Introduction. Pressure to control health care costs may limit the ability of new implants to enter the market. Customized individually made (CIM) knee implants are produced from CT scans of each patient and may result in improved clinical outcomes based on early data showing less blood loss, reduced bone resection, and better implant function and alignment. Limited economic evidence suggests that the use of CIM technology may result in cost savings, particularly when post-discharge expenses are included. The purpose of this study was to evaluate real-world cost data to determine episode spending in a Medicare population receiving either CIM or off-the-shelf (OTS) implants. Methods. The Yale Center for Musculoskeletal Care and Baker Tilly Healthcare Management reviewed episode expenditures among Medicare beneficiaries who received CIM and OTS implants for TKA between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2015. Episode costs included the pre-operative CT scan, index TKA procedure, and 12-month post-index spending for inpatient (IP), outpatient (OP), emergency room (ER), skilled nursing facility (SNF), and home health (HH) services. CIM patients were identified through a matching process utilizing de-identified patient demographic and procedural information and the presence of a CT scan 28–365 days before index. OTS patients included those without a CT scan within one year of index. CIM and OTS cohorts were propensity matched to produce comparable cohorts at a one-to-five ratio based on age range, gender, race, geographical location, and comorbidities. Average expenditure was used to calculate one-year costs of care differences between the CIM and the OTS technologies. A Generalized Linear Model (GLM) and two-part model (logistics and GLM) were used to test statistical significance. Results. The study included 4,434 patients (CIM: 739, OTS: 3,695). CIM index hospital expenses were 6.5% less than OTS (CIM: $11,579; OTS: $12,386, p<0.0001). CIM patients were 37.5% less likely to incur SNF costs than OTS patients (CIM: 3.0% vs. OTS: 4.8%; p=0.0241) and had 45.1% lower average SNF expenditures (CIM: $8,882 vs. OTS: $16,183; p=0.0236). There was no difference in the probability of incurring post-index IP costs (CIM: 15.7% vs. OTS: 15.4%; p=0.9437) but average post-index IP expenditures were 27.2% lower among the CIM cohort than OTS (CIM: $12,817 vs. OTS: $17,605; p=0.0008). However, CIM patients were 10.5% more likely to incur OP costs (CIM: 90.9% vs. OTS: 85.7%; p=0.0005) and had 6.1% higher average OP expenditures (CIM: $2,328 vs. OTS: $2,106; p=0.0377). Average 12-month episode spending for the CIM cohort was 8.4% less than the OTS cohort ($1,697 Difference; CIM: $18,585 vs. OTS: $20,280; p<0.0001). Conclusion. Study findings demonstrate that the use of CIM technology can result in significant 12-month episode savings among a Medicare population. The average expenditure differences noted for post-index IP, SNF, and OP cost categories suggest there are differences in required post-operative treatment across the two cohorts. Savings calculated in the analysis is a meaningful reduction for payers. Providers may also benefit from index and episode cost savings through shared savings arrangements. CIM technology should be considered as a method to reduce TKA episode spending

Background. Routine closed suction drainage and postoperative laboratory studies have long been tenets of most TJA protocols. However, recent literature has called into question whether either is necessary with modern outpatient TJA clinical pathways. Methods. Demographic, cost, and readmission data for 2,605 primary unilateral TJA cases was collected retrospectively and analyzed prior to and after a protocol change where routine closed suction drains and postoperative laboratory tests were eliminated. This protocol change was designed to treat all primary TJA like outpatients regardless of their admission status. Drain usage changed from routine to selective based on hemostasis. Lab studies changed from routine to selective for patients on warfarin for VTE prophylaxis (INR), with ASA 4 or 5 status (BMP), and with a hematocrit < 27% in the recovery room after THA (CBC). Results. Drain utilization decreased by 50% and postoperative labs decreased by 70%. Drain and lab test cost per patient decreased from $74.62 before to $19.91 after the change, while charges per patient decreased from $625.23 before to $77.15 after. The 30 and 90-day readmission rates decreased with no readmissions occurring before or after the change that could have been prevented by using a drain or obtaining labs. Conclusion. Selective elimination of routine closed suction drainage and postoperative laboratory studies as part of an outpatient TJA protocol is safe and provides cost savings for inpatient primary TJA. Per 100 cases, this change could decrease institution costs by $5,500 and patient charges by $55,000 without decreasing quality or safety

In 2000 our emergency department implemented a new management for the treatment of isolated, apex volar distal radial fractures involving immobilisation with a wrist splint, written information for carers and no planned follow up. Next day x-ray review acted as a safety net for misdiagnosed or less stable fractures. This has now been validated with a retrospective review of treatment for distal radial # within the ED. Patients were identified through the Emergency department’s electronic discharge record. Over a 9 month period 260 patients were identified with metaphyseal distal radial and/or ulna injuries to which a non orthopaedic junior doctor might be expected to apply the Buckle Fracture Algorithm. Of these 161 had isolated distal radial fractures suitable for treatment with a wrist splint. 118 were correctly identified and treated in the ED. 43 patients were sent to # clinic, of these 11 patients were discharged at the 1st visit, however 3 had 3 or more visits and 2 children had additional x-rays. Over this period 9 children were given splints inappropriately according to the protocol, most of these had stable injuries on reviewing the x-rays, 3 were identified and recalled for a cast. None of the children with injuries outside the protocol who were not recalled had an unplanned return with complications. Taking into account only those children who were correctly managed from the ED the estimated annual cost savings to the NHS for this hospital for this period is £40,784, compared to standard treatment before introduction of this protocol. If all children had been treated according to protocol the estimated cost savings would be £56096/yr

The Dawn Hip - An Effective Strategy to Improve the Management of Traumatic Hip Fractures. Introduction. Traumatic hip fractures are managed with nationwide standards, and are regularly audited and published. A previous audit last year at the William Harvey revealed 66% of hip fractures were operated within 48 hours, compared to the national average of 75%. We implemented a strategy to improve this target by introducing the ‘Dawn Hip’ - a hip fracture operation which is prepared for surgery at 8am on the Emergency (CEPOD) list. Methods. Over a two month period after the introduction of the ‘Dawn hip’, the number of hip operations and start time on the CEPOD list were audited. Performance data were extrapolated from the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) and compared nationally. Results. Three months prior to the ‘Dawn hip’ the mean start time of surgery on the CEPOD list was 9.50am. Two months since the introduction of the dawn hip, 67% of all trauma hip operations were done on the CEPOD list. The mean start time of the CEPOD list improved to 8.38am. Data from the NHFD revealed 81% of traumatic hip fractures were operated on within 48 hours, with the national average being 80%. Conclusion. This is an effective strategy which increases efficiency of existing resources and improves hospital services and patient care. It requires a multidisciplinary approach and participation from both managerial and clinical departments. This strategy not only optimises the care we provide for hip fractures, but also increases trauma list space for other pending trauma operations. By meeting nationwide targets, the trust is rewarded with cash incentives, which is used to further improve services. In the current economic climate, this represents a method of optimising healthcare, increasing cost savings and maximising productivity and efficiency

The debate whether to use cemented or uncemented components in primary total hip replacement (THR) has not yet been considered with reference to the cost implications to the National Health Service.

We obtained the number of cemented and uncemented components implanted in 2009 from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. The cost of each component was established. The initial financial saving if all were cemented was then calculated. Subsequently the five-year rates of revision for each type of component were reviewed and the predicted number of revisions at five years for the actual components used was compared with the predicted number of revisions for a cemented THR. This was then multiplied by the mean cost of revision surgery to provide an indication of the savings over the first five years if all primary THRs were cemented.

The saving at primary THR was calculated to be £10 million with an additional saving during the first five years of between £5 million and £8.5 million. The use of cemented components in routine primary THR in the NHS as a whole can be justified on a financial level but we recognise individual patient factors must be considered when deciding which components to use.

Purpose Of The Study: To compare the Coblation technology Vs standard diathermy regarding surgical time & cost in arthroscopic subacromial decompression.

Methods & Results: This prospective randomized comparative study between Coblation technology Vs standard monopolar diathermy in ASD. 40 patients with chronic impingement syndrome prospectively randomized 20 patients in each group. Procedure time & cost per case were accurately calculated. Results show that the Coblation group had an average 8 minutes shorter procedure time per case P value: 0.0001. The cost saving as a result was about £64 per case P value: 0.01

Conclusion: Use of Coblation technology for soft tissue debridement & resection in ASD reduces procedure time by 38% and the cost by an average of 18% per case (£64) compared with the use of a shaver and diathermy probe.

Aims

Implant waste during total hip arthroplasty (THA) represents a significant cost to the USA healthcare system. While studies have explored methods to improve THA cost-effectiveness, the literature comparing the proportions of implant waste by intraoperative technology used during THA is limited. The aims of this study were to: 1) examine whether the use of enabling technologies during THA results in a smaller proportion of wasted implants compared to navigation-guided and conventional manual THA; 2) determine the proportion of wasted implants by implant type; and 3) examine the effects of surgeon experience on rates of implant waste by technology used.

In the current healthcare environment, cost containment has become more important than ever. Perioperative services are often scrutinized as they consume more than 30% of North American hospitals’ budgets. The procurement, processing, and use of sterile surgical inventory is a major component of the perioperative care budget and has been recognized as an area of operational inefficiency. Although a recent systematic review supported the optimization of surgical inventory reprocessing as a means to increase efficiency and eliminate waste, there is a paucity of data on how to actually implement this change. A well-studied and established approach to implementing organizational change is Kotter's Change Model (KCM). The KCM process posits that organizational change can be facilitated by a dynamic 8-step approach and has been increasingly applied to the healthcare setting to facilitate the implementation of quality improvement (QI) interventions. We performed an inventory optimization (IO) to improve inventory and instrument reprocessing efficiency for the purpose of cost containment using the KCM framework. The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) project was to implement the IO using KCM, overcome organizational barriers to change, and measure key outcome metrics related to surgical inventory and corresponding clinician satisfaction. We hypothesized that the KCM would be an effective method of implementing the IO. This study was conducted at a tertiary academic hospital across the four highest-volume surgical services - Orthopedics, Otolaryngology, General Surgery, and Gynecology. The IO was implemented using the steps outlined by KCM (Figure 1): 1) create coalition, 2) create vision for change, 3) establish urgency, 4) communicate the vision, 5) empower broad based action, 6) generate general short term wins, 7) consolidate gains, and 8) anchor change. This process was evaluated using inventory metrics - total inventory reduction and depreciation cost savings; operational efficiency metrics - reprocessing labor efficiency and case cancellation rate; and clinician satisfaction. The implementation of KCM is described in Table 1. Total inventory was reduced by 37.7% with an average tray size reduction of 18.0%. This led to a total reprocessing time savings of 1333 hours per annum and labour cost savings of $39 995 per annum. Depreciation cost savings was $64 320 per annum. Case cancellation rate due to instrument-related errors decreased from 3.9% to 0.2%. The proportion of staff completely satisfied with the inventory was 1.7% pre-IO and 80% post-IO. This was the first study to show the success of applying KCM to facilitate change in the perioperative setting with respect to surgical inventory. We have outlined the important organizational obstacles faced when making changes to surgical inventory. The same KCM protocol can be followed for optimization processes for disposable versus reusable surgical device purchasing or perioperative scheduling. Although increasing efforts are being dedicated to quality improvement and efficiency, institutions will need an organized and systematic approach such as the KCM to successfully enact changes. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction. Virtual fracture clinics (VFC's) aim to reduce the number of outpatient appointments while improving the clinical effectiveness and patients experience through standardisation of treatment pathways. With 4.6% of ED admissions due to trauma the VFC prevents unnecessary face to face appointments providing a cost savings benefit to the NHS. Methods. This project demonstrates the importance of efficient VFC process in reducing the burden on the fracture clinics. We completed preformed a retrospective cross-sectional study, analysing two cycles in May (n=305) and September (n=332) 2021. We reviewed all VFC referrals during this time assessing the quality of the referral, if they went on to require a face to face follow up and who the referring health care professional was. Following the cycle in May we provided ongoing education to A&E staff before re-auditing in September. Results. Between the two cycles there was an average 19% improvement in quality of the referrals, significant reduction in number of inappropriate referrals for soft tissue knee and shoulder injuries from 15.1% (n=50) to 4.5% (n=15) following our intervention. There was an 8% increase in number of fracture clinic appointments to 74.4% (n=247), primarily due to an increase number of referrals from nurse practitioners. Radial head fractures were targeted as one group that were able to be successfully managed in VFC, despite this 64% (n=27) of patients were still seen in the outpatient department following VFC referral. Conclusion. Despite the decrease in the number of inappropriate referrals, and the increase in quality of referrals following our intervention. The percentage of VFC referrals in CAVUHB is still higher than other centres in with established VFCs in England. This possibly highlights the need for further education to emergency staff around describing what injuries are appropriate for referral, specifically soft tissue injuries and radial head fractures. In order to optimise the VFC process and provide further cost savings benefits while reducing the strain on fracture clinics

Is Non-Weight-Bearing Necessary? (INWN) is a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing immediate protected weight-bearing (IWB) with non-weight-bearing cast immobilisation (NWB) following ankle fracture fixation (ORIF). This trial compares; functional outcomes, complication rates and performs an economic analysis to estimate cost-utility. IWB within 24hrs was compared to NWB, following ORIF of all types of unstable ankle fractures. Skeletally immature patients and tibial plafond fractures were excluded. Functional outcomes were assessed by the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) and RAND-36 Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) taken at regular follow-up intervals up to one year. A cost-utility analysis via decision tree modelling was performed to derive an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER). A standard gamble health state valuation model utilising SF-36 scores was used to calculate Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) for each arm. We recruited 160 patients (80 per arm), aged 15 to 94 years (M = 45.5), 54% female. Complication rates were similar in both groups. IWB demonstrated a consistently higher OMAS score, with significant values at 6 weeks (MD=10.4, p=0.005) and 3 months (MD 12.0, p=0.003). Standard gamble utility values demonstrated consistently higher values (a score of 1 equals perfect health) with IWB, significant at 3 months (Ẋ = 0.75 [IWB] / 0.69 [NWB], p=0.018). Cost-utility analysis demonstrated NWB is €798.02 more expensive and results in 0.04 fewer QALYs over 1 year. This results in an ICER of −€21,682.42/QALY. This negative ICER indicates cost savings of €21,682.42 for every QALY (25 patients = 1 QALY gain) gained implementing an IWB regime. IWB demonstrates a superior functional outcome, greater cost savings and similar complication rates, compared to NWB following ankle fracture fixation

Aims. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is now commonly used in major surgical operations including orthopaedics. The TRAC-24 randomized control trial (RCT) aimed to assess if an additional 24 hours of TXA postoperatively in primary total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) reduced blood loss. Contrary to other orthopaedic studies to date, this trial included high-risk patients. This paper presents the results of a cost analysis undertaken alongside this RCT. Methods. TRAC-24 was a prospective RCT on patients undergoing TKA and THA. Three groups were included: Group 1 received 1 g intravenous (IV) TXA perioperatively and an additional 24-hour postoperative oral regime, Group 2 received only the perioperative dose, and Group 3 did not receive TXA. Cost analysis was performed out to day 90. Results. Group 1 was associated with the lowest mean total costs, followed by Group 2 and then Group 3. The differences between Groups 1 and 3 (-£797.77 (95% confidence interval -1,478.22 to -117.32) were statistically significant. Extended oral dosing reduced costs for patients undergoing THA but not TKA. The reduced costs in Groups 1 and 2 resulted from reduced length of stay, readmission rates, emergency department attendances, and blood transfusions. Conclusion. This study demonstrated significant cost savings when using TXA in primary THA or TKA. Extended oral dosing reduced costs further in THA but not TKA. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):536–542

Knee arthroscopy with meniscectomy is the third most common Orthopaedic surgery performed after TKA and THA, comprising up to 16.6% of all procedures. The efficiency of Orthopaedic care delivery with respect to waiting times and systemic costs is extremely concerning. Canadian Orthopaedic patients experience the longest wait times of any G7 country, yet perioperative surgical care constitutes a significant portion of a hospital's budget. In-Office Needle Arthroscopy (IONA) is an emerging technology that has been primarily studied as a diagnostic tool. Recent evidence shows that it is a cost-effective alternative to hospital- and community-based MRI with comparable accuracy. Recent procedure guides detailing IONA medial meniscectomy suggest a potential node for OR diversion. Given the high case volume of knee arthroscopy as well as the potential amenability to be diverted away from the OR to the office setting, IONA has the potential to generate considerable improvements in healthcare system efficiency with respect to throughput and cost savings. As such, the purpose of this study is to investigate the cost savings and impact on waiting times on a mid-sized Canadian community hospital if IONA is offered as an alternative to traditional operating room (OR) arthroscopy for medial meniscal tears. In order to develop a comprehensive understanding and accurate representation of the quantifiable operations involved in the current state for medial meniscus tear care, process mapping was performed that describes the journey of a patient from when they present with knee pain to their general practitioner until case resolution. This technique was then repeated to create a second process map describing the hypothetical proposed state whereby OR diversion may be conducted utilizing IONA. Once the respective process maps for each state were determined, each process map was translated into a Dupont decision tree. In order to accurately determine the total number of patients which would be eligible for this care pathway at our institution, the OR booking scheduling for arthroscopy and meniscectomy/repair over a four year time period (2016-2020) were reviewed. A sensitivity analysis was performed to examine the effect of the number of patients who select IONA over meniscectomy and the number of revision meniscectomies after IONA on 1) the profit and profit margin determined by the MCS-Dupont financial model and 2) the throughput (percentage and number) determined by the MCS-throughput model. Based on historic data at our institution, an average of 198 patients (SD 31) underwent either a meniscectomy or repair from years 2016-2020. Revenue for both states was similar (p = .22), with the current state revenue being $ 248,555.99 (standard deviation $ 39,005.43) and proposed state of $ 249,223.86 (SD $ 39,188.73). However, the reduction in expenses was significant (p < .0001) at 5.15%, with expenses in the current state being $ 281,415.23 (SD $ 44,157.80) and proposed state of $ 266,912.68 (SD $ 42,093.19), representing $14,502.95 in savings. Accordingly, profit improvement was also significant (p < .0001) at 46.2%, with current state profit being $ (32,859.24) (SD $ 5,153.49) and proposed state being $ (17,678.82) (SD $ 2,921.28). The addition of IONA into the care pathway of the proposed state produced an average improvement in throughput of 42 patients (SD 7), representing a 21.2% reduction in the number of patients that require an OR procedure. Financial sensitivity analysis revealed that the proposed state profit was higher than the current state profit if as few as 10% of patients select IONA, with the maximum revision rate needing to remain below 40% to achieve improved profits. The most important finding from this study is that IONA is a cost-effective alternative to traditional surgical arthroscopy for medial meniscus meniscectomy. Importantly, IONA can also be used as a diagnostic procedure. It is shown to be a cost-effective alternative to MRI with similar diagnostic accuracy. The role of IONA as a joint diagnostic-therapeutic tool could positively impact MRI waiting times and MRI/MRA costs, and further reduce indirect costs to society. Given the well-established benefit of early meniscus treatment, accelerating both diagnosis and therapy is bound to result in positive effects

Abstract. Objectives. To analyse the costs and benefits of sending femoral head specimens for histopathological analysis and whether our practice had changed since the original study five years ago. Methods. The cohort definition was patients who had both undergone hip hemiarthroplasties (HHAs) and had femoral head specimens sent for histopathological analysis at our tertiary care institution from 2013 to 2016. Retrospective review of clinical and electronic notes was performed on these patients for history of malignancy, histopathological diagnosis of femoral head, indication for histopathological examination and radiological studies. The total number of HHAs performed at the centre and the costs involved in analysing each femoral head specimen were identified. Results. A total of 805 HHAs were performed at the centre. We identified 56 femoral head specimens from 56 patients (6.96%) that were sent for histopathological analysis after HHA. 29 patients (51.79%) had a known history of malignancy. Three femoral head specimens (10.34%) were histologically positive for malignancy. Two patients had hip radiographs demonstrating metastasis to the femoral head. The third patient had a PET-CT scan two weeks prior to fracture that did not show signs of metastatic disease. 27 patients (48.21%) had no history of malignancy. None of their femoral head specimens were found to be histologically positive for malignancy. 10 patients had no appropriate indication for histopathological analysis. The cost savings for 27 patients with no previous history of malignancy ranged from €2,295 to €9,504. The cost savings for 10 patients with no appropriate indication ranged from €850 to €3,520. Conclusions. Histopathological analysis of femoral head specimens after HHA has little benefit for patients without a history of malignancy. The practice at our institution had not changed significantly in the past five years. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Introduction. Total knee arthroplasty is a highly effective procedure to improve the quality of life in patients with advanced osteoarthritis. The number of these procedures are expected to grow 174% by 2030. This growth rate is expected to economically strain the health care system. A potential solution to alleviate this problem is the utilization of single use instruments (SUI). Potential advantages of SUI include: improved operating room efficiencies, decreased costs associated with traditional instrument management (sterile processing, shipping), and decreased infection risk. The present study examines the clinical results of SUI compared to standard instrumentation. Furthermore, economic modeling is performed to examine the cost savings that is potentially realized with their use. Materials and Methods. 51 patients receiving a TKA with use of SUI were prospectively compared to 49 patients utilizing standard instrumentation. Knee Society Scores and Radiographic alignment will be evaluated. Adverse events will be recorded. Economic modeling of SUI will be performed in 4 different areas: 1. Decreased infection burden; 2. Operating room logistics; 3. Sterile processing savings; and 4. Instrument logistical savings. Results. The average Pre-operative KSS (Objective/Functional) scores were 48.7/41.6 for the SIU patients compared to 50.2/38.7 for the standard instrumentation patients. Post-operative improvements measured 84.0/72.8 and 83.9/76.4 for the 2 groups respectively. The Pre-operative Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle was 176.2 and 177.0 for the 2 groups. The SUI HKA improved to 179.3 while the standard improved to 178.9. There were no statistical differences between the 2 groups. Furthermore, there were no cases of subsidence, migration, loosening, or infection in either group. There were no SUI procedure abandonments. Economic analysis revealed a decreased risk of Infection burden of $28.08/case. Operating room efficiencies include reduced set-up/take-down time and case efficiency savings/case. This averages $348.14/case. Instrument sterilization savings occur by bypassing the central sterile-processing department completely and models to $700/case. Finally, instrument logistics savings include time and money spent organizing/turning over/shipping instrument sets for cases. This estimate is $112.88/case for a total economic value of $1, 189.10/case. Discussion. In summary, the present study confirms that SUI provides similar clinical and radiographic results to standard instrumentation for TKA. Furthermore, SUI offers significant cost savings/case via potential benefits of reduced risk of infection, increased operating room productivity, and significant tray sterilization and loaner instrumentation cost savings

