Aims. Endoprosthetic reconstruction following distal femur tumour resection has been widely advocated. In this paper, we present the design of an uncemented endoprosthesis system featuring a short, curved stem, with the goal of enhancing long-term survivorship and functional outcomes. Methods. This study involved patients who underwent implantation of an uncemented distal femoral endoprosthesis with a short and curved stem between 2014 and 2019. Functional outcomes were assessed using the 1993 version of the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS-93) score. Additionally, we quantified five types of complications and assessed osseointegration radiologically. The survivorship of the endoprosthesis was evaluated according to two endpoints. A total of 134 patients with a median age of 26 years (IQR 16 to 41) were included in our study. The median follow-up time was 61 months (IQR 56 to 76), and the median functional MSTS-93 was 83% (IQR 73 to 91) postoperatively. Results. Overall, 21 patients (16%) encountered complications, and the rate of aseptic loosening was 7% (9/134). The survival rate up to 8.5 years was 93% for aseptic loosening as the endpoint, and 88% for any reason as the endpoint, retrospectively. Conclusion. The use of an uncemented distal femoral endoprosthesis with a short, curved stem demonstrated a low incidence of aseptic loosening and achieved long-term survivorship of up to nine years. Meanwhile, aseptic loosening typically occurs in the early stage postoperatively. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(9):1000–1007

Following resection of tumours in the distal femur, reconstruction with joint-sparing prostheses have shown good short-term functional outcomes. There is however limited literature on the affect of knee-sparing prostheses on function of the distal femoral physis in children of bone growing age. We discuss two patients, a male (11yrs) and female (10yrs) who had joint-sparing distal femoral prostheses inserted for treatment of Ewing’s sarcoma. The knee joint, along with the distal growth plate, was preserved and fixed to the distal end of the prosthesis using uni-cortical screws positioned distal to the physis. In the female, these screws were removed 6 months postop due to prominence of the screws under the skin. In both patients, we assessed radiographs from immediately post[surgery and the most recent follow-up (20 and 28 months respectively). In each set, for the operated limb, we measured the height and width of the distal femoral epiphysis, the total length of the femur and the length of the proximal femoral bone segment from the femoral head to the proximal bone-prosthesis interface. In addition, postoperative assessments of leg lengths, bilaterally, were documented. In both patients, distal femoral epiphyseal height and width in the operated leg showed no significant change following endoprosthetic replacement. In the female, growth did not resume even after removal of the epiphyseal screws. In both patients, lengths of the femur and the proximal bone segment increased significantly following surgery. The patients demonstrated no clinical leg length discrepancy at the most recent follow-up. This study suggests that the function of the distal femoral growth plate ceases following insertion of joint-sparing distal femoral endoprostheses, probably due to trans-physeal fixation. This does not appear to resume following early removal of distal screws. The proximal growth plate, however, continues to function adequately enough to maintain symmetry in overall leg length

Debate surrounds the optimum operative treatment of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures (PDFFs) at the level of well fixed femoral components; lateral locking plate fixation (LLP-ORIF) or distal femoral replacement (DFR). To determine which attributed the least peri-operative morbidity and mortality we performed a retrospective cohort study of 60 consecutive unilateral PDFFs of Su types II (40/60) and III (20/60) in patients ≥60 years; 33 underwent LLP-ORIF and 27 underwent DFR. The primary outcome measure was reoperation. Secondary outcomes included perioperative complications and functional mobility status. Kaplan Meier survival analysis was performed. Cox multivariable regression analysis identified risk factors for reoperation after LLP-ORIF.

