header advert
Results 21 - 26 of 26
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_13 | Pages 17 - 17
1 Mar 2013
Kulshreshtha R Gibson C Jariwala A Wigderowitz C
Full Access

Various authors have linked hypermobility at the trapeziometacarpal joint to future development of arthritis. When examining hypermobility, the anterior oblique ligament (AOL) and ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) are the two most important supporting structures. Literature suggests that reconstructive techniques to correct the hypermobility can prevent subsequent development of osteoarthritis. Eaton and Littler proposed a surgical technique to reconstruct the ligamentous support of this joint in 1973. This cadaveric biomechanical study aimed to evaluate the resultant effect on the mobility of the thumb metacarpal following this reconstructive technique. Seventeen cadaveric hands were prepared and strategically placed on a jig. Movements at the trapeziometacarpal joint were created artificially. Static digital photographs were taken with intact AOL and UCL at trapeziometacarpal joint (controls), for later comparison with those after sectioning of these ligaments and following Eaton-Littler reconstructive technique. The photographic records were analyzed using Scion.Image. Statistical analysis was performed using Minitab. A paired T-test was used to establish statistical relevance. Results confirmed that the AOL and UCL had a major role in limiting excessive motion at the trapeziometacarpal joint, principally in extension. Division of these ligaments produced a significant degree of subluxation of the metacarpal at this joint with thumb in neutral position (p-value = 0.013). Reconstruction of the ligamentous support using the Eaton-Littler technique reduced the degree of extension available (p-value = 0.005). This study confirmed the important role of the AOL and UCL in maintaining trapeziometacarpal joint stability, and that the Eaton-Littler reconstructive technique reduces the degree of hyperextension at this joint.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 45 - 45
1 Jan 2013
Kulshreshtha R Jariwala A Bansal N Smeaton J Wigderowitz C
Full Access

Introduction

Ulnar nerve entrapment is the second most common nerve entrapment syndrome of the upper extremity. Despite this, only a few studies have assessed the outcome of ulnar nerve decompression. The objectives of the study were to review the pre-operative symptoms, nerve conduction studies, the co-morbidities, operative procedures undertaken and the post-operative outcomes; and investigate and ascertain prognostic factors particularly in cases of persistence of symptoms after the surgery.

Methods

We reviewed the case notes of ulnar nerve decompressions surgery performed over a period of six year period. A structured proforma was created to document the demographics, patient complaints, method of decompression, per-operative findings and symptom status at the last follow up. Outcome grading was recorded as completely relieved, improved, unchanged or worse. Analysis of data was carried out using the SPSS software (Version 16.0; Illinois). The significance level was set at 5%.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 456 - 456
1 Aug 2008
Jariwala A Borremans J Kluger P
Full Access

The current work compares, in the patients with acute spinal cord injuries (SCI), the rate of early complications in those who were operated ‘out of hours’ to the patients who had their surgical interventions performed on the elective trauma list.

In a two-year study, all the complications occurring within the first month of surgery were recorded. Patients who had their operative procedure between 22.00 pm and 8.00 am comprised the ‘out of hours’ group, while the other group included patients operated on daytime spinal trauma lists. Each group had 22 patients. The demographics, injury patterns, time relapse to admission and theatre, the surgical procedure, its duration, the postoperative results and early complications were retrospectively analysed and compared for the two groups.

There were 38 males. 20 patients had complete SCI and 26 had thoracic spine involvement. Road traffic accident was the cause of injury in 26 patients. Two patients received steroids following the injury. The average admission time was 3 days. Surgery occurred on an average within 48 h (range 1–20 days). The mean theatre time was 2.8 h for the emergency group and 3.4 h for the elective cases. Early postoperative complications were chest infections (5), urinary tract infections (7), superficial wound infections (2), and pulmonary embolism (1). The incidence of complications was higher in cervical injuries, polytrauma, complicated procedures and individuals requiring intensive care. No significant differences were noted between the two groups.

Operating non life-saving emergency cases on elective list constitutes good clinical practice. Various reviews including the National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcomes and Deaths (NCEPOD) suggest that operating out of working hours poses a substantial risk to the patient’s health and safety. This study emphasizes that complications relate to the injury level, associated injuries and the procedure itself, rather than to the timing of surgery.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 376 - 376
1 Jul 2008
Jariwala A Azhar A Abboud R Wigderowitz CA
Full Access

The pattern of injury to the carpal ligaments following wrist trauma is unclear. Different imaging techniques often prove inconclusive rendering the diagnosis difficult and hence the treatment controversial. This study aimed to observe and evaluate the differences in scapholunate kinematics before and after sectioning the scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL) and radioscaphocapitate ligament (RSC).

