Cam type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) may lead to osteoarthritis (OA)[1]. In 2D studies, an alpha angle greater than 55° was considered abnormal however limitations of 2D alpha angle measurement have led to the development of 3D methods [2–4]. Failure to completely address the bony impingement lesions during surgery has been the most common reason for unsuccessful hip arthroscopy surgery [5]. Robotic technology has facilitated more accurate surgery in comparison to the conventional means. In this study we aim to assess the potential application of robotic technology in dealing with this technically challenging procedure of cam sculpting surgery. CT scans of three patients' hips with severe cam deformity (A, B and C models) were obtained and used to construct 3D dry bone models. A 3D surgical plan was made in custom written software. Each 3D plan was imported into the Acrobot Sculptor robot and bone resection was carried out. In total, 42 femoral models were sculpted (14/subset), thirty of which were performed by a single operator and the remaining 12 femurs were resected by two other operators. CT of the pre/post resected specimens was segmented and a 3D alpha angle and head neck ratios were measured [3–4] and compared using Mann-Whitney U test. Coefficient of variation (CV) was used to determine the degree of variation between the mean and maximum observed alpha angles for inter and intra observer repeatability.Introduction:
Methods:
Barriers to the adoption of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) by new consultants could be explained by its higher revision rate, to which mal-positioned components contribute. The aim of this study was to determine whether robotic technology enables inexperienced surgeons to perform accurate UKAs when compared to current conventional methods After randomisation, sixteen trainees who had never performed UKAs performed three medial UKAs (Corin Uniglide), one per week, on dry-bone simulators by either robotic (Sculptor RGA) or conventional methods. They were instructed to match a universal 3D-CT based pre-operative plan that would result from a UKA based on the conventional jigs and operating guide. The knees were laser scanned and software used to compare the planned and actual implant positions. Feedback was given to trainees between attempts. Translational and rotational positioning errors were measured in all six degrees of freedom for both components At all attempts robotic medial UKAs were more accurate in both translational and rotational alignments for both components reaching statistical significance (p<0.005) at all attempts for rotational errors. Considering outliers, the maximum rotational errors of the robot group was 9° and 7° for the tibial and femoral components respectively. For the conventional group this reached 18° and 16° for the tibial and femoral components respectively Robotic technology allows inexperienced surgeons to perform medial UKAs on dry bone models with acceptable accuracy and precision on their first attempt. Conventional jigs do not. The adoption of robotic technology might provide new consultants with the confidence to offer UKAs to their patients by limiting the inaccuracies inherent in conventional equipment.
Osteoarticular loss in a major weightbearing joint is one of the many consequences of military conflict. While minor in terms of life and limb salvage, when rehabilitation is being planned, a small amount of joint damage can make a large impact on the level of long term disability. Reconstruction methods include allograft, massive replacement, arthrodesis and amputation. We have been developing a suite of technologies that contribute to the reconstruction of such injuries including assessment of disability in a fully instrumented gait lab, modelling of the injury using low dose CT, analysis of the extent of loss and creation of stereolithograph files of the bones, planning of the surgical procedure including implants as needed, custom manufacture of osteotomy guides and prostheses if required and technology assisted surgery, including active constraint robots. We report 3 cases of soldiers who have suffered osteoarticular loss to part of the knee, two from high velocity rounds and one from an IED. All 3 have received custom partial knee replacements preserving their cruciates, the other compartment and the patella-femoral joint. No major technical issues have been encountered. The surgery is quick and recovery simple, with the prospect of normal painfree pedestrian life. Exchange of the bearing will be necessary. It is expected and planned for once a decade as a day case procedure. While the surgery is expensive, it is highly cost-effective, as it restores near normal gait. It does not appear to be particularly risky, as the volume of tissue being excised is small, and highly constrained. The same approach is now being developed for deployment in civilian life for post traumatic osteoarthritis.