Closed ankle fractures have been reported to account for 10% off all fractures presenting to the Emergency Department. Many of these injuries require acute surgical management either via direct admission or through defined outpatient surgical pathways. While both methods have been shown to be safe, few studies have examined the cost effectiveness of each clinical scenario. The purpose of this study is to compare cost and resource utilization associated with inpatient and outpatient ankle fracture surgery at a Canadian academic institution. This is a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent acute ankle fracture surgery at London Health Sciences Centre between 2016 and 2018. Thirty patients who underwent inpatient ankle surgery for closed, isolated ankle fractures at University Hospital were compared to 30 consecutive patients who underwent outpatient ankle surgery for similar fractures at Victoria hospital. Data pertaining to age at time of surgery, sex, BMI, fracture type, operating/recovery room time, and length of hospital stay were collected. All emergency room visits, readmissions and complications within 30 days of surgery were also recorded. Inpatient and outpatient cohorts were similar with respect to average age (48 vs. 44, P=0.326) and body mass index (29.8 vs. 29.1, P=0.741). There was a greater proportion of patients with an American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) Classification of 3 or greater in the inpatient surgery group (48% vs. 23%). The inpatient group spent an average of 1.2 days in hospital while waiting for surgery and a average of 72 hours in hospital for their entire surgical encounter. The outpatient group spent an average of eight days (at home) waiting for surgery while spending an average of 7.4 hours in hospital during their entire surgical encounter. Outpatient ankle fracture surgery was associated with a cost savings of 35.9% in comparison to inpatient ankle fracture surgery (P < 0 .001). There were no significant differences in the rates of emergency room visits, readmissions, or complications between cohorts. Preliminary findings suggest that outpatient ankle fracture surgery is appropriate for most patients, requires less hospital resources and is associated with similar rates of readmission and complications as inpatient surgery. An established outpatient surgical pathway may offer significant cost savings in the treatment of the common closed ankle fracture that requires surgical intervention

Abstract. Introduction. Uni-compartmental knee replacement (UKR) has become popularised due to quicker recovery times, reduced postoperative pain, and blood loss. The desire to increase bed capacity and reduce costs, while preserving safety and patient satisfaction, has led to increased interest in day-case arthroplasty. This study observes the feasibility of UKR as a day-case procedure and whether this affects short and long-term postoperative outcomes. Methodology. Between 2018 and 2021, at a single institution and operated by a single orthopaedic surgeon, seventy-seven patients received a UKR on an elective basis. The patients were divided into two groups: ‘day-case’ for those discharged on the same day, and ‘non day-case’ group. Results. 31 patients were identified as day case procedures with the remaining 46 requiring between one to three days before discharge. Mean age, sex, modal ASA score, BMI, Charlson co-morbidity index, and pre-op oxford knee score showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p>0.05). No significant difference between the post-op oxford knee score at 1 year was found for patients treated and discharged as a day case procedure (37.8 +/− 6.88) and those who remained as an inpatient postoperatively (37.8 +/− 10.7); t(df) = −0.0007, p=0.994. No patients in either group suffered any complications beyond the peri-operative period. 30-day and 90-day readmission rates were equal. Conclusions. With no significant differences in post-op knee scores, complication, and readmission rates, we feel UKR can be performed as a viable day case procedure in a planned elective setting. This will result in significant cost savings

Patients awaiting resolution of swelling and oedema prior to ankle surgery can represent a significant burden on hospital beds. Our study assessed whether external pneumatic intermittent compression (EPIC) can reduce delays to surgery. Our prospective randomised controlled trial (n= 20) compared outcomes of patients treated with EPIC vs control group managed with ice and elevation. Included were patients aged <18 years with isolated closed ankle fractures admitted for management of swelling prior to surgery. Excluded were open fractures, injuries to contralateral leg, diabetes, absent pulses, peripheral vascular disease, inability to consent, no requirement for admission. Eligible patients were randomised to active or control arms. All patients were managed initially with reduction and back slab application. Patients in active arm fitted with EPIC (Hydroven 3000) device over the back slab. Assessment by treating team determined the time at which patient is assessed ready for surgery. Patients in the treatment arm were assessed as ready for surgery sooner, (123 hrs vs 168hrs, T score = 1.925, P 0.035) and had a shorter time to surgery (167 hrs vs 216 hrs, T score = 1.748, P 0.047) Length of stay was reduced bud did not reach statistical significance. (259 hrs vs 269 hrs, T score 0.229, P 0.41). Our results showed a statistically and clinically significant reduction in time that patients were assessed ready for surgery and time to surgery in the treatment cohort. We conclude that although further data is needed to achieve an adequately powered study and assess the safety profile of the EPIC, incorporation of EPIC into routine clinical practice has the potential for significant cost savings

The recruitment drive, investment and collaboration within Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board (BCUHB) sites providing specialist lower limb arthroplasty and trauma service has evolved over last few years with aims to improve patient care and reduce reliance on tertiary referral centres. Through our service-evaluation project, we reviewed the results of treatment provided for periprosthetic femur fractures (PPFFs) presenting to BCUHB sites over last 4 years. We retrospectively reviewed consecutive PPFFs admitted at three BCUHB sites from January’20 to June’23 with mean follow-up of 20.8 ± 13.2 (8–49) months [n=161; Mean age: 82.2 ± 8.5 (59–101) years, Females:107]. Over the review period we noted a 23% increase in service demand for care of PPFFs. Majority were managed surgically [132/161] [38 revision arthroplasties; 94 ORIFs] at BCUHB sites and two patients were referred to tertiary centre. Average time to surgery was 3.5 days. 90% of the PPFFs were managed successfully with 10% (16/159) having orthopaedic complications needing further intervention. 6.3 (10/159) had medical complications and did not need orthopaedic re-intervention. In our series, 12-month re-operation rate was 6.1% (8/132) and 1-month, 3-month and 1-year mortality rate was 6.3%, 11.3% and 21.4% respectively. These results are comparable to the published results of PPFF management at tertiary centres. Potential cost savings compared to transfer to tertiary centre for PPFF management was £2.31 million. Thus, it is possible to successfully provide adequate care for PPFFs at DGHs and efforts should be made to appropriately equip and adequately staff DGHs, to provide service for local PPFF care

Percutaneous flexor tenotomy involves cutting the flexor digitorum tendons to correct claw toe deformity to treat apical pressure areas and prevent subsequent infection in patients with peripheral neuropathy. Performing this under ultrasound guidance provides reassurance of complete release of the tendon and increases procedural safety. This study is a retrospective case series evaluating the effectiveness, safety, and patient satisfaction of performing percutaneous ultrasound-guided flexor tenotomy in an outpatient setting. People with loss of protective sensation, a digital flexion deformity, and an apical toe ulcer or pre-ulcerative lesion who presented to our institution between December 2019 and June 2022 were included in this study. Participants were followed-up at a minimum of 3 months. Time to ulcer healing, re-ulceration rate, patient satisfaction, and complications were recorded. An Australian cost analysis was performed comparing this procedure performed in rooms versus theatres. There were 28 ulcers and 41 pre-ulcerative lesions. A total of 69 tenotomy procedures were performed on 38 patients across 52 episodes of care. The mean time to ulcer healing was 22.5 +/- 6.4 days. There were 2 cases of re-ulceration. 1 patient sustained a transfer lesion. There were four toes that went onto require amputation, all in the setting of pre-existing osteomyelitis. 94% of patients strongly agreed that they were satisfied with the outcome of the procedure. Costs saved were estimated to be $1426. Flexor tenotomy is a minimally invasive procedure that can be performed in the outpatient setting, and therefore without delay to treatment, reducing risk of ulcer progression and need for subsequent amputation. This is the first study to report on flexor tenotomy under ultrasound-guidance. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous flexor tenotomy is safe and effective, with high patient satisfaction and low recurrence rates. This performance in the outpatient setting ensures significant time and cost savings for both the practitioner and patient

We report the impact of implementing a new short-stay hip and knee arthroplasty pathway in a National Health Service (NHS) hospital. This was enacted due to existing concerns with a long length of stay (LOS) and reduced elective operating capacity each winter due to emergency bed pressures. The overnight introduction of this pathway was aimed to reduce LOS, alleviate bed pressures, minimise readmission rates and generate financial savings, all combining to facilitate full elective activity during the winter. We conducted a prospective study at a regional tertiary arthroplasty centre. The new pathway was introduced across the service overnight. It includes rigorous preoperative optimisation, specific anaesthetic protocols and uniform changes in surgical practice to allow a focus on early mobilization and discharge on the day of surgery where possible. Data collection spanned 17 months, including the initial six months post implementation of the short-stay pathway. LOS data was collected for the full period and data was compared pre- and post-implementation of the new pathway. Patient satisfaction and 30-day readmission data were also collected. There was an immediate and significant decrease in median LOS from 4 days pre-implementation to 1 day post-implementation. Patient satisfaction was high, and the 30-day readmission rate was unchanged (5.95%), with no readmissions directly related to decreased inpatient stay. Financial analyses revealed substantial cost savings due to reduced LOS and the elimination of routine post-operative blood tests, estimated at over £1.6m per year. Elective activity over winter was significantly higher (79%) than in the same time period in the previous year. An acute introduction of a carefully planned and coordinated short-stay hip and knee pathway is safe, cost-effective and popular with patients, but also contributes to increased efficiency in the delivery of elective healthcare in the context of increasing demand and financial constraints in the NHS

Abstract. Background. Daycase pathways which aim to discharge patients the same day following Unicompartmental Knee Replacement have been introduced in some centres, though most continue with Standard pathways. While Daycase pathways have cost savings, recovery data comparing pathways is limited. This study aims to compare patient-reported early recovery between Daycase and Standard pathways following UKR. Method. This study was carried out in two centres that originally used the same Standard recovery pathway for UKR. In one centre, the Standard pathway was modified into a Daycase pathway. 26 Daycase-Outpatient, 11 Daycase-Inpatient, and 18 Standard patients were recruited. Patients completed the Oxford Arthroplasty Early Recovery Score (OARS) and SF-36 (Acute) measure between Days 1–42. Results. Standard patients had significantly better Day-1 scores than Daycase patients, but this difference rapidly diminished, and from Day-3 onwards both groups had near-identical scores (OARS Day-1, 59 vs 37, p=0.002, stemming from differences in Pain, Nausea/Feeling-Unwell, Function/Mobility subscores p=0.003,0.014,0.011. OARS Day-3 48 vs 49, p=0.790). Daycase-Outpatients had a higher overall OARS (p=0.002), recovering 1–2 weeks faster than Daycase-Inpatients. OARS subscores demonstrated that Daycase-Outpatients had better Pain, Nausea/Feeling-Unwell, Fatigue/Sleep scores (p=0.020,0.0004,0.019 respectively). SF-36 scores corroborate OARS scores. Conclusion. The Standard cohort had better Day-1 scores than the Daycase cohort, likely due to later mobilisation and stronger inpatient analgesia; these differences diminished by Day-3. Daycase-Outpatients recovered substantially faster than Daycase-Inpatients – likely due to the factors that delayed their discharge. The convergence of scores at 6 weeks demonstrates that both pathways have similar early recovery outcomes

Aims. We introduced a self-care pathway for minimally displaced distal radius fractures, which involved the patient being discharged from a Virtual Fracture Clinic (VFC) without a physical review and being provided with written instructions on how to remove their own cast or splint at home, plus advice on exercises and return to function. Methods. All patients managed via this protocol between March and October 2020 were contacted by a medical secretary at a minimum of six months post-injury. The patients were asked to complete the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), a satisfaction questionnaire, advise if they had required surgery and/or contacted any health professional, and were also asked for any recommendations on how to improve the service. A review with a hand surgeon was organized if required, and a cost analysis was also conducted. Results. Overall 71/101 patients completed the telephone consultation; no patients required surgery, and the mean and median PRWE scores were 23.9/100 (SD 24.9) and 17.0/100 (interquartile range (IQR) 0 to 40), respectively. Mean patient satisfaction with treatment was 34.3/40 (SD 9.2), and 65 patients (92%) were satisfied or highly satisfied. In total there were 16 contact calls, 12 requests for a consultant review, no formal complaints, and 15 minor adjustment suggestions to improve patient experience. A relationship was found between intra-articular injuries and lower patient satisfaction scores (p = 0.025), however no relationship was found between PRWE scores and the nature of the fracture. Also, no relationship was found between the type of immobilization and the functional outcome or patient satisfaction. Cost analysis of the self-care pathway V traditional pathway showed a cost savings of over £13,500 per year with the new self-care model compared to the traditional model. Conclusion. Our study supports a VFC self-care pathway for patients with minimally displaced distal radius fractures. The pathway provides a good level of patient satisfaction and function. To improve the service, we will make minor amendments to our patient information sheet. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(9):726–732

Introduction: Ranked as the second most common cause of long-term disability amongst American adults, osteoarthritis (OA) affects well over 60 million Americans per year. OA is one of the major contributors to health care-related economic cost in the US, which is generally considered unacceptably high when compared other Western industrialized nations. Methods: Three hundred and thirty-five patients undergoing primary unilateral or bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA), metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MOMHR), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), or unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) were offered voluntary participation in an one-on-one preoperative education session with a pre-operative educator. Length of stay (LOS) and in-patient costs was collected for patients who received individual pre-operative education. This was then compared to patients who chose not to participate in the education sessions using linear regression models. Results: Patients who chose to participate enjoyed a significantly shorter LOS than those who did not receive education, controlling for age, sex, type of procedure, and number of co-morbid conditions (3.1 ± 1.1 vs. 4.5 ± 4.7; p< 0.01). THA patients participating in the preoperative education program exhibited a calculated cost savings of $861 per case over non-educated patients (p=0.06), while TKA patients participating in the program exhibited a statistically significant savings of $1,144 per case (p=0.02). This translated into a cost savings of $84,351 for 93 THA patients and $93,493 for 74 TKA patients at our institution, accounting for the cost of the patient educator. Of higher significant impact on cost savings was the number of co-morbid conditions for both THA (p=0.01) and TKA (p=0.01) patients. If applied in the national setting, national cost savings projections for a mean 0.84 day reduction in LOS for educated THA patients estimated a savings of nearly $800 million; a mean 0.56 day reduction for preoperatively educated TKA translated into a projected savings of $1.1 billion on the national scale. Conclusion: Preoperative education in the setting of hip and knee arthroplasty is an important cost-savings tool for hospitals, Medicare and third party payers in this era of rising health care costs

Anatomically specific fixation devices have become mainstream, yet there are anatomical regions and clinical conditions where no pre-contoured plates are available, such as for glenohumeral arthrodesis. In a case series of 4 glenohumeral arthrodesis patients, a consultant orthopaedic surgeon at GCUH implemented 3D printing technology to create reconstructions of each patient's shoulder girdle to pre-contour arthrodesis plates. Our aim was to quantify the cost-benefit & intra-operative time savings of this technique in glenohumeral arthrodesis. We hypothesized that the use of 3D printing for creating patient specific implants through pre-operative contouring of plates will lead to intra-operative time and cost savings by minimising time spent bending plates during surgery. This study analysed 4 patients who underwent shoulder arthrodesis by a single consultant orthopaedic surgeon at GCUH between 2017-2021. A CT-based life-size model of each patient's shoulder girdle was 3D printed using freely available computer software programs: 3D Slicer, Blender, Mesh Mixer & Cura. Once the patient's 3D model was created, plate benders were used to contour the plate pre-op, which was then sterilised prior to surgery. Arthrodesis was performed according to AO principles of fixation. The time spent pre-bending the plate using the 3D model was calculated to analyse the intra-op time and cost-saving benefits. For the 4 cases, the plate pre-bending times were 45, 40, 45 & 20 minutes (average 38.8 mins). The intra-op correction time to make small adjustments to the plate was 2 min/ case. 3 plates needed minor (3 degree) adjustment to fine-tune scapula spine contouring. 1 plate needed a 5 degree correction to fine-tune hand position. On average, the pre-bending of the plate saved approximately 38.8 mins intra-op/ case. These shorter anaesthetic and operating times equate to approximately $2586 saving/ case, given an estimate of $4000/hour of theatre costs. We conclude that pre-bending plates around 3D-printed life-size models of an individual's shoulder girdle prior to surgery results in approximately 38.8 mins time saving intra-op when used in shoulder arthrodesis. This is a viable and effective technique that will ultimately result in significant operative time and financial savings

Tranexamic Acid (TXA) is now commonly used in major surgical operations including orthopaedics. The TRAC-24 randomised control trial aimed to assess if an additional 24 hours of TXA post – operatively in primary total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) reduced blood loss. Contrary to other orthopaedic studies to date this trial included high risk patients. This paper presents the results of a cost analysis undertaken alongside this RTC. TRAC-24 was a prospective randomised controlled trial on patients undergoing TKA and THA. Three groups were included, Group 1 received 1 g intravenous (IV) TXA perioperatively and an additional 24-hour post-operative oral regime, group 2 received only the perioperative dose and group 3 did not receive TXA. Cost analysis was performed out to day 90. Group 1 was associated with the lowest mean total costs, followed by group 2 and then group 3. The difference between groups 1 and 3 −£797.77 (95% CI −1478.22, −117.32) were statistically significant. Extended oral dosing reduced costs for patients undergoing THA but not TKA. The reduced costs in groups 1 and 2 resulted from reduced length of stay, readmission rates, Accident and Emergency (A&E) attendances and blood transfusions. This study demonstrated significant cost savings when using TXA in primary THA or TKA. Extended oral dosing reduced costs further in THA but not TKA

Aims. The aim of this study was to compare ten-year longitudinal healthcare costs and revision rates for patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. The Humana database was used to compare 2,383 patients undergoing UKA between 2007 and 2009, who were matched 1:1 from a cohort of 63,036 patients undergoing primary TKA based on age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Medical and surgical complications were tracked longitudinally for one year following surgery. Rates of revision surgery and cumulative mean healthcare costs were recorded for this period of time and compared between the cohorts. Results. Patients undergoing TKA had significantly higher rates of manipulation under anaesthesia (3.9% vs 0.9%; p < 0.001), deep vein thrombosis (5.0% vs 3.1%; p < 0.001), pulmonary embolism (1.5% vs 0.8%; p = 0.001), and renal failure (4.2% vs 2.2%; p < 0.001). Revision rates, however, were significantly higher for UKA at five years (6.0% vs 4.2%; p = 0.007) and ten years postoperatively (6.5% vs 4.4%; p = 0.002). Longitudinal-related healthcare costs for patients undergoing TKA were greater than for those undergoing UKA at one year ($24,771 vs $22,071; p < 0.001) and five years following surgery ($26,549 vs $25,730; p < 0.001); however, the mean costs of TKA were comparable to UKA at ten years ($26,877 vs $26,891; p = 0.425). Conclusion. Despite higher revision rates, patients undergoing UKA had lower mean healthcare costs than those undergoing TKA up to ten years following the procedure, at which time costs were comparable. In the era of value-based care, surgeons and policymakers should be aware of the costs involved with these procedures. UKA was associated with fewer complications at one year postoperatively but higher revision rates at five and ten years. While UKA was significantly less costly than TKA at one and five years, costs at ten years were comparable with a mean difference of only $14. Lowering the risk of revision surgery should be targeted as a source of cost savings for both UKA and TKA as the mean related healthcare costs were 2.5-fold higher in patients requiring revision surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):23–31

