Many authors have described component position and leg length discrepancy (LLD) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) as the most important factors for good postoperative outcomes. However, regarding the relationships between component position and different approaches for THA, the optimal approach for component position and LLD remains unknown. The aims of this study were to compare these factors among the direct anterior, posterolateral, and direct lateral approaches on postoperative radiographs retrospectively, and determine which approach leads to good orientation in THA. We retrospectively evaluated 150 patients who underwent unilateral primary THA in our department between January 2009 and December 2014, with the direct anterior, posterolateral, or direct lateral approach used in 50 patients each. Patients with significant hip dysplasia (Crowe 3 or 4), advanced erosive arthritis, prevented osteotomy of the contralateral hip, and body mass index (BMI) of more than 30 were excluded. The mean age, sex, and preoperative diagnosis of the affected hip were equally distributed in patients who underwent THA with the different approaches. The mean BMI did not differ significantly among the groups. The radiographic measurements included cup inclination angle, dispersion of cup inclination from 40°, and LLD on an anteroposterior pelvic radiograph, and cup anteversion angle and dispersion of cup anteversion from 20° on a cross-table lateral radiograph postoperatively. We also measured the ratios of patients with both cup inclination of 30–50° and cup anteversion of 10–30° (target zone in our department), femoral stem varus/valgus, and LLD of 10 mm or less. Statistical analyses used an unpaired Introduction
Methods
We perform PAO via a modified Smith-Petersen approach. The purpose of this study was to investigate the result of PAO via a modified Smith-Petersen approach at a minimum 10-years' follow-up. We retrospectively reviewed 209 hips in 179 patients with acetabular dysplasia who underwent PAO with a modified Smith-Petersen approach from August 1995 to April 2010. Exclusion criteria were as follows: under 10 year follow-up, incomplete clinical or radiographic data. Harris hip score (HHS) was investigated preoperatively, at the time of most improvement and at the final follow-up for clinical evaluation. Tönnis classification was investigated preoperatively and at the final follow-up for evaluation of osteoarthritis. Center edge (CE) angle and acetabular roof obliquity (ARO) were investigated preoperatively, postoperatively and at the final-follow up for radiographic evaluation. Tönnis classification and radiographic parameters were investigated on anterior-posterior radiographs. Patients of conversion of PAO to total hip arthroplasty (THA) were investigated for preparing Kaplan Myer survival analysis. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare changes in HHS and radiographic parameters between the preoperative and the postoperative values. Statistical significance was defined a priori as p < 0.05.Introduction
Methods