Mean length of follow-up was 3.8 years (range 1.0–10.4). One-year mortality was 13% (8/60). Reoperation rate was significantly higher following LLP-ORIF: 7/33 vs 0/27, p=0.008. For the endpoint reoperation, five-year survival was better following DFR: 100% compared to 70.8% (51.8 to 89.8 95%CI) (p=0.006). For the endpoint mechanical failure (including radiographic loosening) there was no difference at 5 years: ORIF 74.5% (56.3 to 92.7); DFR 78.2% (52.3 to 100), p=0.182). Reoperation following LLP-ORIF was independently associated with medial comminution: HR 10.7 (1.45 to 79.5, p=0.020). Anatomic reduction was protective against reoperation: HR 0.11(0.013 to 0.96, p=0.046). When inadequately fixed fractures were excluded differences in survival were no longer significant: reoperation (p=0.156); mechanical failure (p=0.453).

Reoperation rates are higher following LLP-ORIF of low PDFFs compared to DFR. Where adequate reduction, proximal fixation and augmentation of medial comminution is used there is no difference in survival between LLP-ORIF and DFR.

Introduction. Surgeons commonly resect additional distal femur during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to correct a flexion contracture to restore range of motion and knee function. However, the effect of joint line elevation on the resulting TKA kinematics including frontal plane laxity is unclear. Thus, our goal was to quantify the effect of additional distal femoral resection on passive extension and mid-flexion laxity. Methods. Six computational knee models with capsular and collateral ligament properties specific to TKA were developed and implanted with a contemporary posterior-stabilized TKA. A 10° flexion contracture was modeled by imposing capsular contracture as determined by simulating a common clinical exam of knee extension and accounting for the length and weight of each limb segment from which the models were derived (Figure 1). Distal femoral resections of 2 mm and 4 mm were simulated for each model. The knees were then extended by applying the measured knee moments to quantify the amount of knee extension. The output data were compared with a previous cadaveric study using a two-sample two-tailed t-test (p<0.05) [1]. Subsequently, varus and valgus torques of ±10 Nm were applied as the knee was flexed from 0° to 90° at the baseline, and after distal resections of 2 mm, and 4 mm. Coronal laxity, defined as the sum of varus and valgus angulation in response to the applied varus and valgus torques, was measured at 30° and 45°of flexion, and the flexion angle was identified where the increase in laxity was the greatest with respect to baseline. Results. With 2 mm and 4 mm of distal femoral resection, the knee extended an additional 4°±0.5° and 8°±0.75°, respectively (Figure 2). No significant difference was found between the extension angle predicted by the six models and the results of the cadaveric study after 2 mm (p= 0.71) and 4 mm (p= 0.47). At 2 mm resection, mean coronal laxity increased by 3.1° and 2.7° at 30° and 45°of flexion, respectively. At 4 mm resection, mean coronal laxity increased by 6.5° and 5.5° at 30° and 45° of flexion, respectively (Figures 3a and 3b). The flexion angle corresponding to the greatest increase in coronal laxity for 2 mm of distal resection occurred at 22±7° of flexion with a mean increase in laxity of 4.0° from baseline. For 4 mm distal resection, the greatest increase in coronal laxity occurred at 16±6° of flexion with a mean increase in laxity of 7.8° from baseline. Conclusion. A TKA computational model representing a knee with preoperative flexion contracture was developed and corroborated measures from a previous cadaveric study [1]. While additional distal femoral resection in primary TKA increases passive knee extension, the consequent joint line elevation induced up to 8° of additional coronal laxity in mid-flexion. This additional midflexion laxity could contribute to midflexion instability; a condition that may require TKA revision surgery. Further studies are warranted to understand the relationship between joint line elevation, midflexion laxity, and instability. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction. Surgeons commonly resect additional distal femur during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to correct a flexion contracture. However, the effect of joint line proximalization on TKA kinematics is unclear. Thus, our goal was to quantify the effect of additional distal femoral resection on knee extension and mid-flexion laxity. Methods. Six computational knee models with TKA-specific capsular and collateral ligament properties were implanted with a contemporary posterior-stabilized TKA. A 10° flexion contracture was modeled to simulate a capsular contracture. Distal femoral resections of +2 mm and +4 mm were simulated for each model. The knees were then extended under standardized torque to quantify additional knee extension achieved. Subsequently, varus and valgus torques of ±10 Nm were applied as the knee was flexed from 0° to 90° at the baseline, +2 mm, and +4 mm distal resections. Coronal laxity, defined as the sum of varus and valgus angulation with respective torques, was measured at mid-flexion. Results. With +2 mm and +4 mm of distal femoral resection, the knee extended an additional 4°±0.5° and 8°±0.75°, respectively. At 30° and 45°of flexion, baseline laxity averaged 4.8° and 5.0°, respectively. At +2 mm resection, mean coronal laxity increased by 3.1° and 2.7° at 30° and 45°of flexion, respectively. At +4 mm resection, mean coronal laxity increased by 6.5° and 5.5° at 30° and 45° of flexion, respectively. Maximal increased coronal laxity for a +4 mm resection occurred at a mean 16° (range, 11–27°) of flexion with a mean increased laxity of 7.8° from baseline. Conclusion. While additional distal femoral resection in primary TKA increases knee extension, the consequent joint line elevation induces up to 8° of coronal laxity in mid-flexion in this computational model. As such, posterior capsular release prior to resecting additional distal femur to correct a flexion contracture should be considered

