Metal-on-metal retrieval studies indicated that MOM wear-rates could rise as high as 60–70mm3/year in short-term failures (Morlock, 2008). In contrast, some MOM and ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) devices of 1970's era performed admirably over 2–3 decades (Schmalzreid, 1996; Shishido, 2003). While technology has aided analysis of short-term MOM and COC failures (Morlock 2008; Lord 2011), information on successful THA remains scant. Lack of long-term data creates difficulties in setting benchmarks for simulator studies and establishing guidelines for use in standards. In this study we compared clinical and wear histories for a 30-year MOM and a 32-year COC to establish such long-term, wear-rates.

The McKeeTM retrieval was cemented and made 100% of CoCr alloy (Fig. 1a). This patient had a right femoral fracture at 47 years of age, treated by internal-fixation, which failed. Her revision with a Judet implant also failed, leaving her right hip as a Girdlestone. At the age of 68, she had a McKee THA implanted in left hip, and used it until almost 98 years of age (Campbell, 2003). The COC case was a press-fit AutophorTM THA, head and cup made of alumina ceramic, with the only metal being the CoCr stem (Fig. 1c). This was implanted in a female patient 17-years of age active in sports (water-skiing). This modular THA was revised 32-years later due to hip pain from cup migration. Wear on these implants was identified by stereomicroscopy and stained red for photography (Fig. 1). Cup-to-neck impingement was denoted by circumferential neck notching, roughness was assessed by interferometry, and wear determined by CMM (Lord, 2011).

McKee head wear covered 1092mm2 area (Figs. 1a, 2: hemi-area ratio 58%). There was no stripe wear and head roughness was 36nm (Ra). Cup wear covered an area of 1790mm2 (hemi-area 63%). Circumferential damage was noted on the supero-posterior femoral neck with scuff marks also on posterior collar (Fig. 2c). Head and cup wear amounted to 37.7 and 25.2mm3, respectively. Total MOM wear was 62.9mm3, indicating a wear-rate of 2.1mm3/year.

Ceramic head wear consisted of two circular patterns (Fig. 1c), the major one of area 1790mm2 (hemi-area 79%). No wear stripes were identified. Non-worn and extensively worn surfaces had roughness (Ra) 17nm and 123nm, respectively. The cup showed 360o circumferential arc of rim wear with a small, non-wear zone inferiorly (Fig. 1c). Gray metallic transfer was evident, EDS revealing Co and Cr (Fig. 3a). Head and cup wear volumes were 77.2 and 54mm3, respectively. Total COC wear amounted to 131.2mm3 indicating a wear-rate of 4.1mm3/year.

These two THA functioned successfully over 3 decades. The McKee retrieval had minor signs of impingement but no adverse “stripe wear”. This MOM performed satisfactorily due to good positioning and patient's advanced age (68 to 98Yrs of age). The COC patient was 17 years of age at index surgery and active. The ceramic cup showed 360o of edge wear, CoCr transfer and a COC wear-rate double that of the MOM retrieval. Thus the high ceramic wear-resistance protected this youthful patient.

The purpose of this study was to determine the survivorship for a MOM implant series performed by a single community surgeon followed using a practical clinical model. A retrospective cohort of 104 primary MOM THA procedures (94 patients) were all performed by one surgeon at three local hospitals now with 10–13 years follow-up. Sixteen patients are deceased and 16 patients have been lost to follow-up. In the remaining 62 patients, 8 are bilateral providing a total of 70 THA for study. The clinical follow-up model included: hip scores, X-rays, ultrasound, and metal ion concentrations (Co, Cr, Ti). Due to the diversity of patient location, a variety of clinical labs were utilized for metal ions. Statistical methods included Kaplan-Meier survival curve and One-way ANOVA. Hip scores were available for 70 THA and of these 61 had a hip score (HHS) above 80 (87%). X-rays were available for 49 hips and of these 38 (78%) had lateral/version angles in the safe zone (Fig 1: inclination ≤ 55 and anteversion ≤ 35). Thirty-eight ultrasound exams were performed and of these three yielded fluid collections (8%). Metal ion concentrations were documented in 39 of 62 patients (63%, either serum or whole blood). Six outliers were identified with high concentrations of metal ions (Fig 2); Co 0.3–143.9 ppb (median 3.6), Cr 0.2–200.3 ppb (median 2.2) and Ti 2-110 ppb (median 54). Six patients were revised by the original surgeon. Three of six with elevated ions were documented as wear problems and the other three were revised for infection, femur fracture and metal-ion sensitivity. The survivorship of 92.5% at 10 years (Fig. 3) may be partly due to the exclusive use of antero-lateral approach performed by one surgeon with 78% of cups well placed and the MOM design used exclusively.