The introduction of the Stanmore Implants Savile Row mobile-bearing UKA procedure in July 2011 marked a world first – the use of a patient-specific knee implanted with robotic technology – the Sculptor Robotic Guidance Arm (RGA). This union gives a truly personalised solution by designing an implant for each patient based upon preoperative CT data and using Sculptor RGA to prepare the bone accurately so that the implant is correctly positioned as planned. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of Sculptor RGA both in-vitro and in-vivo. We report on the accuracy of our first clinical procedures. In-vitro: CTs of plastic-bones were used to create plans for Sculptor RGA, establishing a relationship between the implant position and plastic-bone (planned-transform). Sculptor RGA was then used to prepare bones for 16 UKA implants mimicking the clinical set-up. The implants were placed in the prepared bones without cement. A coordinate-measuring-arm was used to register a)the bone, and b)the implant in relation to the bone (achieved-transform). The difference between planned-and-achieved transforms gives the error in implant position. In-vivo: Preoperative CTs of 8 OA patients, acquired using the low-dose Imperial Knee CT protocol, were used to plan the position and the shape of the patient-specific implants. Intra-operatively, Sculptor RGA was used to register and prepare the bone and the implants were cemented in place. Post-operative CTs were also acquired. Two techniques were used to measure planned-to-achieved positions of the implants: 1). Preoperative-to-postoperative CT image registration followed by extraction of the achieved implant position and comparison with the plan, 2). Surface-to-surface registration of bone-models segmented from the preoperative and postoperative CTs followed by extraction of the achieved implant position and comparison with the plan.Introduction
Methods
High functional aspirations and an active ageing population equate to a growing number of patients awaiting hip arthroplasty demanding superior biomechanical function. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanics of top walking speed between two commonly used hip arthroplasty procedures to determine if a performance advantage existed. A retrospective comparative study was performed using sixty-seven subjects, twenty-two subjects in both hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty groups along with twenty-three healthy controls. All arthroplasty subjects were recruited based on high psychometric scoring and had been performed through a posterior approach, and had been discharged from follow-up. On an instrumented treadmill each subject was measured by a researcher blinded to which procedure that patient had undergone. After a six minute acclimatization period, the speed was increased incrementally until top walking performance had been attained. At all increments, ground reaction forces and temporospatial measurements were collected.Background
Methods
The combination of patient-specific “just-in-time” implant manufacture and robotic technology has not yet been reported. The robot enables accurate placement of anatomically-matched implants. It should be cost-effective, simplify the procedure, and reduce instrumentation. The aims of this study were to determine whether the procedure was safe, radiographically accurate, and comparable in time and cost to conventional arthroplasty. All patients over 3 months post-op were included. Component position, orientation and size were determined from CT scans by the surgeon prior to manufacture. The implants were inserted using the Sculptor robot, which is supplied free of cost (Savile Row, Stanmore Implants, UK). Following registration, bone was milled away using a high-speed burr under haptic control of the robot. The implants were cemented and a mobile bearing inserted. Patients were followed up clinically and radiographically. Oxford and EQ-5D scores were obtained. Costs of the implant, instruments, and consumables were calculated and compared to published data for conventional UKA and TKA.Background
Methods
Are there really ‘conventional’ bearings, offering more security and less risk than the ‘alternative’ bearings that feature in the programme? Alternative, when used as an adjective has 2 meanings: offering or expressing a choice, as in several alternative plans different from or functioning outside the usual or conventional: eg alternative newspaper, alternative rock music, alternative medicine This paper reviews the elements that make up the bearing couples available today in the developed world, and tests each bearing against these meanings. what are the alternatives? The materials available today fall into the following broad families:Introduction
Materials
Metal on Metal hip resurfacing (MoM HR) can be an effective operation for the young arthritic hip population. However, errors in cup orientation have been associated with increased wear, circulating blood metal ions, and soft tissue abnormalities that can lead to premature failure of the bearing surface and subsequent revision surgery. While image free computer guidance has been shown to increase surgical accuracy in total hip arthroplasty, the role of image based technology in MoM HR is unclear. In this study, we compared the accuracy of cup orientation in MoM HR performed by either freehand technique or CT based navigation. Seventy five patients (81 hips) underwent either freehand (n=42) or navigation (n=39) surgery, both requiring a three dimensional (3D) CT surgical plan. Surgery was conducted by hip specialists blind to the method of cup implantation until the operation. Deviation in inclination and version from the planned orientation, as well as, number of cups within a 10° safe zone and 5° optimal zone of the target position was calculated using post operative 3D CT analysis. Error in inclination was significantly reduced with navigation compared to freehand technique (4° vs 6°, p=0.02). We could not detect a difference between the two groups for version error (5° vs 7°, p=0.06). There was a significantly greater number of hips within a 10° (87% vs 67%, p=0.04) and 5° (50% vs 20%, p=0.06) safe zone when navigated. Image based navigation can substantially improve accuracy in cup orientation. The results of our freehand group appear better than historic controls, suggesting the use of a 3D plan may help to reduce technical error and improve the learning curve in this technically demanding procedure. We advocate the use of image based navigation in MoM hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
The current generation of knee replacements are based upon assumptions from kinematic studies that preceded their designs. These implants were further limited by practical restrictions imposed by affordability, materials and manufacturing, and finally by the methods available to surgeons to prepare the bone and implant them. The early designs of knee seldom distinguished left from right, as the early kinematic work had not appreciated the very different functions of the medial and lateral compartments. Trochlea shape and position within devices was also limited by the published work on the way the knee bends. Surgical insertion has been limited to landmark based registration, and adjustment of the kinematics by soft tissue releases. However accurately such operations were performed, they could not restore normal function, as the kinematics of the joint were quite different from the normal knee. Recently, we have begun to appreciate three distinct axes of the knee joint: the flexion axis, the extension axis and the trochlea axis. These can be reliably found from 3d imaging, but cannot be immediately established by eye, or by conventional jigs, which must rely on unreliable landmarks acquired in surgery. The current market leaders in knee joint sales do not reflect these three axes in their joint designs, so the instrumentation used to insert them cannot restore the kinematics of the normal knee. The emerging partial replacements can be designed to take the axes and their resulting kinematics into account. If they are then inserted using robotic assistance, or patient specific guides, they can restore joints to these axes reliably. Knee function following such conservative surgery reflects this improvement in kinematics with higher functional scores and faster top walking speeds than has ever been possible using conventional devices inserted using the conventional landmark based surgical techniques.
