Recent emphasis in total knee arthroplasty has been on accelerated rehabilitation and recovery. Minimally invasive and quadriceps sparing techniques have been developed to expediate return to normal function. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the tourniquet on post-operative pain and quadriceps function in total knee arthroplasty.

This study involved a randomised, blinded, prospective trial of 20 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty by a single surgeon. All patients received a general anaesthetic, identical prosthesis and post-operative protocol. Patients were randomly allocated to one of two group: (a) tourniquet group or (b) no tourniquet group. A standard surgical tourniquet was applied to all patients but only inflated in the tourniquet group.

Outcomes included Oxford knee scores, post-operative pain scores, post-operative drainage and transfusion requirements, thigh and knee circumference measurements, range of motion, and surface EMG measurements at intervals of two weeks, six weeks, six months and twelve months.

The study included 16 male and four female patients with 11 right and nine left knees. There was no significant difference pre-operatively between groups in age, degree of deformity or range of motion.

There was no significant difference detected between Oxford knee scores up to twelve months, days to discharge, post-operative drainage and range of motion. However, the pain scores were significantly higher in the tourniquet group. Surface EMG as a measurement of quadriceps activation showed a significant difference between the groups and between time points. The no tourniquet group can support more energy in their quads muscle than the tourniquet group

The use of a tourniquet in total knee arthroplasty has no effect on overall knee function at twelve months as measured by the Oxford knee score and range of motion; however tourniquet use results in higher initial pain scores and reduction in quadriceps function as measured by surface EMG.

The Birmingham Hip Mid Head Resection (BMHR) was designed to accommodate patients with lower quality bone in the proximal half of the femoral head. It is a relatively new conservative hip implant with promising early results. Finite element modelling may provide an insight into mid-term results.

A cadaveric femur was CT scanned and 3D geometry of the intact femur constructed. The correctly sized BMHR implants (with and without visual stop) were positioned and these verified by a surgeon; hence constructing the post-operative models. Walking loads were applied and contact surfaces defined.

Stress analyses were performed using the finite element method and contact examined. Also, a strain-adaptive bone remodelling analysis was run using 45% gait hip loading data. Virtual DEXA images were computed and were analysed in seven regions of the bone surrounding the implants.

The BMHR was found to be mechanically stable with all surfaces indicating micromotion less than the critical 150 microns. Stress distribution was similar to the intact femur, with the exception of the head-neck region where some stress/strain shielding occurs. This is mirrored in the bone remodelling results, which show some bone resorption in this region. The visual stop, which is designed to ensure that the stem is not overdriven during implantation, did not affect the stress/strain results; only on a very local scale.

There is minimal data available in the literature regarding conservative hip implants and no data regarding the BMHR. This study is the first to look at the mechanical response of the bone to this implant.

The advantages of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) include its bone preserving nature, lower relative cost and superior functional results. Some temporary pain has been reported clinically following this procedure. Could this be related to bone remodeling? A validated bone remodeling algorithm may have the answers…

A 3D geometry of an intact human cadaveric tibia was generated using CT images. An all poly unicompartmental implant geometry was positioned in an inlay and onlay configuration on the tibia and the post-operative models created. An adaptive bone remodeling algorithm was used with finite element modeling to predict the bone remodeling behavior surrounding the implant in both scenarios. Virtual DEXA images were generated from the model and bone mineral density (BMD) was measured in regions of interest in the AP and ML planes. BMD results were compared to clinical results.

The bone remodelling algorithm predicted BMD growth in the proximal anterior regions of the tibia, with an inward tendency for both inlay and onlay models. Looking in the AP plane, a maximum of up to 7% BMD growth was predicted and in the ML plane this was as high as 16%. Minimal BMD loss was observed, which suggests minimal disturbance to the natural bone growth following UKA.

Positron emission tomography (PET) scans showed active hot spots in the antero- medial regions of the tibia. These results were consistent with the finite element modeling results.

Bone remodeling behavior was found to be sensitive to sizing and positioning of the implant.

The adaptive bone remodeling algorithm predicted minimal BMD loss and some BMD growth in the anterior region of the tibia following UKA. This is consistent with patient complaint and PET scans.