After TKR, excessive tension within the lateral retinaculum can lead to joint instability, component wear, stiffness and pain. The spatial distribution of strain in the lateral retinculum is unknown, both in the native knee and after TKR. In this study we measure the magnitude and distribution of mechanical strain in the lateral retinaculum with knee flexion, both in the native knee and after TKR. We hypothesize that:
Strain in the lateral retinaculum will increase as a function of flexion. Some regions of the lateral retinaculum experience greater strain than others. TKR will affect the magnitude and location of strain during knee flexion. A fiduciary grid of approximately 40–70 markers was attached to the exposed lateral retinacula of five fresh frozen cadaveric knees in order to allow tracking of soft-tissue deformation. Each knee was flexed from 0–120° in a 6 degree-of-freedom custom activity simulator that physiologically loaded the knee during a squatting maneuver. During simulation, the displacement of each fiduciary point was measured using visible-light stereo-photogrammetry. The fiduciary grid divided into four distinct regions for strain analysis. Using the grid of the native knee in full extension as the initial state, the average principal strain in each region was calculated as a function of flexion. Measurements were repeated after TKR was performed using a contemporary implant system.Introduction
Materials and Methods
A disturbing prevalence of painful inflammatory reactions has been reported in metal-on-metal (MoM) hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A contributing factor is localized loading of the acetabular shell leading to “edge wear” which is often seen after precise measurement of the bearing surfaces of retrieved components. Factors contributing to edge wear include adverse cup orientation leading to proximity (<10 mm) of the hip reaction force to the edge of the acetabular component. As this phenomenon is a function of implant positioning and patient posture, this study was performed to investigate the occurrence of edge loading during different functional activities as a function of cup inclination and version. We developed a computer model of the hip joint through reconstruction of CT scans of a proto-typical pelvis and femur and virtually implanting a hip resurfacing prosthesis in an ideal position. Using this model, we examined the relationship between the resultant hip force vector and the edge of the acetabular shell during walking, stair ascent and descent, and getting in and out of a chair. Load data was derived from 5 THR patients implanted with instrumented hip prostheses (Bergmann et al). We calculated the distance from the edge of the shell to the point of intersection of the load vector and the bearing surface for cup orientations ranging from 40 to 70 degrees of inclination, and 0 to 40 degrees of anteversion.Introduction:
Methods:
Increasing attention to the functional outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has demonstrated that many patients experience limitations when attempting to perform demanding activities that are normal for age-matched peers, primarily because of knee symptoms. Episodes of instability following TKA are most commonly reported during activities in which significant transverse or torsional forces are supported by the joint with relatively low joint compression forces, including stair-descent and walking on sloped or uneven surfaces. This study was performed to examine the influence of conformity between the femoral and tibial components on the Antero-Posterior (AP) stability of knee during stair descent. Six cadaveric knees were loaded in a six degree-of-freedom joint simulator, with the application of external forces simulating the action of the quadriceps and hamstring muscles and the external loads and moments occurring during stair descent, including the stages of terminal swing phase, weight-acceptance phase (prior to and after quadriceps contraction) and mid-stance. During these manoeuvres, the displacement and rotation of the femur and the tibia were measured with a multi-camera high resolution motion analysis system (Fig. 1). Each knee was tested in the intact and ACL deficient condition – and after implantation of total knee prosthesis with Cruciate-Retaining (CR), Cruciate-Sacrificing with an intact PCL (CS + PCL), Cruciate-Sacrificing with an absent PCL (CS-PCL) and Posterior-Stabilizing (PS) tibial inserts (Figs 2 and 3).Introduction
Methods
Despite all the attention to new technologies and sophisticated implant designs, imperfect surgical technique remains a obstacle to improving the results of total knee replacement (TKR). On the tibial side, common errors which are known to contribute to post-operative instability and reduced function include internal rotation of the tibial tray, inadequate posterior slope, and excessive component varus or valgus. However, the prevalence of each error in surgeries performed by surgeons and trainees is unknown. The following study was undertaken to determine which of these errors occurs most frequently in trainees acquiring the surgical skills to perform TKR. A total of 43 knee replacement procedures were performed by 11 surgical trainees (surgical students, residents and fellows) in a computerized training center. After initial instruction, each trainee performed a series of four TKR procedures in cadavers (n = 2) and bone replicas (n = 2) using a contemporary TKR instrument set and the assistance of an experienced surgical instructor. Prior to each procedure, computer models of each cadaver and/or bone replica tibia were prepared by reconstructing CT scans of each specimen. All training procedures were performed in a navigated operating room using a 12 camera motion analysis system (Motion Analysis Inc.) with a spatial resolution in all three orthogonal directions of ± 0.15 mm. The natural slope, varus/valgus alignment, and axial rotation of the proximal tibial surface were recorded prior to surgery and after placement of the tibial component. For evaluation of all data, acceptable limits for implantation were defined as: posterior slope: 0–10°; varus/valgus inclination of tibial resection: ± 3°; and external rotation: 0–10°.Introduction:
Materials and Methods:
A disturbing prevalence of short-term failures of metal-on-metal (MoM) hip resurfacings has been reported by joint registries. These cases have been primarily due to painful inflammatory reactions and, in extreme cases, formation of pseudotumors within periarticular soft-tissues. The likely cause is localized loading of the acetabular shell leading to “edge wear” which is often seen after precise measurement of the bearing surfaces of retrieved components. Factors contributing to edge wear of metal-on-metal arthroplasties are thought to include adverse cup orientation, patient posture, and the direction of hip loading. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of different functional activities in edge loading of hip resurfacing prostheses as a function of cup inclination and version. We developed a computer model of the hip joint through reconstruction of CT scans of a proto-typical pelvis and femur and virtually implanting a hip resurfacing prosthesis in an ideal position. Using this model, we examined the relationship between the resultant hip force vector and the edge of the acetabular shell during walking, stair ascent and descent, and getting in and out of a chair. Load data was derived from 5 THR patients implanted with instrumented hip prostheses (Bergmann et al). We calculated the distance from the edge of the shell to the point of intersection of the load vector and the bearing surface for cup orientations ranging from 40 to 70 degrees of inclination, and 0 to 40 degrees of anteversion.Introduction
Methods
With the growing emphasis on the cost of medical care, there is renewed interest in the productivity and efficiency of surgical procedures. We have developed a method to systematically examine the efficiency of the surgical team during primary total knee replacement (TKR). In this report, we present data derived from a series of procedures performed by different joint surgeons. This data demonstrates a variation between the duration and efficiency of each step in this procedure and its relationship to the experience and coordination of the surgeon working with the scrub team. After consent was achieved, videotaped recordings were prepared of ten primary TKR procedures performed by five highly experienced joint surgeons. For quantitative analysis, each procedure was divided into 7 principal tasks from initial incision to wound closure. In order to quantify efficiency, we recorded the occurrence of events leading to delays in each step of the procedure. Starting with a total score of 100 points, deductions were made, based on the number of delaying events and its impact on the efficiency of the procedure. A final score for the surgery was then determined using the individual scores from each principal task. The experience of each member of the surgical team in participating in TKR, and in working with the surgeon, were recorded and correlated with the total efficiency score for the entire procedure.Introduction
Methods
Although the “learning curve” in surgical procedures is well recognized, little data exists documenting the accuracy of surgeons in performing individual steps of orthopedic procedures. In this study we have used a validated computer-based training system to measure variations instrument placement and alignment in TKA, specifically those relating to tibial preparation. Eleven trainees (surgical students, residents and fellows) were recruited to perform a series of 43 knee replacement procedures in a computerized training center. After initial instruction, each trainee performed a series of four TKA procedures in cadavers (n=2) and bone replicas (n=2) using a contemporary TKA instrument set and the assistance of an experienced surgical instructor. The Computerized Bioskills system was utilized to monitor the placement and orientation of the proximal tibial osteotomy and the tibial tray.Introduction
Methods
Proper rotational alignment of the tibial component is a critical factor affecting the outcome of TKA. Traditionally, the tibial component is oriented with respect to fixed landmarks on the tibia without reference to the plane of knee motion. In this study, we examined differences between rotational axes based on anatomic landmarks and the true axis of knee motion during a functional activity. 24 fresh-frozen lower limb specimens were mounted in a joint simulator which enable replication of lunging and squatting through application of muscle and body-weight forces. Kinematic data was collected using a 3D motion analysis system. Computer models of the femur and tibia were generated by CT reconstruction. The motion axis of each knee (TFA) was defined by the 3D path of the femur with respect to the tibia as the knee was flexed from 30 to 90 degrees. The orientation the TFA was compared to 5 different anatomic axes commonly proposed for alignment of the tibial component.Introduction
Materials and Methods
