Introduction

Acetabular dysplasia is associated with an increased risk of hip pain and early development of osteoarthritis (OA). The Bernese peri-acetabular osteotomy (PAO) is the most well-established technique in the Western world for the treatment of symptomatic acetabular dysplasia. This case-control study aims to assess whether the severity of acetabular dysplasia has an effect on outcome following Peri-Acetabular Osteotomy (PAO) and/or the ability to achieve desired acetabular correction.

A modular hemiarthroplasty has a Metal-on-Metal (MoM) taper-trunnion junction, which may lead to increased wear and Adverse-Reaction-to-Metal-Debris (ARMD). To-date no wear related issues have been described in the elderly and less active that receives a hemiarthroplasty. This study aims to determine in vivo wear (i.e. serum metal ion levels) in hip hemiarthroplasty, and identify factors associated with increased wear.

This is a prospective, IRB approved, single-centre, cohort study of patients that received an uncemented, modular hemiarthroplasty of proven design for the treatment of hip fracture between 2013–2015. All, alive, patients at 12-months post-implantation with AMTS≥6 were invited to participate. Of the 125 eligible patients, 50 accepted the invitation and were reviewed, including clinical/radiological assessment, metal-ion ([Chromium (Cr) and Cobalt (Co)]) measurement and Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Acetabular erosion was graded (0–3: normal-protrusio). Metal ion levels were considered high if ≥7ppb.

The mean OHS was 37 (SD: 10). No acetabular erosion was detected in 21, whilst the remaining had either grade-1 (n=21) or grade-2 (n=8). The median Cr and Co levels were 2.9 (SD:9) and 2.2 (SD:4) respectively. There were 8 cases (16%) with high ion levels. To-date only 2 of them has an ARMD lesion, and none have been revised. Patients with metal ion levels had similar pre-fall mobility, taper- and head- size and OHS to those with low metal ion levels (p=0.2–0.7) However, all hips with high metal ion levels had evidence of acetabular erosion (≥1).

Modular Hip hemiarthroplasties and their taper-trunnion junction are not immune to high wear and ARMD despite being implanted in a less active cohort. Acetabular erosion should alert clinicians, as it is associated with 20× increased-risk of taper wear, presumably due to the increased transmitted torque. Whether the use of modular hemiarthroplasties should remain is debatable.

Degenerative hip and spine pathologies often co-exist, as Hip-Spine-Syndrome (HSS). Many patients eventually need surgery in both hip (THR) and spine [decompression-spinal-arthrodesis (DSA)]. This case-control study aims to determine whether the presence of a DSA compromised THR outcome and whether outcome of THR is better if performed prior to- (THR-1^st) or after- DSA (THR-2^nd).

This is a single centre, multi-surgeon, retrospective, case-control study. Of the 748 patients that underwent DSA between 2004–15, 43 patients (54 THRs) have also had a 1° THR(s) at our unit and formed the cases. Thirty-two THRs were performed prior to the DSA (THR-1^st) and 22 were done following the DSA (THR-2^nd). Most cases had either 1- (n=3) or 2-level (n=20) DSA. The most common DSA level was L4/5 (n=23). The mean THR-DSA interval was 3.6 years. Controls were patients (n=67) without DSA or previous spinal surgery, that had a THR in our unit over the same study period matched for age, gender and type of THR implanted.

Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) were obtained using the Oxford-Hip- and Harris-Hip-Scores (OHS/HHS), with the difference between post- and pre-operative scores defined as Δ. Outcome was compared between Cases and Controls and between THR-1^st and THR-2^nd Groups. Outcome measures included complications, revisions, PROMs and cup orientations achieved.

The mean age at THR was 67 years old (SD: 11) and most patients were female (n=82, 68%). The mean cup inclination and anteversion angles were 41° (SD:8) and 21° (SD:8). At a mean follow-up of 6 years, the OHS improved from OHS_pre:16 (SD: 7) to OHS_fu:41 (SD:10) and the HHS improved from HHS_pre:51 (SD:14) to HHS_fu:88 (SD:13).

A greater incidence of complications were seen in the Cases (n=10; ARMD-3, infection-4, loosening-2, dislocation-1) compared to the Controls (n=3; dislocation-2, loosening-1) (p=0.01). Consequently, more THRs required revision in the Cases (n=7) compared to the Controls (n=1) (p=0.01). There were no differences in OHS_pre/OHS_fu/ΔOHS/HHS_pre/HHS_fu/ΔHHS between cases and controls (p=0.1 – 0.9).

There were no difference in complications (7/29 Vs. 3/25; p=0.3), nor revision rates (5/29 Vs. 2/25; p=0.3) between THA-1^st and THA-2^nd Groups. Greater differences in PROMs were detected between the groups. The THA-1^st Group, compared to the THA-2^nd Group had higher OHS_pre (19 Vs 12), HHS_pre (54 Vs 48), OHS_fu (43 Vs 32) and HHS_fu (93 Vs 76), (p=0.001–0.005). However, no statistically significant difference in ΔOHS (24 Vs 17) and ΔHHS (39 Vs 26) were seen between the THA-1^st and THA-2^nd Groups (p=0.1).

Patients with a 1° THR and DSA, had a greater rate complications and revisions compared to a matched control. Overall, no difference in PROMs were seen between Cases and Controls. No significantly increased risk of dislocation was seen in this predominantly 1- and 2-level DSA cohort. The superior PROMs detected in the THA-1^st Group provide evidence that the hip pathology should be addressed 1^st (in cases with 1- or 2-level planned DSA).

Aims

Advocates of debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) in hip periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) argue that a procedure not disturbing a sound prosthesis-bone interface is likely to lead to better survival and functional outcome compared with revision. This case-control study aims were to compare outcome of DAIRs for infected primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with outcomes following primary THA and two-stage revision of infected primary THAs.