Explanations for “bearing” noise in ceramic-on-ceramic hips (COC) included stripe-wear formation and loss of lubrication leading to higher friction. However clinical and retrieval studies have clearly documented stripe wear in patients that did not have squeaking. Seldom highlighted has been the risk of metal-on-metal or metal-on-ceramic impingement present in total hip arthroplasty (THA) with metal and ceramic cup designs. The limitation in THA positioning studies has been (i) reliance on 2-dimensional radiographic images and (ii) patients lying supine on the examination table, thus not imaged in squeaking positions. We collected eleven squeaking COC cases for an EOS 3D-imaging functional study. Hip positions were documented in each patient's functional ‘squeaking’ posture using standard and 3-D EOS images for sitting, rising from a chair, hip extension in striding, and single-legged stance.

EOS imaging documented for the 1st time that postural dysfunctions with potential impingements were demonstrable for each squeaking case. The 1st major insight in this study came from a female patient who complained of squeaking while walking in flat-soled shoes (Figs. 1a, b). She found that when wearing high-heeled shoes her hip stopped squeaking (Figs. 1c, d). Her lateral EOS view in standing position with heeled shoes revealed that the femoral stem had approximately 3o less hyper-extension compared to flat shoes (Figs. 1b, d, arrows #1,3). The three-dimensional ‘sky-view’ EOS reconstruction of pelvis and femurs (Fig. 2) showed that her femur was also more internally rotated when she wore heels. These subtle shifts in position changed her COC hip from one of squeaking to non-squeaking. A squeaking male patient observed similar postural effects while walking up his boat ramp but not going down the ramp. In both cases, the squeaking was a consequence of cup impinging on a metal femoral neck. Thus the primary cause of squeaking appeared to be hip impingement, i.e. repetitive subluxations that patients generally were not aware of. Another case is representative of situations due to atypical and subtle cup/stem mal-adjustments (Fig. 3); frontal pelvic-tilt, thoracolumbar scoliosis, with 1cm of femur lengthening and a significant increase of offset are observed. Also evident was the femoral-neck retroversion in both standing and sitting. Squeaking occurred when modification of the functional neck orientation occured in one-legged stance (Fig. 3c) or when climbing a stair (Fig. 3d).

It was apparent in our EOS studies that patient functionality controlled whether squeaking occurred or not. Thus the new data indicated COC squeaking was a three-fold consequence of component positioning, spine and pelvic adaptions, and variations in patient posture. One limitation here is that our conclusions are based on a small sample of patients and may not be applicable to all. A consequence of such repetitive impingement can be cup rim damage and neck-notching, with release of metal debris. It is well documented that retrieved ceramic bearings are frequently stained black. Thus hip squeaking may likely result from (i) impingement and secondarily (ii) due to ingress of metal particles, and then (iii) producing a failure of lubrication.

To view tables/figures, please contact authors directly.

Introduction

Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy is an attractive surgical option for physically active patients with early osteoarthritis and varus malalignment. Unfortunately use of this surgical technique is frequently accompanied by an unintended increase in the posterior tibial slope, resulting in anterior tibial translation, and consequent altered knee kinematics and cartilage loading(1).

To address this unintended consequence, it has been recommended that the relative opening of the anteromedial and posterolateral corners of the osteotomy are calculated pre-operatively using trigonometry (1). This calculation assumes that the saw-cut is made parallel to the native posterior slope; yet given the current reliance on 2D images and the ‘surgeon's eye’ to guide the saw-cut, this assumption is questionable.

The aim of this study was to explore how accurately the native posterior tibial slope is reproduced with a traditional freehand osteotomy saw-cut, and whether novel 3D printed patient-specific guides improve this accuracy.

Retrieval studies of metal-on-metal (MOM) resurfaced hips revealed cup “edge wear” as a common failure mechanism [Morlock-2008]. Retrieval analysis of total hip arthroplasty (THA) also demonstrated extensive rim wear (Fig. 1: 190–220o arcs), typically across the superior cup [Clarke-2013]. Such wear patterns have not been demonstrated in hip simulator studies. The simulator “steep cup” models typically had motion arcs (flexion, etc.) input via the femoral head [Leslie-2008, Angadji-2009]. With fixed-inclination cups this produces constant loading of cup rim against the head (Fig. 2a). This is unlikely to be the physiological norm, unless patients walk constantly on the rims of mal-positioned cups. More likely the patients produce edge-wear intermittently due to functional and postural variations. Therefore a novel simulator model is proposed in which the cup undergoes edge-wear intermittently at one extreme of flexion (Fig. 2a). Our study objective using this new simulator model (Fig. 2a, b) was to (i) demonstrate MOM wear-rates and wear patches as a function of these dynamic-inclinations (40 o, 50 o, 70o), and (ii) compare the simulator data to MOM retrievals (Fig. 1).

