Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) represents a complex challenge in orthopaedic surgery associated with substantial morbidity and healthcare expenditures. The debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) protocol is a viable treatment, offering several advantages over exchange arthroplasty. With the evolution of treatment strategies, considerable efforts have been directed towards enhancing the efficacy of DAIR, including the development of a phased debridement protocol for acute PJI management. This article provides an in-depth analysis of DAIR, presenting the outcomes of single-stage, two-stage, and repeated DAIR procedures. It delves into the challenges faced, including patient heterogeneity, pathogen identification, variability in surgical techniques, and antibiotics selection. Moreover, critical factors that influence the decision-making process between single- and two-stage DAIR protocols are addressed, including team composition, timing of the intervention, antibiotic regimens, and both anatomical and implant-related considerations. By providing a comprehensive overview of DAIR protocols and their clinical implications, this annotation aims to elucidate the advancements, challenges, and potential future directions in the application of DAIR for PJI management. It is intended to equip clinicians with the insights required to effectively navigate the complexities of implementing DAIR strategies, thereby facilitating informed decision-making for optimizing patient outcomes.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(12):1377–1384.

Aim. Arthroscopic interventions have revolutionized the treatment of joint pathologies. The appropriate diagnostics and treatment are required for infections after ligament reconstructions using non-resorbable material such as tendon grafts, anchors, and sutures, prone to biofilm formation. The infection rate is around 1% for knee and shoulder, while up to 4% for Achilles tendon reconstructions. Despite high number of these procedures worldwide, there is limited evidence about the best treatment protocol. Our study aimed to provide a general protocol for the treatment of small implants for soft tissue reconstruction. Method. Between 2019 and 2023, we treated 48 infections of ligament, meniscus, and tendon reconstructions out of 7291 related procedures performed in the same time period. Early infection (<30 days) were treated with an arthroscopic debridement and implant retention (DAIR), except Achilles tendons had open DAIR, while those with delayed or chronic infection (>30 days) were treated with extensive debridement and lavage combined with one-stage exchange (OSE) or implant removal. During surgery, at least 5 microbiological s and samples for histopathology were obtained. The removed material was sonicated. After surgery, all patients were one week on iv. antibiotics, followed by oral antibiofilm antibiotics for 6 weeks including rifampicin and/or a quinolone. All patients were followed for at least 1 year. Failure was defined as the need for additional revision surgery after finished iv. antibiotic treatment. Results. Among 48 patients, 38 were early and 10 were late acute or chronic infections. The incidence of infection for our cohort was 0.7%. We observed 27 infections after ligament reconstruction of the knee, 15 of the shoulder, 5 of the ankle, and 1 infection of the elbow joint. 40 patients were treated with DAIR, 5 with OSE, and 3 with implant removal. We had 11 C. acnes, 10 S. aureus, 6 S. epidermidis, 2 P. aeruginosa, 2 S. lugdunensis, 10 mixed flora, and 3 culture-negative infections. 12 patients received antibiotics before surgery, and all culture-negative infections were related to this subgroup. We observed 2 failures, both in a combination of proximal tibial osteotomy and ligament reconstruction of the knee joint. The success rate of our protocol was 96%. Conclusions. Prompt surgical treatment followed by 6 weeks of antibiotic treatment cured 96% of infections of small implants after reconstruction procedures of knee, shoulder, and ankle joints. Our study is the first to provide a treatment protocol for infections of small implants after ligament reconstruction procedures

