Purpose: The role of the posterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament (PMCL) in stability of the elbow remains poorly defined. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of sectioning the PMCL on the stability of the elbow.

Method: Varus and valgus gravity-loaded passive elbow motion and simulated active vertical elbow motion were performed on 11 cadaveric arms. An in-vitro elbow motion simulator, utilizing computer-controlled pneumatic actuators and servo-motors sutured to tendons, was used to simulate active elbow flexion. Varus/valgus angle and internal/external rotation of the ulna with respect to the humerus were recorded using an electromagnetic tracking system. Testing was performed on the intact elbow and following sectioning of the PMCL.

Results: With active flexion in the vertical position the varus/valgus kinematics were unchanged after PMCL sectioning (p=0.08). However, with the forearm in pronation, there was a significant increase in internal rotation after PMCL sectioning compared to the intact elbow (p< 0.05) which was most evident at 0° and 120° degrees of flexion (p< 0.05). This rotational difference was not statistically significant with the forearm in supination (p=0.07). During supinated passive flexion in the varus position, PMCL sectioning resulted in increased varus angulation at all flexion angles (p< 0.05). In pronation varus angulation was only increased at 120° of flexion (p< 0.05). However, internal rotation was increased at flexion angles of 30° to 120° (p< 0.05). In supination, sectioning the PMCL had no significant effect on maximum varus-valgus laxity or maximum internal rotation (p=0.1). However, in pronation, the maximum varus-valgus laxity increased by 3.5° (30%) and maximum internal rotation increased by 1.0° (29%) (p< 0.05).

Conclusion: These results indicate that isolated sectioning of the PMCL causes a small increase in varus angulation and internal rotation during both passive varus and active vertical flexion. This study suggests that isolated sectioning of the PMCL may not be completely benign and may contribute to varus and rotation instability of the elbow. In patients with insufficiency of the PMCL appropriate rehabilitation protocols (avoiding forearm pronation and shoulder abduction) should be followed when other injuries permit.

Results: Repeatability of creating motion-based JCS was less than 1 mm and 1° in all directions. The inter-specimen standard-deviations of position and orientation measurements were smaller for the motion-based than for the anatomy-based JCS in every direction and for every specimen (p< 0.006). The ulno-humeral varus angle and internal/external rotation kinematics of active flexion showed less inter-specimen variability when calculated using motion-based JCS (p< 0.05).

Purpose: While computer-assisted techniques can improve the alignment of the implant articulation with the native structure, stem abutment in the intramedullary canal may impede achievement of this alignment. In the current study, the effect of a fixed valgus (6 degree) stemmed humeral component on the alignment of navigated total elbow arthroplasty was investigated. Our hypothesis was that implantation of a humeral component with a reduced stem length would be more accurate than implantation of the humeral component with a standard length stem.

Method: Thirteen cadaveric distal humeri were imaged using a CT scanner, and a 3D surface model was reconstructed from each scan. Implantation was performed using two implant configurations. The first set was unmodified (Regular) while the second set was modified by reducing the length of the humeral stem to 25% of the original stem (Reduced). A surface model of the humeral component was aligned with the flexion-extension (FE) axis of the CT-based surface model, which was registered to the landmarks of the physical humerus using the iterative closest point algorithm. Navigated implant positioning was based on aligning a 3D computer model calibrated to the implant with a 3D model registered to the distal humerus.

Results: Implant alignment error was significantly lower for the Reduced implant, averaging 1.3±0.5 mm in translation and 1.2±0.4° in rotation, compared with 1.9±1.1 mm and 3.6±2.1° for the Regular implant. Abutment of the implant stem with the medullary canal of the humerus prevented optimal alignment of the Regular humeral component as only four of the 13 implantations were aligned to within 2.0° using navigation.

Conclusion: These results demonstrate that a humeral component with a fixed valgus angulation cannot be accurately positioned in a consistent fashion within the medullary canal of the distal humerus without sacrificing alignment of the FE axis due to stem abutment. Improved accuracy of implant placement can be achieved by introducing a family of humeral components, with three valgus angulations of 0°, 4° and 8°. Based on humeral morphology for these specimens, 12 of the 13 implants may be positioned to within 2° of the native FE axis using one of these 3 valgus angulations.

Purpose: Coronal shear fractures of the humerus include the Kocher-Lorenz fracture, an osteochondral fracture of the capitellar articular surface, the Hahn-Steinthal fracture, a substantial shear fragment, extension into the trochlea, and complete involvement of the capitellum and trochlea. If the fracture proves irreparable, it is not known what the impact of fragment excision would have on the biomechanics of the elbow. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of the sequential loss of the capitellum and trochlea on the kinematics and stability of the elbow.

Method: Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric arms were mounted in an upper extremity joint testing system, with cables attaching the tendons of the major muscles to motors and pneumatic actuators. Electromagnetic receivers attached to the radius and ulna enabled quantification of the kinematics of both bones with respect to the humerus. The distal humeral articular surface was sequentially excised to replicate clinically relevant coronal shear fractures while leaving the collateral ligaments intact. Active flexion in both the vertical and valgus-loaded positions, and passive rotation in the vertical position was conducted for each excision.