Aim

Advocates of Debridement-Antibiotics-and-Implant-Retention (DAIR) in hip peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) argue that a procedure not disturbing a sound prosthesis-bone interface is likely to lead to better survival and functional outcome compared to revision. However, no evidence supports this. This case-control study's aims were to compare outcome of DAIRs for infected 1° total hip arthroplasty (THA) with outcomes following 1° THA and 2-stage revisions of infected 1° THAs.

Introduction

The burden of peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) following hip and knee surgery is increasing. Endoprosthetic replacement (EPR) is an option for management of massive bone loss resulting from infection around failed lower limb implants.

Objectives

A possible solution for the management of proximal femoral bone loss is a modular femoral endoprosthesis (EPR). Although the outcome of EPRs in tumour surgery has been well described, the outcome of their use in revision hip surgery has received less attention. The aim of this study was to describe the outcome of using EPR for non-neoplastic indications.

Image-guided intra-articular hip injection of local-anaesthetic and steroid is commonly used in the management of hip pain. It can be used as a diagnostic and/or therapeutic tool and is of low cost (£75). The aim of this study was to assess how often a hip injection has a therapeutic effect.

This is a retrospective, consecutive, case series of intra-articular hip injections performed in a tertiary referral hospital over a 2-year period (2013–4). Patients were identified from the radiology department's prospectively entered database. Clinical information, reason for injection and subsequent management was obtained from hospital records. All patients prospectively reported their pain levels in a numeric pain scale diary (out of 10) at various time points; pre-, immediately post-, 1st day-, 2nd day- and 2 weeks- post-injection. Only patients with complete pain scores at all time points were included (n=200, of the 250 injections performed over study period, 80%).

The majority of injections were performed for osteoarthritis (OA) treatment (82%). The pain was significantly reduced from a pre-injection score of 7.5 (SD:2) to 5.0 (SD:3) immediately post-injection(p<0.001); only 24 (11%) reported any worsening of pain immediately post-injection. Pain significantly reduced further to 3.8(SD:3) at 2-weeks post-injection (p<0.001). 50% of patients had at least a 3 point drop in reported pain. No improvement was seen in 18 patients and 10 (5%) reported worse pain at 2-weeks compared to pre-injection. Of the OA cohort, 10% have required repeat injections, 45% required no further intervention and 45% underwent or are due for hip replacement. No immediate complications occurred.

Intra-articular hip injection reduced pain in 86% of cases and has delayed any further surgical treatment for at least 2 years in over 50% of OA cases. It is hence a cost-effective treatment modality. Further work is necessary to describe factors predicting response.

The management of proximal femoral bone loss is a significant challenge in revision hip arthroplasty. A possible solution is the use of a modular proximal femur endoprosthesis (EPR). Although the survivorship and functional outcome of megaprostheses used in tumour surgery has been well described, outcome of EPRs used in revision hip surgery has received less attention. The aim of this study was to determine the 5-year outcome following proximal femur EPR and determine factors that influence it.

This was a retrospective consecutive case series of all EPRs (n=80) performed for non-neoplastic indications, by 6 surgeons, in our tertiary referral centre, between 2005–2014. Patient demographics and relevant clinical details were determined from notes. The most common indications for the use of EPRs included infection (n=40), peri-prosthetic fracture (n=12) and failed osteosynthesis of proximal femoral fractures/complex trauma (n=11). Outcome measures included complication and re-operation rates, implant survival and assessment of functional outcome using the Oxford-Hip-Score (OHS).

The mean age at surgery was 69 years and mean follow-up was 4 (0 – 11) years. The mean number of previous hip operations was 2.4 (range: 0 – 17). Twenty-five patients sustained a complication (31%), the most common being infection (n=9) and dislocation (n=4). By follow-up, further surgery was required in 18 (22%) hips, 9 of which were EPR revisions. 5-yr implant survivorship was 87% (95%CI: 76 – 98%). Mean OHS was 28 (range: 4 – 48). Inferior survival and outcome were seen in EPRs performed for the treatment of infection. Infection eradication was achieved in 34/41 with the index EPR procedure and in 40/41 hips by follow-up.

Limb salvage was achieved in all cases and acceptable complication- and re-operation rates were seen. EPRs for periprosthetic fractures and failed osteosynthesis had best outcome. We recommend the continued use of proximal femur EPR in complex revision surgery.

Introduction

The value of Debridement-Antibiotics-and-Implant-Retention (DAIR) in prosthetic-joint-infection (PJI) is still a matter of debate as most studies to-date are underpowered with variable end-points. In our, tertiary referral, bone infection unit we consider DAIR to be a suitable option in all PJIs with soundly fixed prostheses, despite chronicity. The aims of this study were to define the long-term outcome following DAIR in hip PJI and identify factors that influence it.

Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) is a surgical option in the treatment of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). It is thought to be most appropriate in the treatment of early (≤6 weeks post-op) PJI. Most studies to-date reporting on DAIRs in hip PJI have been underpowered by reporting on small cohorts (n= <45), or report on registry data with associated biases and limitations. In our, tertiary referral, bone infection unit we consider DAIR to be a suitable option in all cases of PJI with a soundly fixed prosthesis, with early or late presentation, especially in patients who are too elderly or infirm to undergo major surgery.

Aim: To define the 10-year outcome following DAIR in hip PJI and identify factors that influence it.

We retrospectively reviewed all DAIRs performed in our unit between 1997 and 2013 for hip PJI. Only infected cases confirmed by histological and microbiological criteria were included. Data recorded included patient demographics and medical history, type of surgery performed (DAIR or DAIR + exchange of modular components), organism identified and type/duration of antibiotic treatment. Outcome measures included complications, mortality rate, implant survivorship and functional outcome.