Total Knee Joint Replacement is mostly commonly performed using a measured resection technique. When the PCL is retained 9mm of bone is resected off the distal femur. If the PCL is excised 11m of bone is resected. Computer assisted total knee joint replacement will guide the surgeon to perform the optimal distal femoral resection to gain neutral alignment and full post operative extension. Three hundred TKJR’s were performed by one surgeon using the De Puy Ci navigation system. A ligament balancing technique is used whereby a neutral tibial resection is performed. A ligament tensor is inserted in extension and flexion. The navigation system then performs an optimization process whereby the distal femoral cut is calculated to give a neutral mechanical axis and 0° of knee extension. Data was collected measuring the distal femoral resection in the PCL retained and resected knees. The distal femoral cut required to achieve full extension for the PCL retaining TKJR ranged from 5 – 15mm. The mean was 11.2mm. The distal femoral cut required to achieve full extension for the PCL sacrificing TKJR ranged from 5 – 15mm. The mean was 10.8mm. There was no difference between the two groups (p=0.07). Both the PCL retaining and sacrificing TKJR distal resections correlated with the preoperative flexion deformity, i.e. patients with a greater fixed flexion deformity required a greater distal femoral resection to achieve full extension. There is a wide variation in the distal femoral cut to achieve full extension in TKJR. It is accepted that a smaller distal resection is required for a PCL retaining than a PCL sacrificing TKJR. Our study refutes this premise. A greater femoral resection is required if there is a greater fixed flexion deformity. A measured resection technique will result in a large percentage of patients with a fixed flexion deformity following TKJR

Distal femoral physeal fractures can cause of growth distrurbance which frequently requires further surgical intervention. The aim of this study was to determine if tibial tuberosity ossification at the time of injury can predict further surgery in patients who have sustained a physeal fracture of the distal femur. We retrospectively investigated all patients who had operative treatment for a distal femoral physeal fracture at a paediatric level one trauma center over a 17 year period. Logistic regression analysis was performed investigating associations between the need for further surgery to treat growth disturbance and tibial tuberosity ossification, age, Salter Harris grade, mode of fixation or mechanism of injury. 74 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were 57 boys (77%) and 17 girls (23%). The average age at time of injury was 13.1 years (range 2.-17.1 years). Following fixation, 30 patients (41%) underwent further surgery to treat growth disturbance. Absence of tibial tuberosity fusion to the metaphysis was significantly associated with need for further surgery (p = < 0 .001). Odds of requiring secondary surgery after tibial tuberosity fusion to metaphysis posteriorly (compared with not fused) were 0.12, 95% CI (0.04, 0.34). The estimate of effect of tibial tuberosity ossification on reoperation rates did not vary when adjusted for gender, mechanism, fixation and Salter Harris grade. When accounting for age, the odds of further operation if the tibial tuberosity is fused to the metaphysis posteriorly (compared with not fused) were 0.28, 95% CI (0.08, 0.94). Tibial tuberosity ossification stage at time of injury is a predictor of further surgery to treat growth disturbance in paediatric distal femoral fractures. Children with distal femoral physeal fractures whose tibial tuberosity was not fused to the metaphysis posteriorly were 8.3 times more likely to require further surgery