Results: Excision of the capitellum had no effect on ulnohumeral stability or kinematics in both the vertical or valgus positions (p=1.0). Excision of the entire capitellum and trochlea led to significant valgus instability with the arm in the valgus position (p=0.01), while excision of the lateral trochlea led to increased valgus instability with pronated flexion in the valgus position (p=0.049). Progressive loss of the articular surface led to posterior, inferior, and medial displacement of the radial head with respect to the capitellum and increased external rotation of the ulna with respect to the humerus in the vertical position (p< 0.05).

Conclusion: Excision of the capitellum did not result in valgus or rotational instability, while excision of the trochlea resulted in multiplanar instability. The radial head displaced medially because it is constrained to the ulna by the annular ligament, and the ulna pivoted into valgus and external rotation on the residual trochlea and medial collateral ligament. In patients with coronal shear fractures, the trochlea must be reconstructed to prevent instability and the potential for secondary degenerative change.

Stress shielding (i.e. reduction in bone strains) in the distal ulna is commonly noted following ulnar head replacement arthroplasty. Optimal design parameters for distal ulnar implants, including the length of the stem, are currently unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of stem length on bone strains along the length of the ulna.

Strain gauges were applied to each of eight cadaveric ulnae to measure bending loads at six locations along each ulna’s length (approximately 1.5, 2.5, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, and 13.0cm from the ulnar head). The proximal portion of each bone was secured in a custom-designed jig. A materials testing machine applied loads (5–30N) to the ulnar head while native strains were recorded. The ulnar head was removed and the loading procedure repeated for cemented stainless steel stems 3 and 7cm in length, according to a previously reported technique (Austman et al, CORS 2006). Other stem lengths between 3 and 7cm were tested in 0.5cm intervals with a 20N load applied only. Data were analyzed using a two-way repeated measures ANOVA (á=0.05).

In general, distal bone strains increased as stem length decreased (e.g. average microstrains at the second distal-most gauges: 138±13 (7cm), 147±15 (6cm), 159±21 (5cm), 186±40 (4cm), 235±43 (3cm)). The native strains were different from all stem lengths for the four distal-most gauges (p< 0.05). No differences were found between any stem length and the native bone at the two proximal-most gauges. The 3cm stem replicated the native strains more closely than the 7cm, over all applied loads (e.g. average microstrains at the third gauge level for a 25N load: 357±59 (native), 396±74 (3cm), 257±34 (7cm)).

No stem length tested matched the native strains at all gauge locations. The 3cm stem results were closer to the native strains than the 7cm stem for all loads at gauges overtop of the stem. Overall, the 3cm stem produced the highest strains, and thus would likely result in less distal ulnar bone resorption after implantation. These results suggest that shorter (approximately 3cm) stems should be considered for distal ulnar implants to potentially reduce stress shielding, although this must be balanced by adequate stem length for fixation.

This in-vitro study was conducted to determine the effect of rotator cuff tears on joint kinematics. A shoulder simulator produced unconstrained active abduction of the humerus. Three sequential 1cm lesions were created, the first two in the supraspinatus tendon and the third in the subscapularis tendon. The plane of abduction moved posteriorly and became more abnormal throughout abduction as the size of the tear increased. It is concluded that in order to generate the same motions achieved by the intact joint other muscle groups must be employed, inevitably resulting in altered joint loading.

This in-vitro study was conducted to determine the effect of simulated progressive tears of the rotator cuff on active glenohumeral joint kinematics.

Five cadaveric shoulders were tested using a shoulder simulator designed to produce unconstrained active motion of the humerus. Forces were applied to simulate loading of the supraspinatus, subscapularis, infraspinatus/teres minor, anterior, middle, and posterior deltoid muscles based upon variable ratios of electromyographic data and average physiological cross-sectional area of the muscles. Three sequential 1cm lesions were created, the first two in the supraspinatus tendon and the third in the subscapularis tendon. Simulated active glenohumeral abduction was performed following the creation of each lesion. Five successive tests were performed to quantify repeatability.

The plane of abduction moved posteriorly and became more abnormal throughout abduction as the size of the lesion increased (p=0.01) (Figure 1).

In order to generate the same motions achieved with an intact rotator cuff other muscle groups must be employed, inevitably resulting in altered joint loading.

A better understanding of the effects that rotator cuff tears have on the kinematics of the glenohumeral joint may result in the development of innovative rehabilitation strategies to compensate for this change in muscle balance and improve the clinical outcomes.

Please contact author for diagram and/or graph.

We have treated 16 patients with recurrent complex elbow instability using a hinged external fixator. All patients had instability, dislocation or subluxation of the ulnohumeral joint. The injuries were open in eight patients and were associated with 20 other fractures and five peripheral nerve injuries. Two patients had received initial treatment from us; 14 had previously had a mean of 2.1 unsuccessful surgical procedures (1 to 6). The fixator was applied at a mean of 4.8 weeks (0 to 9) after the injury and remained on the elbow for a mean of 8.5 weeks (6 to 11). After treatment we found the mean range of flexion-extension to be 105° (65 to 140). At a final follow-up of 23 months (14 to 40), the mean Morrey score was 84 (49 to 96): this translated into one poor, three fair, ten good and two excellent results.

Complications included one fractured humeral pin, one temporary palsy of the radial nerve, one recurrent instability, one wound infection, one severe pin-track infection and one patient with reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Although technically demanding, the use of the fixator is an important advance in the management of recurrent complex elbow instability after failure of conventional treatment.