Two simulator studies were run, both using 60mm MOM. Four bearings were run to 1-million cycles (1Mc) with cups peaking at 40 and 50° dynamic-inclinations, thus providing control data with no edge-wear. In 2nd study, 4 MOM were run with cups given a dynamic-inclination of 70° to produce edge-wear effects. In study-2 currently at 2.5Mc duration, the femoral heads showed the two classical wear phases with run-in at 1.7mm³/Mc and steady-state at 0.084mm³/Mc (Fig. 3a). Wear-rate for cups at 2.34mm³/Mc was 40% higher than heads and continued to rise linearly with time (Fig. 3a). At 2.5Mc, cup wear averaged ×5.7 greater than heads and resulting wear-patterns extended 85°−225° around cup rim (Fig. 3b: average 151°). In study-1, wear patches in cups with 40° dynamic-inclination approached within 12.4mm of the cup rim as denoted by circumferential grooves. This margin-of-safety (MOS) represented a 24°angle. The cup wear-patch averaged area of 1,760mm2. With cups run at 70o dynamic-inclination, the wear patches were transferred an additional 30o towards the rim thereby representing a 6° transfer across the rim.

This is the 1st wear study to use the new dynamic-inclination test mode to better simulate cup function in vivo. It was particularly satisfying to see the similarity in wear-patterns between retrieval (Fig. 1) and simulator cups (Fig. 3b). It is also the 1st study to monitor sites and magnitudes of cup wear areas and to purposely produce “edge wear”. The cups with 40° and 50° dynamic-inclinations had large margins of safety. With 70° dynamic-inclination the margin of safety was lost - effectively there was a 6° transfer of the wear patch across the cup rim. Even this apparently small effect at one location in each gait cycle sufficiently perturbed MOM performance that wear increased by an order of magnitude. Notably this was all cup wear and not by femoral head participation. The study continues but at 2.5Mc duration the cups revealed 5-fold greater wear than heads.

The knee joint displays a wide spectrum of laxity, from inherently tight to excessively lax even within the normal, uninjured population. The assessment of AP knee laxity in the clinical setting is performed by manual passive tests such as the Lachman test. Non-invasive assessment based on image free navigation has been clinically validated and used to quantify mechanical alignment and coronal knee laxity in early flexion. When used on cadavers the system demonstrated good AP laxity results with flexion up to 40°. This study aimed to validate the repeatability of the assessment of antero-posterior (AP) knee joint laxity using a non-invasive image free navigation system in normal, healthy subjects.

Twenty-five healthy volunteers were recruited and examined in a single centre. AP translation was measured using a non-invasive navigation system (PhysioPilot) consisting of an infrared camera, externally mounted optical trackers and computer software. Each of the volunteers had both legs examined by a single examiner twice (two registrations). The Lachman test was performed through flexion in increments of 15°. Coefficients of Repeatability (CR) and Interclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) were used to validate AP translation. The acceptable limits of agreement for this project were set at 3mm for antero-posterior tibial translation.

The most reliable and repeatable AP translation assessments were at 30° and 45°, demonstrating good reliability (ICC 0.82, 0.82) and good repeatability (CR 2.5, 2.9). The AP translation assessment at 0°, 15°, 75° and 90° demonstrated moderate reliability (ICC ≤ 0.75), and poor repeatability (CR ≥3.0mm).

The non-invasive system was able to reliably and consistently measure AP knee translation between 30° and 45° flexion, the clinically relevant range for this assessment. This system could therefore be used to quantify abnormal knee laxity and improve the assessment of knee instability and ligamentous injuries in a clinic setting.

Introduction

Over 40-years the dominant form of implant fixation has been bone cement (PMMA). However the presence of circulating PMMA debris represents a 3rd-body wear mechanism for metal-on-polyethylene (MPE). Wear studies using PMMA slurries represent tests of clinical relevance (Table 1). Cup designs now use many varieties of highly-crosslinked polyethylene (HXPE) of improved wear resistance. However there appears to be no adverse wear studies of vitamin-E blended cups.1–4 The addition of vitamin E as an anti-oxidant is the currently preferred method to preserve mechanical properties and ageing resistance of HXPE. Therefore the present study examined the response of vitamin-E blended liners to PMMA abrasion combined with CoCr and ceramic heads. The hip simulator wear study was run in two phases to compare wear with, (i) clean lubricants and (ii) PMMA slurries.

Metal-on-metal (MOM) retrieval studies have demonstrated that CoCr bearings used in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and resurfacing (RSA) featured stripe wear damage on heads, likely created by rim impact with CoCr cups.^1-3 Such subluxation damage may release quantities of large CoCr particles that would provoke aggressive 3^rd-body wear. With RSA, the natural femoral neck reduces the head-neck ratio but avoids risk of metal-to-metal impingement (Fig. 1).⁴ For this study, twelve retrieved RSA were compared to 12 THA (Table 1), evaluating, (i) patterns of habitual wear, (ii) stripe-wear damage and (iii) 3^rd-body abrasive scratches. Considering RSA have head/neck ratios much lower than large-diameter THA, any impingement damage should be uniquely positioned on the heads.