Abstract. Introduction. Distal Femoral Fractures around a Total Knee Replacement have a reported incidence of 0.25–2.3% of primary TKRs. Literature suggests that these fractures have high complication rates such as non union and revision. Methodology. A retrospective case note review was undertaken of all patients who sustained a distal femoral fracture around a TKR from April 2014-April 2021. Data parameters collected included patient demographics, classification of fracture, management, post op mobility, fracture union and mortality. Results. 52 distal femoral fractures were recorded, out of which 5 patients had bilateral fractures. The average age was 83.6 years (61–101). 41 fractures were managed operatively with 61% undergoing ORIF, 37% undergoing Distal Femoral Replacement & 2% undergoing a retrograde IM Nail. The median LOS was 22 days (11–85) for patients treated with DFR versus 10 (3–75) for those undergoing an ORIF. 60% of DFR patients were discharged home compared to 56% of those who underwent an ORIF. All the DFR patients were FWB post op compared to ORIF 24%. Conclusion. Over a 7 year study period, 52 distal femoral fractures were reviewed. Despite FWB status post op, patients undergoing a DFR had a longer length of stay and less were discharged home compared to the ORIF group. Given the cost of a distal femoral replacement (£4485-6500) compared to £212-297 for a locking plate, in order to get patients FWB post operatively potentially dual plating (medial and lateral) may need to be considered if the fracture is amenable to improve stability & allow FWB

Aims. Surgeons commonly resect additional distal femur during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to correct a flexion contracture, which leads to femoral joint line elevation. There is a paucity of data describing the effect of joint line elevation on mid-flexion stability and knee kinematics. Thus, the goal of this study was to quantify the effect of joint line elevation on mid-flexion laxity. Methods. Six computational knee models with cadaver-specific capsular and collateral ligament properties were implanted with a posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA. A 10° flexion contracture was created in each model to simulate a capsular contracture. Distal femoral resections of + 2 mm and + 4 mm were then simulated for each knee. The knee models were then extended under a standard moment. Subsequently, varus and valgus moments of 10 Nm were applied as the knee was flexed from 0° to 90° at baseline and repeated after each of the two distal resections. Coronal laxity (the sum of varus and valgus angulation with respective maximum moments) was measured throughout flexion. Results. With + 2 mm resection at 30° and 45° of flexion, mean coronal laxity increased by a mean of 3.1° (SD 0.18°) (p < 0.001) and 2.7° (SD 0.30°) (p < 0.001), respectively. With + 4 mm resection at 30° and 45° of flexion, mean coronal laxity increased by 6.5° (SD 0.56°) (p < 0.001) and 5.5° (SD 0.72°) (p < 0.001), respectively. Maximum increased coronal laxity for a + 4 mm resection occurred at a mean 15.7° (11° to 33°) of flexion with a mean increase of 7.8° (SD 0.2°) from baseline. Conclusion. With joint line elevation in primary PS TKA, coronal laxity peaks early (about 16°) with a maximum laxity of 8°. Surgeons should restore the joint line if possible; however, if joint line elevation is necessary, we recommend assessment of coronal laxity at 15° to 30° of knee flexion to assess for mid-flexion instability. Further in vivo studies are warranted to understand if this mid-flexion coronal laxity has negative clinical implications. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):87–93