121 DAIRs were identified with mean age of 71 years (range: 33–97). 67% followed an index procedure of 1° arthroplasty. 53% included exchange of modular components. 60% of DAIRs were for early onset PJI. Isolated staphylococcus was present in 50% of cases and 25% had polymicrobial infection. At follow-up (mean:7 years, range: 0.3 – 18), 83 patients were alive; 5- and 10- year mortality rates were 15% and 35% respectively. 45% had a complication (persistence of infection: 27%, dislocation: 10%) and 40% required further surgery. Twenty hips have been revised to-date (17%). Performing a DAIR and not exchanging the modular components was associated with an almost 3× risk (risk ratio: 2.9) of subsequent implant failure (p=0.04). 10-yr implant survivorship was 80% (95%CI: 70 – 90%). Improved 10-year implant survivorship was associated with DAIR performed for early PJI (85% Vs 68%, p=0.04). Functional outcome will be discussed.

DAIR is a particularly valuable option in the treatment of hip PJI, especially in the early post-operative period. Whenever possible, exchange of modular implants should be undertaken, however DAIRs are associated with increased morbidity even in early PJI. Factors that predict success of DAIR in late PJI need to be identified.

Introduction

Joint preserving procedures have gained popularity in an attempt to delay arthroplasty in young, dysplastic hips. Excellent results can be achieved with peri-acetabular osteotomy (PAO) in congruent non-arthritic hips. The role of salvage procedures such as the Shelf acetabuloplasty remains undefined. This study aims to determine the long-term survival and functional outcome following Shelf acetabuloplasty and to identify factors that influence outcome.

We assessed the orientation of the acetabular component in 1070 primary total hip arthroplasties with hard-on-soft, small diameter bearings, aiming to determine the size and site of the target zone that optimises outcome. Outcome measures included complications, dislocations, revisions and ΔOHS (the difference between the Oxford Hip Scores pre-operatively and five years post-operatively). A wide scatter of orientation was observed (2sd 15°). Placing the component within Lewinnek’s zone was not associated withimproved outcome. Of the different zone sizes tested (± 5°, ± 10° and ± 15°), only ± 15° was associated with a decreased rate of dislocation. The dislocation rate with acetabular components inside an inclination/anteversion zone of 40°/15° ± 15° was four times lower than those outside. The only zone size associated with statistically significant and clinically important improvement in OHS was ± 5°. The best outcomes (ΔOHS > 26) were achieved with a 45°/25° ± 5° zone.

This study demonstrated that with traditional technology surgeons can only reliably achieve a target zone of ±15°. As the optimal zone to diminish the risk of dislocation is also ±15°, surgeons should be able to achieve this. This is the first study to demonstrate that optimal orientation of the acetabular component improves the functional outcome. However, the target zone is small (± 5°) and cannot, with current technology, be consistently achieved.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:164–72.

National Institute of Clinical Excellence guidelines state that cemented stems with an Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP) rating of > 3B should be used for hemiarthroplasty when treating an intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck. These recommendations are based on studies in which most, if not all stems, did not hold such a rating.

This case-control study compared the outcome of hemiarthroplasty using a cemented (Exeter) or uncemented (Corail) femoral stem. These are the two prostheses most commonly used in hip arthroplasty in the UK.

Data were obtained from two centres; most patients had undergone hemiarthroplasty using a cemented Exeter stem (n = 292/412). Patients were matched for all factors that have been shown to influence mortality after an intracapsular fracture of the neck of the femur. Outcome measures included: complications, re-operations and mortality rates at two, seven, 30 and 365 days post-operatively. Comparable outcomes for the two stems were seen.

There were more intra-operative complications in the uncemented group (13% vs 0%), but the cemented group had a greater mortality in the early post-operative period (n = 6). There was no overall difference in the rate of re-operation (5%) or death (365 days: 26%) between the two groups at any time post-operatively.

This study therefore supports the use of both cemented and uncemented stems of proven design, with an ODEP rating of 10A, in patients with an intracapsular fracture of the neck of the femur.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:94–9.

There is great variability in acetabular component orientation following hip replacement. The aims of this study were to compare the component orientation at impaction with the orientation measured on post-operative radiographs and identify factors that influence the difference between the two. A total of 67 hip replacements (52 total hip replacements and 15 hip resurfacings) were prospectively studied. Intra-operatively, the orientation of the acetabular component after impaction relative to the operating table was measured using a validated stereo-photogrammetry protocol. Post-operatively, the radiographic orientation was measured; the mean inclination/anteversion was 43° (sd 6°)/ 19° (sd 7°). A simulated radiographic orientation was calculated based on how the orientation would have appeared had an on-table radiograph been taken intra-operatively. The mean difference between radiographic and intra-operative inclination/anteversion was 5° (sd 5°)/ -8° (sd 8°). The mean difference between simulated radiographic and intra-operative inclination/anteversion, which quantifies the effect of the different way acetabular orientation is measured, was 3°/-6° (sd 2°). The mean difference between radiographic and simulated radiographic orientation inclination/anteversion, which is a manifestation of the change in pelvic position between component impaction and radiograph, was 1°/-2° (sd 7°).

This study demonstrated that in order to achieve a specific radiographic orientation target, surgeons should implant the acetabular component 5° less inclined and 8° more anteverted than their target. Great variability (2 sd about ± 15°) in the post-operative radiographic cup orientation was seen. The two equally contributing causes for this are variability in the orientation at which the cup is implanted, and the change in pelvic position between impaction and post-operative radiograph.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1290–7

The orientation of the acetabular component is influenced not only by the orientation at which the surgeon implants the component, but also the orientation of the pelvis at the time of implantation. Hence, the orientation of the pelvis at set-up and its movement during the operation, are important. During 67 hip replacements, using a validated photogrammetric technique, we measured how three surgeons orientated the patient’s pelvis, how much the pelvis moved during surgery, and what effect these had on the final orientation of the acetabular component. Pelvic orientation at set-up, varied widely (mean (± 2, standard deviation (sd))): tilt 8° (2sd ±32), obliquity –4° (2sd ±12), rotation –8° (2sd ±14). Significant differences in pelvic positioning were detected between surgeons (p < 0.001). The mean angular movement of the pelvis between set-up and component implantation was 9° (sd 6). Factors influencing pelvic movement included surgeon, approach (posterior >  lateral), procedure (hip resurfacing > total hip replacement) and type of support (p < 0.001). Although, on average, surgeons achieved their desired acetabular component orientation, there was considerable variability (2sd ±16) in component orientation. We conclude that inconsistency in positioning the patient at set-up and movement of the pelvis during the operation account for much of the variation in acetabular component orientation. Improved methods of positioning and holding the pelvis are required.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B:876–83.