Twelve RSA and THA retrievals were selected with respect to similar diameter range and vendors with follow-up ranging typically 1–6 years (Table 1). Patterns of habitual wear were mapped to determine position in vivo. Stripe damage was mapped at three sites: polar, equatorial and basal. Wear patterns were examined using SEM and white light interferometry (WLI). Graphical models characterized the complex geometry of the natural femoral neck in coronal and sagittal planes and provided RSA head-neck ratios.⁴

Normal area patterns of habitual wear were similar on RSA and THA bearings. The wear patterns showing cup rim-breakout proved larger for RSA cups than THA. Polar stripes presented in juxtaposition to the polar axis in both RSA and THA (Fig. 1). As anticipated, basal stripes on RSA occurred at steeper cup-impingement angles (CIA) than THA. The micro-topography of stripe damage was similar on both RSA and THA heads. Some scratches were illustrative of 3^rd-body wear featuring raised lips, punctuated terminuses, and crater-like depressions (Fig. 2).

Neck narrowing observed following RSA procedures may be a consequence of impingement and subluxation due to the small head-neck ratios. However, lacking a metal femoral neck, such RSA impingement would not result in metal debris being released. Nevertheless it has been suggested that cup-to-head impingement produced large CoCr particles and also cup “edge wear” as the head orbits the cup rim.⁴ Our study showed that impingement had occurred as evidenced by the polar stripes and 3^rd-body wear by large hard particles as evidenced by the wide scratches with raised lips. We can therefore agree with the prior study, that 2-body and 3rd-body wear mechanisms were present in both RSA and THA retrievals.

Introduction

Hip simulators proved to be valuable, pre-clinical tests for assessing wear. Preferred implant positioning has been with cup mounted above head, i.e. ‘Anatomical’ (Figs. 1a-c) ^1,2 while the ‘Inverted’ test (cup below head) was typically preferred in debris studies (Figs. 1d-f).^3,4 In an Anatomical study, wear patterns on cups and heads averaged 442 and 1668 mm² area, respectively, representing 8% and 30% of available hemi-surface (Table 1), i.e. the head pattern was ×3.8 times larger than cup. This concept of wear patterns is illustrated well in the ‘pin-on-disk’ test (Fig. 1) in which the oscillating pin has the ‘contained’ wear area (CWP) and the large wear track on the disk is the ‘distributed’ pattern (DWP). Hip simulators also create CWP and DWP patterns, site dependant on whether Anatomical (Fig. 1a-c) or ‘Inverted’ (Fig. 1d-f) test. However there is scant foundation as to clinical merits of either test mode. Retrieval studies of MOM bearings have indicated that cups have the larger wear patterns, i.e. contrary to simulator tests running Anatomical cups (Table 1).⁵ Therefore we compared Anatomical and Inverted cup modes using 38mm and 40mm MOM in two 5-million cycle simulator studies.

Introduction

Looking for optimal solutions to wear risks evident in total hip arthroplasty (THA), silicon nitride ceramic bearings (Si₃N₄) are noted for demanding high-temperature applications such as diesel engines and aerospace bearings. As high-strength ceramic for orthopedic applications, Si₃N₄ offers improved fracture toughness and fracture strength over contemporary aluminas (Al₂O₃). Our pilot studies of Si₃N₄ in 28mm diameter THA showed promising results at ISTA meeting of 2007.¹ In this simulator study, we compared the wear resistance of 40mm to 28mm diameter Si₃N₄ bearings.

The 28mm and 40mm bearings (Fig. 1) were fabricated from Si₃N₄ powder (Amedica Inc, Salt Lake City, UT).¹ Wear tests run were run at 3kN peak load in an orbital hip simulator (SWM, Monrovia, CA) and. The lubricant was standard bovine serum (Hyclone: diluted to 17 mg/ml protein concentration). Wear was measured by gravimetric method and wear-rates calculated by linear regression. SEM and interferometic microscopic was performed at 3.5-million cycles (3.5Mc) to 12Mc.

The simulator was run to 3.5Mc duration with no consistent weight-loss trends. The bearings could show either small positive or negative weight fluctuations in an unpredictable manner (Fig. 2). Surface analysis showed protein layers up to 3μm thick, furrowed due to abrasion by small particles (Fig. 3). The low ceramic wear was camouflaged by protein contaminants alternatively forming and shedding. From 3.5 to 12.8Mc duration we experimented with various detergents and wash-procedures, all to no avail. Protein coatings were also more prevalent on 44 mm heads, likely due to frictional heating by the larger diameter effect. Selected heads were washed with a mild acid solution - the cumulative effect appeared to be removal of some protein layers, but not in a predictable manner.

