Areal BMD (aBMD) is relatively poor at discriminating those patients at risk of hip fracture. This study tested the hypothesis that a measure of bending resistance, cross section moment of inertia (CSMI) and section modulus, derived from 3D peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) images made ex-vivo, would discriminate cases of hip fracture from controls better than areal bone mineral density. The biopsies were from (n = 20, F) subjects that had suffered an intracapsular hip fracture. The control material (n = 23, F) was from post-mortem subjects. Serial pQCT 1mm thick cross-sectional images using the Densiscan 1000 pQCT clinical forearm densitometer were obtained, and matched for location along the neck. The image voxels were converted to units of bone mass, which were then used to derive the mass weighted CSMI (MWCSMI), section modulus and areal bone mineral density, (see Table). The aBMD results showed that the difference between the means of the fracture cases compared to the controls was 9.9% (−0.061g/cm2; +0.0055g/cm2, −0.127g/cm2; 95% confidence interval). However, the MWCSMI was 29.5% (−5966mm4; −8868mm4,−3066mm4; 95% confidence interval) lower in the fracture cases compared to the controls, while section modulus was 32.5% (−242mm3; −133mm3, −352mm3 95% confidence interval) lower. When presented as Z scores the fracture cases had considerably lower section modulus Z scores (mean −1.27 SD, p=0.0001) than aBMD – Z scores (mean −0.5 SD, p=0.07). To simulate the forces experienced during a sideways fall, the model’s neutral axis was rotated by 210°. The results were similar for section modulus to those at 0°. This study suggests that biomechanical analysis of the distribution of bone within the femoral neck may offer a marked improvement in the ability to discriminate patients with an increased risk of intracapsular fracture. Progress towards implementing this form of analysis in clinical densitometry should improve its diagnostic value.
The displaced intracapsular fracture in the elderly has frequently been termed the ‘unsolved’ fracture because of the debate as whether the femoral head should be preserved or replaced. To answer this question 413 patients aged over 70 years with a displaced intracapsular fracture were entered into a prospective randomised trial, to treatment with either an uncemented Austin Moore hemiarthroplasty or reduction and fixation with three cancellous screws. Pathological fractures, Paget’s disease and rheumatoid arthritis patients were excluded. Analysis of pre-operative characteristics of patients showed there was no significant difference between the two groups. Mean follow-up of surviving patients was 827 days. Internal fixation resulted in a reduced mean operative time (22 versus 47 minutes), operative blood loss (23ml versus 171mls) and transfusion requirements. There was no significant differences in the incidence of post-operative complications between treatment other than and increased risk of wound sepsis for arthroplasty (4/207 versus 0/206 deep wound infections). There was a consistent tendency to a marginally lower mortality following internal fixation (15.5% versus 12.7% at 90 days). Six patients in the arthroplasty group required revision, four for loosening, one for sepsis and one for fracture around the implant. Non-union occurred in 64(31%) of those treated by internal fixation. Most of these patients had conversion to arthroplasty. Other complications of internal fixation requiring secondary operations were avascular necrosis (4 cases), fracture below implant (1 cases) and removal for painful screw heads (7 cases). Functional assessment of the survivors at one year from injury showed no significant difference between the two groups for pain or change in mobility. These results indicate that arthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures in the elderly is associated with a reduced re-operation rate but at the expense of a marginally increased mortality.
We assessed 882 patients presenting with a proximal femoral fracture by a new mobility score and by a mental test score, to determine which was of the most value in forecasting mortality at one year. Both scores gave a highly significant prediction, but the mobility score had a greater predictive value and is easier to perform.
We studied prospectively a consecutive series of 765 patients with proximal femoral fractures to determine if the time interval between injury and surgery influenced the outcome. Patients in whom surgery had been delayed for medical reasons were excluded. We divided the patients into four groups depending on the delay to surgery. Analysis of pre- and postoperative characteristics showed the groups to be similar. Mortality in the four groups was not significantly different but morbidity was increased by delay, particularly with regard to the incidence of pressure sores.
We have determined the quality-adjusted-life-years and cost of such in several types of hip fracture and various treatment options. Operative treatment proved more cost-effective than other methods for displaced subcapital fractures and for extracapsular fractures. For undisplaced subcapital fractures conservative treatment was almost as cost-effective as surgery.
The results of treatment in 242 patients with intracapsular fractures of the neck of femur treated with Garden screws are presented with reference as to whether the screws were crossed or parallel. The incidence both of nonunion and of avascular necrosis was less in those fractures treated with parallel screws. The outcome was also superior if the reduction was good.