INTRODUCTION

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MoMHRA) requires a new standardized radiographic evaluation protocol. Evaluation of the acetabular component is similar to total hip arthroplasty but the femoral component requires different criteria since there is no component in the femoral canal and the metallic femoral implant overlies the junctions between bone-cement and cement-prosthesis. Lucencies around the metaphyseal HRA femoral stem can be described with the femoral zonal system into 3 peg-zones (Amstutz' et al) but this doesn't account for bony changes of the femoral neck away from the stem. This study proposes a new femoral zonal system for radiographic HRA assessment. We tested the efficacy of radiographs in identifying a problem by reviewing 711 radiographs of resurfaced hips and correlating radiographic features to outcome.

Introduction

Solid or cystic pseudotumour is a potentially destructive complication of metal on metal (MoM) couples, usually needing revision surgery. However, complete clearance of the pseudotumour is unlikely at times. This prospective case-controlled study reports cases which had recurrence after revision surgery for pseudotumour related to metal on metal hip couples.

Recent events have highlighted the importance of implant design for survival and wear-related complications following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. The mid-term survival of the most widely used implant, the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR), has been described by its designers. The aim of this study was to report the ten-year survival and patient-reported functional outcome of the BHR from an independent centre.

In this cohort of 554 patients (646 BHRs) with a mean age of 51.9 years (16.5 to 81.5) followed for a mean of eight years (1 to 12), the survival and patient-reported functional outcome depended on gender and the size of the implant. In female hips (n = 267) the ten-year survival was 74% (95% confidence interval (CI) 83 to 91), the ten-year revision rate for pseudotumour was 7%, the mean Oxford hip score (OHS) was 43 (sd 8) and the mean UCLA activity score was 6.4 (sd 2). In male hips (n = 379) the ten-year survival was 95% (95% CI 92.0 to 97.4), the ten-year revision rate for pseudotumour was 1.7%, the mean OHS was 45 (sd 6) and the mean UCLA score was 7.6 (sd 2). In the most demanding subgroup, comprising male patients aged < 50 years treated for primary osteoarthritis, the survival was 99% (95% CI 97 to 100).

This study supports the ongoing use of resurfacing in young active men, who are a subgroup of patients who tend to have problems with conventional THR. In contrast, the results in women have been poor and we do not recommend metal-on-metal resurfacing in women. Continuous follow-up is recommended because of the increasing incidence of pseudotumour with the passage of time.

INTRODUCTION

Femoral neck narrowing (NN) following Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty (MoMHRA) is a well-recognised clinical phenomenon. The incidence of resurfaced hips with NN > 10% is reported to be up to 27%. Its pathogenesis is thought to be multi-factorial secondary to stress shielding, impingement, osteolysis secondary to wear/ion particles and as a result of reduced vascularity and pressure effect on cancellous bone secondary to the presence of a soft-tissue mass around the resurfaced hip. Recognised risk factors for its development include: female gender and the presence of a pseudotumour. Serum Chromium (Cr) and Cobalt (Co) are recognised surrogate markers of in-vivo wear of MoMHRA. The aims of this study were to establish whether NN is associated with increased wear.

INTRODUCTION

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty (MoMHRA) is a surgical option in the treatment of end-stage hip disease. The measurement of systemic levels of metal ions gives an insight into the wear occurring and is advocated by regulatory bodies as routine practice in the assessment of resurfaced hips. However, the acceptable upper levels of Chromium (Cr) and Cobalt (Co) ions concentration with clinical significance still have to be established. The aim of this study is to address this issue in unilateral and bilateral resurfaced hips.

Introduction

Since the introduction of 3rd generation Metal-on-Metal-Hip-Resurfacing-Arthroplasty (MoMHRA), thousands of such prostheses have been implanted worldwide in younger patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis. However, no independent centre has reported their medium-to-long term outcome. The aim of this study is to report the ten year survival and outcome of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR), the most commonly used MoMHRA worldwide.

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip is an important cause of pain and morbidity. The mechanisms and pathogenesis of OA'sdevelopment remain unknown. Minor acetabular dysplasia and subtle variations in proximal femoral morphology are increasingly being recognized as factors that potentially compromise the joint biomechanically and lead to OA. Previous studies have shown that risk of hip OA increased as the femoral head to femoral neck ratio (HNR) decreased. Previous work has described the evolutionary change in inferior femoral neck trabecular density and geometry associated with upright stance, but no study has highlighted the evolutionary change in HNR. The aim of this study was to examine evolutionary evidence that the hominin bipedal stance has lead to alterations in HNR that would predispose humans to hip OA.

Introduction

Tribological studies have described a characteristic wear pattern of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings (MoMHRAs) with a run-in period followed by a ‘bedding-in’ phase minimising wear or by an increasing wear patch with edge loading. The use of metal ions as surrogate markers of in-vivo wear is now recommended as a screening tool for the performance of MoMHRAs. The aims of this retrospective, single-surgeon study were to measure ion levels in unilateral MoMHRAs at different stages during the steady-state in order to study the evolution of wear and factors affecting it.

INTRODUCTION

Studies have suggested that there is a reduction in head-neck-ratio (HNR) associated with MoMHRA. A reduction in HNR at operation would decrease range of movement and increase impingement risk. Impingement could lead to 20 edge loading, increasing wear. Serum ion levels of Chromium (Cr) and Cobalt (Co) are surrogate markers of wear. Although acetabular component orientation has been shown to contribute to wear and PT development, the role of a decrease in HNR has only been highlighted in PT development. This study aimed to measure changes in HNR that occur at resurfacing and determine any gender- and component size-specific differences. In addition it aimed to determine whether changes in HNR could be associated with increased wear.

