At the clinical CT image resolution level, there is no influence of the image voxel size on the derived finite element human cancellous bone models Computed tomography (CT)-based finite element (FE) models have been proved to provide a better prediction of vertebral strength than dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry [1]. FE models based on µCTs are able to provide the golden standard results [2], but due to the sample size restriction of the µCT and the XtremeCT machines, the clinical CT-based FE models is still the most promising tool for the in vivo prediction of vertebrae's strength. It has been found [3] that FE predicted Young's modulus of human cancellous bone increases as the image voxel size increases at the µCT resolution level [3]. However, it is still not clear whether the image voxel size in the clinical range has an impact on the predicted mechanical behavior of cancellous bone. This study is designed to answer this question.Summary
Introduction
One of the most controversial issues in total knee replacement is whether or not to resurface the patella. In order to determine the effects of different designs of femoral component on the conformity of the patellofemoral joint, five different knee prostheses were investigated. These were Low Contact Stress, the Miller-Galante II, the NexGen, the Porous-Coated Anatomic, and the Total Condylar prostheses. Three-dimensional models of the prostheses and a native patella were developed and assessed by computer. The conformity of the curvature of the five different prosthetic femoral components to their corresponding patellar implants and to the native patella at different angles of flexion was assessed by measuring the angles of intersection of tangential lines. The Total Condylar prosthesis had the lowest conformity with the native patella (mean 8.58°; 0.14° to 29.9°) and with its own patellar component (mean 11.36°; 0.55° to 39.19°). In the other four prostheses, the conformity was better (mean 2.25°; 0.02° to 10.52°) when articulated with the corresponding patellar component. The Porous-Coated Anatomic femoral component showed better conformity (mean 6.51°; 0.07° to 9.89°) than the Miller-Galante II prosthesis (mean 11.20°; 5.80° to 16.72°) when tested with the native patella. Although the Nexgen prosthesis had less conformity with the native patella at a low angle of flexion, this improved at mid (mean 3.57°; 1.40° to 4.56°) or high angles of flexion (mean 4.54°; 0.91° to 9.39°), respectively. The Low Contact Stress femoral component had the best conformity with the native patella (mean 2.39°; 0.04° to 4.56°). There was no significant difference (p >
0.208) between the conformity when tested with the native patella or its own patellar component at any angle of flexion. The geometry of the anterior flange of a femoral component affects the conformity of the patellofemoral joint when articulating with the native patella. A more anatomical design of femoral component is preferable if the surgeon decides not to resurface the patella at the time of operation.