The purpose of this prospective pilot study is to examine the feasibility of a physiotherapist led rapid access shoulder screening clinic (RASC). The goal of this study is to assess for improvements in patient access to care, patient reported outcome measures, patient reported experience measures, and cost outcomes using time driven activity based costing methods. Patient recruitment began in January 2021. Consultation requests from general practitioners and emergency rooms are analyzed and triaged through a central system. One half of patients awaiting consultation were triaged to the traditional route used at our center while the other half were triaged to be assessed at the RASC. Outcome measures consisting of the Simple Shoulder Test and SF-12 were recorded at the initial consultation and at follow up appointments. Cost benefit analysis was conducted using time driven activity based costing methods (TD-ABC). From January to August of 2021, 123 new patients were triaged for RASC assessment. On average, the RASC gets 10 new referrals per month. As of September 2021, there are 65 patients still on waitlist for RASC assessment with 58 having been assessed. Of the 58, 11% were discharged through the RASC, 48% pursued private physiotherapy, 14% had injections, 19% proceeded on for surgical consultation, and 8% did not show. Over time same time period, approximately 15 new patients were seen in consultation by the surgeon's office. Thirty-five responses were obtained from RASC patients during their initial intake assessment. The average age of respondents was 54.7 with 21 females and 14 males. Median SF-12 scores in the physical dimension (PCS-12) for RASC patients were 36.82 and mental (MCS-12) 49.38927. Median Simple Shoulder Test scores measured 6. Of the patients who responded to the follow up questionnaires after completing physiotherapy at the RASC, both the SF-12 and Simple Shoulder Test scoring improved. Median PCS-12 measured 47.08, MCS-12 of 55.87, and Simple Shoulder Test measured 8. RASC assessments by PT saved $172.91 per hour for consultation and $157.97 per hour for patient follow ups. Utilization of a physiotherapy led rapid access shoulder clinic resulted in improvements in patient outcomes as measured by the SF-12 and Simple Shoulder Test as well as significant direct cost savings. Proper triage protocols to identify which patients would be suitable for RASC assessment, buy-in from physiotherapists, and timely assessment of patients for early initiation of rehabilitation for shoulder pain is paramount to the success of a RASC system at our centre. Future research direction would be geared to analyzing a larger dataset as it becomes available

It has been established that a dedicated orthopaedic trauma room (DOTR) provides significant clinical and organizational benefits to the management of trauma patients. After-hours care is associated with surgeon fatigue, a high risk of patient complications, and increased costs related to staffing. However, hesitation due to concerns of the associated opportunity cost at the hospital leadership level is a major barrier to wide-spread adoption. The primary aim of this study is to determine the impact of dedicated orthopaedic trauma room (DOTR) implementation on operating room efficiency. Secondly, we sought to evaluate the associated financial impact of the DOTR, with respect to both after-hours care costs as well as the opportunity cost of displaced elective cases. This was a retrospective cost-analysis study performed at a single academic-affiliated community hospital in Toronto, Canada. All patients that underwent the most frequently performed orthopedic trauma procedures (hip hemiarthroplasty, open reduction internal fixation of the ankle, femur, elbow and distal radius), over a four-year period from 2016-2019 were included. Patient data acquired for two-years prior and two-years after the implementation of a DOTR were compared, adjusting for the number of cases performed. Surgical duration and number of day-time and after-hours cases was recorded pre- and post-implementation. Cost savings of performing trauma cases during daytime and the opportunity cost of displacing elective cases by performing cases during the day was calculated. A sensitivity analysis accounting for varying overtime costs and hospital elective case profit was also performed. 1960 orthopaedic cases were examined pre- and post-DOTR. All procedures had reduced total operative time post-DOTR. After accounting for the total number of each procedure performed, the mean weighted reduction was 31.4% and the mean time saved was 29.6 minutes per surgery. The number of daytime surgical hours increased 21%, while nighttime hours decreased by 37.8%. Overtime staffing costs were reduced by $24,976 alongside increase in opportunity costs of $22,500. This resulted in a net profit of $2,476. Our results support the premise that DOTRs improve operating room efficiency and can be cost efficient. Through the regular scheduling of a DOTR at a single hospital in Canada, the number of surgeries occurring during daytime hours increased while the number of after-hours cases decreased. The same surgeries were also completed nearly one-third faster (30 minutes per case) on average. Our study also specifically addresses the hesitation regarding potential loss of profit from elective surgeries. Notably, the savings partially stem from decreased OR time as well as decreased nurse overtime. Widespread implementation can improve patient care while still remaining financially favourable

Introduction:. Historically the incidence of Achilles re-ruptures has been described as around 5% after surgical repair and up to 21% after conservative management. In 2008 we commenced a dedicated Achilles tendon rupture clinic for both conservative and surgically managed patients using new standardised operating procedures (SOP). We have evaluated the impact of this new service, particularly with regard to re-rupture rate. Materials and methods:. The SOP was stage dependent and included an initial ultrasound examination, functional orthotics with early weight bearing, accelerated exercise and guidelines for the return to work and sport. Evaluation included re-rupture rate, complication rate, and outcome measured by the Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) and Achilles Tendon Repair Score (AS). A basic cost evaluation was performed to assess any potential savings. Results:. A total of 213 patients (151 treated conservatively and 62 surgically) were included. Re-rupture occurred in two patients (1 conservative and 1 surgically managed). There were 16 major complications e.g. DVT, wound infection. The mean ATRS was 54.79, 67.66 and 71.05 at 4, 6 and 9 months respectively and the mean AS was 64.67, 73.96 and 71.05 at 4, 6 and 9 months respectively. The reduction in re-rupture compared to the literature was 4.1% and 19.1% for surgical and conservatively treated patients respectively. Cost savings achieved were £50,000 each annum. This was due to both a decrease in the number of re-ruptures as well as a decrease in the number of patients being managed operatively. Conclusion:. A dedicated follow up Achilles clinic treating acute Achilles tendon ruptures using monitored SOP's, provides an exceptionally low re-rupture rate (0.9%), excellent patient outcome and potential cost savings compared to a traditional fracture clinic approach. The reduction in re-rupture rate, and therefore cost savings, is greater in conservatively managed patients

Abstract. Objectives. Knee alignment affects both the development and surgical treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Automating femorotibial angle (FTA) and hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) measurement from radiographs could improve reliability and save time. Further, if the gold-standard HKA from full-limb radiographs could be accurately predicted from knee-only radiographs then the need for more expensive equipment and radiation exposure could be reduced. The aim of this research is to assess if deep learning methods can predict FTA and HKA angle from posteroanterior (PA) knee radiographs. Methods. Convolutional neural networks with densely connected final layers were trained to analyse PA knee radiographs from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) database with corresponding angle measurements. The FTA dataset with 6149 radiographs and HKA dataset with 2351 radiographs were split into training, validation and test datasets in a 70:15:15 ratio. Separate models were learnt for the prediction of FTA and HKA, which were trained using mean squared error as a loss function. Heat maps were used to identify the anatomical features within each image that most contributed to the predicted angles. Results. FTA could be predicted with errors less than 3° for 99.8% of images, and less than 1° for 89.5%. HKA prediction was less accurate than FTA but still high: 95.7% within 3°, and 68.0 % within 1°. Heat maps for both models were generally concentrated on the knee anatomy and could prove a valuable tool for assessing prediction reliability in clinical application. Conclusions. Deep learning techniques could enable fast, reliable and accurate predictions of both FTA and HKA from plain knee radiographs. This could lead to cost savings for healthcare providers and reduced radiation exposure for patients

Introduction: The addition of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) showed significant reduction of secondary intervention, fracture healing time and infection rates compared with intramedullary nailing alone in open tibia fractures. However, the upfront price of approx. 3000 € is a barrier to its regular use. The goal of the study was to determine potential cost savings and cost-effectiveness of rhBMP-2 in grade III open tibia fractures from the perspective of the UK National Health Service (NHS) and the German Health Care System and to derive conclusions for other European health care systems. Materials and Methods: Clinical data from a previously published randomised controlled study with 450 patients (“BESTT study”) were used to generate total treatment costs for each patient for the control and the 1.5 mg/ml BMP-2 group based on the current German-DRG and the NHS for UK. The analysis was performed from a health care system and a societal perspective for a one year time horizon. Furthermore, assessment of the cost-effectiveness of BMP-2 was done by utility analysis. Results: The use of BMP-2 for grade III open tibia fractures is leading to cost savings of 3183 € per case and, therefore, to net savings for the German health care system. The main driver for cost savings is faster fracture healing with faster resumption of work and reduced expenses for sickness leave payments. For the UK rhBMP-2 is a cost-effective strategy with a cost-effectiveness ratio of approx. £11,000/QALY which is well below the standard £30,000 benchmark for the NHS. From a societal perspective, rhBMP-2 is a cost-saving treatment. Conclusions: BMP-2 leads to net savings in grade III open tibia fractures in Germany which can be expected for other European countries where sickness payments are provided by health care insurers. For countries like UK where sickness are provided by third parties BMP-2 is a cost-effective treatment strategy from a health care system perspective and a cost-saving treatment from a societal perspective

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common and extremely beneficial procedure that is being performed more often as the population ages. Current THA follow-up guidelines require large amounts of resources and may not justify their cost with increased patient outcomes. Most problems that would require THA revision will cause symptoms. Late-presenting asymptomatic THAs that are found to require revision are complicated and expensive to address and often lead to poor patient outcomes. Follow-up visits for THA patients are essentially a screening tool to identify asymptomatic THAs that require revision. The rate of asymptomatic THA revision and the subsequent cost of screening for them is not well reported in the literature. Given the relative shortage of orthopaedic resources, efficient use of clinic time should be a priority and inefficient practices should be identified and changed. We calculated the rate of asymptomatic hip revisions over the first twenty years of THA ownership. We further calculated the cost of a single visit to the orthopaedic clinic for follow up of a THA. Finally, we calculated the cost savings of decreasing the follow-up schedule to a total of three visits. The cost savings of foregoing the screening to identify one asymptomatic THA requiring revision is CAD $1.2 million. Asymptomatic THAs requiring revision are rare and, as such, require a large amount of follow up to diagnose. As a screening tool, regular orthopaedic follow up of THA is an inefficient use of resources. Current follow-up guidelines are cost-prohibitive and should be made much less frequent in order to save resources

Aims. The aim of the Scaphoid Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Trauma (SMaRT) trial was to evaluate the clinical and cost implications of using immediate MRI in the acute management of patients with a suspected fracture of the scaphoid with negative radiographs. Patients and Methods. Patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) with a suspected fracture of the scaphoid and negative radiographs were randomized to a control group, who did not undergo further imaging in the ED, or an intervention group, who had an MRI of the wrist as an additional test during the initial ED attendance. Most participants were male (52% control, 61% intervention), with a mean age of 36.2 years (18 to 73) in the control group and 38.2 years (20 to 71) in the intervention group. The primary outcome was total cost impact at three months post-recruitment. Secondary outcomes included total costs at six months, the assessment of clinical findings, diagnostic accuracy, and the participants’ self-reported level of satisfaction. Differences in cost were estimated using generalized linear models with gamma errors. Results. The mean cost up to three months post-recruitment per participant was £542.40 (. sd. £855.20, n = 65) for the control group and £368.40 (. sd. £338.60, n = 67) for the intervention group, leading to an estimated cost difference of £174 (95% confidence interval (CI) -£30 to £378; p = 0.094). The cost difference per participant increased to £266 (95% CI £3.30 to £528; p = 0.047) at six months. Overall, 6.2% of participants (4/65, control group) and 10.4% of participants (7/67, intervention group) had sustained a fracture of the scaphoid (p = 0.37). In addition, 7.7% of participants (5/65, control group) and 22.4% of participants (15/67, intervention group) had other fractures diagnosed (p = 0.019). The use of MRI was associated with higher diagnostic accuracy both in the diagnosis of a fracture of the scaphoid (100.0% vs 93.8%) and of any other fracture (98.5% vs 84.6%). Conclusion. The use of immediate MRI in the management of participants with a suspected fracture of the scaphoid and negative radiographs led to cost savings while improving the pathway’s diagnostic accuracy and patient satisfaction. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:984–994

Aims. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted and delayed medical and surgical examinations where attendance is required in person. Our article aims to outline the validity of online assessment, the range of benefits to both candidate and assessor, and the challenges to its implementation. In addition, we propose pragmatic suggestions for its introduction into medical assessment. Methods. We reviewed the literature concerning the present status of online medical and surgical assessment to establish the perceived benefits, limitations, and potential problems with this method of assessment. Results. Global experience with online, remote virtual examination has been largely successful with many benefits conferred to the trainee, and both an economic and logistical advantage conferred to the assessor or organization. Advances in online examination software and remote proctoring are overcoming practical caveats including candidate authentication, cheating prevention, cybersecurity, and IT failure. Conclusion. Virtual assessment provides benefits to both trainee and assessor in medical and surgical examinations and may also result in cost savings. Virtual assessment is likely to be increasingly used in the post-COVID world and we present recommendations for the continued adoption of virtual examination. It is, however, currently unable to completely replace clinical assessment of trainees. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(2):111–118

Introduction. Hip and knee device sales representatives (reps) can provide intra-operative guidance through their knowledge of the products, especially in complicated cases such as revision hip and knee arthroplasty. However, for an experienced arthroplasty surgeon in the majority of straightforward primary cases, the rep's presence may not be required for clinical decision-makings. With recent challenges in cost savings and bundle payments, hospitals and surgeons have focused on reducing the implant costs, among others, with a “repless” model. The aim of this study was to describe the process of utilizing this model, assess its efficacy, and analyze the cost savings in primary hip arthroplasty. Methods. During the month of January 2016, 20 cases of primary, straightforward total hip arthroplasties were performed with the repless model by 2 experienced arthroplasty trained surgeons. All patients were followed prospectively for minimum 3 months. Prior to initiating the repless model, we focused on process management of the operating room with staff training and re-engineering of the trays to obtain a setup that included one hospital tray and one device company tray for each operation. The responsibilities of the rep were divided into 2 categories for better management:. Familiarity of the instruments, implant, and techniques; trays set up and assurance of availability of the implants. These responsibilities were covered by a trained OR technician and the surgeon. Final verification of the accurate implants prior to opening the packaging. This was done by a trained OR nurse and the surgeon. Results. We did not have any intra-operative complications. We also did not encounted any issued with the trays or errors in opening of the implants. There were no re-admissions, fracture, dislocation, or infection. The mean length of stay was 2.2 ± 0.5 days (range 1–3 days) with 68% home discharges. The cost of the implant was reduced from $4,800 to $1,895 with $2,905 cost saving per case and total savings of $58,100. The projected savings only for uncomplicated primary total hip arthroplasty (minimum 120 cases/year between 2 surgeons) is $384,600. Further cost saving from the process management changes were seen in central sterile processing time. Prior to the one tray system, the hospital had 3 in-house trays and there were 4 device company trays. We also noticed an approximate 27% improvement in turnover time. Conclusion. Repless model has significant cost saving potential. Preparation for the transition, proper patient selection, standardization of the trays and implants, and distribution of the responsibilities between OR nurses, technicians and the surgeon are essential

Purpose. Traditionally, an inpatient hospital stay has been required for joint replacement surgery. The three primary drivers of cost for joint replacement have been implant cost, other hospital charges and postoperative rehabilitation costs. The three primary reasons that have made hospitalization necessary are pain control, blood loss / transfusion, and monitoring patients with comorbidities. Advances in surgical technique, implants, comprehensive blood management, and multimodal pain management have allowed a marked reduction in the hospital stay required and have eliminated the need for extensive formal rehabilitation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if hip resurfacing can be performed safely and cost-effectively as an outpatient procedure. Methods. We present the short-term outcome of our first 125 hip resurfacings done as an outpatient procedure performed by two experienced surgeons. Young patients without major medical co-morbidities were selected. The average age was 53±7 years old (range: 38 to 66), there were 98 men and 27 women. The mean ASA score was 1.7±0.5 (range 1 to 3). The diagnosis was OA in 92, dysplasia in 22, and osteonecrosis in 9, and trauma in 2. There were no major complications noted in the first 6 weeks postoperative. There was one ER visit, and there were no hospitalizations required. Results. The average and highest pain score for each day was shown in Figure 1 for the first 5 days postoperative. Three patients required a morphine injection after discharge from the surgery center. No patients required a transfusion. The satisfaction survey showed: The cost comparison is obtained from the Blue Cross website which indicates that the “120 day episode of care” for total hip arthroplasty is $35,000, $ 45,000, and $65,000 at the three local hospitals, while cost at our surgery center was $26,000. This represents a cost savings for the insurance company of nearly $9,000 (26%) compared to the lowest cost and $39,000 (60%) compared to the highest cost hospital in our region. Conclusion. We conclude that in properly selected patients, outpatient hip resurfacing can be accomplished safely, with a high degree of patient satisfaction and a tremendous cost savings to the insurer. We suspect that indications can be gradually expanded to allow more patients to take advantage of this option. If insurers could find creative ways to incentivize patients to take advantage of the highest quality lowest cost options, tremendous health care savings are possible in a free-market health care model free of excessive government regulations and price controls

Purpose and background. To explore the cost-utility of implementing stratified care for low back pain (LBP) in general practice, compared with usual care, within patient risk subgroups (low, medium and high risk of persistent disabling pain determined by the STarT Back tool). Methods. Adopting a cost-utility framework alongside a prospective, sequential comparison of separate patient cohorts (922 patients in total) with six-month follow-up, the base case analysis estimated the incremental LBP-related healthcare cost per additional quality-adjusted life year (QALY) by risk subgroup. Uncertainty was explored with cost-utility planes and acceptability curves. Sensitivity analyses examined alternative approaches (a complete case analysis, the incorporation of non-LBP-related healthcare use and estimation of societal costs relating to work absence). Results. Stratified care was a dominant treatment strategy compared with usual care for patients at high risk, with mean healthcare cost savings of £124 and an incremental QALY estimate of 0.023. The likelihood that stratified care provides a cost-effective use of resources for patients at low and medium risk is no greater than 60% irrespective of a decision makers' willingness-to-pay for additional QALYs. Patients at medium and high risk of persistent disability in paid employment at six-month follow-up reported, on average, six fewer days of LBP-related work absence in the stratified care cohort compared with usual care (associated societal cost savings per employed patient of £736 and £652, respectively). Conclusions. At the observed level of adherence to screening tool recommendations for matched treatments, stratified care for LBP is cost-effective for patients at high risk of persistent disabling LBP. This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented previously at a national meeting. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: The Health Foundation

INTRODUCTION. Preoperative optimization and protocols for joint replacement care pathways have led to decreased length of stay (LOS), decreased narcotic use and are increasingly important in delivering quality, cost savings and shifting appropriate cases to an outpatient setting. The intraoperative use of vasopressors is independently associated with increased length of stay, risk of adverse postoperative events including death and in total hip arthroplasty there is an increased risk for ICU admission. Our aim is to characterize the patient characteristics associated with vasopressor use specifically in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS. We retrospectively reviewed 748 patients undergoing inpatient primary total knee arthroplasty at a single academic institution by two surgeons from 1/1/17 to 12/21/18. Demographics, comorbidities, perioperative factors and intraoperative medication administration were compared with multivariate regression to identify patients who may require intraoperative vasopressors. RESULTS. Seven hundred-forty eight patients underwent total knee arthroplasty and 439 patients required intraoperative vasopressors while 307 did not require vasopressors. Significant predictors of vasopressor use were male sex (p=0.035), history of prior cerebrovascular event (p=0.041) and older age (p=0.048). NPO time, anesthesia provider level of training, operative time, and intraoperative mean arterial pressure and heart rate were not significant predictors of vasopressor use intra-operatively during total knee arthroplasty. CONCLUSION. In this study, nearly fifty-nine percent of patients undergoing TKA received intraoperative vasopressor support. Male gender, history of stroke and older age were significantly associated with increased intraoperative vasopressor use. Surgical time and case order do not appear to be optimizable factors to minimize the use of vasopressors in TKA. Our results highlight variation in anesthesia practices and an opportunity to standardize vasopressor triggers and identify patients who may require vasopressor support during preoperative optimization and selection of their surgical setting