INTRODUCTION

Although simulation studies have shown superior wear properties of metal-on-metal articulations, increased concern exists regarding the excess in-vivo wear of a small number of Metal-on-Metal-Hip-Resurfacing (MoMHRA) implants. Serum ion levels of Chromium (Cr) and Cobalt (Co) are surrogate markers of wear. Risk factors associated with increased wear include female gender, small components, dysplasia, cup orientation outside safe zone and femoral head downsize during surgery with an associated decrease in Head-Neck-Ratio (HNR). However, these factors are interlinked. This study aims to identify the factors that are most important for subsequent wear of MoMHRA, by performing a multivariate analysis.

INTRODUCTION

The introduction of hard-on-hard bearings and the consequences of increased wear due to edge-loading have renewed interest in the importance of acetabular component orientation for implant survival and functional outcome following hip arthroplasty. Some studies have shown increased dislocation risk when the cup is mal-oriented which has led to the identification of a safe-zone1. The aims of this prospective, multi-centered study of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) were to: 1. Identify factors that influence cup orientation and 2. Describe the effect of cup orientation on clinical outcome.

A femoral head/neck ratio (HNR) of less than 1.27 is associated with an increased risk of arthritis. The aim of this study was to establish whether there is evolutionary evidence that the homonin, bipedal stance has led to alterations in HNR that predispose humans to osteoarthritis (OA).

Specimens provided by The Natural History Museums of London, Oxford and the Department of Zoology, University of Oxford were grouped according to gait pattern, HAKF (Hip and knee flexed), Arboreal (ability to stand with hip and knee joints extended) and homonin/bi-pedal. Specimens included those from Devonion, Triassic, Jurrasic, Cretaceous, Miocene, Paleolithic, Pleistocene periods to modern day. Three-dimensional skeletal geometries were segmented using CT images and HNR measurements were taken from coronal views. These were compared with the HNR of 119 asymptomatic human volunteers and 210 patients that had a hip joint replacement for primary OA.

Species of the HAKF group had the smallest HNR (1.10, SD:0.09). Species of the Arboreal group had significantly higher HNR (1.63, SD:0.15) in comparison to the Bipedal group (1.41, SD:0.04) (p=0.006), Human (1.33, SD:0.08) and the OA group (1.3, SD:0.09).

The range of movement associated with arboreal habitat caused an associated change in HNR. This study would suggest that the HNR peaked in the Miocene period with species that ambulated on both ground and trees. More recent homonin gait appears to have developed a smaller HNR and humans have the smallest amongst their close ancestors. Evolutionary theory would suggest that modern environmental pressures might pre-dispose future hominin evolution to OA, secondary to a further reduction in HNR.

Introduction: Metal-on-metal-hip-resurfacing-arthroplasty (MoMHRA) has been associated with the development of inflammatory pseudotumours(IP), especially in females. IPs have been linked to wear debris, which can be related to metal-ion blood levels. Acetabular component position has been shown to influence wear. We have identified an optimum component orientation minimising IP risk around an inclination/anteversion of 40°/20°±10°. Our aim was to see if this optimal position results in lower metal ions and to identify the boundary of an optimal placement zone for low wear.

Methods: A cohort of 104 patients(60M:44F) with unilateral MoMHRA was studied. Blood tests were obtained at a mean follow up of 3.9 years and serum Co/Cr levels were measured(ICPMS). High metal ion concentrations were defined as Co> 4.1ppb and Cr> 5.2ppb. Radiographic cup inclination/anteversion were measured using EBRA. The differences in ion levels between different orientation zones were investigated. Three orientation zones were defined centered on 40°/20°: Z1-within ±5°, Z2-outside ±5°/within ±10° and Z3-within ±10°.

Results: There was a wide range of cup placements. Females had significantly (p< 0.001) smaller components(mean:51, 44–60) than males(mean: 56, 52–64). Cr levels, but not Co, were higher in females(p=0.002) and those with small femoral components(< 50mm, p =0.03). Patients with cups within Z1 (n=13) had significantly lower Co(p=0.005) and Cr(p=0.001). Males with cups within Z3(n=27) had lower ion levels in comparison to those outside, which were significantly lower for Co(p=0.049) but not Cr(p=0.084). Females had similar ion levels within and out of Z3(Cr/Co: p=0.83/0.84). Co levels were significantly lower in Z1(n=13) in comparison to Z2(n=33)(p=0.048) but Cr levels were not different (p=0.06).

Discussion: MoMHRA cups placed within ±5° of the optimum(40°/20°) had significantly lower metal ions indicating lower wear within this narrow zone. This safe zone, could extend to ±10° for males only. The narrower safe zone coupled with smaller components implanted are possible factors contributing to the increased IP incidence seen in females.

Introduction: Metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty(MoMHRA) is an alternative option to THR in the treatment of young adults with OA. A recognised MoMHRA complication is the development of an inflammatory pseudotumour(IP). Diagnosis is made with the aid of US and/or MRI. To-date, no radiographic indication of the presence of IP has been identified. Neck thinning is a recognised phenomenon in MoMHRA hips not associated with any adverse clinical events. Its pathogenesis is considered multi-factorial. Our aim was to establish whether excessive neck narrowing is associated with the presence of a pseudotumour.

Methods: Twenty-seven hips (26 patients) with IP confirmed clinically, radiologically, intra-operatively and histologically were matched for sex, age, pre-operative diagnosis, component size and follow-up with an asymptomatic MoMHRA cohort (Control n=60). For all patients, prosthesis-neck-ratio(PNR) was measured on plain AP pelvic radiographs post-operatively and at follow-up as previously described and validated.