The Si₃N₄ ceramic is used in demanding industrial applications and it is therefore unfortunate that we are yet not able to quantify the actual wear performance of Si₃N₄/ Si₃N₄ bearings (COC). The contaminating protein layers combined with low-wearing silicon nitride obscured the actual wear data. This has also been a problem in prior studies with alumina and zirconia bearings. Considerable challenges still stand in the way of the optimal biomaterials choices that will result in reduced risk of failure while providing extended lifetimes. Thus important issues remain unsolved and call for innovative solutions. Searching for a more effective ‘wear-measurement’ remedy, we noted that abrasive slurries of bone cement (PMMA) used in contemporary simulator studies were effective in promoting adverse wear in polyethylene bearings. These investigations also revealed that PMMA debris did not damage CoCr heads^2,3, alumina heads^4,5 or diffusion-hardened zirconia heads (ZrDH).⁶ We can therefore speculate at this ISTA meeting of 2014 that future ceramic wear tests should incorporate PMMA slurries. Here a new hypothesis can be formulated, that PMMA particulates will provide a continual and beneficial removal of contaminating proteins from the ceramic surfaces (see Fig. 3) and thereby aid definition of low-wearing COC bearings such as Si₃N₄.

The application of non-oxide ceramics such as silicon nitride presented here may become a viable alternative for THA designs of next decade.

Introduction

The assessment of leg length is essential for planning the correction of deformities and for the compensation of length discrepancy, especially after hip or knee arthroplasty. CT scan measures the “anatomical” lengths but does not evaluate the “functional” length experienced by the patients in standing position. Functional length integrates frontal orientation, flexion or hyperextension. EOS system provides simultaneously AP and lateral measures in standing position and thus provides anatomical and functional evaluations of the lower limb lengths.

The objective of this study was to measure 2D and 3D anatomical and functional lengths, to verify whether these measures are different and to evaluate the parameters significantly influencing these potential differences

A 35-year-old female (age 35Yrs) had primary MOM total hip arthroplasty (THA) in 2008. At 8 months this patient postoperatively developed headaches, memory loss, vertigo, and aura-like symptoms that progressed to seizures. At 18 months review, she complained of progressive hip pain, a popping sensation and crepitus with joint motion. This patient weighed 284lbs with BMI of 38.5. Radiographs revealed the cup had 55° inclination, 39° anteversion (Fig. 1). Metal ion concentrations were high (blood: Co=126 mcg/L, Cr= 64mcg/L). Revision was performed in November 2010 A dark, serous fluid was observed, along with synovitis. The implants were well fixed and the femoral head could not be removed; thus the stem was removed by femoral osteotomy. With the head fused on this femoral stem, for the 1^st time it was possible to precisely determine the habitual patterns of MOM wear relative to her in-vivo function. We investigated (1) size and location of wear patterns and (2) signs of cup-stem impingement to help explain her symptoms developed over 32 months follow-up.

The retrieved MOM was a Magnum™ with head diameter 50mm and 50×56mm cup (Biomet). This was mounted on a Taperloc™ lateralized porous-coated stem. Components were examined visually and wear damage mapped by stereo-microscopy, interferometry, CMM, SEM, and EDS. Main-wear zone (MWZ) areas were calculated using standard spherical equations¹ and centroidal vectors determined.

The head-cup mismatch was 427um with the cup revealing a form factor of 228um. The cup showed wear area of 1275mm² that extended up to the cup rim over 150°arc. The cup rim was worn thin over a 90° arc with loss of cup bevel. The head showed an elliptical wear area of 2200mm² located centrally on the superior-medial surface (ellipsoidal ratio ×1.2). Compared to the hemispherical surface (50mm: hemi-area = 3927mm²), the worn area represented hemi-area ratio of 56%. The centroidal vectors measured 8° anterior and 24° superior to the head's polar axis (Fig. 2). Stripe wear damage revealed multiple impingement sites. SEM and EDS revealed stripes were contaminated by metal transfer from the stainless-steel instruments used at revision. The main impingement position was identified (Fig. 3) indicating the site of repetitive subluxations whereby the subluxing head thinned the cup, i.e. “edge wear”.

Cup and head wear patterns corresponded well, reinforcing our definition of the MWZ locations in vivo. The femoral MWZ was centrally located superiorly and medially with respect to the polar axis of the femoral neck and head. The noted impingement position indicated this patient had experienced repetitive subclinical subluxations (RSS).² The taper inside the fused head may also have been a contributory factor that we cannot ignore. Nevertheless her excessive cup thinning was likely a result of a steep cup and considerable anteversion allowing the femoral head to sublux over the cup rim, thus thinning the cup and wearing the rim bevel, and producing MOM wear debris.

Introduction

Coronal misalignment of the lower limbs is closely related to the onset and progression of osteoarthritis. In cases of severe genu varus or valgus, evaluating this alignment can assist in choosing specific surgical strategies. Furthermore, restoring satisfactory alignment after total knee replacement promotes longevity of the implant and better functional results. Knee coronal alignment is typically evaluated with the Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA) angle. It is generally measured on standing AP long-leg radiographs (LLR). However, patient positioning influences the accuracy of this 2D measurement. A new 3D method to measure coronal lower limb alignment using low-dose EOS images has recently been developed and validated. The goal of this study was to evaluate the relevance of this technique when determining knee coronal alignment in a referral population, and more specifically to evaluate how the HKA angle measured with this 3D method differs from conventional 2D methods.