Abstract. Objective. In this systematic review we aim to analyse the economical impact of using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. Four medical electronic databases were searched. Eligible studies included those investigating the costs of NPWT in primary TKA. Exclusion criteria included studies investigating cost of NPWT not related to primary TKA. We also excluded studies with poor scientific methodology. We retrieved and analysed data on dressing costs and hospital length of stay (LOS). Results. Three studies (359 patients) reported on dressing and associated health care costs, and two further studies (330 patients) reported on hospital LOS in primary TKA. The cost of NPWT ranged between £125 and £196; with an average cost of £155, compared to £23 for the regular surgical dressing. The hospital LOS in NWPT patients ranged from 1.9 – 3.8 days, while LOS in patients managed with regular surgical dressing ranged between 2.3 – 4.7 days. The hospital LOS accounted for delayed discharge due to wound complications. Any extended LOS secondary to medical comorbidities or for other reasons were not included here. Conclusion. Our pooled analysis found a decrease in hospital LOS from wound related problems when using NWPT instead of regular dressings after accounting for other variables responsible for LOS. If the mean cost of overnight inpatient hospital stay for elective TKA is estimated as £275, the range of overnight admission cost for one TKA patient would be £522 - £1045 when NPWT dressing is used, and £632.5 - £1292 when using regular dressings. The cost savings from reduced LOS amounts to £110 - £247 per patient when NPWT is used. We hypothesize that in primary TKA patients with high risk of wound related problems that may delay discharge from hospital, there may be an overall cost saving when using NWPT dressings. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Objectives. “Virtual fracture clinics” have been reported as a safe and effective alternative to the traditional fracture clinic. Robust protocols are used to identify cases that do not require further review, with the remainder triaged to the most appropriate subspecialist at the optimum time for review. The objective of this study was to perform a “top-down” analysis of the cost effectiveness of this virtual fracture clinic pathway. Methods. National Health Service financial returns relating to our institution were examined for the time period 2009 to 2014 which spanned the service redesign. Results. The total staffing costs rose by 4% over the time period (from £1 744 933 to £1 811 301) compared with a national increase of 16%. The total outpatient department rate of attendance fell by 15% compared with a national fall of 5%. Had our local costs increased in line with the national average, an excess expenditure of £212 705 would have been required for staffing costs. Conclusions. The virtual fracture clinic system was associated with less overall use of staff resources in comparison to national cost data. Adoption of this system nationally may have the potential to achieve significant cost savings. Cite this article: P. J. Jenkins. Fracture clinic redesign reduces the cost of outpatient orthopaedic trauma care. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:33–36. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.52.2000506

Introduction. Traditionally an inpatient hospital stay has been required for all joint replacement surgery. The three primary drivers of cost for joint replacement have been implant cost, other hospital charges and postoperative rehabilitation costs. The three primary reasons that have made hospitalization necessary are pain control, therapy and possible transfusion. Advances in surgical technique, implants, comprehensive blood management, and multimodal pain management have allowed a marked reduction in the hospital stay required, eliminated the need for extensive formal rehabilitation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if hip resurfacing can be performed safely and cost-effectively as an outpatient procedure. Methods. We present the short-term outcome of our first 77 hip resurfacings done as an outpatient procedure performed by two experienced surgeons. Young patients without major medical co-morbidities were selected. The average age was 53±6 years old (range: 38 to 66), there were 57 men and 20 women. The mean ASA score was 1.6±0.5 (range 1 to 2). The diagnosis was OA in 56, dysplasia in 17, avascular necrosis in 2, and others in 2. Results. All patients were successfully discharged on the day of surgery from our physician-owned outpatient surgery center. There were no major complications noted in the first 6 weeks postoperative. There was one ER visit, and there were no hospitalizations required. The average and highest pain score for each day was shown in Figure 1 for the first 5 days postoperative. Three patients required a morphine injection after discharge from the surgery center. No patients required a transfusion. The cost comparison is obtained from the Blue Cross website which indicates that the “120 day episode of care” cost for hip replacement was $35,000 at Providence, $ 45,000 at Palmetto, $65,000 at Lexington hospital, while cost at our surgery center was $26,000. This represents a cost savings for the insurance company of nearly $9,000 (26%) compared to the lowest cost and $39,000 (60%) compared to the highest cost hospital in our region. Conclusion. We conclude that in properly selected patients, outpatient hip resurfacing can be accomplished safely, with a high degree of patient satisfaction and a tremendous cost savings to the insurer. We suspect that indications can be gradually expanded to allow more patients to take advantage of this option. If insurers could find creative ways to incentivize patients to take advantage of the highest quality, lowest cost options, tremendous health care savings are possible in a free-market health care model free of excessive government regulations and price controls

Aims. Recent improvements in surgical technique and perioperative blood management after total joint replacement (TJR) have decreased rates of transfusion. However, as many surgeons transition to outpatient TJR, obtaining routine postoperative blood tests becomes more challenging. Therefore, we sought to determine if a preoperative outpatient assessment tool that stratifies patients based on numerous medical comorbidities could predict who required postoperative haemoglobin (Hb) measurement. Methods. We performed a prospective study of consecutive unilateral primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) and total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed at a single institution. Prospectively collected data included preoperative and postoperative Hb levels, need for blood transfusion, length of hospital stay, and Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment (OARA) score. Results. A total of 504 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age at time of arthroplasty was 65.3 years (SD 10.2). Of the patients, 216 (42.9%) were THAs and 288 (57.1%) were TKAs. Six patients required a blood transfusion postoperatively (1.19%). Transfusion after surgery was associated with lower postoperative day 1 Hb (median of 8.5 (interquartile range (IQR) 7.9 to 8.6) vs 11.3 (IQR 10.4 to 12.2); p < 0.001), longer length of stay (1 day (IQR 1 to 1) vs 2 days (IQR 2 to 3); p < 0.001), higher OARA score (median of 60.0 (IQR 40 to 75) vs 5.0 (IQR 0-35); p = 0.001), and total hip arthroplasty (p < 0.001). All patients who received a transfusion had an OARA score > 34; however, this did not reach statistical significance as a screening threshold. Conclusion. Risk of blood transfusion after primary TJR was uncommon in our series, with an incidence of 1.19%. Transfusion was associated with OARA scores > 60. The OARA score, not American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, reliably identified patients at risk for postoperative blood transfusion. Selective Hb monitoring may result in substantial cost savings in the era of cost containment. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(1):65–70

Background. The Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model was implemented in April-2016 to standardize cost and improve quality of care for two of the most commonly billed inpatient procedures for Medicare patients, total knee and total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to compare one institution's predicted savings and losses under the CJR model with actual savings and losses after two years of implementation and discuss new methods to maintain savings. Methods. Using our institution's data, we calculated the mean cost per episode of care. We calculated the percent reduction in target price and percent savings or losses per case for the CJR and Bundle Payment Care Initiative (BPCI) for each Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Group (MS-DRG) using mean cost per episode and CJR and BPCI target prices. We compared the target prices, annual savings, and losses per episode of care for both CJR and BPCI. All CJR savings, projected and actual, were computed by comparing CJR savings to that of 2018 BPCI savings. Results. We found an average savings of 2.32% under CJR compared to the projected loss of −11.6% for MS-DRG 469 with fracture. There was a 7.97% savings for MS-DRG 470 without fracture compared to the projected 1.9%, a 20.94% savings for MS-DRG 470 with fracture compared to the projected 23.7%, and a loss of −3.98% for MS-DRG 469 without fracture compared to the projected 2.5% savings. Conclusions. The CJR target prices are lower than that of BPCI and this makes maintaining an episode of care at or below the target price increasingly difficult. Discharge disposition and readmission are well established factors that increase hospital cost [7]. However, reduction of these does not seem enough to maintain savings under the CJR model. New cost savings mechanisms such as identification of patients eligible for SDD, and reduction of unnecessary home services resulted in smaller losses of positive margins, though these were still significantly less for CJR than BPCI

Introduction. Robotic-arm assisted knee arthroplasty (rKA) has been associated with improved clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes. There is a paucity of literature, however, addressing its cost effectiveness. In the context of an integrated health system with an insurance plan and single source comprehensive data warehouse for electronic health records and claims data, we present an evaluation of healthcare costs and utilization associated with manual knee arthroplasty (mKA) versus rKA. We also examine the influence of rKA technology on surgeons’ practice patterns. Methods. Practice patterns of KA were assessed 18 months before and after introduction of robotic technology in April 2018. For patients also insured through the system's health plan, inpatient costs (actual costs recorded by health system), 90-day postoperative costs (allowed amounts paid by insurance plan), and 90-day postoperative utilization (length of stay, home health care visits, rehabilitation visits) were compared between mKA and rKA patients, stratified by total (TKA) or unicompartmental (UKA) surgery. Linear regression modeling was used to compare outcomes between the two pairs of groups (mKA vs. rKA, for both UKA and TKA). Log-link function and gamma error distribution was used for costs. All analyses were done using SAS statistical software, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results. Overall KA volume increased 21%, from 532 cases in the pre-rKA period to 644 post-rKA introduction, with UKA surgeries increasing from 38 to 97 (155%). Of these KAs, 218 patients were insured through our system's health plan (38 rUKAs, 9 mUKAs, 91 rTKAs, and 80 mTKAs), allowing precise insurance claims analysis for postoperative utilization and cost. Patients with rKA had significantly lower mean home health costs (-90% difference for UKA, −79% difference for TKA, p<0.02) and home rehab costs (-64% difference for UKA, −73% difference for TKA, p≤0.007) than mKA patients. No significant differences were observed in outpatient rehab (visits or costs), total rehab costs, or length of stay. Mean total postoperative costs were significantly lower for rUKA than mUKA (-47% difference, p=0.02) but similar for TKA (p>0.05). There were no significant differences in total inpatient costs between MAKO and non-MAKO patients. Conclusion. Robotic-arm assisted KA can allow for increased UKA volume and potential for substantial cost savings over the total episode of care by reducing postoperative utilization and costs

The discussion of outpatient unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) requires proof that it can be done safely and effectively, and also begs the question of whether it can be performed in an ambulatory surgery center (ASC) rather than a general hospital (which raises costs and is typically less efficient). Successful outpatient UKA requires carefully crafted algorithms/protocols, home support, preoperative planning and preparation, expectation management, risk stratification (not everyone is a candidate), perioperative pain management and buy-in from patients, support networks and the health care team. Relatively little data is available on the feasibility, safety and potential cost savings associated with this shift in care. We evaluated the costs and short term outcomes and complications of 150 consecutive UKAs performed in an ASC compared to those done in a general hospital both on an inpatient and outpatient basis. Determination of the setting of the outpatient surgery was made based on geographic preference by the patients; otherwise choice of inpatient or outpatient surgery in the hospital was left to the discretion of the surgeon and was primarily based on the patients' comorbidity profile and circumstances of home help. Total direct facility costs were calculated, including institutional supplies and services, anesthesia services, implants, additional PACU medications and services required, and costs associated with operating room use. Only total cost was evaluated, as it is the most consistent cost variable amongst the two institutions evaluated. The mean total direct cost of UKA in a general community hospital with an overnight stay was 1.24 and 1.65 times greater than the cost of UKA performed at the same hospital or an ASC on an outpatient basis, respectively. The mean total direct cost of outpatient UKA in a general hospital was 1.33 times greater than the mean total cost of UKA performed in an ASC. Semi-autonomous robotic technology has been introduced to optimise accuracy of implant positioning and soft tissue balance in UKA, with the expectation of resultant improvement in durability and implant survivorship. Currently, nearly 20% of UKA's in the U.S. are being performed with robotic assistance. It is anticipated that there will be substantial growth in market penetration over the next decade, projecting that nearly 37% of UKA's and 23% of TKA's will be performed with robotics in 10 years (Medical Device and Diagnostic Industry, March 5, 2015). First generation robotic technology improved substantially implant position compared to conventional methods; however, high capital costs, uncertainty regarding the value of advanced technologies, and the need for preoperative CT scans were barriers to broader adoption. Newer image-free robotic technology offers an alternative method for further optimizing implant positioning and soft tissue balance without the need for preoperative CT scans and with price points that make it suitable for use in an ASC. Currently, as a result of cost and other practical issues, <1% of first generation robotic technologies are being used in ASC's. Alternatively, more than 35% of second generation robotic systems are in use in ASC's for UKA, due to favorable pricing. In conclusion, UKA can be safely performed in the outpatient setting in select patients. Additionally, we demonstrated a substantial cost savings when UKA is performed in an outpatient setting and care is shifted from a general community hospital to an ASC. Finally, robotics can be utilised to optimise accuracy of implant placement and soft tissue balance in UKA, and newer image-free robotic technology is cost effective for outpatient UKA

Introduction. Proposed advantages of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) include enhanced accuracy for component positioning, reduced operative time, and increased OR efficiency leading to potential cost savings. However, various studies with relatively small sample sizes have evaluated the impact of these custom cutting guides and were unable to detect any significant differences compared to conventional surgical technique. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to improve the sensitivity of investigation through meta-analysis and compare patient-specific versus standard TKA instrumentation with regard to: (1) coronal alignment, (2) sagittal alignment, (3) operative time, (4) blood loss, (5) transfusion requirement, and (6) peri-operative costs. Methods. A systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature indexed on Medline and/or Embase was performed in search of Level I, II, or III studies comparing the results of patient-specific versus standard TKA instrumentation. Nine studies remained following the screening process. The data published in these studies were extracted and aggregated for the purpose of comparing the two treatment groups with regard to coronal alignment, sagittal alignment, operative time, blood loss, transfusion requirement, and peri-operative costs. Using previously published data, it was determined that a sample size of 80 patients per group would have sufficient power (0.80) to detect a significant difference (α = 0.05) in all primary outcomes. Results. The nine component studies described a total of 957 total knee arthroplasties (529 performed with patient-specific instrumentation and 428 with standard instrumentation). While patient-specific instrumentation demonstrated improved accuracy in coronal alignment as measured by femorotibial angle (FTA) (p = 0.0003), standard instrumentation demonstrated improved accuracy in coronal alignment as measured by hip-knee-ankle (HKA) (p = 0.02). Importantly, there were no significant differences in the ability of either technique to avoid outliers (+ or – 3 degrees of target alignment) in either FTA or HKA. Measures of sagittal alignment accuracy were equivalent between the two groups for both the femoral component (p = 0.5) and the tibial component (p = 0.9). Operative time (92.5 minutes vs. 104.1 minutes, p = 0.1), blood loss (371 mL vs. 384 mL, p = 0.2), and transfusion requirement (10.1% vs. 14.1%, p = 0.1) were also similar between treatment groups. The three studies that compared costs (307 TKAs) found decreased peri-operative costs associated with patient-specific instrumentation as a result of increased OR efficiency, but these costs were offset by the expenditures related to producing the custom instrumentation. Discussion and Conclusion. Patient-specific instrumentation does not demonstrate superiority over standard instrumentation with regard to coronal or sagittal alignment. In addition, operative time, blood loss, and transfusion requirement are similar between techniques. Finally, while patient-specific instrumentation can lead to cost savings through improved OR efficiencies, these costs are often offset by the cost of generating the custom instrumentation. Therefore, current data does not support routine use of patient-specific instrumentation during primary TKA

The Swansea Morriston Achilles Rupture Treatment (SMART) programme was introduced in 2008. This paper summarises the outcome of this programme. Patients with a rupture of the Achilles tendon treated in our unit follow a comprehensive management protocol that includes a dedicated Achilles clinic, ultrasound examination, the use of functional orthoses, early weight-bearing, an accelerated exercise regime and guidelines for return to work and sport. The choice of conservative or surgical treatment was based on ultrasound findings. . The rate of re-rupture, the outcome using the Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) and the Achilles Tendon Repair Score, (AS), and the complications were recorded. An elementary cost analysis was also performed. . Between 2008 and 2014 a total of 273 patients presented with an acute rupture 211 of whom were managed conservatively and 62 had surgical repair. There were three re-ruptures (1.1%). There were 215 men and 58 women with a mean age of 46.5 years (20 to 86). Functional outcome was satisfactory. Mean ATRS and AS at four months was 53.0 (. sd . 14), 64.9 (. sd. 15) (n = 135), six months 67.8 (. sd. 16), 73.8 (. sd. 15) (n = 103) and nine months (72.4; . sd. 14) 72.3 (. sd. 13) (n = 43). The programme realised estimated cost savings exceeding £91 000 per annum. The SMART programme resulted in a low rate of re-rupture, a satisfactory outcome, a reduced rate of surgical intervention and a reduction in healthcare costs. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B:510–15

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious complication after total hip and knee arthroplasty. There is still no consensus regarding the best mode of thromboprophylaxis after lower limb arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to ascertain the efficacy, safety profile and rate of adverse thromboembolic events of aspirin as extended out of hospital pharmacological anticoagulation for elective primary total hip and knee arthroplasty patients and whether these rates were comparable with published data for low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Data was extracted from a prospective hospital acquired thromboembolism (HAT) database. The period of study was from 1st Jan 2013-31st Dec 2016 and a total of 6078 patients were treated with aspirin as extended thromboprophylaxis after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. The primary outcome measure of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism within 90 days postoperatively was 1.11%. The secondary outcome rates of wound infection, bleeding complications, readmission rate and mortality were comparable to published results after LMWH use. The results of this study clearly show that Aspirin, as part of a multimodal thromboprophylactic regime, is an effective and safe regime in preventing VTE with respect to risk of DVT or PE when compared to LMWH. It is a cheaper alternative to LMWH and has associated potential cost savings

Aims. The purpose of this study is to determine if higher volume hospitals have lower costs in revision hip and knee arthroplasty. Materials and Methods. We questioned the Centres for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Inpatient Charge Data and identified 789 hospitals performing a total of 29 580 revision arthroplasties in 2014. Centres were dichotomised into high-volume (performing over 50 revision cases per year) and low-volume. Mean total hospital-specific charges and inpatient payments were obtained from the database and stratified based on Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) codes. Patient satisfaction scores were obtained from the multiyear CMS Hospital Compare database. Results. High-volume hospitals comprised 178 (30%) of the total but performed 15 068 (51%) of all revision cases, including 509 of 522 (98%) of the most complex DRG 466 cases. While high-volume hospitals had higher Medicare inpatient payments for DRG 467 ($21 458 versus $20 632, p = 0.038) and DRG 468 ($17 003 versus $16 120, p = 0.011), there was no difference in hospital specific charges between the groups. Higher-volume facilities had a better CMS hospital star rating (3.63 versus 3.35, p < 0.001). When controlling for hospital geographic and demographic factors, high-volume revision hospitals are less likely to be in the upper quartile of inpatient Medicare costs for DRG 467 (odds ratio (OR) 0.593, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.374 to 0.941, p = 0.026) and DRG 468 (OR 0.451, 95% CI 0.297 to 0.687, p <  0.001). Conclusion. While a high-volume hospital is less likely to be a high cost outlier, the higher mean Medicare reimbursements at these facilities may be due to increased case complexity. Further study should focus on measures for cost savings in revision total joint arthroplasties. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1611–17

Introduction: Common pathologies seen in hand clinics include Dupuytren’s contracture, ganglia and trigger digits. Some patients can be treated in the out patient department by percutaneous fasciotomy, aspiration, or percutaneous A1 pulley release. The effectiveness and safety of these procedures has been documented in the literature. There are no studies investigating the cost effectiveness these of treatments. Aim: Our aim was to compare the cost of treatment of Dupuytren’s contracture, ganglia and trigger digits in the out-patient department with the operating theatre. Methods: All patients seen in a new patient hand clinic with a diagnosis of Dupuytren’s contracture, trigger digit or ganglion of the wrist or hand were prospectively identified over a 6 month period.. The number undergoing a procedure in the out-patient clinic or theatre was recorded. Costings of theatre time and out-patient time were obtained from the hospital management. Results: 80, 26, and 52 patients were treated with regard to Dupuytrens contracture, ganglia, and trigger digits respectively over the 6-month period. Of these, 37, 23, and 44 were treated by an out patient procedure, and 43, 3 and 8 underwent a formal operation. Based on a cost of £216 per out-patient clinic session, the cost of the out-patient procedures was calculated at £1872 over 6 months, or £3744 per annum. Based on a theatre cost of £1785 per session, to perform all the clinic procedures as formal operations would have cost £60,690 over 6 months, or £121380 per annum. The cost savings were therefore £117636 per annum. Discussion: We conclude that outpatient interventions for dupuytrens disease, ganglions and trigger digits results in significant cost savings over formal surgical treatment

A longer stay in the hospital after primary total hip replacement is consistent with an increased morbidity and slower recovery for patients. In addition, it is among the more costly aspects of a total joint replacement. A process, which reduces the length of stay following this procedure and synchronically maintains the high standards of safe care would certainly improve the clinical practice and provide financial benefits. Our objective was to evaluate the efficiency of a holistic perioperative, accelerated recovery programme following this procedure and in particular to assess its impact in the shot term patient’s recovery, morbidity, complications, readmission rate and cost savings for the NHS. Eighty-nine patients participated in our rapid recovery programme, which is a comprehensive approach to patient care, combining individual pre-operative patient education, pain management, infection control, continuous nursing and medical staff motivation as well as intensive physiotherapy in the ward and the community. Forty-eight male and 41 female patients with an average age of 69 (range-50 to 87) underwent a total hip replacement in an NHS District General Hospital. The average BMI was 28 (range-18 to 39) and the average ASA 2.3 (range-1 to 4). The procedure was performed by 3 different surgeons using the same operative standards. A standardised post-operative protocol was followed and the patients were discharged when they were medically fit and had achieved the ward physiotherapy requirements. They were then daily followed up by a community orthopaedic rehabilitation team in patient’s own environment as long as it was required. The average length of stay was reduced from 7.8 days to 5. There was no increase in complications–or readmissions rate while there were significant cost savings. The waiting list for this surgery was reduced and the patient’s satisfaction was high. The rapid recovery programme for primary total hip replacement surgeries has been proved to be an efficient method of reducing the length of stay in hospital and consequently the financial costs while it ensures the safe and effective peri-operative management of patients