Introduction. Previous anthropometric studies have reported gender differences in distal femoral morphology. After total knee arthroplasty, females have a higher prevalence of medial or lateral femoral component overhang, which could be responsible for postoperative knee pain and decreased range of motion. Consequently, gender-specific knee prostheses were designed to accommodate female morphology. However, to date, very few studies have investigated the knee morphology of Japanese adults and possible gender differences. The purpose of this study was to examine the distal femoral morphology of Japanese patients, to characterize anatomical differences between men and women, and to evaluate the need to create gender-specific knee prostheses. Material and Methods. We evaluated 107 knees in 17 male and 90 female Japanese patients for total knee arthroplasty (TKA)[fig.1]. The medial-lateral (ML) and anteroposterior (AP) dimensions of the knees at different levels evaluated intraoperative measurement, and ML/AP aspect ratios were calculated. Results. On the distal femoral cut surface, the mean ML widths were 74.8 mm for men and 65.5 mm for women. Such values were generally smaller compared to data from European and North American studies. In this study, the mean ML/AP aspect ratios were 1.21 for men and 1.13 for women, higher than those from non-Asian regions. The ML/AP ratios of Japanese patients were negatively correlated with distal femoral AP length. Discussion. The dimensions and sizes of the human femur have been reported in the literature, as measured by dissection of cadaver knees, plain radiographs or CT scans of living subjects, or other means. Compared to data on knees from European and North American populations, femoral ML/AP ratios were smaller for a given AP length in Japanese individuals. In addition, the mean AP and ML distances of the distal femur of Japanese individuals were smaller than those of Western populations, which could be associated with differences in height or other physical and skeletal characteristics. Several studies reported significant gender difference in the ML/AP ratio. Because of the shapes of the distal femur were more trapezoidal for women and more rectangular for men. After TKA, females have a higher prevalence of medial or lateral femoral component overhang, which could be responsible for postoperative knee pain and decreased range of motion. Our results suggest that gender-specific knee prostheses may prevent such postoperative complications. Conclusions. Japanese women had a relatively narrower femoral width for a given AP length than men. Our study suggests the utility of Japanese-specific implants and provides useful insights for manufacturers to design components of appropriate sizes and aspect ratios for Japanese TKA patients

Lower limb mal-alignment due to deformity is a significant cause of early degenerative change and dysfunction. Standard techniques are available to determine the centre of rotation of angulation (CORA) and extent of the deformities. However, distal femoral deformity is difficult to assess because of the difference between anatomic and mechanical axes. We describe a novel technique which accurately determines the CORA and extent of distal femoral deformity. Using standard leg alignment views of the normal femur, the distal femoral metaphysis and joint line are stylised as a block. A line bisecting the anatomical axis of the proximal femur is then extended distally to intersect the joint. The angle (?) between the joint and the proximal femoral axis, and the position (p) where the extended proximal femoral axis intersects the joint line are calculated. These measurements can then be reproduced on the abnormal distal femur in order to calculate the CORA and extent of deformity, permitting accurate correction. We examined the utility and reproducibility of the new method using 100 normal femora. We found this technique to be universally robust in a variety of distal femoral deformities

Lower limb mal-alignment due to deformity is a significant cause of early degenerative change and dysfunction. Standard techniques are available to determine the centre of rotation of angulation (CORA) and extent of the majority of deformities, however distal femoral deformity is difficult to assess because of the difference between anatomic and mechanical axes. We found the described technique involving constructing a line perpendicular to a line from the tip of the greater trochanter to the centre of the femoral head inaccurate, particularly if the trochanter is abnormal. We devised a novel technique which accurately determines the CORA and extent of distal femoral deformity, allowing accurate correction. Using standard leg alignment views of the normal femur, the distal femoral metaphysis and joint line are stylized as a block. A line bisecting the axis of the proximal femur is then extended distally to intersect the joint. The angle (θ) between the joint and the proximal femoral axis and the position (p) where the extended proximal femoral axis intersects the joint line are calculated. These measurements can then be reproduced on the abnormal distal femur in order to calculate the CORA and extent of the deformity, permitting accurate correction. We examined the utility and reproducibility of the new method using 100 normal femora. θ = 81 ± sd 2.5°. As expected, θ correlated with femoral length (r=0.74). P (expressed as the percentage of the distance from the lateral edge of the joint block to the intersection) = 61% ± sd 8%. P was not correlated with θ. Intra-and inter-observer errors for these measurements are within acceptable limits and observations of 30-paired normal femora demonstrate similar values for θ and p on the two sides. We have found this technique to be universally applicable and reliable in a variety of distal femoral deformities