Results: All IP patients (4M:23F) and all (12M:48F) but two controls had a posterior approach at the time of MoMHRA. Post-operatively, there was no difference in the PNR between the two groups (p=0.19). At an average follow up of 3.5 years (range:0.7–8.3), IP patients(mean 1.26, 1.10–1.79) had a significantly higher (p< 0.0001) PNR in comparison to their controls(mean 1.14, 1.03–1.35). Greater neck narrowing occurred in both genders. IP necks had narrowed by an average of 8% (range:3–23). The degree of neck narrowing was correlated with length of survival of implant (p=0.001).

Discussion: This study shows a strong association between IP and neck narrowing. Processes such as impingement and increased wear are considered to be involved in the pathogenesis of both IP and neck narrowing. Furthermore, the presence of an IP, could lead to altered vascularity via a mass effect and further contribute to neck narrowing. Neck narrowing in symptomatic MOMHRA patients should alert surgeons of the possible presence of IP.

Introduction: Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty (MoMHRA) has gained popularity as an alternative to THR for younger patients with osteoarthritis. A growing concern has been the association of MoMHRA with the development of inflammatory pseudotumours (IP), especially in women. These have been linked to metal-on-metal wear, which can be related to metal ion concentrations. Elevated metal wear debris levels may result from impingement, rim contact and edge loading. Head-neck ratio (HNR) is a predetermining factor for range of movement and impingement. Neck thinning is a recognised phenomenon post-MoMHRA and we have found an association of IP with increased neck thinning based on a case control study. Our aims were to identify HNR changes a hip undergoes when resurfaced and at follow up; and whether greater neck thinning at follow-up could be associated with the presence of elevated metal ions.

Methods: A cohort of 91 patients (57M:34F) with unilateral MoMHRAs were included in this study. Blood tests were obtained at a mean follow up of 3.9 years (range 1.7–7 years) and serum (Co:Cr) ion levels were measured (ICPMS). High metal ion concentrations were defined as Co> 4.1ppb and Cr> 5.2ppb. For all patients, head-neck ratio (HNR) was measured on plain anterio-posterior pelvic radiographs pre-operatively, immediately post-operatively and at follow-up.

Results: Female patients had significantly bigger HNR pre-op (mean=1.35, range:1.22–1.64) compared to males(mean=1.22, range:1.05–1.38) (p< 0.01). Immediately post-op, female HNRs (mean: 1.26, range: 1.14–1.34) were not different to male patients(mean=1.24, range=1.11–1.38) (p=0.11). At follow-up HNR was once again significantly bigger (p< 0.01) in females (mean=1.35, range: 1.21–1.49), compare to males (mean=1.27, range:1.11–1.38). HNR alterations with operation (p=0.00) and at follow-up (p< 0.01) were significantly bigger in female patients. Furthermore, there was a significant correlation between high ion levels and HNR change at follow-up for both Co (p=0.02) and Cr (p< 0.01).

Conclusion: This study identified gender-specific changes in HNR that resurfaced hips undergo, not previously documented. Female hips have greater HNR pre-operatively, compared to male hips, and appear to be biomechanically disadvantaged when resurfaced. A decrease in HNR with resurfacing could result in impingement and lead to processes, known to be more prevalent in females, such as neck thinning, increased wear and IP development. In addition, we highlight a correlation between high ion levels and greater neck thinning at follow-up. Increased neck thinning in symptomatic MoMHRA hips could be secondary to increased wear and should be investigated further radiologically for the presence of IP.

Introduction: Metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty (MoMHRA) has become an alternative option to THR in the treatment of young adults with OA. A recognised MoMHRA complication is the development of an inflammatory pseudotumour (IP). IPs can be cystic (predominantly posterio-laterally located), solid (mostly anteriorly located) or mixed in nature. Diagnosis is made with the aid of US and/or MRI. To-date, no radiographic aid in the diagnosis of IP has been identified. Neck thinning is a recognised phenomenon following MoMHRA, occurring in up to 90% of resurfaced hips, which has not been associated with any adverse clinical events. Its pathogenesis is considered multi-factorial secondary to stress shielding, impingement, pressure effect on cancellous femoral neck, bone necrosis secondary to femoral preparation and altered vascularity/AVN. Our aim was to establish whether neck thinning is associated with the presence of a pseudotumour.

Methods: Thirty-one hips (30 patients) with IP confirmed clinically, radiologically, intra-operatively and histologically were matched for sex, age, pre-operative diagnosis, component size and follow-up with an asymptomatic MoMHRA cohort without pseudotumour (Control n=60). Radiological and operative findings at the time of revision of all IP patients were reviewed regarding location of pseudotumour; 4 different locations were defined: anteriorly-extending, posteriorly-extending, anteriorly & posteriorly-extending and within joint only. For all patients, prosthesis-neck ratio (PNR) at follow-up was measured on plain AP pelvic radiographs as previously described and validated.

Results: All IP patients (6M:24F) and all (12M:48F) but two controls had a posterior approach at the time of MoMHRA. Mean femoral component size was 46 mm for both groups. At an average follow up of 3.5 years (0.7–8.3), IP patients (mean 1.26, 1.10–1.79) had a significantly higher (p< 0.0001) PNR in comparison to their controls (mean 1.14, 1.03–1.35). Greater neck thinning had occurred in both IP-males (p< 0.001) and IP-females (p=0.002) in comparison to their controls. Location of IP and hence nature did not appear to have an effect on the degree of neck thinning.

Discussion: This study shows that IP patients had significantly narrower femoral necks at follow-up. Processes, such as impingement and increased wear that are thought to contribute to the process of neck narrowing are also thought to be factors in IP development. Furthermore, the presence of an IP, could lead to altered vascularity via a mass effect and further contribute to neck narrowing. Interestingly, nature of IP did not have a significantly affect PNR. Although one cannot be certain whether neck narrowing is a consequence or a contributing factor for IP development, their association is significant. Surgeons should consider the possibility of pseudotumour in symptomatic MoMHRA patients with neck narrowing.