Patient specific instrumentation (PSI) uses advanced imaging of the knee (CT or MRI) to generate individualised cutting blocks aimed to make the procedure of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) more accurate and efficient. However, in this era of healthcare cost consciousness, the value of new technologies needs to be critically evaluated. There have been several comparative studies looking at PSI versus standard instrumentation. Most compare PSI with conventional instrumentation in terms of alignment in the coronal plane, operative time and surgical efficiency, cost effectiveness and short-term outcomes. Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have also been published. PSI has not been shown to be superior compared with conventional instrumentation in its ability to restore traditional mechanical alignment in primary TKA. Most studies show comparative efficacy and no decrease in the number of outliers in either group. In terms of operative time and efficiency, PSI tended towards decreasing operative time, saving a mean of five minutes per patient (0 to 20). Furthermore, while some cost savings could be realised with less operative time and reduced instrumentation per patient, these savings were overcome by the cost of the CT/MRI and the cutting blocks. Finally, there was no evidence that PSI positively affected clinical outcomes at two days, two months, or two years. Consequently, current evidence does not support routine use of PSI in routine primary TKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B(1 Suppl A):78–80

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is the most common pediatric hip disorder. The most devastating complication is development of avascular necrosis of the femoral head. In order to reduce the potential for this complication occurring following delayed contralateral SCFE, there has been consideration in the literature of prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip. The objective of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of this treatment strategy. The outcome probabilities and utilities utilised in a decision analysis of prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip in SCFE, reported by Kocher et al, were used in this study. Costing data, reported in 2005 Canadian dollars, was obtained from our institution. Using this data, an economic evaluation was performed. The time horizon was four years, so as to follow the adolescents to skeletal maturity. Discounting was performed at 3% per year. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine the effect of variation of the outcome probabilities and utilities. In all analyses, prophylactic pinning resulted in cost savings but lower utility, compared to the currently accepted strategy of observation of the contralateral hip. The results were most sensitive to an increase in the probability of a delayed contralateral SCFE to 27%. Using the base case analysis, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $7856.12 per utility gained. Using the most sensitive probability of a delayed contralateral SCFE of 27%, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $27,252.92 per utility gained. The results of this study demonstrated overall cost savings with prophylactic treatment, however the utility was lower than the standard treatment of observation. For both the base case and sensitivity analysis, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was less than the accepted threshold of $50,000 per quality adjusted life year gained. It should be noted that the use of a four year time horizon excluded consideration of the costs related to total hip arthroplasty for the sequelae of AVN. A prospective, randomised controlled trial, with an accompanying economic evaluation, is required to definitively answer the question of the cost-effectiveness of this treatment. On the basis of this cost-effectiveness analysis, prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip in SCFE cannot be recommended. A prospective, randomised controlled trial, with an accompanying economic evaluation, is required to definitively answer the question of the cost-effectiveness of this treatment

Surgical site infections constitute the cause of 13% to 18% of readmissions within 90 days of a total hip arthroplasty and are a leading cause of failure of revision total knee arthroplasty. The goals of wound closure are to enhance healing potential, prevent infection, and provide a cosmetic appearance. Traditionally, this has been achieved with the use of interrupted sutures. However, recently “barbed” sutures have been introduced which consist of a solid core with peripheral etched barbs in a helical array. These sutures have been used for both the deep and superficial layers of wound closure in a running fashion with the barbs intended to be self-retaining in the event that the suture is cut or pulls out of the tissue. Proposed advantages include the avoidance of knots, less needles required, improved efficiency, and creation of a “watertight” seal. Numerous studies have shown decreased times for wound closure with the use of barbed vs. interrupted sutures with no difference in infection or complication rates. With less needles and improved efficiency, there is the potential for cost savings with the use of barbed sutures. However, there have been two studies raising concerns of arthrotomy failure with their use in total knee arthroplasty. In addition, several reports have noted the potential for increased superficial wound complications when barbed sutures are used for a subcutaneous closure. Therefore, what remains clear is that there is no proven, optimal method of wound closure in total joint arthroplasty and that every closure method remains technique dependent

Introduction. Alternative payment models for total hip arthroplasty (THA) were initiated by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to decrease overall healthcare cost by optimizing healthcare delivery. The associated shift of financial risk to participating institutions has been criticized to introduce patient selection in order to avoid potentially high cost of care. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model on patient selection, care delivery and hospital costs at a single care center. Methods. This is a retrospective review of THA patient from July 2015-December 2017 was performed. Patient were stratified by insurance type (Medicare and commercial insurance) and whether care was provided before or after implementation of the CJR bundle. Patient age, gender, and BMI, as well as Elixhauser comorbidities and ASA scores were analyzed. Delivery of care variables including surgery duration, discharge disposition, length of stay, and direct hospital costs were compared before and after CJR implementation. Results. 751 THA patients (273 Medicare and 478 Commercial Insurance) were evaluated before (29%) and after (71%) CJR bundle implementation. There was no difference in patient demographics (age, gender, or BMI); however, commercially insured patients had less Elxihauser comorbidies pre-bundle (p=0.033). After CJR implementation length of stay (p=0.010) for Medicare patients was reduced with a trend toward discharge to home (p=0.019). However, surgical time and OR service time as well as direct hospital costs were similar before and after the CJR bundle initiation. Conclusions. There was no differential patient selection after CJR bundle implementation, and value-based metrics (surgical time, OR service time) were not affected. Patients were discharged sooner and more often to home. However, overall direct hospital expenses remained unchanged revealing that any cost savings were for insurance providers, not participating hospitals. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Purpose. Arthritis is the most common chronic illness in the United States. TKR provides reliable pain relief and improved function for patients with advanced knee arthritis. Total joint replacement now represents the greatest expense in the national healthcare budget. Surgical costs are driven by two key components: fixed and variable costs. Patient Specific Instruments™ (PSI, Zimmer, Warsaw, IN, USA) has the potential to reduce both fixed and variable costs by shortening operative time and reducing surgical instrumentation. However, PSI requires the added costs of pre-operative MRI scanning and fabrication of custom pin guides. Previous studies have shown reduction in operating room times and required instrumentation, but question the cost-effectiveness of the technology. Also, these studies failed to show improvement in coronal alignment, but call for additional studies to determine any improvement in clinical function and patient satisfaction. Our pilot study aims to compare the incremental PSI costs to fixed and variable OR cost savings, and compare meaningful patient and clinical outcomes between PSI and standard TKR surgeries. Methods. This IRB approved, prospective, randomized pilot trial involves 20 TKR patients. Inclusion criteria includes: diagnosis of osteoarthritis, ability to undergo MRI, and consent for primary TKR. Following informed consent, patients are randomized to PSI or standard TKR. Patients randomized to PSI undergo pre-operative non-contrast MRI of the affected knee at least 4 weeks prior to surgery. Custom pin guides are prototyped from 3D pre-operative planning software customizable to individual surgeon and patient. All surgeries will be completed by a single surgeon (DA), using a medial parapatellar arthrotomy and Zimmer Nexgen™ implants. Surgical technique for PSI patients utilizes custom pin guides to determine placement of the femoral and tibial cutting guides, whereas an intramedullary femoral rod and extramedullary tibial guide are used in standard TKR patients. Our pilot study will compare numerous intra-operative and post-operative variables between the two patient cohorts. Intra-operative variables include: bony cutting time, tourniquet time, total OR time, surgical instrumentation, and bony resection height. Post-operative variables include: instrument processing and sterilization, blood transfusion, pain medication usage, length of stay, complications (including hospital readmission), and patient reported outcomes (SF-36, WOMAC, and satisfaction) at 4 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year. Additional economic sensitivity analyses using hospital and national cost-to-charge figures will quantify the potential added revenue or costs of implementing the PSI system. Discussion. This pilot study will illustrate the potential benefits of the PSI technology. To our knowledge no clinical trials have been published on the PSI system. Former studies have neglected to include meaningful clinical and patient outcomes, which could potentially add to the cost savings of the technology through reduced blood transfusions, length of stay, and hospital readmission. Additionally, improved rotational alignment may produce superior patient function and satisfaction. Studies recently published on alternative patient-specific TKR systems question the cost-effectiveness and technical improvement of patient-specific instrumentation. Although our sample size may fail to produce statistical significance, the consummate measurement of all the proposed hospital, surgical, and patient factors will inform future randomized multicenter trials

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a potentially fatal complication after total hip replacement (THR) and may be associated with a considerable economic burden. In many centres, thromboprophylaxis using a subcutaneous (sc) anticoagulant in patients undergoing THR is restricted to 14 days or less. Rivaroxaban is a once-daily, oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor in advanced clinical development for thromboprophylaxis after major orthopaedic surgery; it does not require monitoring or dose adjustment. In a phase III study, RECORD2, oral rivaroxaban 10 mg, given once daily for 35±4 days, significantly reduced the incidence of the primary endpoint (deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and all-cause mortality), compared with 40 mg sc enoxaparin, given for 14 days (2.0% vs 9.3%, respectively; relative risk reduction 79%; p< 0.001). The incidence of bleeding was low and similar in both groups, despite extended thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban. This analysis demonstrates the economic impact of extended thromboprophylaxis with oral rivaroxaban. The effect of rivaroxaban on healthcare costs was based on the primary efficacy results, and the associated reduced administration and monitoring costs, and includes non-drug costs only. The cost of symptomatic VTE was taken from published sources in the US and the UK 2007 NICE Guidelines. It was assumed that nurses spent 3 mins/day administering enoxaparin and training patients to self-inject for outpatient use. Hospital duration was 5 days. In the UK, full blood counts should be taken every 3 days when receiving enoxaparin. The total US health-care resource cost was $192/patient for enoxaparin and $39 for rivaroxaban (excluding drug costs). This saving of $153 was driven by reduced hospital costs associated with fewer VTEs when using rivaroxaban. In the UK, the total healthcare cost/patient was £44 with enoxaparin and £2 with rivaroxaban – savings driven equally by reduced hospitalization and monitoring costs with rivaroxaban prophylaxis. The different cost savings in the US and UK are due to higher US hospital costs. The costs of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) were excluded in this analysis. PTS has an estimated 5-year rate of 21% after asymptomatic VTE and 30% after symptomatic VTE, at a total cost/patient of more than $11,000 in the US and £4000 in the UK. Given the reduction in all VTE events with rivaroxaban, there are potential further healthcare cost savings due to reduced PTS. The RECORD2 study showed that extended prophylaxis (35 days) with rivaroxaban was significantly more effective than short-term enoxaparin (14 days) for the prevention of VTE, and was not associated with an increased risk of bleeding. This analysis illustrates an additional benefit of once-daily, oral rivaroxaban in the reduction in healthcare costs related to administration and monitoring

There is no consensus on the management of TA rupture. For operative management, TA have been repaired under general/spinal anaesthetic (GA) or LA. LA repair may be at least as effective and can reduce anaesthetic complications. LA can be performed as a day case and could have significant cost savings. We retrospectively reviewed 80 patients (sample size 120), during the five year period 2001–2005 at Nelson Hospital, who’s ruptured TA was repaired under general anaesthetic (GA) or local anaesthetic (LA). All patients reviewed were at least six months post-op. We assessed at a clinic their long-term outcome, including pain and function. This included their range of motion and strength. Epidemiological data including risk factors was collected. Patients completed a Foot and Ankle questionnaire developed by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Complications such as infection or nerve damage were noted. Further patients are currently being seen to increase sample size. Of the 80 TA that were repaired, 51 (64%) were repaired under GA, 29 (36%) under LA. Results thus far show similar levels of patient satisfaction. 82% of GA patients and 83% of LA patients reported no pain. Patient-reported weakness was 27% (GA) and 24% (LA). Single leg hop distance comparing injured with uninjured was 94% (GA) and 91% (LA). Maximum calf raises in 30 seconds comparing injured with uninjured was 84% (GA) and 82% (LA). Calf diameter on the injured side was 97% (GA) and 96% (LA) compared with the uninjured. The average theatre time was 38 minutes (LA) compared with 65 minutes. LA patients spent on average 0.26 days in hospital compared with 1.2 days, reflecting a greater proportion of day cases. LA patients had a quicker return to work, average 21 days versus 30. Complications in the GA group, included two deep vein thromboses and two pulmonary emboli. One patient from each group had a re-rupture. Results will be reviewed and further statistical analysis done once further patients have been seen. There is no disadvantage in repairing a ruptured TA under LA with regards to long-term pain, function and patient satisfaction. LA repair avoids anaesthetist involvement and anaesthetic complications. Repair under LA results in significant cost savings due to less theatre time, a shorter hospital stay and a quicker return to work

Introduction. There have been significant advancements in postoperative care following total hip arthroplasty (THA) over the past decade and it is essential to quantify the impact of efforts made to better optimize patients and improve postoperative care. The purpose of this study was to assess trends in discharge destination, length of stay (LOS), and readmissions following primary THA. Methods. Patients undergoing primary THA during 2011–2017 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program using CPT code 27130. Non-elective surgery and simultaneous bilateral THA procedures were excluded. Patients were classified as having discharged home or to not home locations. Trends in discharge destination, LOS, 30-day readmission, 30-day reoperation, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification were assessed using the Cochran-Armitage test. Results. Of the 155,638 primary THA patients analyzed, 81% discharged home and 19% did not discharge home. From 2011–2017 there was a 21% increase in percentage of patients discharging home (72% in 2011, 87% in 2017, p<0.001) despite a significantly increasing number of patients with ASA score ≥ 3 (34% to 40%, p<0.001, Figure 1). Over this time period, hospital LOS decreased from 3.1 to 2.0 days for those discharging home (p<0.001) and from 3.8 to 3.6 days those not discharging home (p=0.003). There were no significant changes in 30-day reoperation rates for patients discharging home and readmission rates significantly decreased over time (3.2% in 2011 to 2.6% in 2017, p=0.02). Conclusion. From 2011–2017, patients undergoing THA were more likely to discharge home, had shorter hospital LOS and significantly decreased readmission rates. These trends persisted despite an increasingly comorbid patient population. It is likely these trends have resulted in significant cost savings, for both payers and hospitals. The efforts necessary to create and maintain such improvements should be considered when changes to reimbursement are being evaluated. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Introduction Bilateral total knee replacement under one anaesthetic is a common procedure. Claimed benefits include: shorter hospital stays, fewer complications of some kinds, lower over all cost and more efficient use of staff time. In general the literature supports these concepts though some writers caution against the procedure. Most studies come from large university hospitals but most joint replacements are done in smaller hospitals. At Calvary Hospital we instituted a quality assessment review of our experience to determine patient safety and cost savings. Methods A medical records review between 1997 and 2001 showed 63 patients had bilateral total knee replacement (126 knees). We further identified 38 patients who had both knees replaced at separate admissions within one year (76 knees), these were the staged knee replacements. We selected a matched subset of the patients who had only one joint replaced in this period (125 knees). A review was carried out over a wide variety of parameters on a relation database. Results The incidence of infection, unplanned return to theatre and DVT was too low for this study to have statistical power and little difference was noted. Amongst the more common post-operative respiratory, cardiovascular and gastrointestinal complications no significant difference was noted per hospital admission. Post-operative confusion was not more common in bilateral replacements and we felt that fat embolism syndrome was not increased. Neither, type of anaesthesia, previous medical history nor post-operative care predicted for confusion but we did note a strikingly increased incidence in patients of low BMI. Contrary to common views obese patients did not have more complications or longer hospital stays. Mobilisation in heavy patients is not prolonged provided they have good upper limb strength. Blood transfusion is more likely in bilateral cases but our review has allowed us to formulate a nomogram based on weight and pre-operative haemoglobin to improve blood management. High admission rates to ICU were noted but mostly for precautionary reasons, the unplanned admission rate was not greater. Pre-operative urinary tract infection and use of an IDC were not associated with any infective events. Conclusions Bilateral total knee replacement was found to be a safe proceedure with complication rates equivalent to single knee replacement. For the patient who has severe arthritis in both knees it is prefered to repeated single knee replacement as the exposure to complications is halved. A nomogram to predict blood transfusion requirements has allowed a reduction in the transfusion rate for all groups. Twenty-three hour recovery admission covers the needs of bilateral replacement patients in the immediate post-opertaive setting. Cost savings are identified allowing four knees to be replaced, if done bilaterally, for each three knees replaced as seperate admissions

Widespread use of XLPE has reduced the incidence of both revision surgery and dislocations. This paper aims to create gross estimates of the magnitude of the resulting cost savings. Data about decreasing rates of revision surgery and dislocations after THA, comparing XLPE versus CPE, were obtained from the literature along with figures for costs. Gross estimates were generated from these figures. AOA NJRR 17 reports that at 15 years XLPE reduced the “all cause” revision rate of ceramic on polyethylene by 6.8% and at 16 years reduced the rate for metal on polyethylene by 6.5%. Their average 15 year figure was 4.8%, nearly in half. Dislocations were reduced by 24%. Other data substantiate these trends. Inclusive costs of nonseptic revisions in US dollars, incorporating those relevant costs for the year prior to and the year following surgery, have been shown to average in the neighborhood of $55,000. Dislocations add further to the costs. The estimated savings from XLPE by 15 years on those total hip replacements done in one year in North America equal nearly $1 billion, even without incorporating any increase annually in the number done. While the specific savings in other countries with lower costs are less, similar proportions likely obtain. Despite all the assumptions, the magnitude is striking. In addition to major benefits to the patients, the surgeons, and the hospitals, XLPE affords a massive advantage economically

Introduction. The purpose of bundled payment programs is to reduce cost via risk sharing, while still maintaining quality. If savings are achieved under a historic target price, the orthopedic surgeon will receive a monetary bonus. If costs are higher, a portion is deducted from payment to the orthopedic surgeon. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our experience with the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Program (BPCI) when run by an orthopedic surgeon group to determine patient safety and who benefited the most financially. Methods. This program ran from January 2015 through September 2018. 3,186 Medicare total hip and knee replacements, elective (DRG 470) and for fracture (DRG 469), performed by our group were included. 90 day hospital and all postoperative expenditures were reconciled against our historic cost. All patients were medically optimized with discharge plans established preoperatively. We developed preferred skilled nursing facilities and home health care agencies with synergistic medical providers so that discharges were recommended as soon as appropriate. We hired two full-time case managers to have direct contact with patients pre-and post-operatively. Waiver assistance such as house and pet sitters were used if necessary at our expense. 35% of savings went to the convener, who acted as a liaison between our group and CMS. Expenditures for the 90-day period for all patients were calculated to determine where savings occurred and which entity benefitted financially. Results. There was an average 9.2% reduction in hospital readmissions. An estimated total savings of $5,100,000 occurred. There was a 17% reduction in hospital costs, a 12.1% reduction in admissions to skilled nursing facilities with a 34% reduction in length of stay, and a 5% reduction in admissions to inpatient rehabilitation facilities. There was a 35% reduction in home health visits, but no change in outpatient physical therapy visits. After group expenses, final bonus to the orthopedic provider was on average $262 per patient. Conclusion. The physician managed program was very successful from Medicare's standpoint, achieving significant monetary savings without reducing quality of care. However, the bonus to the providing and managing physicians was nominal. It also does not take into consideration the 50 plus hours spent in meetings to develop this program. Participation could be considered a defensive posture so as not to lose more reimbursement. However, experience was gained which will be valuable for future gain sharing programs. Physicians and physician organizations need to sit at the head of the table to manage future payment bundles and perhaps also act as the convener. We deserve this, as a result of demonstrating high safety and cost savings. For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly

Background. In surgeon controlled bundled payment and service models, the goal is to reduce cost but preserve quality. The surgeon not only takes on risk for the surgery, but all costs during 90 days after the procedure. If savings are achieved over a previous target price, the surgeon can receive a monetary bonus. The surgeon is placed in a position to optimize the patients preoperatively to minimize expensive postoperative readmissions in a high risk population. Traditionally, surgeons request that primary care providers medically clear the patient for surgery with cardiology consultation at their discretion, and without dictating specific testing. Our participation in the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) program for total hip and knee replacement surgeries since 1/1/15 has demonstrated a significant number of patients having costly readmissions for cardiac events. Objective. To determine the medical effectiveness and cost savings of instituting a new innovative cardiac screening program (Preventive Cardio-Orthopaedics) for total hip and knee replacement patients in the BPCI program and to compare result to those managed in the more traditional fashion. Methods. The new screening program was instituted on 11/1/17 directed by an advanced cardiac imaging cardiologist (EH). Testing included an electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, carotid and abdominal ultrasound, and coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). If needed, a 3 day cardiac rhythm monitor was also performed. Four of the ten physicians in our group performing hip and knee replacement surgeries participated. Charts of readmitted patients were reviewed to determine past medical history, method of cardiac clearance, length and cost of readmission. Results. 2,459 patients had total hip or knee replacement in the BPCI program between 1/1/15 and 10/31/17 prior to instituting the new program. All had complete 90 day postoperative readmission data supplied by the CMS, with 25 (1%) of these patients having readmissions for cardiac events for a total cost of readmissions of %149,686. 14 of 25 had a preoperative clearance by a cardiologist. In 19 of the 25 patients, the only preoperative cardiac screening tool performed was an electrocardiogram. Since instituting the new program, 842 additional surgeries were performed, 463 by the four surgeons involved. 126 patients were agreeable to be evaluated through the Preventive Cardio-Orthopaedics program. 4 patients of the four physicians still screened via the traditional cardiac program had a cardiac event readmission. The average readmission hospital stay was 3.33 days at a total cost of %42,321. 2 patients of the four physicians evaluated by the Preventive Cardio-Orthopaedics program had a cardiac related readmission, at an average hospital stay of 2 days, and at a total cost of %10,091. Conclusions. Risk sharing programs have forced surgeons to take a more active role in optimizing their patients medically; otherwise they will be penalized with a decreased reimbursement. Traditionally, we have abdicated this responsibility to primary care and cardiology physicians but have noted a high cardiac readmission risk. In response, we have begun using a unique cardiac screening model. Our preliminary experience predicts fewer cardiac readmissions thereby improving care, and at a lower cost