The radiographic analysis of over 5000 metal on metal (MoM) hips using Ein Bild Roentgen Analyse (EBRA) software have been recently published in an attempt to determine the influence of cup orientation on bearing function. The validation of this software relies one study, conducted in a phantom pelvis without a femoral head in situ. Three dimensional computed tomographic (3D-CT) has been shown to be more accurate for hip and knee arthroplasty than plain radiographs for measurements of component orientation and position. The accuracy of EBRA when compared to 3D-CT for MoM hips specifically is unclear. We measured the cup orientation of 96 large diameter MoM hips using EBRA analysis of plain radiographs and compared this to 3D-CT. All measurements were made using the radiographic definition of cup orientation. The mean difference in version between the two imaging modalities was 8°; with wide limits of agreement of −21.2° and +5.6°. Three retroverted cups were not detected by EBRA. The mean difference in inclination values was 0.3°, but there was up to 9°difference between imaging modalities. When measured by 3D CT, 64% of hips were within a 10° safe zone around 45° inclination and 20° version, compared to only 24% when measured by EBRA (Fishers Exact test, p< 0.0001). The measurement of cup orientation of MoM hips using EBRA software is insufficiently accurate, particularly for the assessment of cup version. The cup rim is obscured by the large diameter femoral head on plain radiographs. Research studies using EBRA analysis for version have limited value if accuracy of more than 20 degrees is required to draw conclusions. This software may not be suitable to measure the performance of a device or surgeon. The limitations of EBRA can be overcome, if 3D-CT with an extended Hounsfield scale for data capture is used.
Metal Artefact Reduction Sequence (MARS) MRI is being increasingly used to detect soft tissue inflammatory reactions surrounding metal-on-metal hip replacements. The UK MHRA safety alert announced in April 2010 recommended cross-sectional imaging such as MRI for all patients with painful MOM hips. The terms used to describe the findings include bursae, cystic lesions and solid masses. A recently used term, pseudotumour, incorporates all of these lesions. We aimed to correlate the pattern of abnormalities on MRI with clinical symptoms. Following our experience with over 160 MARS MRI scans of patients with MOM hips we recognized patterns of lesions according to their: wall thickness, T1/T2 signal, shape, and location. We categorised the 79 lesions from 159 MARS MRI scans of into our novel classification scheme of 1, 2a, 2b and 3. There were two groups of patients: well functioning and painful.Introduction
Method
In large diameter hip arthroplasty, the femoral head size and shape have to be optimised to avoid neck on socket impingement if the head is too small, or psoas tendonopathy if the head is too large, overhanging the normal head neck junction in the sagittal plane. Currently there is no published guideline to help the surgeon select an optimal size femoral head. Instead, the novice surgeon may inadvertently oversize the femoral component through fear of notching the femoral neck—causing psoas impingement, especially in female patients. We sought to provide anatomically based advice for surgeons to optimise both the position of the femoral head and the head neck ratio. 100 hips were reviewed. Fifty radiographically normal hips in elderly patients with fractures of the contralateral side and 50 hips from patients whose contralateral side was arthritic secondary, either to Cam or pincer type impingement, or DDH. The head neck ratios were calculated using two methods: the plain AP radiographs were measured on PACS (Picture Archiving and Communication System) and CT scans obtained as part of the work up to hip surgery were measured in validation. The head neck ratio was calculated by dividing the diameter of the widest point across the femoral head by the narrowest part across the femoral neck. The HNR of 39 patients who attended a painful MOM clinic were also reviewed.Background
Materials and Methods
In 2009, surgeon error is a major factor contributing to premature failure in conventional arthroplasty. Technology has revolutionised quality control in all manufacturing industries, yet it has made little or no impact on practice in arthroplasty. Currently, no agreed standards exist—in either the UK or Australia— that allows us to state whether or not the operation was performed correctly. In hip arthroplasty, acetabular orientation may be considered a non-controversial metric for assessing surgical precision in hip arthroplasty. We considered that a trained surgeon should be able to orientate the acetabular component within the safe zone 19 times out of 20. 40 trainees at different stages in their training and 20 trained surgeons, (half of whom had performed over 1000 hip replacements) were assessed for their ability to orient an acetabular cup within the safe zone on three stations, one with the pelvis in the anatomic orientation, one with the pelvis in a distorted position, and one with the pelvis clad in a body preventing reliable palpation of landmarks and in a distorted position. Their scores were compared to the standard we set, and to the scores of medical students using robotic technology to assist them.Introduction
Materials and methods