Aim. An instrumented blood culture system automatically flags when growth within the culture medium has been detected (‘work in progress’), and subsequently when the organism has been identified. We explore using this data to switch patients to oral therapy within 72 hours post-surgery, reducing costs and improving antimicrobial stewardship. Method. This retrospective review focused on clinically significant culture-positive bone and joint infections over a 5-month period in 2022. Two cohorts were defined as either having positive intraoperative microbiology at <72 hours or at ≥72 hours. Results. 150 patients were included. 133/150(88%) exhibited microbial growth <72hours. Of these, 98/133(74%) had all organisms identified <72-hours, and 34/133(26%) had additional organisms ≥72 hours. 19/151(12%) patients had their first positive cultures ≥72hrs from sampling. The most common isolates identified within 72 hours were S. aureus(30%), Enterobacteriaceae (26%), and Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS)(19%). If no growth was observed by 48 hours, there was a 69.6% probability that subsequent growth wouldn't occur; this probability increases to 81.9% by 72 hours, 88.7% by 96 hours, 91.0% by 120 hours, and 95.0% by 144 hours (see figure 1). The most common isolates identified ≥72 hours were CoNS(28%), Cutibacterium acnes(16%) and S. aureus(12%). Assessing oral antibiotic regimes for isolates identified after 72 hours demonstrated that linezolid would cover isolates from 96% of patients, tetracyclines 92% of patients, clindamycin 85% of patients, and ciprofloxacin and rifampicin would cover 80% of patients. Vancomycin and meropenem, our standard empirical therapy, gave the best cover at 96% of patients. Conclusions. This study suggests there is sufficient microbiological information at 72 hours for most patients to allow transition to a targeted regimen. If there has been no detection of growth when using an instrumented blood culture system by 72 hours, it is likely that there will be no growth. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Aim. The SOLARIO trial is a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial of antibiotic strategy for bone and joint infection. SOLARIO compares short or long post-operative systemic antibiotic duration, for patients with confirmed infections, who had local antibiotics implanted and no infected metalwork retained when undergoing surgery. This analysis compared systemic antibiotic use in the short (intervention) and long (standard of care) arms of the trial, in the 12 months after index surgery. Method. Data was collected prospectively from study randomisation, within 7 days of index surgery. All systemic antibiotics prescribed for the index infection were recorded, from health records and patient recall, at randomisation, 6 weeks, 3-6 months and 12 months after study entry. Start and end dates for each antibiotic were recorded. Results. 251 patients were randomised to short systemic antibiotics (up to 7 post-operative days) and 249 patients, to long systemic antibiotics. 5 participants in the short group and 2 participants in the long group withdrew from study follow-up. Complete data for all systemic antibiotics taken in the 12 months following surgery, were available for 237 participants in the short group and 236 participants in the long group. 80 participants across both groups were noted as having deviated from their assigned treatment strategy. Both groups received empiric antibiotics, predominantly vancomycin and meropenem, for up to 7 days after surgery. Considering each prescribed antibiotic as a separate duration (even when administered concurrently), participants assigned to standard care received a mean of 74.9 antibiotic-days. Participants assigned to short systemic antibiotics received a mean of 27.5 antibiotic-days in the 12 months after surgery. The most commonly prescribed antibiotics in both treatment groups were vancomycin and meropenem: these antibiotics accounted for 7.1 days prescribed per participant in the long group, and 6.3 days in the short group (p=0.37). Reasons for post-randomisation antibiotic prescribing in the short treatment group included later planned surgery, identification of bacteria requiring additional systemic antibiotics, and treatment of superficial wound infections. WHO AWaRe classification ‘watch’ and ‘reserve’ group antibiotics, such as ciprofloxacin, rifampicin, vancomycin and meropenem, accounted for 39.4 antibiotic-days per long group participant, and 16.5 antibiotic-days per short group participant. Conclusions. Considering the combined duration of all systemic antibiotics prescribed over 12 months, including those co-administered, participants in the short arm of the SOLARIO trial received considerably fewer days of all antibiotic classes, and particularly those antibiotics restricted in the WHO AWaRe classification (2021)