Fixed flexion contracture is often present in association with osteoarthritis of the knee and correction is one of the key surgical goals in total knee replacement. Surgical strategies to correct flexion contracture include removal of posterior osteophytes, posterior capsular release and additional distal femoral bone resection. Traditional teaching indicates 2 mm of additional distal femoral bone resection will correct 10 degrees of flexion deformity. However some studies have questioned this figure and removing excessive distal femoral bone results in elevation of the joint line, potentially causing patella baja, alteration in collateral ligament tension through the flexion arc and mid-flexion instability. The aim of our study is to determine the relationship between distal bone resection of the femur and passive knee extension in total knee arthroplasty. A cohort of 50 patients, undergoing total knee arthroplasty, was recruited. Following complete femoral and tibial bone preparation, to simulate the effect of distal femoral bone resection, augments of 2 mm increments (2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm, 8 mm) were placed onto the trial femoral component. The degree of flexion contracture with each augment was measured using computer navigation. The results showed a 2 mm augment produced an average of 3.37 degrees of flexion deformity. A 4 mm augment led to an average of 6.68 degrees fixed flexion, whilst a 6 mm augment produced 11.38 degrees. To correct 10 degrees flexion deformity, an additional 6 mm distal femoral bone resection is required. In conclusion, additional distal femoral bone resection may not be as an effective strategy as previously believed to correct fixed flexion deformity in total knee arthroplasty

Lower limb mal-alignment due to deformity is a significant cause of early degenerative change and dysfunction. Standard techniques are available to determine the centre of rotation of angulation (CORA) and extent of the majority of deformities, however distal femoral deformity is difficult to assess because of the difference between anatomic and mechanical axes. We found the described technique involving constructing a line perpendicular to a line from the tip of the greater trochanter to the centre of the femoral head inaccurate, particularly if the trochanter is abnormal. We devised a novel technique which accurately determines the CORA and extent of distal femoral deformity, allowing accurate correction. Using standard leg alignment views of the normal femur, the distal femoral metaphysis and joint line are stylized as a block. A line bisecting the axis of the proximal femur is then extended distally to intersect the joint. The angle (Θ) between the joint and the proximal femoral axis and the position (p) where the extended proximal femoral axis intersects the joint line are calculated. These measurements can then be reproduced on the abnormal distal femur in order to calculate the CORA and extent of the deformity, permitting accurate correction. We examined the utility and reproducibility of the new method using 100 normal femora. Θ = 81 ± sd 2.5. As expected, Θ correlated with femoral length (r=0.74). P (expressed as the percentage of the distance from the lateral edge of the joint block to the intersection) = 61% ± sd 8%. P was not correlated with Θ. Intra-and inter-observer errors for these measurements are within acceptable limits and observations of 30-paired normal femora demonstrate similar values for Θ and p on the two sides. We have found this technique to be universally applicable and reliable in a variety of distal femoral deformities

Introduction. Optimal alignment and position of implants is an important goal In TKA. Conventional mechanical instruments use the anatomic axis and “average” anatomy to position the femoral component to achieve acceptable mechanical limb alignment. Numerous studies have documented the frequency of TKA outliers (+/− 3 degrees) to be 30% or more. The purpose of this study was to determine the “true” distal femoral valgus angle of the femur. Methods. 13,586 CT scans of patients undergoing TKA with patient specific instruments were analyzed. Three-dimensional reconstructions were performed and the distal femoral anatomic and mechanical axes were measured digitally. The distal femoral valgus angle was defined and the difference between the anatomic and mechanical axes of the distal femur. Results. The average distal femoral valgus angle was 5.7 +/− 2.3 degrees. The range was one-degree varus to 16 degrees valgus. 13.8% of patients had greater than 9 or less than 3 degrees of femoral valgus. Conclusion. The anatomy of the distal femur is highly variable in patients undergoing TKA. Routine use of anatomic based instruments and average distal femoral valgus angular resections can lead to errors in resultant mechanical limb alignment in a significant number of patients undergoing TKA