Introduction. Current CMS reimbursement policy for total joint replacement is aligned with more cost effective, higher quality care. Upon implementation of a standardized evidenced-based care pathway, we evaluated overall procedural costs and clinical outcomes over the 90-day episode of care period for patients undergoing TKA with either conventional (Conv.) or robotic-assisted (RAS) instrumentation. Methods. In a retrospective review of the first seven consecutive quarters of Bundled Payment for Care Improvement (BPCI) Model 2 participation beginning January 2014, we compared 90-day readmission rates, Length of Stay (LOS), discharge disposition, gains per episode in relation to target prices and overall episode costs for surgeons who performed either RAS-TKA (3 surgeons, 147 patients) or Conv. TKA (3 surgeons, 85 patients) at a single institution. All Medicare patients from all surgeons performing more than two TKA's within the study period were included. An evidence-based clinical care pathway was implemented prior to the start of the study that standardized pre-operative patient education, anesthesia, pain management, blood management, and physical/occupational therapy throughout the LOS for all patients. Physician specific target prices were established from institutional historical payment data over a prior three year period. Results. RAS and Conv-TKA procedures exhibited an average gain per episode of $7,600 and $5,579, respectively. The average total cost per 90-day episode was $2,085 lower for patients receiving RAS-TKA ($28,943 versus $31,028), with the majority of cost savings in reduced SNF usage ($1,481) and readmissions ($944). Discharge to home versus Sub-acute Rehabilitation Facilities (SAR's) was 14% higher in the RAS group (62% vs 48%, p<0.05). Conclusions. Implementation of a standardized care pathway across all service departments and physicians resulted in a reduction in overall episode of care costs, with further reductions in cost and discharge to SARs observed with the use of RAS

We present a case series of patients who underwent 3 or 4 part proximal humerus fracture fixation using an intra-osseous suture technique. 18 patients are included in the study with follow up data obtained ranging from 1 to 4 years. Oxford Shoulder Scores (OSS) and range of movement measurements were taken for all patients. The mean OSS for the group was 50/60 with a mean forward flexion of 140°, abduction of 132°, external rotation of 48° and internal rotation to the level 10. th. thoracic vertebra. Three patients developed adhesive capsulitis, 2 requiring subsequent arthroscopic release. This data compares favourably to outcomes reported in the literature with hemiarthroplasty or locking plate fixation. An activity based costing analysis estimated that the treatment costs for proximal humerus fractures was approximately £2,055 when performing a soft tissue reconstruction, £3,114 when using a locking plate and £4,679 when performing a hemiarthroplasty. This demonstrates a significant financial saving when using intra-osseous fixation compared to other fixation techniques. We advocate the use of the intra-osseous suture fixation technique for certain 3 and 4 part fractures. It gives good functional outcomes, significant cost savings and potentially makes revision procedures easier when compared to other fixation techniques

Pre-operative knowledge. Knowledge-based total hip arthroplasty is becoming increasingly recognised for improved safety, efficiency, and accuracy. Pre-operative knowledge of native and planned femoral anteversion, the exact size of implants, neck length and offset, and head lengths can serve to safely accelerate surgery and reduce the need for intra-operative imaging. Pre-operative knowledge of the effect on change in leg length and offset effected by specific implant combinations can serve to minimise undesired changes. The use of a smart mechanical navigation tool superimposed on this knowledge, can serve to easily and swiftly achieve optimal component position. Cost savings. Economic data from Q1 2013 to Q2 2016 demonstrate that CMS-insured patients treated by knowledge-based surgery using the HipXpert mechanical navigation system combined with the superior hip approach have the lowest cost of all patients treated in Massachusetts by an average of more than $7,000 over 90 days for Medicare Part A expenditure (HipXpert System, Surgical Planning Associates, Boston, MA). The data show that these combined techniques outpace all other technology/technique combinations including robotics. Accuracy. The system has been proven to be robust, with repeated studies showing accurate cup placement in 100% of cases including an independent study. This compares to a recent study of robotic methods that showed only 88% accuracy in inclination and 84% for anteversion. Summary. Knowledge-based surgery with smart mechanical navigation has shown the potential to accelerate surgery, improve safety, lower cost and facilitate recovery

Introduction. Close to 30% of the surgical causes of readmission within 90 days post-total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and nearly half of those occurring in the first 2 years are caused by instability, arthrofibrosis, and malalignment, all of which may be addressed by improving knee balance. Furthermore, the recently launched Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) initiative mandates that any increase in post-acute care costs through 90-days post-discharge will come directly from the bundle payment paid to providers. Post-discharge costs, including the cost of readmissions for complications are one of the largest drivers of the 90-day cost of care. It is hypothesized that balanced knees post-TKA will lower the true provider costs within the 90-day bundle. Methods. Cost, outcomes and resource utilization data were collected from three independent surgeons pre- and post- adoption of intraoperative technology developed to provide real-time, quantitative load data within the knee. In addition, data were collected from Medicare claims, hospital records, electronic medical records (EMR), clinical, and specialty databases. The cohorts consisted of 932 patients in the pre-adoption group and 709 patients in the post-adoption group. These 2 groups were compared to the CMS national average data from 291,201 cases. The groups were controlled for age, sex, state, and BMI with no major differences between cohorts. The cost factors considered were the length of hospital stay, physician visits and physical therapy visits in addition to post-operative complications (e.g., manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) and aseptic revision). Results. After adoption of technology to improve ligament balancing intra-operatively, all three surgeons decreased their patients’ hospital stay (3.0 days to 2.6 days), number of physician visits (2.3 to 2.1), number of outpatient physical therapy visits (14.9 to 10.6) and MUA rate (2.3% to 1.8%). These clinical benefits subsequently lowered the 90-day net cost of TKA an average of $443 per case. When compared to the national average, this cost savings was $725 per case. Conclusions. Appropriately balancing TKA patients intra-operatively might help mitigate costs associated with TKA procedures within the 90-day bundle. In this study, it was found that using new joint balancing technology generated a substantial cost-savings post-discharge, primarily due to patients requiring less outpatient physical therapy

Background. Non-invasive hemoglobin measurement was introduced to potentially eliminate blood draws postoperatively. We compared the accuracy and effectiveness of a non-invasive hemoglobin measurement system with a traditional blood draw in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty. Methods. After IRB approval, 100 consecutive patients undergoing primary total hip or knee arthroplasty had their hemoglobin level tested by both traditional blood draw and a non-invasive hemoglobin monitoring system. Results were analyzed for the entire group, further stratifying patients based on gender, race, surgery (THA versus TKA), and post-operative hemoglobin level. Finally, we compared financial implications and patient satisfaction with the device. Paired t-test with 0.05 conferring significance was used. Stratified analyses of the absolute difference between the two measures were assessed using Mann- Whitney test. To assess the level of agreement between the two measures, the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was calculated. Results. Mean blood-draw hemoglobin value on POD1 was 11.063 ± 1.39 g/dL and 11.192 ± 1.333 g/dL with the non-invasive device. For all patients, the mean absolute difference between the two methods was 0.13 g/dL (p = 0.30). The CCC between the two methods was 0.58, conferring a moderate to strongly positive linear relationship (Figure 1). Non-invasive measurement was preferred by 100% of patients with a mean VAS score of 0/10. Additionally, the cost savings with the non-invasive system was $16.50 per patient. Discussion. Overall, there was no significant difference between the hemoglobin level obtained by traditional laboratory methods versus the Masimo Radical-7 system on post-operative day #1 in patients who underwent total joint arthroplasty. In the minority of patients (19%) who had a hemoglobin level of less than 10 g/dL, the difference between the two methods was statistically significant. Additionally, 100% of patients preferred the Masimo device to a traditional blood draw and the Masimo device was substantially cheaper. While further investigation of non-invasive hemoglobin monitoring systems is necessary, particularly in patients with a post-operative hemoglobin of less than 10 g/dL, our study shows that the Masimo Radical-7 device provides an accurate, preferable, and less expensive alternative to a traditional blood draw after total joint replacement. Conclusion. Overall, the non-invasive hemoglobin monitoring system offered a similar hemoglobin reading to the standard lab-draw reading, while improving satisfaction and lowering cost. The system relies on adequate perfusion for measurement, and our study demonstrated that lower hemoglobin values may reduce finger-tip perfusion and affect the hemoglobin reading

Introduction. Robotic assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty (rTKA), provides surgeons with preoperative planning and real-time data allowing for continuous assessment of ligamentous tension and range-of-motion. Using this technology, soft tissue protection, reduced early post-operative pain and improved patient satisfaction have been shown. These advances have the potential to enhance surgical outcomes and may also reduce episode-of-care (EOC) costs for patients, payers, and hospitals. The purpose of this study was to compare robotic assisted vs. manual total knee arthroplasty: 1) 90-day episode-of-care (EOC) costs; 2) index costs; 3) lengths-of-stay (LOS); 4) discharge disposition; and 5) readmission rates. Methods. TKA procedures were identified using the Medicare 100% Standard Analytic Files including; Inpatient, Outpatient, Skilled Nursing (SNF) and Home Health. Members included patients with rTKA or manual TKA (mTKA) between 1/1/2016-3/31/2017. To account for potential baseline differences, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed in a 1-to-5 ratio, robotic to manual based on age, sex, race, geographic division, and comorbidities. After PSM, 519 rTKA and 2,595 mTKA were identified and included for analysis. Ninety-day episode-of-care cost, index cost, LOS, discharge disposition and readmission rates were assessed. Results. Overall 90-day EOC costs were $2,391 less for rTKA patients ($18,568 vs. $20,960; p<.0001). Index facility cost and LOS were also less for rTKA patients by $640 ($12,384 vs. $13,024; p=.0001) and 0.7 days (p<.0001). Additionally, rTKA patients were discharged to SNF less frequently (12.52% vs. 21.70%; p<.0001) and home with health aid (56.65% vs. 46.67%; p<.0001) or self-care (27.55% vs. 23.62%; p=.0566) more frequently and had a 90-day readmission reduction of 33% (p=.0423). Conclusion. Robotic assisted TKA resulted in an overall lower 90-day episode-of-care cost when compared to manual TKA. The 90-day EOC cost savings of rTKA were driven by reduced facility costs, LOS and readmissions, and an economically beneficial discharge destination

Background. We identified several opportunities to significantly reduce cost for hip and knee arthroplasty procedures:. Customized instruments: by identifying the essential instruments for arthroplasty cases, we managed to have one universal tray for each case, and 3 specific trays from the implant manufacturing company. Customized wrap-free, color-coded, stackable trays: by using a wrap-free trays, preparation time in central sterile, opening tray time in OR and turn-over time were reduced. Also, stackable trays were organized based on side and size, therefore only 2 trays needed to be used in each case. Discounted implants: negotiated through optional case coverage with revision system and reps available as backup. Optional rep coverage protocols: designed through process management of the operating room surgical staff and central sterile. Aim of the study was to measure the cost savings, efficacy, and outcomes associated with primary total hip and knee arthroplasty by implementing these protocol. Methods. This is a prospective study from January to October 2016 for selected primary total hip and knee arthroplasties were performed with the above protocols by 2 experienced arthroplasty trained surgeons, were followed for minimum 3 months. Initiating the cost saving protocols were achieved by re-engineering customized trays, discounted implants through optional case coverage (Sourced Based Selection of a Cooperating Manufacturer, MTD), and focused on process management of the staff training. Staff responsibilities were divided into 2 categories:. Familiarity of the instruments, implant, and techniques; trays set up and assurance of availability of the implants. These responsibilities were covered by a trained OR technician and the surgeon. Final verification of the accurate implants prior to opening the packaging. This was achieved by a trained OR nurse and the surgeon. Results. We did not have any intra-operative complications. We also did not encounter any issued with the trays or errors in opening of the implants. There were no re-admissions, fracture, dislocation, or infection. The mean length of stay was 2.2 ± 0.5 days (range 1–3 days) with 68% home discharges. The cost of the implant was reduced from $4,800 to $1,895 with $2,905 cost saving per case and total savings of $58,100. The projected savings only for uncomplicated primary total hip arthroplasty (minimum 120 cases/year between 2 surgeons) is $384,600. Further cost saving from the process management changes were seen in central sterile processing time. Prior to the one tray system, the hospital had 3 in-house trays and there were 4 device company trays. We also noticed an approximate 27% improvement in turnover time. Conclusion. Repless model has significant cost saving potential. Preparation for the transition, proper patient selection, standardization of the trays and implants, and distribution of the responsibilities between OR nurses, technicians and the surgeon are essential

Background. The Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) was developed by the US Center for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) to evaluate a payment and service delivery model to reduce cost but preserve quality. 90 day postoperative expenditures are reconciled against a target price, allowing for a monetary bonus to the provider if savings were achieved. The surgeon is placed in a position to optimize the patients preoperatively to minimize expensive postoperative cardiovascular readmissions in a high risk population. Traditionally, surgeons request that primary care providers medically clear the patient for surgery with or without additional cardiology consultation, without dictating specific testing. Typical screening includes an EKG, occasionally an echocardiogram and nuclear stress test, and rarely a cardiac catheterization. Our participation in the BPCI program for total hip and knee replacement surgeries since 1/1/15 has demonstrated a significant number of patients having readmissions for cardiac events. Objective. To determine the medical effectiveness and cost savings of instituting a new innovative cardiac screening program (Preventive Cardio-Orthopaedics) for total hip and knee replacement patients in the BPCI program and to compare result to those managed in the more traditional fashion. Methods. The new screening program was instituted on 11/1/17 directed by an advanced cardiac imaging cardiologist (EH). Testing included an electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, carotid and abdominal ultrasound, and coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). If needed, a 3 day cardiac rhythm monitor was also performed. Four of the ten physicians in our group performing hip and knee replacement surgeries participated. Charts of readmitted patients were reviewed to determine past medical history, method of cardiac clearance, length and cost of readmission. Results. 1,361 patients had total hip or knee replacement in the BPCI program between 1/1/15 and 1/28/18 and all had complete 90 day postoperative readmission data supplied by the CMS, with 25 of these patients evaluated through the Preventive Cardio- Orthopaedics program. 12 (0.90%) screened via the traditional cardiac program had a cardiac event readmission. The average readmission hospital stay was 3.67 days at a total cost of $69,378. 7 of 12 had a preoperative clearance by a cardiologist. In 9 of the 12 patients, the only preoperative cardiac screening tool performed was an electrocardiogram. None of these 25 patients evaluated through the new program has been readmitted. 84 more patients have been evaluated in this program since 1/28/18, but 90 day readmission data is still incomplete. Preliminary data suggests that the highest risk in these patients is not severe coronary artery disease, but atrial fibrillation, hypertension with left ventricular hypertrophy, and cardiac plaques with ulceration. Conclusions. Risk sharing programs have forced joint replacement surgeons to take a more active role in optimizing their patients medically; otherwise they will be penalized with a decreased reimbursement. Traditionally, we have abdicated this responsibility to primary care and cardiology physicians but have noted a high readmission risk with a cardiac event. In response, we have begun using a unique cardiac screening model. Our preliminary experience predicts fewer cardiac readmissions thereby improving care, and at a lower cost

Adequate soft tissue balance at the time of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) prevents early failure. In cases of varus deformity, once the medial osteophytes have been resected, a progressive release of the medial soft tissue sleeve (MSS) from the proximal medial tibia is needed to achieve balance. The “classic” medial soft tissue release technique, popularised by John Insall et al., consists of a sharp subperiosteal dissection from the proximal medial tibia that includes superficial and deep medial collateral ligament (MCL), semimembranosus tendon, posteromedial capsule, along with the pes anserinus tendons, if needed. However, this technique allows for little control over releases that selectively affect the flexion and extension gaps. When severe deformity is present, an extensive MSS release can cause iatrogenic medial instability and the need to use a constrained implant. It has been suggested that the MSS can be elongated by performing selective releases. This algorithmic approach includes the resection of the posterior osteophytes as the initial balancing gesture. If additional MSS release is necessary in extension, a subperiosteal release of the posterior aspect of the MSS is performed with electrocautery, detaching the posterior aspect of the deep MCL, posteromedial capsule and semimembranosus tendon for the proximal and medial tibia. Dissection is rarely extended more than 1.5 cm distal to the joint line. If additional release is necessary in extension, the medial compartment is tensioned with a laminar spreader and multiple needle punctures (generally less than 8) are performed in the taut portion of the MSS using an 18G or 16G needle. If additional release is necessary to balance the flexion gap, multiple needle punctures in the anterior aspect of the MSS are performed. This stepwise approach to releasing the MSS in a patient with a varus deformity allows the surgeon to target areas that selectively affect the flexion and extension gaps. Its use has resulted in diminished use of constrained TKA constructs and subsequent cost savings. We have not seen an increase in post-operative instability developing within the first post-operative year. We recommend caution when implementing this technique. Unlike the traditional release method, pie-crusting is likely technique-dependent and failure can occur within the MCL itself. Due to the critical importance of the MCL in knee stability, further research and continuous follow up of patients undergoing TKA with this technique are warranted. Intra-operative sensing technology may be useful to quantitate the effect of pie-crusting on the compartmental loads and overall knee balance

Background. Non-operative cases of mallet finger can be followed up by the hand therapists. Both trust and national policies encourage appropriate indication for follow-up in fracture clinic & cost-effective approach without affecting the patient care. Aims. To reduce unnecessary fracture clinic follow up for Mallet finger injuries. Methods. Management for uncomplicated mallet finger injuries is provided by hand therapy and does not need surgical input. Hand Surgeons in the department agreed to a management protocol for Mallet finger injuries, to streamline patient management and save costs. All Mallet finger injuries less than 6 weeks old not requiring surgery to be referred for hand therapy at the first appointment in fracture clinic and left with an open appointment. Retrospective audit of all patients referred to hand therapy in 2015 (Jan-Dec) done to identify extra appointments. Results. Inclusion criteria: All mallet fingers seen in fracture clinic. Exclusion criteria: > 6-week-old injury at presentation, Patients requiring surgery (joint subluxation). Retrospective first Audit (01/01/2015-31/12/2015):. 55 patients identified fulfilling inclusion criteria. 33 patients had delayed referral to hand therapists (12–107 days). 37 patients had extra fracture clinic appointments totalling 72 appointments. Prospective re-audit (01/10/2016 – 31/12/2016):. 16 patients met inclusion criteria. Number of patients referred in their first fracture clinic: 10 patients. Other 6 patients had mean delay 20 days. Potential cost saving in fracture clinic for the trust over a year of £4730. Extra-fracture clinic in 7 patients, but 3 were clinically indicated (review to check possible subluxation) i.e. only 4 wasted clinic appointments. Conclusions. By restructuring our management for Mallet fingers we have streamlined the service. There is early referral to hand therapy, reduced fracture clinic appointments, decreasing pressure on fracture clinics, enhanced patient experience and cost savings for the trust

Patients over 70 years old have subclinical or impending rotator cuff dysfunction, raising concern about TSA in this population. The purpose of this study is to examine whether reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) should be considered for the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis in the presence of an intact rotator cuff (GHOA+IRC in patients older than 70 years of age. Twenty-five elderly (>70 years) patients at least one year status-post RTSA for GHOA+IRC were matched via age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, and whether the procedure involved the dominant extremity with 25 GHOA+IRC patients who received anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Standardised outcome measures, range of motion, and treatment costs were compared between the two groups. Treatment cost was assessed using implant and physical therapy costs as well as reimbursement. Patients who received RTSA for GHO+IRC had significantly lower pre-operative active forward elevation (AFE, 69° vs. 98°, p <0.001) and experienced a greater change in AFE (p=0.01), but had equivalent AFE at final follow-up (140° vs. 142°, p=0.71). Outcomes were otherwise equivalent between groups with no differences. In both those patients who underwent TSA and those that underwent RTSA, significant improvements between pre-operative and final follow-up were seen in all standardised outcome measures and in AFE (p<0.001 in all cases). RTSA provided these outcomes at a cost savings of $2,025 in Medicare reimbursement due to decreased physical therapy costs. In patients over the age of 70 with GHOA+IRC, RTSA provides similar improvement in clinical outcomes to TSA at a reduced cost while avoiding issues related to the potential for subclinical or impending rotator cuff dysfunction

