimise the risk of surgical cancellations; and

to reduce the mean length of inpatient post-operative stay to 4 days.

Analysis of the programme's results showed:

1609 and 1602 joint replacements were performed during each of the first two respective years of operation – an additional 16% of provincial capacity, thus achieving the headline target;

a mean patient satisfaction score of 4.7 out of 5;

a self-reported complication rate of 4.4% (47 of the first 1078 patients surveyed);

a mean theatre time of 1hr 45min, a mean post-anaesthesia recovery stay of 2hr 4min and a mean post-surgical length of stay of 3.4 days; and

delivery of the programme within budget.

By maintaining the patient/surgeon relationship and adhering to other key principles a high standard of care has been achieved in this programme with high rates of patient and surgeon satisfaction and a low complication rate.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XIX | Pages 1 - 1
1 May 2012
Kassianos A Jeavons L L Kincaid R
Full Access

Rivaroxaban was introduced for thromboprophylaxis at the Royal Cornwall Hospital for hip and knee arthroplasty surgery in October 2009. We identified 140 patients from theatre logbooks who underwent elective joint replacement between October 2009 and March 2010. Patient notes, computer and DVT clinic records and WebPacs data were collected to determine the uptake of the new drug and the incidence of wound problems, DVTs and any other post-operative complications. In our sample 55.7% [78/140] patients received rivaroxaban. 10.3% [8/78] of patients on rivaroxaban suffered wound complications compared with 6.6% [4/62] of patients on alternative anticoagulation. Three patients suffered DVT's, 1 of whom was taking rivaroxaban. There were a further 6 patients, 4 on rivaroxaban, with leg swelling severe enough to merit investigation, all of whom had negative doppler scans. Bleeding events included 4 patients with postoperative haematemesis of which 2 were taking rivaroxaban. Five patients, all under different surgical operators of which 3 had taken rivaroxaban, developed stiff total knee replacements and were offered MUA or physiotherapy.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 86-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 278 - 278
1 Mar 2004
Su‡rez-Su‡rez M Murcia-Maz—n A Acebal-Cortina G Rodr’guez-L—pez L Nu–o-Mateo J
Full Access

Aims: To compare the vastus muscle-splitting approach and the classical medial parapatellar in total knee replacement. Methods: Prospective clinical and radiographic study in 50 cemented cruciate-retaining prostheses (Interax, Stryker-Howmedica-Osteonics): midvastus approach in 25 and parapatellar medial in 25. Results: There were no differences (p> 0.05) in postoperative femoro-tibial or patelar tilt angles, duration of surgery, drainage bleeding, Hemoglobine and Hematocrite at postoperative day 3, units of blood transfused, complications, hospital stay, range of motion, and score of the American Knee Society at 1, 6, 12 or 24 months. However, the midvastus approach showed less intraoperative lateral retinacular releases, more patients were able to get independent terminal knee extension at postoperative day 5, and the range of motion at discharge was higher (p< 0.05). Conclusions: The midvastus splitting approach can reduce the need to perform lateral retinacular releases, with advantages in the early postoperative range of motion and knee extension ability.