Aim. The management of PJIs is slowed down by the presence of bacteria forming biofilms where they may withstand antibiotic therapy. The use of adjuvant strategies, such as hydrolytic enzymes cocktail targeting biofilm matrices and facilitating their dispersion, is a promising option to limit impact of biofilms. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of enzymes cocktail combined with antibiotic dual therapy of rifampicin and vancomycin in a relevant in-vitro model. Method. Mature methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilms were grown on Ti-6Al-4V coupons by adding 1mL of a 8Log10 ATCC 33591 suspension in TGN (TSB + 1% glucose + 2% NaCl) to 24-wells plates containing the coupons and incubating the plates for 24h at 37°C with a continuous 50rpm agitation. The samples were rinsed and placed in 6 wells plates containing 1ml of the enzymatic cocktail (C.D.D.) solution (tris-buffered (pH 7.0) solution of 400 U/ml of aspecific DNA/RNA endonuclease, 50 U/ml of endo-1,4-b-D-glucanase, and 0.06 U/ml of β-N-acetylhexosaminidase). 9ml of TGN or TGN containing antibiotics RIF/VAN (rifampicin 5µg/mL + vancomycin 8µg/mL) at clinically relevant concentrations found locally in bone or joints, was then added and the samples were incubated in identical conditions for 24h. The samples were then recovered and rinsed. CFU counts were obtained by recovering the bacteria with sonication, serial dilutions, and TSA plating. Biomass was determined via crystal violet staining, followed by dye solubilization in acetic acid, and absorbance measurement using a spectrophotometer. Results. Significant reductions in bacterial counts were observed in biofilms exposed to either RIF/VAN or RIF/VAN+CDD, by respectively 2,6 and 3,7Log10 when compared to samples reincubated with TGN alone (p <0.05). Additionally, CFU counts in samples exposed to RIF/VAN+CDD were reduced by 1,1Log10 when compared to those exposed to RIF/VAN (p<0,05). Significant reduction in biomass (-29,8%, p<0.05) was observed for coupons exposed to RIF/VAN+CDD when compared to C.D.D alone (figure 1). Conclusions. The concurrent utilization of enzymes with rifampicin and vancomycin, holds promise as a feasible method to address periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Aim. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a complication of total joint arthroplasty that typically requires revision surgery for treatment. Systemic antibiotics are usually held prior to surgery to improve yield of intraoperative cultures. However, recent studies suggest that preoperative aspirations have a high concordance with intraoperative cultures, which may allow surgeons to initiate antibiotic treatment earlier. The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of Pre-surgical systemic antibiotic therapy on the bacterial burden within the periprosthetic space and systemic immune reaction. Method. PJI was induced with MSSA (Xen36) S. aureus in the right knee of 16-week old, female, C57BL6 mice using a previously validated murine model. Mice were randomized to three groups (n=8, each): control; Vanc, receiving systemic vancomycin (110mg/kg, SQ, twice daily); or VancRif receiving vancomycin same as in Vanc group, plus rifampin (12mg/kg dose, IV, once daily). Following 2 weeks of treatment, mice were euthanized and periprosthetic bone, soft tissue and the implant were harvested. Bacterial burden, colony forming units (CFUs), was quantified in soft tissue, tibial bone, and on the implant. Specifically, tissues were homogenized and serially plated for CFUs, while the implant was sonicated and then plated for CFUs. The host immune response was analysed through weighing inguinal and iliac lymph nodes and through measuring serum amyloid A (SAA). Non-parametric pairwise group comparisons of the three outcome measures were performed using a Mann-Whitney U test. Results. VancRif, the combined treatment significantly reduced bacterial burden in the periprosthetic soft tissue, bone, and implant compared to control (p<0.001) and Vanc alone (p<0.001). While not significant, Vanc alone did reduce bacterial load as compared to control. The ipsilateral weight of the iliac lymph nodes was significantly reduced in Vanc and VancRif mice compared to controls (p<0.001), was well as in VancRif versus Vanc alone (p<0.001). Interestingly, SAA levels did not significantly differ among all groups. During tissue harvesting, minimal purulence was observed in antibiotic treatment groups, unlike controls. Conclusions. Treating active PJI with vancomycin alone decreases periprosthetic bacterial loads and reduces the local immunological response. This effect is significantly enhanced with the combined rifampin use. These findings could suggest that when culture positive PJI is diagnosed, pre-surgical treatment with antibiotics may decrease immunosuppression and soft tissue infiltration, leading to a better chance of infection cure with subsequent surgical debridement. Histological investigations and repeat experiments involving subsequent surgical treatment are underway. Acknowledgements. Funding comes from internal institutional grants