Corail implants have shown to give good results in elective total hip replacements (THR) and in hemi-arthroplasties. Pre-operative planning to identify the correct size of the Corail implant is vital for good post-operative outcomes. An undersized implant can lead to subsidence. The aim of the study was to review the incidence of subsidence. Post-operative radiographs of trauma patients (n=39) and elective (n=45) patients who had Corail femoral implants were reviewed. The implant-to-canal (I:C) ratio were calculated at the given 50% and 70% levels of the Corail implant. Follow up radiographs were reviewed to identify subsidence. The average age of patients was 80.3 years (range 66–93 years) in hemi-arthroplasties and 61 years (range 18–88) in elective THRs. The implant to canal (I:C) ratio at the 50% and 70% levels in trauma patients were 0.77 (range 0.54 – 0.97) and 0.81 (range 0.59 – 0.94) respectively. In elective patients, the ratios at the 50% and 70% marks were 0.77 (range 0.57 – 0.98) and 0.81 (0.56 – 0.95). One case of subsidence was seen in a collarless implant and I:C ratios at 50% and 70% were 0.57 and 0.56. A larger study is required to determine the reliability of this novel ‘implant:canal’ ratio to predict incidence.

Damage to metal-on-metal bearings (MOM) has been varyingly described as “edge wear,” third-body abrasive wear and “rim-damage” (1–4). However, no distinction has been made between any of these proposed wear mechanisms. The goal of this study was to discover what features might differentiate between surface damage created by either 2-body or 3-body wear mechanisms in MOM bearings. The hypotheses were that surface damage created by impingement of the cup rim (2-body wear) would be i) linear on the micro-scale, ii) reveal transverse striations (in direction of the sliding rim), iii) have either no raised lip or have a single lip along one side of the track, and iv) have an asymmetrical surface profile across the track width.

Five cases with 28 mm MOM, five of 34–38 mm MOM, and five of 50–56 mm diameter were studied (N = 15). The main wear zone (MWZ) was measured in each MOM head and the number of 2-body wear tracks recorded in the non-wear (NWZ) and main wear zone (MWZ). Bearing damage was examined using a white-light interferometer (Zygo Newview 600; 5x lens) and a scanning electron microscope (Zeiss MA15). The depths and slopes were assessed across the width of the damage tracks.

Thirteen of the 15 MOM bearings showed wear tracks that exhibited all four of the hypothesized 2-body wear characteristics. These wear tracks will be referred to as “micro-segments”. While micro-segments visually appeared linear, microscopically they revealed a semi-lunar edge coupled with transverse striations leading to a linear edge. This indicated that during impingement episodes, the cup rim ploughed material from the CoCr surface at the semi-lunar edge (Fig. 1), thereby creating the abruptly raised lip on the linear edge of the track. This “snow plough effect” and its distinct edge effect can account for the asymmetrical surface profile. A different type of 2-body wear was identified and referred to as “furrows”. Furrows also visually appeared linear visually, but microscopically revealed longitudinal striations and a symmetrical surface profile (Fig. 2). Furrows had lips raised on both sides of the track, but not circumscribing the terminal ends of the track. Instead, the ends of the furrows are tapered smooth transitions to the articular surface.

Thus, 2-body tracks were found to be distinguishable from 3-body tracks (micro-grooves) and were classified as either micro-segments or furrows. Micro-segements supported hypotheses 1–3 and provided a clearer definition for hypothesis-4, while furrows only supported hypothesis 1. The divergence in features between micro-segments and furrows allude to different interactions between the bearing and cup rim that led to each type of track. While these data represent a small set of cases (n = 15) this evidence shows for the first time what was previously only suspected (2), that the CoCr rim can routinely create 2-body wear damage mechanisms in MOM femoral heads.

The relevance of fluid-film lubrication, elasto-hydrodynamic lubrication and ‘tribolayers’ for hip bearings has been the subject of much debate (Fisher 2012). However, knowledge of the thickness and distribution of proteins in and around the wear zone of metal-on-polyethylene (MPE) bearings is scant. The efficacy of protein lubrication with metal-on-metal bearings (MOM) is in discovery. This simulator study was designed to analyze film formation on MOM bearings using varied protein concentrations. The hypotheses were that increasing protein concentrations in the serum lubricant would result in 1) greater thickness of protein films, and 2) reduced MOM wear.

The hip simulator was run for 5 million cycles (5 Mc) duration using 28 mm MOM bearings (DJO Inc) run with the cups anatomical. Lubricant protein concentrations were 16.5, 33, and 66 mg/ml. At each test interval of 1 Mc, the proteins films on CoCr surfaces were analyzed by both interferometry and SEM imaging in main-wear, transition-wear and non-wear zones. Thickness of protein films was measured using non-contacting interferometry. Areas of wear zones were mapped and measured and the areas compared. MOM wear rates were assessed gravimetrically.

