THE EFFECT OF IMPLANT STEM LENGTH ON BONE STRAINS IN THE DISTAL ULNA

Abstract

Stress shielding (i.e. reduction in bone strains) in the distal ulna is commonly noted following ulnar head replacement arthroplasty. Optimal design parameters for distal ulnar implants, including the length of the stem, are currently unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of stem length on bone strains along the length of the ulna.

Strain gauges were applied to each of eight cadaveric ulnae to measure bending loads at six locations along each ulna’s length (approximately 1.5, 2.5, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, and 13.0cm from the ulnar head). The proximal portion of each bone was secured in a custom-designed jig. A materials testing machine applied loads (5–30N) to the ulnar head while native strains were recorded. The ulnar head was removed and the loading procedure repeated for cemented stainless steel stems 3 and 7cm in length, according to a previously reported technique (Austman et al, CORS 2006). Other stem lengths between 3 and 7cm were tested in 0.5cm intervals with a 20N load applied only. Data were analyzed using a two-way repeated measures ANOVA (á=0.05).

In general, distal bone strains increased as stem length decreased (e.g. average microstrains at the second distal-most gauges: 138±13 (7cm), 147±15 (6cm), 159±21 (5cm), 186±40 (4cm), 235±43 (3cm)). The native strains were different from all stem lengths for the four distal-most gauges (p< 0.05). No differences were found between any stem length and the native bone at the two proximal-most gauges. The 3cm stem replicated the native strains more closely than the 7cm, over all applied loads (e.g. average microstrains at the third gauge level for a 25N load: 357±59 (native), 396±74 (3cm), 257±34 (7cm)).

No stem length tested matched the native strains at all gauge locations. The 3cm stem results were closer to the native strains than the 7cm stem for all loads at gauges overtop of the stem. Overall, the 3cm stem produced the highest strains, and thus would likely result in less distal ulnar bone resorption after implantation. These results suggest that shorter (approximately 3cm) stems should be considered for distal ulnar implants to potentially reduce stress shielding, although this must be balanced by adequate stem length for fixation.