This study reviewed all patients who received an EXOGEN Express bone stimulating device (BSD) to treat delayed union / non-union following operative treatment for a long bone fracture & evaluate if our results are comparable with the NICE guideline expectations. A retrospective review of records between December 2004 & January 2013 revealed 113 patients treated with a BSD. A total of 59 patients were eligible for analysis, (operative treatment for a long bone fracture with adjuvant EXOGEN BSD for non-union or delayed union). Twenty-one were open fractures. The BSD was applied at a mean of 264 days post-operatively. Thirty-five patients went on to have a 2nd operation before union was achieved. Forty-two patients went on to union following application of the BSD. Mean time to union was 293 days. Seventeen patients failed to unite by the end of the study. There were no adverse reactions to the EXOGEN BSD in this cohort. This study has shown that the use of an EXOGEN BSD is a safe, non-invasive method to successfully treat long bone non-unions following initial operative surgery, with potential cost savings (a potential saving of £48,888 to the hospital according to NICE estimations) compared to the standard re-operative management

Introduction. Robotic-arm total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) was developed to potentially improve accuracy of bone cuts, component alignment, soft tissue balance, and patient outcomes. There is a paucity of data demonstrating that RTKA is superior to conventional total knee arthroplasty (CTKA) in terms of any of these metrics. This prospective comparative multicenter study was designed with these purposes in mind. Methods. Patients were enrolled between June 1st, 2016 and March 31st, 2018 in a prospective, non-randomized, open-label, multicenter, consecutive comparative cohort study comparing RTKA and CTKA. Only patients who satisfied the following inclusion criteria were included: body mass index (BMI) ≤ 40kg/m2, primary unilateral TKA procedure, at least 18 years of age, and no joint infection. The following data were collected for analysis:. Preoperative data on component size prediction from CT scans. Intraoperative data on bone resection levels and joint line maintenance. Functional activity scores, patient-reported symptoms, satisfaction and expectation scores using The New Knee Society Scoring System. Radiographic results, specifically coronal alignment. Results. For femoral components implanted, 82% were the exact size as predicted by the robotic-software and the remaining 18% were within 1 size (100% within 1 size). For tibial implants, 69% were the exact size of what the robotic-software predicted and 29% were within 1 size (98% within 1 size). RTKAs had significantly less distal lateral femoral resection (5.55 vs. 7.11 mm), distal medial femoral resection (6.89 vs. 7.97 mm), lateral tibial resection (7.76 vs. 8.54 mm), and medial tibial resection (4.11 vs. 5.56 mm, p<0.05) compared to CTKA. Joint line restoration was comparable between RTKA and CTKA, but required less tibial bone removal when using robotic techniques. Pre-operatively, all demographic, functional, symptom, satisfaction, and expectation measures were similar between treatment groups (all p<0.05, Tables 1–5). Those who underwent RTKA had significantly higher mean functional activity walking and standing score improvements from baseline to 4–6 weeks (1.4 vs. −1.2 points; p=0.019) and to 6 months (9.6 vs. 6.9 points; p=0.017) after surgery compared to CTKA. The mean overall functional activity score improvement from baseline to 1-year post-surgery was also higher for RTKA compared to CTKA (36.8 vs. 15.0 points; p=0.020). For all other parameters (standard activities, advanced activities, pain with walking, pain with stairs, satisfaction and expectation scores), score changes from baseline were not significantly different between groups, though many trended slightly higher for RTKA. Radiographic evaluation of RTKA demonstrated that varus deformity was corrected to neutral in 96% of cases and valgus deformity was corrected in 100%. Conclusion. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to prospectively evaluate outcomes of RTKA patients compared to CTKA. A number of positive early effects were seen with RTKA. This patient cohort will continue to be followed, and these findings may translate into longer-term patient reported outcomes improvement, longer component survivorship and cost savings. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

The statements contained in this document are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CMS. The authors assume responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the information contained in this document. Background. The Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative was introduced to reduce healthcare costs while maintaining quality. We examined data from a healthcare system comprised of five hospitals that elected to participate in the BPCI Major Joint Replacement of the Lower Extremity Model 2 initiative beginning July 1, 2015. We compared one hospital that did 507 BPCI knee cases to the four other hospitals that did 566 cases. Stratifying the data by hospital volume, we sought to determine if costs decreased during the BPCI period, how the savings were achieved, and if savings resulted in financial rewards for participation. Methods. The Medicare data included the target cost for each episode (based on historical data from 2009–2012 for each hospital that was adjusted quarterly) and actual Part A and Part B spending for 90 days. Using 1,836 primary knee replacements, we analyzed the costs associated with the anchor hospitalization, inpatient rehabilitation, skilled nursing facilities, home health, outpatient physical therapy and readmission to compare the 1,073 knees done during the 16-month BPCI initiative period with the 763 knees done during the 1-year period preceding BPCI participation. Owing to the nonparametric distribution of the cost data, a Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the higher volume hospital with the four lower volume hospitals. Results. Compared to the preceding year, the mean episode of care cost during BPCI participation decreased by 8.5% (from $20,853 to $19,087, p=0.24) at the higher volume hospital while remaining virtually unchanged (going from $20,383 to $20,380, p=0.10) at the lower volume hospitals. During the BPCI period, the mean Medicare 90-day target cost was $18,307 at the higher volume hospital and $22,287 at the lower volume hospitals (p<0.001). At the higher volume hospital, the major components of the savings included $367,290 from reduced readmission rates (5.7% versus 8.7%, p=0.11), $207,608 primarily due to a reduction in the length of stay at skilled nursing facilities (mean 15 days versus 25 days, p=0.005), and $130,894 associated with a decreased percentage of patients using inpatient rehabilitation (3.2% versus 4.9%, p=0.22). Although offset by other cost increases, the largest component of the savings at the lower volume hospitals was $262,548 due to a decrease in the percentage of patients (2.3% versus 4.8%, p=0.04) using inpatient rehabilitation. Despite its savings, the mean reconciliation penalty was $851 per case at the higher volume hospital while the lower volume hospitals received a mean reward of $2,165 per case. Conclusion. Based on the reduction in costs and decreased readmission rates, the BPCI initiative is achieving its objectives. Despite an 8.5% decrease in costs, the $18,307 target based on historical data resulted in an $851 penalty per case at the higher volume hospital. In contrast, as a result of a $3,980 higher target, the lower volume hospitals were rewarded even though they did not achieve cost savings. As structured, there is no incentive for centers with historically low costs to participate in BPCI

Introduction. While total hip arthroplasty is considered to be one of the most cost-effective medical interventions, the total cost of care for a population patients treated by THR can present a significant burden on the payer, whether it be an employer, private insurer or government. Data on the true cost of care has rarely been made available to the treating physician. Such lack of information makes comprehensive management difficult. Bundled payment models of care require knowledge of all costs associated with the care of our patients and opens new opportunity for analysis to improve management and outcomes. The current study assess the influence of surgical technique on total cost of care for total hip arthroplasty. Methods. Payment data for 341 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty at a single institution from June 1. st. , 2011 to October 31. st. , 2014 were analyzed. Each procedure was performed using either the superior, anterior, or posterior exposure. The superior exposure was performed with femoral head excision and without dislocation of the hip. The data were analyzed for total cost, inpatient cost, inpatient physician cost, readmission cost, skilled nursing facility cost, and home healthcare agency cost among the different approaches. Results. The superior hip approach for total hip arthroplasty results in a significant total cost savings over a 90-day episode of care when compared to both the anterior and posterior exposure techniques. It reduced overall costs by approximately $2,000 and $7,000 per case versus the other groups respectively. The superior approach also demonstrated savings in inpatient and skilled nursing facility cost when compared to the other groups. Conclusions. Surgical technique can have a profound influence on the total cost of care for hip arthroplasty patients. The current study demonstrates that the posterior exposure resulted in the largest consumption of resources post-operatively as measured by total cost of care and that the superior exposure resulted in the least consumption of resources among the three surgical exposures assessed. The study suggests that while we focus on many aspects of improvement in the overall episode of care for our patients, that focus on surgical technique may be worthwhile

In a global environment of rising costs and limited funds, robotic and computer-assisted orthopaedic technologies could provide the means to drive a necessary revolution in arthroplasty productivity. Robots have been used to operate on humans for 20 years, but the adoption of the technology has lagged behind that of the manufacturing industry. The use of robots in surgery should enable cost savings by reducing instrumentation and inventories, and improving accuracy. Despite these benefits, the orthopaedic community has been resistant to change. If the ergonomics and economics are right, robotic technology just might transform the provision of joint replacement

Refinement of surgical techniques, anesthesia protocols, and patient selection has facilitated this transformation to same day discharge for arthroplasty care, most notably Partial Knee Arthroplasty (PKA). The trend for early discharge has already happened for procedures formerly regarded as “inpatient” procedures such as upper extremity surgery, arthroscopy, ACL reconstruction, foot and ankle procedures, and rotator cuff repair. Our program began focused on PKA and has now expanded to primary TKA and THA, and select revision cases. Over the past few years we have performed 1,230 knee arthroplasty procedures with no readmissions for pain control. Average age and age range is identical to our inpatient cohort for our partial knee cases. Patient selection is based on medical screening criteria and insurance access. PKA is the ideal procedure to begin your transition to the outpatient space. We currently perform medial PKA, lateral PKA, and patellofemoral arthroplasty as an outpatient. The program centers on the patient, their family, home recovery, preoperative education, efficient surgery, and represents a shift in the paradigm of arthroplasty care. It can be highly beneficial to patients, surgeons, anesthesia, facility costs, and payors as arthroplasty procedures shift to the outpatient space. Perhaps the most significant developments in joint replacement surgery in the past decade have been in the area of multimodal pain management. This has reduced length of stay in the inpatient hospital environment opening the opportunity for cost savings and even outpatient joint replacement surgery for appropriately selected patients. The hallmark of this program is meticulous protocol execution. Preemptive pain control with oral anti-inflammatory agents, gabapentin, regional anesthetic blocks that preserve quad function for TKA (adductor canal block) and pericapsular long acting local anesthetics with the addition of injectable ketorolac and IV acetaminophen are key adjuncts. Over the past two years utilizing this type of program over 60% of our partial knee replacement patients are now returning home the day of surgery. Concerns over readmission are appropriate. The rates of complications and readmissions are less than our inpatient cohort in appropriately selected cases with a standardised care map. We believe this brings the best VALUE to the patients, surgeons, and the arthroplasty system

Introduction. Cementless total knees were historically associated with early failure. These failures, likely associated with implant design, made cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) the “gold standard”. Manufacturers have introduced newer uncemented technologies that provide good initial stability and utilize a highly-porous substrates for bony in-growth. Outcome data on these implants has been limited. In addition, these implants typically have a price premium which makes them difficult to use in the setting of cost containment and in at risk 90-day bundles. Our purpose was to compare 90-day outcomes of a new uncemented implant with those of a comparable cemented implant from the same manufacturer. We hypothesized that the implants would have equivalent 90-day clinical and economic outcomes. Methods. Ninety-day clinical and economic outcomes for 252 patients with prospectively collected data from the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative (MARCQI) database were reviewed. Ninety-day outcomes were compared between uncemented knees and an age-matched group of cemented knees (Triathlon cemented vs uncemented Triathalon-tritanium, Stryker Orthopedics, Mahwah, NJ, USA). Both cruciate retaining and posterior stabilized designs were included. MARCQI data: demographics, co-morbidities, length of stay, complications, emergency department visits, discharge disposition, and readmissions were reviewed. Financial data provided by the hospital's finance department was used for economic comparisons. Fischer's test was done to assess categorical data and a student's t-test was used to compare numerical data. Results. Uncemented knees had shorter length of stay (1.58 vs. 1.87, p<0.0001), were more frequently discharged home (90.48% vs. 68.75%; p<0.0001) and used less home care or extended care facilities (6.35% vs. 19.14%, p<0.0001; 2.78% vs. 11.72%, p=0.0001). More uncemented knees had “no complications”. Moreover, there were no reoperations in uncemented knees, compared to 19 reoperations in cemented knees most being manipulations (14 vs. 0, p=0.0028). Uncemented knees scored better than age matched counterparts Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (63.69 vs. 47.10, n=85 and 43, p<0.0001), and Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System T-physical and T-mental (44.12 vs. 39.45, n=95 and 59, p<0.0001; 51.84 vs 47.82, n=97 and 59, p=0.0018). Cemented cases were more expensive overall, the surgical costs were higher ($6806.43 vs. $5710.78 p<0.01) and the total hospital costs were higher ($8347.65 vs. $7016.11 p<0.01). The 90-day readmission and hospital outpatient costs were not significantly different between the designs. Conclusion. The use of a modern uncemented TKA implants has increased, but data on outcomes and the economic impact has been limited particularly in regard to 90-day at risk global periods. Our study suggests that patients receiving an new uncemented TKA have a shorter length of stay, higher rate of discharge to home, better patient reported outcome measures, fewer complications and fewer reoperations than an age-matched group of patients receiving a similar, cemented design during the 90-day global period. Importantly, the uncemented knees had $1,095 less surgical episode costs (p< 0.001) and a 90-day cost savings of over $1,300 (p< 0.001). Uncemented TKA, when utilizing modern technologies, is successful and economically viable for an at-risk bundle. The results of this study should alleviate fears increased cost, early failure, complications or poor outcomes with the use of a modern uncemented TKA

Refinement of surgical techniques, anaesthesia protocols, and patient selection have facilitated this transformation to same day discharge for arthroplasty care, most notably Partial Knee Arthroplasty (PKR). The trend for early discharge has already happened for procedures formerly regarded as “inpatient” procedures such as upper extremity surgery, arthroscopy, ACL reconstruction, foot and ankle procedures, and rotator cuff repair. Our program began focused on Partial Knee Arthroplasty (PKA) and has now expanded to primary TKA and THA, and select revision cases. Over the past few years we have performed 1,230 Knee Arthroplasty procedures with no readmissions for pain control. Average age and age range is identical to our inpatient cohort for our partial knee cases. Patient selection is based on medical screening criteria and insurance access. PKA is the ideal procedure to begin your transition to the outpatient space. We currently perform medial PKA, lateral PKA, and patellofemoral arthroplasty as outpatient cases. The program centers on the patient, their family, home recovery, pre-operative education, efficient surgery, and represents a shift in the paradigm of arthroplasty care. It can be highly beneficial to patients, surgeons, anaesthesia, facility costs, and payors as arthroplasty procedures shift to the outpatient space. Perhaps the most significant developments in joint replacement surgery in the past decade have been in the area of multimodal pain management. This has reduced length of stay in the inpatient hospital environment opening the opportunity for cost savings and even outpatient joint replacement surgery for appropriately selected patients. The hallmark of this program is meticulous protocol execution. Pre-emptive pain control with oral anti-inflammatory agents, gabapentin, regional anesthetic blocks that preserve quad function for TKA (adductor canal block) and pericapsular long acting local anesthetics with the addition of injectable ketorolac and IV acetaminophen are key adjuncts. Over the past two years utilizing this type of program over 60% of our partial knee replacement patients are now returning home the day of surgery. Concerns over readmission are appropriate. The rates of complications and readmissions are less than our inpatient cohort in appropriately selected cases with a standardised care map. We believe this brings the best VALUE to the patients, surgeons, and the arthroplasty system

Cementless stem fixation is a widely used method of stem revision in North America and elsewhere in the world. There is abundant literature in its support. Most of the reports from 1985 to 2005 related to proximally or extensively porocoated designs, the former falling into disfavor with time because of unpredictable outcomes. With few exceptions (e.g. S-ROM) the modularity of these designs was limited to the head/neck junction. But this generation of designs was associated with some issues such as insertional fractures, limited control of anteversion (and risk of dislocation), limited applicability in the setting of severe bone loss (Paprosky Type 4 osteolysis or Vancouver Type B3 periprosthetic fracture), as well as ongoing concern relating to severe proximal stress shielding. In the past decade we have seen the mounting use of a new design concept: tapered fluted titanium stems (TFTS), which incorporate the advantages of titanium (for less flexural rigidity), conical taper (for vertical taper-lock stability), longitudinal ribs or flutes (for rotational stability), and surface preparation which attracts bone ongrowth for long term fixation. Four consecutive reports from our center have documented the superiority of the TFTS in our hands, with encouraging outcomes even when dealing with severe bone loss or periprosthetic fractures. There is an increasing body of other literature which reports a similar experience. Furthermore, with increasing experience and confidence in this design concept, we now use a monoblock or non-modular design in the majority of cases in which a TFTS is indicated. This circumvents the potential drawbacks of stem modularity, including taper corrosion and taper junction fracture. Our recent report of this concept in 104 cases with a 2-year minimum follow-up supports the use of this concept in many if not most stem revisions. The question remains as to which should be favored? Because of equipoise in the outcomes of the two fundamental stem designs, at least in our hands, clearly the surgeon needs to ask other, more practical questions:. Am I familiar enough with the TFTS technique so as to bypass the potential versatility of the modular stem for the simplicity and potential cost savings of the non-modular?. Is this a case in which modularity will offer me distinct advantages (periprosthetic fracture, and severe bone loss as examples). Should I introduce the nonmodular TFTS to my practice, choosing straightforward cases first; ones in which I would comfortably and with confidence use an extensively porocoated stem?

In the current health care climate, there is an increasing focus on cost savings and resource management. As such, there is an emphasis on decreasing length of stay and performing surgery on an outpatient basis. Consequently, some patients will have unanticipated intra-operative or post-operative adverse events that will necessitate an unplanned post-operative hospital admission or a readmission after discharge. These unplanned admissions or readmissions represent an increased burden on health care systems and can cause cancellation of other scheduled procedures. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether pre-operative patient risk factors or intra-operative events could predict unplanned admission or readmission following discharge in patients undergoing either elective or emergency foot and ankle surgery. Data was prospectively collected on a total of 889 patients. The patients were divided into two groups: patients without readmissions (N=791) and patients who had an unplanned admission or readmission (N=98). We also collected and analysed the following variables: age, gender, BMI, diabetes, ASA class, surgery start time, length of surgery, regional vs. general anesthetic, elective vs. trauma surgery and type of procedure. Logistic regression models were used to identify risk factors that could independently predict unplanned admissions or readmissions to hospital following foot and ankle surgery. Factors that could be used to independently predict readmission were length of surgery (p 0.0154, Odds Ratio 1.004) and trauma surgery (0.0167; 1.978). For every 1-hour increase in length of surgery, the odds of unplanned admission/readmission increase by 1.27 times. The odds of patients undergoing surgery for acute traumatic injuries getting readmitted are 1.978 times higher than for elective surgery patients. In conclusion, our study showed that pre-operative patient risk factors including BMI, diabetes, and ASA status were unable to predict whether patients would have an unplanned admission or readmission. The two factors that were able to predict whether patients would have an unplanned admission or readmission were length of the procedure and trauma surgery – both of which are not readily modifiable. Our results showed that in spite of institutional measures to ensure timely discharge, only 11% of patients required an unplanned admission or readmission

Background:. Developing a successful outpatient service for Ilizarov frame removal provides both patient and cost benefits. Misinformation and patient trepidation can be detrimental to recovery and influence choices. Education may play an important role in tailoring an efficacious service. Objective:. Review Belfast Regional Limb Reconstruction frame removal practice, introduce changes aimed at improving care and evaluate effects. Methods:. 1 year retrospective review of Ilizarov frame removal. Evaluation of service prior to and following provision of a new patient information leaflet, alongside a test wire removal technique. Subsequent service evaluation supplemented via patient reported feedback questionnaire. Results:. Retrospectively 85% Ilizarov frames removed in clinic, 54% required Entonox. Annual cost £19000. 46% patients unaware of process, gathering information from unprofessional sources. General anaesthetic and analgesic requirements related to psychosocial influences; no correlation between fracture configuration, elective reconstructive cases and operative techniques. Prospectively 96% patients found information leaflet educational and beneficial. 87% Ilizarov frames removed in clinic. 100% patients who had outpatient removal recommend this method. Entonox use reduced to 15% with average pain score 4.6/10 without analgesia. Patients felt happier. Projected annual cost savings £3000. 100% rated service excellent. Discussion:. Professional education and a standardised outpatient removal process for Ilizarov frames, delivered by a dedicated specialist team, reduces morbidity and positively impacts service provision

Perhaps the most significant developments in joint replacement surgery in the past decade have been in the area of multimodal pain management. This has reduced length of stay and opened the opportunity for cost savings and even outpatient joint replacement surgery for appropriately selected patients. The hallmark of this program is preemptive pain control with oral anti-inflammatory agents, gabapentin, regional anesthetic blocks that preserve quad function for TKA (adductor canal block) and long acting local anesthetics with the addition of injectable ketorolac and acetaminophen. Over the past two years utilising this type of program over 60% of our partial knee replacement patients are now returning home the day of surgery. We currently utilise a long acting local anesthetic delivery medication consisting of microscopic, spherical, lipid-based particles composed of a honeycomb-like structure of numerous nonconcentric internal aqueous chambers containing encapsulated bupivacaine separated from adjacent chambers by lipid membranes. Bupivacaine is released from the particles with diffusion of the drug over an extended period of time that more closely matches the time course of postsurgical pain following joint replacement surgery. Trials have demonstrated that a single dose administered via deep tissue infiltration is effective at reducing pain up to 72 hours