It was found that the proteins formed two types of film (Figure 1). Type-1 was visually hazy in appearance, grainy in structure, and most commonly found in the main-wear zone. This type of protein film was always present in the main-wear zone but its thickness (approximately 0.05 μm) did not increase with increase in the lubricant protein concentrations. Type-2 was visually rainbow-like in appearance, more gel-like with thick clumps appearing as islands on the CoCr surfaces, and more common in the transition zone. This type of film was always present (approximately 1 μm thick) and its thickness notably increased in cups with increased lubricant protein concentrations. This film remained relatively consistent on femoral heads and did not change with increased protein concentrations (Figure 2).

The type-1 protein films were always detectable in the actual wear zones but only the type-2 film showed a build-up with protein concentration and only inside the cups. This may be partially a response to the orbital simulator set up. In the Anatomical test mode, the cup is fixed with respect to the load axis and the head oscillates. Thus the main-wear zone on the head had a distributed type of wear patch and the main-wear zone in the cup was fixed. This configuration would allow the type-2 proteins to accumulate around the edge of the cup wear zone. In contrast, they would be scraped off the wear zone of the orbiting femoral head. This study showed that protein films endure even inside the main-wear zone of MOM bearings. In addition, collaborative studies have shown that the protein films are highly mobile and stream across the main-wear zones. Thus there is both an interaction with the CoCr surfaces and a degradation phenomenon that likely results in the protein-rich layers in the transition regions.

Figure 1: SEM images of type 1 and type 2 protein films.

Figure 2: Protein films on MOM bearings under three different protein concentrations.

This study of retrieved 28 mm Metasul™ (cemented) revealed for the first time adverse wear effects created by impingement-subluxation in MOM. The 10 cases selected (with femoral stems) had annual follow-up 3–11 years. (1) Unequivocal evidence here shows that all heads routinely subluxed from the Metasul liners.

Femoral stems revealed well-demarcated notches (DN) on necks and trunnions (Fig. 1a: n = 6), shallow cosmetic blemishes (Fig. 1b CB: n = 4), and abrasion by cement (Fig. 1b: PMMA). As demonstrated by EOS radiographs, impingement locations varied with implant positioning, pelvic mobility and patient functionality – both anterior and posterior notching (Fig. 1). The first impingement notch occurred with head located (Fig. 2a), whereas the head had subluxed from the cup at 2^nd notch (Fig. 2b). The model demonstrated that patients gained 20° motion by such head-subluxation manoeuvres. It was surprising that there was no collateral damage evident on the liners. Even with severe notching of Ti6Al4V and CoCr stems, the cup rims generally appeared well-polished.

Femoral heads revealed macro-stripe damage on articular surfaces (Fig. 3), as did cups. Basal and polar macro-stripes on heads were always located at hip impingement positions. The equatorial stripes were formed at main-wear zone boundaries. Thus equatorial stripes were likely created by some form of rim-impact damage (micro-separation) or by local ingress of 3^rd-body wear particles under the cup rim.

Micro-grooving was evident within these macro-size stripes and frequently featured large raised lips (Fig. 3), interpreted as signs of adverse 3^rd-body wear mechanisms, and rarely described.(2) It would appear that large metal particulates were released during MOM impingement-subluxation manoeuvres and circulated the hip joint to producing severe 3^rd-body abrasion. Gradual decomposition of such large debris to nano-sized particulates under joint loading would then produce the often-referenced ‘self polishing’ effect of CoCr. EDS studies revealed metal smears on the CoCr surfaces containing the elements of titanium alloy (Ti, Al, V). This was further evidence of impingement-subluxation manoeuvres.(1, 3)

In-vivo cup wear patterns also appeared much larger than those produced in MOM simulators. Such differences likely reflected head-subluxation in vivo, whereby heads unconstrained by the subluxation maneuver were free to orbit up and even cross cup rims, i.e. “edge wear”. This appears to be the first study detailing the adverse wear mechanisms in MOM bearings. There are two limitations to our retrieval study, a) these wear results may not be representative for all MOM designs, and b) it is unknown whether such results have relevance to MOM cases continuing successfully.

Controversy exists over the role of fretting-corrosion in modular junctions of large-diameter metal-on-metal (MOM) heads given the many design plus alloy mix-and-match variations. Overall data was also scant regarding a) fitting stem trunnions to head tapers, b) role of taper angles, c) role of smooth vs threaded trunnion junctions, d) role of head neck-lengths and e) role of head diameters. While the “12: 14” taper has been used with small CoCr heads for 40 years, we could not find retrieval analyses on this European ‘gold-standard’. We therefore selected 10 femoral stems with 28 mm modular heads for analysis (3–8 years follow-up). Unique to this study were the threaded taper profiles on both stems and heads (Fig. 1).