Aim. Rifampicin and fluoroquinolone based therapy is generally considered as first-choice targeted oral antimicrobial therapy for staphylococcal prosthetic joint infections (PJI) treated with debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR). Alternative equally effective antimicrobial strategies are urgently needed due to toxicity and drug-drug interactions that frequently occur with this strategy. Data from recent clinical studies suggests equipoise for other antimicrobial treatment regimens. The objective of the Rifampicin Combination Therapy versus Targeted Antimicrobial Monotherapy in the Oral Antimicrobial Treatment Phase of Staphylococcal Prosthetic Joint Infection (RiCOTTA)-trial is to evaluate whether monotherapy with clindamycin is non-inferior to rifampicin/fluoroquinolone combination therapy in patients with staphylococcal PJI that are treated with DAIR. Method. The RiCOTTA-trial is a multicenter, non-inferiority, open-label, randomized controlled trial evaluating clindamycin versus rifampicin/fluoroquinolone combination therapy in the oral treatment phase in patients with staphylococcal PJI managed with DAIR. The trial is performed in 16 hospitals in the Netherlands. Eligible patients are adults with staphylococcal knee or hip PJI managed by DAIR. Patients are included one to six days before antibiotic treatment is switched from intravenous to oral therapy. Patients with a contraindication for rifampicin, with a megaprosthesis or who receive intravenous antibiotics for more than three weeks after initial debridement are excluded. Primary outcome is treatment success one year after finishing antimicrobial treatment. Success is defined as the absence of: i. Infection related re-surgery, ii. New episode of antibiotic treatment for infection of the index joint after the initial treatment phase of 12 weeks, iii. Ongoing use of antibiotics for the index joint at the end of follow-up, iv. Death. The estimated treatment success of rifampicin combination therapy is 85% and the monotherapy strategy is considered not inferior when the difference in treatment success will be less than 10%. Enrolment of 158 patients per group (316 in total) is needed to confirm non-inferiority of monotherapy with a power of 80%. The trial is currently open for enrolment. The study is approved by the Medical Ethics Committee Leiden, the Hague, Delft, the Netherlands and registered under EU trial number 2022-501620-26-00 in Clinical Trial Information System. Conclusions. Currently, the RiCOTTTA study is the largest randomised clinical trial that compares targeted oral monotherapy with rifampicin combination treatment for staphylococcal PJI. Noninferiority of monotherapy would result in a change in national PJI guidelines and enable clinicians to use a more patient-tailored approach when considering antibiotics for patients during the oral treatment phase of PJI

Aim. In trauma surgery, the development of biomaterial-associated infections (BAI) is one of the most common complications affecting trauma patients, requiring prolonged hospitalization and the intensive use of antibiotics. Following the attachment of bacteria on the surface of the biomaterial, the biofilm-forming bacteria could initiate a chronic implant-related infection. Despite the use of conventional local and systemic antibiotic therapies, persistent biofilms involve various resistance mechanisms that contribute to therapeutic failures. The development of in vivo chronic BAI models to optimize antibiofilm treatments is a major challenge. Indeed, the biofilm pathogenicity and the host response need to be finely regulated, and compatible with the animal lifestyle. Previously, a Galleria mellonella larvae model for the formation of an early-stage biofilm on the surface of a Kirschner (K)-wire was established. In the present study, two models of mature biofilm using clinical Staphylococcus aureus strains were assessed: one related to contaminated K-wires (in vitro biofilm maturation) and the second to hematogenous infections (in vivo biofilm maturation). Rifampicin was used as a standard drug for antibiofilm treatment. Method. In the first model, biofilms were formed following an incubation period (up to 7 days) in the CDC Biofilm Reactor (CBR, BioSurface Technologies). Then, after implantation of the pre-incubated K-wire in the larvae, rifampicin (80 mg/kg) was injected and the survival of the larvae was monitored. In the second model, biofilm formation was achieved after an incubation period (up to 7 days) inside the larvae and then, after removing the K-wires from the host, in vitro rifampicin susceptibility assays were performed (according to EUCAST). Results. The first model indicate that in vitro biofilm maturation affects the bacterial pathogenicity in the host, depending on the S. aureus strain used. Furthermore, the more the biofilm is matured, the more the rifampicin treatment efficiency is compromised. The second model shows that, despite the fast in vivo biofilm formation in the host, the number of bacteria, either attached to the surface of the K-wire surface or in surrounding tissue of the larvae, was not increased over time. Conclusions. Altogether, these results allow the establishment of biofilm models using G. mellonella larvae in order to understand the impact of biofilm maturation on both the bacterial pathogenicity and the efficiency of antibiofilm treatments

Aims

This aim of this study was to analyze the detection rate of rare pathogens in bone and joint infections (BJIs) using metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), and the impact of mNGS on clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Aims

Bacteriophages infect, replicate inside bacteria, and are released from the host through lysis. Here, we evaluate the effects of repetitive doses of the Staphylococcus aureus phage 191219 and gentamicin against haematogenous and early-stage biofilm implant-related infections in Galleria mellonella.

Aims

Although low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) combined with disinfectants has been shown to effectively eliminate portions of biofilm in vitro, its efficacy in vivo remains uncertain. Our objective was to assess the antibiofilm potential and safety of LIPUS combined with 0.35% povidone-iodine (PI) in a rat debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) model of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

Aims

This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with culture-negative limb osteomyelitis patients.

Aims

To explore the clinical efficacy of using two different types of articulating spacers in two-stage revision for chronic knee periprosthetic joint infection (kPJI).