Perhaps the most significant developments in joint replacement surgery in the past decade have been in the area of multimodal pain management. This has reduced length of stay in the inpatient hospital environment opening the opportunity for cost savings and even outpatient joint replacement surgery for appropriately selected patients. The hallmark of this program is pre-emptive pain control with oral anti-inflammatory agents, gabapentin, regional anesthetic blocks that preserve quad function for TKA (adductor canal block) and pericapsular long acting time release local anesthetics with the addition of injectable ketorolac and IV acetaminophen. Over the past two years utilising this type of program over 60% of our partial knee replacement patients are now returning home the day of surgery. We currently utilise a long acting local anesthetic delivery medication consisting of microscopic, spherical, lipid-based particles composed of a honeycomb-like structure of numerous nonconcentric internal aqueous chambers containing encapsulated bupivacaine separated from adjacent chambers by lipid membranes. Bupivacaine is released from the particles with diffusion of the drug over an extended period of time that more closely matches the time course of postsurgical pain following joint replacement surgery. Trials have demonstrated that a single dose administered via deep tissue infiltration is effective at reducing pain up to 72 hours. This has been trialed in TKA as well

Carpal tunnel decompression is one of the most commonly performed orthopaedic operations. Last year 160 patients attended our department for surgery. There have been reports in the literature of good results and improved patient satisfaction for wound closure with Vicryl Rapide following Dupuytren's surgery. We looked at 200 consecutive patients who underwent carpal tunnel decompression. Wounds were closed using either non-absorbable monofilament sutures (first 97 patients) or interrupted Vicryl Rapide (next 103 patients). We compared the incidence of wound problems in the early post operative period, scar sensitivity and the number of patients requiring a further outpatient appointment because of ongoing problems associated with these issues. There was a higher incidence of early wound problems (p=0.0359) in patients whose wounds were closed with nylon. There was no difference in the rates of scar tenderness (p=1) or in the number of patients requiring further clinic appointments (p=0.356). There are also potential cost savings in using absorbable sutures as they require fewer sundry items at the dressings clinic. In conclusion there were fewer problems associated with wound closure with interrupted Vicryl Rapide sutures than with nylon in patients undergoing carpal tunnel decompression

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal perioperative care pathway designed to achieve early recovery for patients undergoing major surgery. ERAS allows for the incorporation of evidence based practices and incorporated a comprehensive assessment of the patient's journey through the surgical process from pre-operative screening through to post-operative care. The purpose of this study was to determine if optimisation of ERAS protocol with pre-operative screening and incorporating patient-specific factors into their post operative care would improve length of stay (LOS) and readmission rates following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in a Canadian community hospital setting. The study collected clinical, demographic data and the physical status perioperative using the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) classification on 508 patients who underwent TJA between January and August 2015 and compared similar data from the same time frame in the previous calendar year prior to implementation of the pathway. Cohorts were analysed for length of stay (LOS), readmission rates, Pre-operative assessments (completed by anaesthesia, nursing and pharmacy), relevant labs, patient history (surgery, medical, social), and patient values were all considered when developing a specific patient plan for care post-operatively. A post-operative management tool was used to optimise pain control, post-operative nausea and vomiting, bowel management, diabetes blood glucose control, venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, as well as monitoring parameters specific to patient medical history (e.g. respiratory, cardiac). While in hospital, physiotherapy and nursing were consulted by the pharmacist to assess whether patient's post op management needed to be altered to optimise mobilisation and recovery in hospital. The average patient's LOS and readmission rates in 30 days was analysed to assess the change after implementation of the post-operative management tool based on patient specific factors. A total of 508 patients (mean age: 66 years), ASA classification was 3 or greater for 430 patients. The patients were assessed for LOS, readmission rates in 30 days. The mean LOS decreased from 3.6 to 3.3 days after optimisation of the ERAS protocol (student t test p=0.021). The 30-day readmission rate decreased from 2.9% to 1.4% post intervention (z test p=0.087) when compared to the same time period in the previous calendar year prior to protocol implementation. Overall, the cost savings to optimising the ERAS protocol for the hospital is substantial; with approximately $238 saved per patient. Pre-operative screening and incorporating patient-specific factors into an individualised care plan to optimise the ERAS protocol for TJA reduced mean length of stay without a concomitant increase in readmission rates with significant cost saving

Introduction. Preoperative templating of femoral and tibial components can assist in choosing the appropriate implant size prior to TKA. While weight bearing long limb roentograms have been shown to provide benefit to the surgeon in assessing alignment, disease state, and previous pathology or trauma, their accuracy in size prediction is continually debated due to scaling factors and rotated views. Further, they represent a static time point, accounting for boney anatomy only. A perceived benefit of robotic-assisted surgery is the ability to pre-operatively select component sizes with greater accuracy based on 3D information, however, to allow for flexibility in refining based on additional data only available at the time of surgery. Methods. The purpose of this study was to determine the difference of pre-operative plans in size prediction of the tibia, femur, and polyethylene insert. Eighty four cases were enrolled at three centers as part of an Investigational Device Exemption to evaluate a robotic-assisted TKA. All patients had a CT scan as part of a pre-operative planning protocol. Scans were segmented and implant sizes predicted based on the patients boney morphology and an estimated 2mm cartilage presence. Additional information such as actual cartilage presence and soft tissue effects on balance and kinematics were recorded intra-operatively. Utilizing this additional information, surgical plans were fine tuned if necessary to achieve minimal insert thickness and balance. Data from the Preoperative CT plan sizing and final size were compared to determine the percentage of size and within one size accuracy. Results. The pre-operative plan was able to determine the femoral and tibial components within one size for 100% of cases. Intra-operatively, surgeon upsized femoral 15 out of 85 (18%), downsized femoral 1 out of 85 (1%), baseplate 13 out of 85 (15%), and downsized baseplate 4 out of 85 (5%). Polyethylene exact size could be planned 93% of the time. Discussion/Conclusion. Robotic-assisted pre-operative CT based planning was accurate over 70% of the time for the femur and tibial components, and over 90% with respect to the insert thickness Additionally, intraoperative information allowed for adjustments to provide patients with ideal coverage of articular surfaces and for joint balancing providing optimal individualized component placement. Further research is needed to determine the potential cost savings in hospital and OR inventory management

We present a complete audit cycle of Emergency Department management of paediatric clavicle fractures at Derriford Hospital. Local guidelines divide the clavicle into three zones. Fractures with minimal displacement in the middle 3/5th heal in the majority of cases without complication and can be discharged without need for follow up, provided parents are adequately educated. An initial audit cycle of 63 cases identified short comings in adherence to the guidelines. These included: Unnecessary fracture clinic follow up of ‘Zone 2’ fractures in 85% and omission of written advice in 86%. The results were circulated, ‘aide memoir’ icons were added to the department's computer coding system, staff teaching sessions were organised and a patient advice sheet was produced. Following the implementation of changes, a 23 case re-audit showed fewer unnecessary referrals to fracture clinic (17% vs. 85%) and improvements in the number of parents being given written advice (43% vs. 14%). Staff training, provision of information leaflets and changes to the ED coding system dramatically improved the adherence to hospital guidance. This resulted in standardisation of care, fewer unnecessary appointments and cost savings to the trust. Following this audit, a telephone survey was completed to assess parent's satisfaction with their treatment

We present a complete audit cycle of Emergency Department (ED) management of paediatric buckle fractures of the distal radius at Derriford Hospital. Local hospital management guidelines state that the limb should be supported in a wrist splint for 3 weeks following injury and, provided parents are adequately educated, no formal follow-up is required. Auditable standards were obtained from the local guidance. An initial audit cycle of 54 cases identified shortcomings in compliance with guidelines. These included: Inappropriate immobilisation in 34 (63%) cases, omission of written advice in 35 (65%) cases and arrangement of unnecessary follow-up in 31 (57%) cases. Following circulation of the results, ‘aide-memoir’ icons were added to the emergency department computer coding system, teaching sessions for emergency department staff were organised and new paediatric specific wrist splints were introduced. A re-audit of 33 patients evaluated the effect of the changes. This demonstrated a 27% improvement in correct wrist support usage (27/33, 82%) and 25% fewer unnecessary referrals to fracture clinic (27/33, 82%). Staff training and provision of appropriate wrist splints were crucial to improving the adherence to guidance. This resulted in standardisation of care, fewer unnecessary appointments for patients and cost savings to the hospital trust

Introduction. Postoperative dislocation remains a vexing problem for patients and surgeons following total hip arthroplasty (THA). It is the commonest reason for revision THA in the US. Dual mobility (DM) THA implants markedly decrease the risk of THA instability. However, DM implants are more expensive than those used for conventional THA. The purpose of this study was to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of DM implants compared to conventional bearing couples for unilateral primary THA using a computer model-based evaluation. Methods. A state-transition Markov computer simulation model was developed to compare the cost-utility of dual mobility versus conventional THA for hip osteoarthritis from a societal perspective (Figure 1). The model was populated with health outcomes and probabilities from registry and published data. Health outcomes were expressed as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Direct costs were derived from the literature and from administrative claims data, and indirect costs reflected estimated lost wages. All costs were expressed in 2013 US dollars. Health and cost outcomes were discounted by 3% annually. The base case modeled a 65-year-old patient undergoing THA for unilateral hip osteoarthritis. A lifetime time horizon was analyzed. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The willingness-to-pay threshold was set at $100,000/QALY. Threshold, one-way, two-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess model uncertainty. Results. DM THA exhibited absolute dominance over conventional THA with lower accrued costs (US$45,960 versus $47,103) and higher accrued utility (12.08 QALY versus 11.84 QALY). The ICER was -$4,771/QALY, suggesting that DM THA is cost-saving compared to conventional THA. The cost threshold at which dual mobility implants were cost-ineffective was $25,000 (Figure 2), and the threshold at which DM implants ceased being cost-saving was $12,845. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the probability of intraprosthetic dislocation, primary THA utility, and age at index THA most influenced model results. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, 90% of model iterations resulted in cost savings for DM THA (Figure 3). Discussion. Dual mobility components showed clear cost-utility advantages over conventional THA components, and DM implants are cost-saving for primary unilateral THA from a societal perspecitve. Model results suggest that DM THA need not be limited to only high-risk patients, although patient age and risk of dislocation are important determinants of its cost-utility

INTRODUCTION. Wasted implants represent both an increased risk and cost to our healthcare system. In our institution, a sterilely packaged implant that is opened and not implanted is wasted in one out of 20 primary total knee replacement procedures. The cost of these wasted implants exceeds $1 million per year. We propose the introduction of a novel, computer based, e.Label and compatibility system to reduce implant-related medical errors and waste in total knee arthroplasty. We hypothesize that the implementation of this system will help reduce medical errors and wasted implants by improving and standardizing the visual markers and by ensuring that parts are compatible so that implant mismatches and inappropriate laterality are prevented. METHODS. A software program was implemented which creates an e.Label for all components (Figure 1) and checks imbedded, manufacturer provided, compatibility charts to ensure that parts are of appropriate laterality, and are compatible with each other. Upon implementation, the program was studied prospectively for seven months and compared to a retrospective cohort in regards to number, type, and cost of wasted implants. Critical errors that were detected were also recorded. RESULTS. During the retrospective period there were 83 wasted implants in 1450 surgeries, or an incidence of 5.7%. After implementation of the computer based system, there were two wasted implant in 244 surgeries performed by the study physicians, or an incidence of 0.8% (Figure 2). One critical medical error was identified and prevented during the study period (Figure 3). The annualized cost savings from this decrease in wasted implants was over $200,000 among our six study surgeons. CONCLUSION. The introduction of this system was able to prevent at least one serious medical error, while dramatically decreasing the number and cost of wasted implants in our institution. Implementation on a larger scale may provide potential for safer, more efficient, and more cost-effective orthopaedic care

Introduction. The aim of the study was to compare and contrast the clinical outcome of conversion of practice of a shoulder surgeon from open to arthroscopic shoulder stabilisation for traumatic anterior shoulder instability. Patients and Methods. Comparison of a cohort consecutive series of 24 patients treated by open stabilisation and a prospective consecutive cohort series of 30 patients treated by arthroscopic stabilisation. Clinical outcomes were assessed with Oxford Shoulder Score Instability (OSS-I) and a Patient Satisfaction Survey at a minimum of 1 year follow up. The operation time as well as cost analysis were also evaluated. Results. The average OSS-I for open stabilisation was 39.6 (range 19-48) as compared to 39.8 (range 23-48) with the arthroscopic group and these scores did not show a statistically significant difference. Both cohorts were pleased with the clinical outcome and were happy to recommend the procedure to others. No complications in either group were seen. Operative time and costs were significantly more in the open group, even taking into account initial learning curve of the arthroscopic method. All arthroscopic procedures were performed as day-cases compared to over-night stays for the open group also providing better use of hospital resources and cost savings. Conclusion. After appropriate surgical training, the conversion from open to arthroscopic stabilisation can be performed without affecting clinical outcome or patient satisfaction. This study provides surgeons with confidence to change methods to gain the advantages of the arthroscopic procedure, which included reduced theatre time, day case surgery and earlier return to work and sport

We reviewed the current screening protocol for MRSA detection in patients admitted for elective lower limb arthroplasty as we thought it may not be cost effective and there is no evidence base for validity of MRSA screening swabs. The current institutional screening protocol includes MRSA swabs from nose and groin taken on 2 different occasions; the 1st swab taken at time patient was placed on the waiting list and the 2nd swab taken at the Orthopaedic pre-clerking clinic around 6–8 weeks later. We found that during the study period, of 1791 patients who underwent MRSA screening swabs, only 16 patients had positive results. Of these, 9 patients had known MRSA (2 in care home) and no data was available in 2 patients. However in 5 patients, there was an initial negative swab which later was found to be positive. The time interval in these ranged from 0.6 to 85 weeks (Conversion rate = 0.3%). The laboratory cost for these screening swabs was £9,027. Given the low prevalence rate of MRSA and low conversion rate at 6 weeks, there is a role for accepting a single-swab screening protocol. This would also result in significant cost savings of around £ 4,500. We can therefore conclude that in the indigenous population, it is unlikely a patient will de-novo acquire MRSA in the community unless exposed to independent risk factors. We have adopted the new screening protocol where patients are screened routinely for detection and eradication only once prior to admission unless independent risk factors such as previous MRSA colonisation, hospital admission or if being admitted from residential/care home. There is however no evidence in literature about the time period of validity of MRSA screening swabs

Percutaneous A1 pulley release is being increasingly used as an alternative to open surgical release and injection of local steroids for the treatment of the trigger digit. We treated 43 patients, average age 57 years (range12-78). All trigger digits were grade III-IV (Quinnell classification). A mean duration of pre-operative symptoms was 7.3 months (range 2-13 months). A percutaneous release was performed with a 19-gauge hypodermic needle under local anaesthesia in the outpatient setting. All patients were evaluated with respect to clinical resolution of symptoms and general satisfaction. We report a 97% successful release and only one case of incomplete release. A result in terms of abolishing triggering was immediate and patient acceptance was excellent. By two weeks, all the patients had no pain at the operative site. After a mean follow-up of 30.2 months (range12-50), there had been no recurrences. There were no digital nerve injuries, flexor tendon injuries, and infections. The percutaneous release is a safe and effective technique, which provides significant cost savings. The time from onset of symptoms and grading prognostically is significant and affects the treatment outcome. We recommend the percutaneous technique for typical cases of trigger finger with a palpable nodule and reproducible mechanical triggering. This technique can be the treatment of choice for the established trigger finger (grade III and IV) with symptoms of more than few months' duration. The open technique is reserved for complicated cases such as florid tenosynovitis, locked digit, failed percutaneous release or those involving the thumb

Introduction. Measured outcomes from knee joint arthroplasty (TKA) have primarily focused on surgeon-directed criteria, such as alignment, range of motion measured in the clinic, and implant durability, rather than on functional outcomes. There is strong evidence that subjective reporting by patients fails to capture objective real-life function. 1,2. We believe that the recent emphasis on clinical outcomes desired by the patient, as well as the need to demonstrate value, requires a new approach to patient outcomes that directly monitors ambulatory activity after surgery. We have developed and tested a system that: 1) autonomously identifies patients who are not progressing well in their recovery from TKA surgery; 2) characterizes patient activity profiles; 3) automatically alerts health care providers of patients who should be seen for additional follow-up. We anticipate that such a system could decrease secondary procedures such as manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) and reduce hospital re-admission rates thereby resulting in significant cost savings to the patient, the care providers, and insurers. Methods. The components of the system include: 1) A sensor package that is mounted correctly in relation to the knee joint (Figure 1a) and is suitable for long term use; 2) An application that runs under the Android operating system to communicate with the sensor and to gather subjective information (pain, satisfaction, perceived stability etc. together with a photograph of the surgical site (Figure 1b); 3) Software to upload the data from the phone to a remote server; 4) An analysis and reporting package that generates, among other metrics, a profile describing the patient's activity throughout the day, trends in the recovery process, and alerts for abnormal findings (Figure 1c). The system was pilot tested on 12 patients (7 females) who underwent TKA. Complete days of data collection were scheduled for each patient every two weeks until 12 weeks, starting during the second week after surgery. Results. Patients tolerated the system well and datasets of up to 13 hours long were recorded. There was a considerable variation between patients in the use of the prosthetic knee joint at a given time point after surgery. At 6 weeks post-surgery, for example, some relatively inactive subjects had less than 50 excursions per hour while active subjects exhibited more than 750 excursions per hour. It was notable that, in activities of daily living, subjects rarely used the extremes of the flexion range that had been measured during post-operative clinic visits. Examples of activity recognition during free-living will be presented. Discussion. A remote knee monitoring system has been designed and successfully tested in an outpatient setting. The system has revealed discrepancies between knee function measured during clinic visits and that measured remotely during free living. Remote monitoring after orthopaedic procedures adds an important new dimension to the assessment of patient outcome. Acknowledgments. This work was supported by grants from the Washington Research Foundation and The Wallace H. Coulter Translational Partnership at the University of Washington

Introduction. Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been shown to decrease hemoglobin loss and reduce the need for transfusions in primary hip and knee arthroplasty. Recently, authors have proven similar results in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). No previous paper has focused on the safety and efficacy of TXA for revision TKA for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The purpose of our study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of topical TXA in revision TKA for PJI. Methods. We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty for infection at our institution between September 25, 2007 and July 12, 2013. We evaluated hemoglobin loss, need for transfusion, one-year reinfection rate, length of stay (LOS), complications and one-year mortality with and without the use of TXA in all patients who underwent Stage-1 removal of hardware with antibiotic spacer placement and/or revision (Stage-2) for PJI of the knee. All data sets were analyzed using a two-sample t-test. Results. During the study period, 45 patients underwent 49 Stage-1 procedures (20 knees with TXA, 29 without) and 44 patients underwent 47 Stage-2 revisions (28 with TXA, 19 without). Tranexamic acid use significantly decreased the hemoglobin loss in the Stage 1 group (19.8% vs 30.05%, p=0.0004) and the Stage-2 group (24.5% vs 32.01%, p=0.01). Furthermore, in both groups, the use of TXA was associated with a significant reduction in transfusion rates (Stage-1 25% vs 51.7%, p=0.04; Stage-2 25% vs 52.6%, p=0.05). There was a non-statistical decreased LOS of over a day in both groups (Stage-1 5.15 vs 6.72 days, p=0.055; Stage-2 5.21 vs 6.84 days, p=0.09). Finally, in both groups, there was no statistical difference in one-year re-infection rate (p=0.98) or one-year mortality (0 vs 0). There was a single upper extremity DVT around a PICC line, occurring in a patient who underwent a Stage 1 procedure augmented with topical TXA. There were no PEs. Conclusion. Topical tranexamic acid is both safe and effective for use in both stages of revision TKA for PJI. Despite the small number of patients, we show a significant reduction in the hemoglobin loss and transfusion requirement in both stages of TKA revision for PJI. Although it did not reach significance with our number of patients, we feel an average LOS over a day shorter in each group is a strong potential for cost savings. Previous studies have shown TXA to aggravate staphylococcal infection in mice, however, we show that topical TXA does not seem to have a negative effect on the treatment of PJI in our patients and does not increase the one-year re-infection or mortality rate

Aim: We wanted to ascertain if clinical examination confers any additional benefit to secondary/targeted ultrasound screening of neonatal hips. Materials/Methods: Of the 30585 births (over a 6 year period) in the population served by our hospital, 2742 babies (8.96percent) were referred to the Hip Screening Clinic by the neonatologists and general practitioners. They were examined clinically and by US scans by the specialist consultants. The findings were documented prospectively. Of these, 1862 hips were normal on clinical examination, 841 hips tense (clinical examination inconclusive). Results: 233 hips were identified as abnormal by the US scans (Graf method). 106 (45percent) of these were normal on clinical examination. In 88 of the hips with abnormal US scans (38percent), clinical examination could not be performed reliably as the babies were tense. None of the hips identified as abnormal on clinical examination were normal on US scans. Conclusion/Discussion: US scanning of hips in at-risk babies by an experienced paediatric radiologist will identify all the abnormal hips. This will release the paediatric orthopaedic surgeon from routine clinical examination of all these babies. This time can be utilised for running other clinics. Babies found to have abnormal hips on US scanning may be seen by the orthopaedic surgeon for treatment and follow-up. Parents of babies with normal hip US scans may be reassured by a nurse practitioner or a paediatric physiotherapist. This should lead to better utilisation of resources and cost savings