Purpose; To show that Distal Femoral Endoprosthetic Replacement for metastatic disease can be performed with relatively few complications and allows good pain control and mobilisation for otherwise severely compromised patients. Method; This is a retrospective study, using the oncology database, patient records and local correspondence, looking at 23 patients with distal femoral metastases who had limb salvage with a Distal Femoral Endoprosthesis (DF EPR). Results; There were 10 males (43%) and 13 females (57%), mean age 65 (38–84). 13 (57%) had Renal, 6 (26%) Breast and 5 other primaries identified. Five had additional metastases. 8 (35%) had pathological fractures. The mean time for diagnosis of mets was 67 months ranging from 0 (i.e. at the time of primary tumour) to 30 years since the original diagnosis. 15 patients had surgery alone. 3 patients were lost to follow up. 15 patients have diseased at a mean of 26 months (4–58) post op. There was one intra-op and four post-op complications. The majority of the patients were satisfied post op with regards to pain and mobility. The generally unfavourable prognosis and perceived risks have led surgeons to palliate, stabilise in situ or amputate for distal femoral metastases despite recognised morbidity and life style restrictions. We conclude that DF EPR should be considered as a limb salvage option in patients with distal femoral mets

The routine use of a fixed distal femoral resection angle in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) assumes little or no variation in the angle between the anatomical and mechanical femoral axes (FMA angle) in different patients. The aims of this study were threefold, firstly to investigate the distribution of FMA angle in TKA patients, secondly to identify any correlation between the FMA angle and the pre-operative coronal mechanical femoro-tibial (MFT) angle and in addition to assess post-operative MFT angle with fixed or variable distal femoral resection angles. 277 primary TKAs were performed using either fixed or variable distal femoral resection angles (174 and 103 TKAs respectively), with intramedullary femoral and extramedullary tibial jigs. The variable distal femoral resection angles were equal to the FMA angle measured on pre-operative Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA) digital radiographs for each patient. Outcomes were assessed by measuring the FMA angle and the pre- and post-operative MFT angles on HKA radiographs. The FMA angle ranged from 2° to 9° (mean 5.9°). Both cohorts showed a correlation between FMA and pre-operative MFT angles (fixed: r = -0.499, variable: r = -0.346) with valgus knees having lower FMA angles. Post-operative coronal alignment within ±5° increased from 86% in the fixed angle group to 96% when using a variable angle, p = 0.025. For post-operative limb alignment within ±3°, accuracy improved from 67% (fixed) to 85% (variable), p = 0.002. These results show that the use of a fixed distal femoral resection angle is a source of error regarding post-operative coronal limb malalignment. The correlation between the FMA angle and pre-operative varus-valgus alignment supports the rational of recommending the adjustment of the resection angle according to the pre-operative deformity (3°-5° for valgus, 6°-8° for varus) in cases where HKA radiographs are not available for pre-operative planning

