PURPOSE: There is an argument in the literature regarding the use of intramedullary nail or the external fixation followed by intramedullary nail in tibial fractures with severe damage of soft tissues, threatened compartment syndrome, open type IIIA fractures and in polytrauma patients. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the results of non-jointed external fixators as a definite treatment for these type of tibial shaft fractures.

MATERIAL AND METHOD: 86 patients (91 tibial shaft fractures) were treated at the authors’ institute with a non-jointed external fixator. The mean patient age was 35 years (range, 15–80). There were 70 male and 16 female patients. The average time of surgery from the accident was 10 hours. The indications for application an external fixator was: severe damage of the soft tissues in 11 fractures, an incipient compartment syndrome in 12 fractures, open type III Gustilo fractures in 57, and 11 tibia fractures in polytrauma patients. According to AO classification 46 fractures were type A, 32 type B and 13 type C.

RESULTS: The average follow up was 2.9 years (ranged, 1–5 years). The average operative time was 50 min. Complications included: 3 non-unions, 5 delayed unions, 1 malunions, 1 tibia shortening, 3 superficial infections of soft tissues in open fractures, 26 pin infections and 1 osteomyelitis in open fractures. In 2 patients fat embolism was diagnosed while pulmonary embolism was a complication in 2 patients. Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) developed in 5 patients. A re-operation was performed in 11 out of 91 fractures. Change of the method was necessary in 2 out of 91 fractures. The primary callus in 10 out of 91 fractures was due to the stiffness of the unilateral non-jointed external fixators and did not influence the final results. Mean time of fracture union for the open fractures that did not require change of the method nor bone graft was 25 weeks, while for the closed fractures was 18 weeks. The dynamization of the system and partial weight bearing was started at 6 weeks and all the patients had full weight bearing by the 12th week.

CONCLUSION: The unilateral external fixators were the definite treatment in 88 out of 91 fractures. The unilateral external fixators can be used as a definite treatment for tibial shaft fractures in the majority of the cases. Re-operation or change of the method is unusual and must be performed only when there is a delay in callus formation.

Aim: The study of quality of life in adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis (IS) that are treated conservatively with a brace.

Introduction: Study of patients’ quality of life, especially of those suffering a chronic disease that requires long term treatment, is of great interest in recent years. Although there are a lot of studies for psycological sequences in IS, only a few papers in the available literature are dealing with quality of life measurement. SF-36 generic questionnaire provides the physician with valuable outcomes of treatment in patients over 14 years old.

Material-Method: Inclusion criteria were diagnosis of IS, a curve between 20o–40o, age of the child between 14–16 years old, follow up by the same physician or team, conservative treatment of IS and minimum duration of brace treatment for 2 years. Twenty-eight children, 25 girls with a mean age 14.8 years old and 3 boys with a mean age 15 years old were included in the study and filled the form of SF-36 questionnaire. All children are still wearing the brace. A control group of 30 children were also filled SF-36 form.

Results: Mean score of SF-36 questionnaire was 76.29 (SD 9.105). Most negatively affected domains are Mental Health (mean score 54.3, SD 11.5) and Vitality (mean score 62.86, SD 16.5). Physical Functioning (mean score 79.3, SD 20.7), Role limitation due to Emotional problems (mean score 76.3, SD 25.23), Social Functioning (mean score 77.9, SD 17.13), Bodily Pain (mean score 79.6, SD 19.5) and General Health Perception (mean score 77.1, SD 19.94) are less affected domains. Best scores are achieved in Role limitation due to Physical problems (mean score 96.4, SD 9.45) and Change in Health (mean score 82.1, SD 23.78) domains.

Discussion-Conclusion: This report appears that brace treatment has negative effect on childrens’ quality of life. The use of SF-36 questionnaire through detection of most affected domains provides the physician a measurable outcome for child’s quality of life in order to 1) interfere with the selected method of conservative treatment and its modalities in a way that it would less affect the child and 2) provide the child specific psychological support by the doctor, the orthotist, the parents and the various voluntary organizations.

Aim: To evaluate the results of management of Char-cot foot and ankle deformities by the use of the Ilizarov apparatus.

Material-Method: This is a retrospective study of 11 cases (9 patients) aged from 39 to 60 years old (mean 44 years), all suffering from Charcot foot neuroarthropathy. All cases showed established midfoot breakdown. In four cases hindfoot deformity coexisted. Three feet were ulcerated. In six cases the Iizarov frame was applied using complex hinges and closed compression fusions were performed, utilizing the bent wire technique. In five cases the correction of the deformities was performed acutely with the use of percutaneous cannulated screws. In the later cases the Ilizarov frame neutralized the former osteosynthesis method. The Ilizarov device remained attached for 8 weeks, regardless the presence of other osteosynthesis hardware. The Maryland Foot score (MFS) was utilized for objective assessment by the physician and the SF-36 questionaire for subjective assessment by the patient.

Results: A statistically significant improvement in MFS and SF-36 score was recorded. In all cases the aim for a stable and painless extremity was achieved. All patients returned to their previous activities and kept using normal shoe wear.

Conclusions: A lot of references are found in the literature describing failure in the treatment of Charcot foot deformity with the use of internal fixation. This is justified by the poor bone quality and decreased bone density of the diabetic and alcoholic patients. The use of tensioned wires in multiple levels provides adequate fixation in cases where a frame is used solely and safe neutralization where a frame is combined with internal fixation.