Six stems were cemented Ti6Al4V (Alize, FH-Orthopedics, France) with 12/14 taper angle defined as 5° 42′. These represented Ti64: CoCr combinations from 2 vendors. The other four were CoCr stems including the CoCrMo (Protasul-2) and CoNiCrMo (Protasul-10) alloys (cemented and HA-coated; Sulzer, Switzerland). These CoCr: CoCr combinations from one vendor had “12/14” stem-taper defined as 5° 38′. Anatomical positioning of Metasul heads (Sulzer, Switzerland) was identified by main-wear zone maps. Femoral heads were then bi-valved in horizontal plane for direct imaging by interferometry (WLI) and SEM. Visual corrosion mapping (3) was recorded digitally in 4 anatomical views. Quantitative analysis used 1 to 5 taper zones with 6-replicate measurements per zone (Fig. 1).

The WLI and SEM studies showed that non-contacting taper zones inside CoCr heads (Fig. 2) were threaded with pitch of 70 μm (PV: peak-valley depth = 5–7 μm). The non-contact zones on Sulzer stems had 130 μm pitch (PV = 4–8 μm) whereas Alize stems had 210 μm pitch (PV = 10–12 μm). Threads on both stem types were much coarser than CoCr heads; Ti64 stem threads were much coarser than CoCr stems. In contact zones, the Metasul threads had flattened (avg. roughness = 0.45 μm Ra). With CoCr stems there was little difference. Difference in pitch of stem-threads vs head-threads indicated there was no imprinting onto head tapers. Nor were there statistically significant differences evident in the contact zones along CoCr or Ti64 tapers. Small damaged areas (Fig. 3: arrows) may have been due to alternatively; initial machining, surgical impaction, in-vivo cold-welds, fretting, corrosion, or from surgical-removal. The as labeled “corrosion damage” was well within the “mild” grade for all implants.(3) Thus even with this considerable variety of design and material parameters, we were satisfied that these gold-standard taper junctions with threaded interfaces had performed very well with 28 mm MOM at 3–8 years follow-up.

Controversy has existed for decades over the role of fretting-corrosion in modular CoCr heads used with stems of CoCr vs Ti6Al4V. Since retrieval data on taper performance remains scant, we report here an18-year survivorship of a Ti6Al4V: CoCr combination (APR design; Intermedics Inc). Unique to this study were the threaded profiles present on both stem and head tapers (Fig. 1).

This female patient was revised for pain, osteolysis and recurrent hip dislocation at 17 years, 10 months. A prior MPE hip replacement performed for her severely dysplastic right hip had lasted 11 years. At this 2nd revision, the 28 mm CoCr head was found dislocated posteriorly and superiorly. Metallosis was evident in the tissues. The polyethylene liner showed extensive rim damage on both anterior and posterior aspects. The neck of her APR Revision stem (Intermedics Inc) had worn through the polyethylene rim and impinged on the metal cage. The cage was found loose, the liner had disassociated, and the peri-trochanteric areas were compromised by massive osteolysis. The femoral stem and head were removed together without disassembly. The femoral stem and acetabular construct were replaced by an ARCOS revision system using 36 mm head with a Freedom cup (cemented to Max-Ti cage; Biomet Inc.).

The complete femoral neck and head were bi-valved assembled in horizontal plane for direct imaging by interferometry and SEM (Fig. 1a). After sectioning the head separated from the stem. Quantitative imaging used 1 to 5 regions with 6-replicate measurements per region and differentiation into contact and non-contact zones (Fig. 1b). Visual corrosion mapping (3) was recorded digitally in 4 anatomical views (Figs 1b–f).

The thread profile on contact zone inside the head (Fig. 2a) had a pitch of approximately 40 μm and a peak-to-valley depth of 4 μm overall (Fig. 2b profile section of thread: PV = 2 μm). The thread profile on stem trunnion (Fig. 3a) had a pitch of approximately 125 μm and a peak-to-valley depth of 3.5 μm overall (Fig. 2b profile section of thread: PV = 1 μm). Thus the stem trunnion thread was much coarser than the head. Overall corrosion grading was judged very mild. Overall we were satisfied that this Ti6Al4V: CoCr combination taper junction with threaded interfaces had performed very well for 18 years. Nevertheless, our visual grading was subject to opinion and thus unrewarding. The continuing project will quantify the contacting and non-contacting regions of head and stem (Fig. 1b).

Introduction

Accurate evaluation of femoral offset is difficult with conventional anteroposterior (AP) X-rays. Routine CT imaging is costly and exposes patients to a significant dose of radiation. The EOS® imaging system is an innovative slot-scanning radiography system that makes possible the acquisition of simultaneous and orthogonal AP and lateral images of the patient in standing position. These 2-dimensional (2D) images are equivalent to standard plane X-rays. Three-dimension (3D) reconstructions are obtained from these paired images according to a validated protocol. This prospective study explores for the first time the value of the EOS® imaging system for comparing measurements of femoral offset obtained from 2D images and 3D reconstructions.