Introduction: Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty (MoMHRA) has gained popularity as an alternative to THR for younger patients with osteoarthritis. A growing concern has been the association of MoMHRA with the development of inflammatory pseudotumours (IP), especially in women. These have been linked to metal-on-metal wear, which can be related to metal ion concentrations. Although cup orientation has been shown to influence wear, the optimum cup position has not been clearly defined. We have identified an optimal cup orientation to minimise IP risk, based on a case controlled study, for inclination/anteversion within ±10° of 40°/20°. Our aim was to see if this optimal position results in lower metal ions, and to identify the boundary of an optimal placement zone for low wear.

Methods: A cohort of 104 patients (60M: 44F) with unilateral MoMHRA was included in this study. Blood tests were obtained at a mean follow up of 3.9 years (range 1.7–7 years) and serum Co and Cr ion levels were measured (ICPMS). High metal ion concentrations were defined as Co> 4.1ppb and Cr> 5.2ppb. Radiographic cup inclination and anteversion were measured using EBRA. The differences in ion levels between different cup orientation zones were investigated. Three orientation zones were defined centered on the target orientation of 40°/20°: Z1 within ±5°, Z2 outside ±5°/within ±10° and Z3: within ±10°.

Results: There was a wide range of cup placements; mean inclination/anteversion were 46.3°(21.5°–64.6°)/15°(2.7°–35.6°). Cr levels, but not Co, were higher in female patients (p=0.002) and those with small femoral components (< 50mm, p =0.03).

For the whole cohort, there was no significant difference in ion levels (Cr: p=0.092. Co=0.075) between cups positioned within Z3 (n=58) versus those outside (n=46 mean). Male patients with cups within Z3 (n=27) had lower ion levels in comparison to those outside Z3, which were significantly lower for Co (p=0.049) but not Cr (p=0.084). Female patients had similar levels within and out of Z3 for both ions (Cr: p=0.83, Co: p=0.84). However, patients with cups within Z1 (n=13) had significantly lower Co (p=0.005) and Cr (p=0.001) than those outside Z1 (n=95). Interestingly, Co levels were significantly lower in Z1 (n=13) in comparison to Z2 (n=33) (p=0.048) but Cr levels were not different (p=0.06).

Discussion: MoMHRA cups placed with ±5° of the ideal position of 40°/20°gave rise to significantly lower metal ions indicating lower wear within this narrow zone, in both sexes. This safe zone, could be extended to ±10° for male patients only. Gender specific factors, such as pelvic anatomy and joint flexibility, could be responsible for the narrower ‘safe’ zone seen in females. The narrower safe zone coupled with smaller components implanted are factors contributing to higher ion levels and hence the increased incidence of IP seen in females.

Introduction: The development of Inflammatory Pseudotumour (IP) is a recognised complication following Metal on Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty (MoMHRA), thought to occur secondary to wear and elevated ion levels. Studies have shown that acetabular component orientation influences the wear of metal-on-metal hip replacement bearings. The aims of this study were to investigate the significance of cup orientation in the development of IP, and to identify a ‘safe-zone’ for cup placement with lower-risk for IP development.

Methods: Twenty six patients (n=27 hips) with IP confirmed radiologically, intra-operatively and histologically were matched for sex, age, pre-operative diagnosis, component size and follow-up with a cohort of asymptomatic MoMHRA patients (Control n=58). Radiographic acetabular anteversion and inclination were measured using EBRA. We calculated the distance in degree space of each acetabular component from the optimum position of 40° inclination and 20° anteversion, recommended by the designers, and thus compared acetabular component position between the two groups. Three different zones were tested as possibly optimum for acetabular placement. These were Lewinneck’s Zone (LZ) (inclination/anteversion; 30–50°/5–25°), and two zones defined by ±5° (Zone 1) or ± 10° (Zone 2) about the suggested target of 40°/20°. An optimal placement zone was determined based on a significant difference in IP incidence between components in the zone versus those outside.

Results: There was a wide range in cup orientations; mean inclination and anteversion were similar in the two groups: IP 47.5° (10.1°–80.6°)/14.1° (4.1°–33.6°) Vs Control 46.1° (28.8°–59.8°)/15.6° (4.3°–32.9°). Acetabular components in the IP group were significantly further away from the optimum position of 40°/20° in comparison to the controls (p=0.023). There was no difference in IP incidence between cups positioned within (IP:13/27, Control:35/58) or out of LZ (p=0.09) and within (IP: 2/27, Control: 10/58) or out of Zone 1 (p=0.156). Cups placed in Zone 2 (IP:6/27, Control:27/58) had significantly lower IP incidence versus those outside this zone (p=0.01). The odd’s ratio of developing IP when the cup is positioned out-of Zone 2 was 3.7.

Discussion: This study highlights the importance of ace-tabular component orientation in IP development. On the whole, patients with pseudotumour had acetabular components that were further away from the optimum position in comparison to the controls. However, a small number of IP patients had well-placed components implying that additional factors, possibly patient and/or gender specific, are involved in the development of pseudotumour. Furthermore, we defined an optimum, ‘safe-zone’ of ±10° around the cup position of 40°/20°. Patients with acetabular components outside this safe zone have an increased risk of IP development.

Pseudotumour is a rare but important complication of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing that occurs much more commonly in women than in men. We examined the relationship between head-neck ratio (HNR) and pseudotumour formation in 18 resurfaced hips (18 patients) revised for pseudotumour and 42 asymptomatic control resurfaced hips (42 patients).

Patients in whom pseudotumour formation had occurred had higher pre-operative HNR than the control patients (mean 1.37 (sd 0.10) vs mean 1.30 (sd 0.08) p = 0.001). At operation the patients with pseudotumours had a greater reduction in the size of their femoral heads (p = 0.035) and subsequently had greater neck narrowing (mean 10.1% (sd 7.2) vs mean 3.8% (sd 3.2) p < 0.001). No female patient with a pre-operative HNR ≤ 1.3 developed a pseudotumour.