Twenty two embalmed cadaveric wrists were used. There were four males and seven females with an average age of 84 years. Their medical records confirmed the absence of previous history of wrist diseases or injuries. The extensor and flexors tendons of the wrist were removed leaving the capsule intact. Two drill bits (1.5 mm) were used to make a hole each in scaphoid and lunate, one centimeter apart. The drill bits were left in the bones to act as metal wires for calibration. Each wrist was moved through a set of motions and each movement was performed thrice; first one with the ligaments intact, second with SLIL sectioned and the last one with RSC excised. Digital photographs were taken and angles measured with MB Ruler software. Analysis of variance was done using SPSS 12.

There was no angle between the metal pointers when the ligaments were intact. There was movement and change in angle detected when SLIL and RSC were sectioned. The sectioning of the SLIL lead to a significant increase in the angle between the pointers in all the movements recorded (p value < 0.001). Subsequent sectioning of the RSC further increased this angle but this increase was much smaller compared to that after sectioning SLIL. On completion of the measurements the wrist capsule was opened to reveal that both the ligaments had been successfully sectioned and there were no degenerative changes in the bones or ligaments in any wrist.

This first cadaveric evaluation of alterations in scapholunate motion with sectioning of SLIL and RSC revealed that SLIL has a significant influence on the scapholunate kinematics, where as sectioning of the RSC has little additional effect. This in-vivo finding might have implications of importance of preserving SLIL during wrist surgeries and its role in management of carpal instabilities.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 379 - 379
1 Jul 2008
Jariwala A Scott I Arnold G Abboud R Wigderowitz C
Full Access

Dynamic assessment of the wrist motion and the specific angles are difficult using the conventional methods. We wanted to adapt and assess the repeatability of the Fas-trak system for continuous monitoring of three dimensional (3 D) wrist movements.

Twenty seven volunteers, aged 18 to 30 years were asked to perform predetermined tasks. The exclusion criteria were previous history of wrist trauma or joint disease. The transmitter was mounted on the dorsum of the forearm while the sensor was placed over the third metacarpal head. The protocol of three tasks was developed. Task 1 measured maximal flexion, extension, radial and ulnar deviation of the wrist. Task 2 involved picking up an object and moving it across a barrier. Task 3 involved the writing simulation. The comparison between the left and the right wrists indicated suitability of the system to be used on either of the limbs. Repeated measurements on the right wrist provided an assessment of repeatability of the Fastrak system.

The Fastrak system was successful in acquiring data in 3 D. The transmitter and the sensor were easy to attach and were of no discomfort to the subjects. As expected the maximum movement was noted in the flexion-extension plane. The total arc of movement in the flexion-extension plane was 127.1 degrees and 69.7 degrees in the radio-ulnar plane. There was no statistically signifi-cant difference between the movements in the left and the right wrists, even when the effect of dominance was considered. The lift and move task showed that most subjects utilised three-fourths of the total possible radio-ulnar movement, but only one-thirds of the total flexion and extension. The writing simulation revealed a substantial variability between subjects. The Fastrak system revealed variation up to 3 degrees in the means of range of movements, while measuring wrist movements.

The current study showed that the Fastrak system is a user-friendly and repeatable device, which could be used in everyday clinical use. It has the potential to be used for evaluation of the diseased wrist and the results of therapeutic interventions, operative or otherwise.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 220 - 220
1 May 2006
Kotnis R Jariwala A Henderson N
Full Access

Method: We reviewed the hospital notes of 45 patients who underwent a lumbar discectomy over a 30month period. The care pathway was divided into three components: Pre-Hospital Wait (time from GP referral to first outpatient appointment), Hospital Wait (first out-patient appointment to being listed for surgery) and the Waiting List period.

The patients were divided into three groups: those following a standard pathway (group I), patients referred with an MRI scan (group II) and emergency admissions to hospital (group III).

Results: The groups I, II and III comprised of 18, 12 and 7 patients respectively. The mean Pre-Hospital Wait in weeks was 16 (group I) and 14 (group II). The Hospital Wait was 12 (group I), 3 (group II) and 1 (group III). The Waiting List period was 26 (group I), 18 (group II) and 1 (group III). The difference in The Hospital Wait between groups I and II reached significance.

Discussion: The Waiting List Period is often blamed as the causa principale for a delay in treatment. This review shows that a considerable time is spent in the Hospital Wait period and draws attention to a recognised delay in the care pathway, which requires a multidisciplinary approach to reduce its effect.