Aims. Fracture-related infection (FRI) is commonly classified based on the time of onset of symptoms. Early infections (< two weeks) are treated with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR). For late infections (> ten weeks), guidelines recommend implant removal due to tolerant biofilms. For delayed infections (two to ten weeks), recommendations are unclear. In this study we compared infection clearance and bone healing in early and delayed FRI treated with DAIR in a rabbit model. Methods. Staphylococcus aureus was inoculated into a humeral osteotomy in 17 rabbits after plate osteosynthesis. Infection developed for one week (early group, n = 6) or four weeks (delayed group, n = 6) before DAIR (systemic antibiotics: two weeks, nafcillin + rifampin; four weeks, levofloxacin + rifampin). A control group (n = 5) received revision surgery after four weeks without antibiotics. Bacteriology of humerus, soft-tissue, and implants was performed seven weeks after revision surgery. Bone healing was assessed using a modified radiological union scale in tibial fractures (mRUST). Results. Greater bacterial burden in the early group compared to the delayed and control groups at revision surgery indicates a retraction of the infection from one to four weeks. Infection was cleared in all animals in the early and delayed groups at euthanasia, but not in the control group. Osteotomies healed in the early group, but bone healing was significantly compromised in the delayed and control groups. Conclusion. The duration of the infection from one to four weeks does not impact the success of infection clearance in this model. Bone healing, however, is impaired as the duration of the infection increases. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2024;13(3):127–135

Aims. To investigate the efficacy of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid-normal saline (EDTA-NS) in dispersing biofilms and reducing bacterial infections. Methods. EDTA-NS solutions were irrigated at different durations (1, 5, 10, and 30 minutes) and concentrations (1, 2, 5, 10, and 50 mM) to disrupt Staphylococcus aureus biofilms on Matrigel-coated glass and two materials widely used in orthopaedic implants (Ti-6Al-4V and highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE)). To assess the efficacy of biofilm dispersion, crystal violet staining biofilm assay and colony counting after sonification and culturing were performed. The results were further confirmed and visualized by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). We then investigated the efficacies of EDTA-NS irrigation in vivo in rat and pig models of biofilm-associated infection. Results. When 10 mM or higher EDTA-NS concentrations were used for ten minutes, over 99% of S. aureus biofilm formed on all three types of materials was eradicated in terms of absorbance measured at 595 nm and colony-forming units (CFUs) after culturing. Consistently, SEM and CSLM scanning demonstrated that less adherence of S. aureus could be observed on all three types of materials after 10 mM EDTA-NS irrigation for ten minutes. In the rat model, compared with NS irrigation combined with rifampin (Ti-6Al-4V wire-implanted rats: 60% bacteria survived; HXLPE particle-implanted rats: 63.3% bacteria survived), EDTA-NS irrigation combined with rifampin produced the highest removal rate (Ti-6Al-4V wire-implanted rats: 3.33% bacteria survived; HXLPE particle-implanted rats: 6.67% bacteria survived). In the pig model, compared with NS irrigation combined with rifampin (Ti-6Al-4V plates: 75% bacteria survived; HXLPE bearings: 87.5% bacteria survived), we observed a similar level of biofilm disruption on Ti-6Al-4V plates (25% bacteria survived) and HXLPE bearings (37.5% bacteria survived) after EDTA-NS irrigation combined with rifampin. The in vivo study revealed that the biomass of S. aureus biofilm was significantly reduced when treated with rifampin following irrigation and debridement, as indicated by both the biofilm bacterial burden and crystal violet staining. EDTA-NS irrigation (10 mM/10 min) combined with rifampin effectively removes S. aureus biofilm-associated infections both in vitro and in vivo. Conclusion. EDTA-NS irrigation with or without antibiotics is effective in eradicating S. aureus biofilm-associated infection both ex and in vivo. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2024;13(1):40–51

Aims

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical application of the PJI-TNM classification for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) by determining intraobserver and interobserver reliability. To facilitate its use in clinical practice, an educational app was subsequently developed and evaluated.

Aims

A higher failure rate has been reported in haematogenous periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) compared to non-haematogenous PJI. The reason for this difference is unknown. We investigated the outcome of haematogenous and non-haematogenous PJI to analyze the risk factors for failure in both groups of patients.