We suggest that reducing the size of the femoral head, made possible by a high pre-operative HNR, increases the risk of impingement and edge loading, and may contribute to high wear and pseudotumour formation. As the incidence of pseudotumour is low in men, it appears safe to perform resurfacing in men. However, this study suggests that it is also reasonable to resurface in women with a pre-operative HNR ≤ 1.3.

Metal on Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty (MoMHRA) has gained popularity due to its perceived advantages of bone conservation and relative ease of revision to a conventional THR if it fails. Known MoMHRA-associated complications include femoral neck fracture, avascular necrosis/collapse of the femoral head/neck, aseptic loosening and soft tissue responses such as ALVAL and pseudotumours. This study’s aim was to assess the functional outcome of failed MoMHRA revised to THR and compare it with a matched cohort of primary THRs.

Method: We have revised 53 MoMHRA cases to THR; the reasons for revision were femoral neck fracture (Fracture Group, n=21), soft tissue reaction (Pseudotumour Group, n=16) and other causes (Other Group, n=16: loosening, AVN and infection). Average followup was 2.9 years. These MoMHRA revisions were compared with 103 matched controls from a primary THR cohort; matched for age, gender and length of followup. We compared, using the MannWhitney U test, operative time (OT, measured in minutes), and Oxford Hip Score (OHS) between the revised MoMHRA groups and their individual controls. We also compared, using the Kruskal Wallis test, UCLA Activity Score in the revised MoMHRA groups.

Results: There were no differences between the Fracture Group (mean OT 99.6, SD: 30.4; mean OHS 19.8, SD:9.2) and its controls (mean OT 95.9, SD: 31.8; mean OHS 17.3, SD: 7.5) nor between the Other Group (mean OT 129.4, SD: 36.7; mean OHS 22.2, SD: 9.4) and its controls (mean OT 104.4, SD: 39.2; mean OHS 20.3, SD: 10.1) in terms of OT and OHS. The Pseudotumour Group had significantly longer OT (mean 161.6, SD: 24.5, p< 0.001) and worse outcome (mean OHS 39.1, SD: 9.3, p< 0.001) than its controls (mean OT 113.1, SD: 51.7; mean OHS 20.0, SD: 9.2). In the Fracture Group, there were 3 infections requiring revisions. For the Pseudotumour Group, there were 3 recurrent dislocations, 1 femoral artery stenosis and 3 femoral nerve palsies. In the Other Group, there were 2 periprosthetic fractures. There was significant difference (p< 0.001) in UCLA scores between the MoMHRA groups. The Pseudotumour Group had the lowest mean UCLA score of 3.8 (SD: 1.89). The Fracture Group (mean: 7.0, S.D. 2.0) and the Other Group (mean: 6.7, S.D. 2.1) had similar UCLA scores.

Discussion: The results demonstrate that outcome after revision of MoMHRA is dependent upon the indication for revision. Patients revised for soft tissue reactions had significantly worse outcome. Patients with soft tissue reactions are more likely to experience complications and require further surgical intervention. The pseudotumour associated revisions were associated with a significantly prolonged OT. The overall complication rate for the study groups was quite high, with 11 (21%) revised MoMHRA cases experiencing a complication. The Pseudotumour Group had a higher complication rate (37%).

Pseudotumours are a rare complication of hip resurfacing. They are thought to be a response to metal debris which may be caused by edge loading due to poor orientation of the acetabular component. Our aim was to determine the optimal acetabular orientation to minimise the risk of pseudotumour formation.

We matched 31 hip resurfacings revised for pseudotumour formation with 58 controls who had a satisfactory outcome from this procedure. The radiographic inclination and anteversion angles of the acetabular component were measured on anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis using Einzel-Bild-Roentgen-Analyse software. The mean inclination angle (47°, 10° to 81°) and anteversion angle (14°, 4° to 34°) of the pseudotumour cases were the same (p = 0.8, p = 0.2) as the controls, 46° (29° to 60°) and 16° (4° to 30°) respectively, but the variation was greater. Assuming an accuracy of implantation of ± 10° about a target position, the optimal radiographic position was found to be approximately 45° of inclination and 20° of anteversion. The incidence of pseudotumours inside the zone was four times lower (p = 0.007) than outside the zone.

In order to minimise the risk of pseudotumour formation we recommend that surgeons implant the acetabular component at an inclination of 45° (± 10) and anteversion of 20° (± 10) on post-operative radiographs. Because of differences between the radiographic and the operative angles, this may be best achieved by aiming for an inclination of 40° and an anteversion of 25°.

Introduction: Metal on metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty (MoMHRA) has gained popularity due to its perceived advantages of bone conservation and relative ease of revision to a conventional THR if it fails. This retrospective study is aimed at assessing the functional outcome of failed MoMHRA revised to THR and comparing it with a matched cohort of primary THRs.

Method: Since 1999 we have revised 53 MoMHRA to THR. The reasons for revision were femoral neck fracture (Group A, n=21), pseudotumour (Group B, n=16) and other causes (Group C, n=16: loosening, avascular necrosis and infection). Average follow-up was 3 years months (1.2–7.3). These revisions were compared with 106 primary THRs which were age, gender and follow-up matched with the revision group in a ratio of 2:1.

Results: The mean Oxford Hip Score (OHS) was 20.1 (12–51) for group A, 39.1 (14– 56) for group B, 22.8 (12–39) for group C and 17.8 (12–45) for primary THR group. In group A, there were three infections requiring further revisions. In group B, there were three recurrent dislocations, three patients with femoral nerve palsy and one femoral artery stenosis. In group C, there were no complications. The differences in clinical and functional outcome between group B and the remaining groups as well as the difference in the outcome between group B and control group were statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: THR for failed MoMHRA was associated with significantly more complications, operation time and need for blood transfusion for the pseudotumour group. In addition, the revisions secondary to pseudotumour also had significantly worse functional outcome when compared to other MoMHRA revisions or primary THR.