Lower limb mal-alignment due to deformity is a significant cause of early degenerative change and limb dysfunction. Standard techniques are available to determine the centre of rotation of angulation (CORA) and extent of the majority of deformities, however distal femoral deformity is difficult to assess because of the difference between the anatomic and mechanical axes. We have found the described technique involving constructing a line perpendicular to a line from the tip of the greater trochanter to the centre of the femoral head inaccurate, particularly if the trochanter is abnormal. We have devised a novel technique which accurately determines the CORA and extent of distal femoral deformity, allowing accurate correction. Using standard leg alignment views of the normal femur, the distal femoral metaphysis and joint line are stylised as a block. A line bisecting the axis of the proximal femur is then extended distally to intersect the joint. The angle (𝛉) between the joint and the proximal femoral axis and the position (p) where the extended proximal femoral axis intersects the joint line are calculated. These measurements can then be reproduced on the abnormal distal femur in order to calculate the CORA and extent of the deformity, permitting accurate correction. We have examined the utility and reproducibility of the new method using one hundred normal femurs. Θ=81+/− sd 2.5°. As expected, 𝛉 correlated with femoral length (r=0.74). P (expressed as the percentage of the distal from the medial edge of the joint block to the intersection) = 61% +/− sd 8%. P was not correlated with 𝛉. Intra-and inter-observer errors for these measurements are within acceptable limits and observations of twenty paired normal femora demonstrate similar values for 𝛉 and p on the two sides. We have employed this technique in a variety of distal femoral deformities, including vitamin D resistant rickets, growth arrest, fibula hemimelia, post-traumatic deformity and Ellis-van Creveld syndrome. We find the system universally applicable and reliable

Distal femoral physeal fractures in children have a high incidence of physeal arrest, occurring in a mean of 40% of cases. The underlying nature of the distal femoral physis may be the primary cause, but other factors have been postulated to contribute to the formation of a physeal bar. The purpose of this study was to assess the significance of contributing factors to physeal bar formation, in particular the use of percutaneous pins across the physis. We reviewed 55 patients with a median age of ten years (3 to 13), who had sustained displaced distal femoral physeal fractures. Most (40 of 55) were treated with percutaneous pinning after reduction, four were treated with screws and 11 with plaster. A total of 40 patients were assessed clinically and radiologically after skeletal maturity or at the time of formation of a bar. The remaining 15 were followed up for a minimum of two years. Formation of a physeal bar occurred in 12 (21.8%) patients, with the rate rising to 30.6% in patients with high-energy injuries compared with 5.3% in those with low-energy injuries. There was a significant trend for physeal arrest according to increasing severity using the Salter-Harris classification. Percutaneous smooth pins across the physis were not statistically associated with growth arrest

Aims. The impact of a diaphyseal femoral deformity on knee alignment varies according to its severity and localization. The aims of this study were to determine a method of assessing the impact of diaphyseal femoral deformities on knee alignment for the varus knee, and to evaluate the reliability and the reproducibility of this method in a large cohort of osteoarthritic patients. Methods. All patients who underwent a knee arthroplasty from 2019 to 2021 were included. Exclusion criteria were genu valgus, flexion contracture (> 5°), previous femoral osteotomy or fracture, total hip arthroplasty, and femoral rotational disorder. A total of 205 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 62.2 years (SD 8.4). The mean BMI was 33.1 kg/m. 2. (SD 5.5). The radiological measurements were performed twice by two independent reviewers, and included hip knee ankle (HKA) angle, mechanical medial distal femoral angle (mMDFA), anatomical medial distal femoral angle (aMDFA), femoral neck shaft angle (NSA), femoral bowing angle (FBow), the distance between the knee centre and the top of the FBow (DK), and the angle representing the FBow impact on the knee (C’KS angle). Results. The FBow impact on the mMDFA can be measured by the C’KS angle. The C’KS angle took the localization (length DK) and the importance (FBow angle) of the FBow into consideration. The mean FBow angle was 4.4° (SD 2.4; 0 to 12.5). The mean C’KS angle was 1.8° (SD 1.1; 0 to 5.8). Overall, 84 knees (41%) had a severe FBow (> 5°). The radiological measurements showed very good to excellent intraobserver and interobserver agreements. The C’KS increased significantly when the length DK decreased and the FBow angle increased (p < 0.001). Conclusion. The impact of the diaphyseal femoral deformity on the mechanical femoral axis is measured by the C’KS angle, a reliable and reproducible measurement. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(4):262–272