Abstract
Introduction
Many authors have described component position and leg length discrepancy (LLD) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) as the most important factors for good postoperative outcomes. However, regarding the relationships between component position and different approaches for THA, the optimal approach for component position and LLD remains unknown. The aims of this study were to compare these factors among the direct anterior, posterolateral, and direct lateral approaches on postoperative radiographs retrospectively, and determine which approach leads to good orientation in THA.
Methods
We retrospectively evaluated 150 patients who underwent unilateral primary THA in our department between January 2009 and December 2014, with the direct anterior, posterolateral, or direct lateral approach used in 50 patients each. Patients with significant hip dysplasia (Crowe 3 or 4), advanced erosive arthritis, prevented osteotomy of the contralateral hip, and body mass index (BMI) of more than 30 were excluded. The mean age, sex, and preoperative diagnosis of the affected hip were equally distributed in patients who underwent THA with the different approaches. The mean BMI did not differ significantly among the groups. The radiographic measurements included cup inclination angle, dispersion of cup inclination from 40°, and LLD on an anteroposterior pelvic radiograph, and cup anteversion angle and dispersion of cup anteversion from 20° on a cross-table lateral radiograph postoperatively. We also measured the ratios of patients with both cup inclination of 30–50° and cup anteversion of 10–30° (target zone in our department), femoral stem varus/valgus, and LLD of 10 mm or less. Statistical analyses used an unpaired t-test and Fisher's exact test, with significance set at p<0.05.
Results
The mean cup inclination was 36.9±5.1° for direct anterior approach, 40.8±7.5° for posterolateral approach, and 38.5±7.5° for direct lateral approach. Dispersion of cup inclination from 40° was almost identical in the three groups, with no significant differences. The mean cup anteversion was 23.4±5.5° for direct anterior approach, 25.9±9.2° for posterolateral approach, and 24.3±8.6° for direct lateral approach. Dispersion of cup anteversion from 20° differed between direct anterior approach and posterolateral or direct lateral approach (P<0.05 for each). The mean LLD was 1.3±6.6mm for direct anterior approach, 3.0±8.6mm for posterolateral approach, and 2.6±7.4mm for direct lateral approach. The mean LLD did not differ significantly among the three groups. The ratio of patients with both cup inclination of 30–50° and cup anteversion of 10–30° was significantly better for direct anterior approach than for posterolateral or direct lateral approach (78% vs. 52% and 52%, respectively; p<0.05). The ratios of femoral stem varus/valgus and LLD of 10 mm or less did not differ among the groups.
Conclusions
The direct anterior approach in THA appeared to have small dispersion of cup anteversion angle and high ratio of cup component position in our target zone compared with the posterolateral and direct lateral approaches. However, the LLD and femoral stem varus/valgus after THA did not differ significantly among the three approaches postoperatively.