Abstract Background. The treatment of bone and joint infections (BJI) involving multi-drug resistant bacteria remains a challenge. MDR Staphylococcus epidermidis (MDRSE) clones, resistant to methicillin, clindamycin, levofloxacin, rifampicin and even linezolid, have been reported worldwide. The interest of delafloxacin (DFX), theoretically active on MRSA, remains to be evaluated with respect to MDRSE. Purpose. Our objective was to evaluate during a retrospective multicenter study the DFX minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and compare its efficacy between ofloxacin-susceptible and ofloxacin-resistant S. epidermidis clinical strains involved in BJI. Methods. In this multicenter retrospective study (Reference centers from the West part of France, CRIOGO), 529 strains were collected mostly from BJI. DFX MICs were determined by using a 0.5 Mc Farland bacterial inoculum on Mueller-Hinton agar plates with gradient strips incubated for 24h at 35°C. For S. aureus, breakpoints differentiate skin and soft tissue infections from other infections. Breakpoints followed 2022 EUCAST criteria, with S. aureus values adopted for S. epidermidis. Results. Of the 529 strains collected, 355 were from prosthetic infections, 159 from synthetic infections and 15 from non-device infections. 152 strains were susceptible to ofloxacin (110 males vs 42 females) and 377 resistant (210 vs 167). As presented in Figure 1, all the ofloxacin-susceptible strains presented a DFX MIC ≤0.006mg/L. Resistant strains presented a double population distribution, with 3.7% categorized susceptible according to skin and soft tissues infections breakpoint, against 88.9% according to other breakpoint infections (0.016 or 0.25mg/L respectively). Conclusion. DFX shows excellent activity against ofloxacine-susceptible strains. Concerning the ofloxacin-resistant strains, more than 80% strains or less than 10% can be considered as DFX-susceptible depending on the breakpoints used. Further clinical studies are needed to validate the real breakpoints that must be used in MDRSE BJI, allowing a microbiological cure and a favourable clinical outcome. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Aim. There is growing evidence that bacteria encountered in periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) form surface-attached biofilms on prostheses, as well as biofilm aggregates embedded in synovial fluid and tissues. However, models allowing the investigation of these biofilms and the assessment of their antimicrobial susceptibility in physiologically relevant conditions are currently lacking. To address this, we developed a synthetic synovial fluid (SSF) model and we validated this model in terms of growth, aggregate formation and antimicrobial susceptibility testing, using multiple PJI isolates. Methods. 17 PJI isolates were included, belonging to Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase negative staphylococci, Cutibacterium acnes, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, enterococci, streptococci, Candida species and Enterobacterales. Growth and aggregate formation in SSF, under microaerophilic or anaerobic conditions, were evaluated using light microscopy. The biofilm preventing concentration (BPC) and minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC) of relevant antibiotics (doxycyclin, rifampicin and oxacillin) were determined for the staphylococcal strains (n=8). To this end, a high throughput approach was developed, using a fluorescent viability resazurin staining. BPC and MBIC values were compared to the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) obtained with conventional methods. Results. The SSF model allowed all isolates to grow well under microaerophilic or anaerobic conditions. When cultured in SSF, all isolates formed biofilm aggregates, varying in size and shape along different species. A susceptibility testing method based on measuring resazurin-derived fluorescence was successfully developed, allowing high throughput determination of the BPC and the MBIC in SSF. For all staphylococci cultured in SSF a reduced susceptibility to the tested antibiotics was observed when compared to susceptibility data obtained in general medium. For rifampicin and doxycyclin the BPC was consistently higher than the MIC (two- to fourfold dilution difference for rifampicin and four- to sixfold dilution difference for doxycyclin). For oxacillin the MIC equaled the BPC for two isolates, while for the other isolates the BPC was higher than the MIC (two- to fourfold dilution difference). Expectedly, the MBIC was higher than the BPC and differences with the MIC were even more pronounced for all antibiotics tested (differences of six- to fourteenfold dilutions were observed). Conclusion. Our data indicate that the in vitro SSF model could provide more insight in how PJI-related pathogens form biofilms in physiologically relevant conditions. The BPC and MBIC were consistently and substantially higher than MIC. This model could be a valuable addition to evaluate the antimicrobial susceptibility in biofilms in a PJI context. Sources of funding: FWO-Vlaanderen (grant G066523N)

Aim. Rifampicin as a biofilm-active antibiotic drug has a significant role in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, rifampicin resistance is an increasing threat to PJI treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of rifampicin resistant staphylococci over time and its association with infection-free survival after PJI in a single centre in Sweden. Methods. We included 238 PJIs in 238 patients who had undergone PJI revision surgery from 2001 to 2020 on whom the causative bacteria were staphylococci, and the agent was tested for rifampicin resistance. Data regarding agents, rifampicin resistance, treatment and outcome was obtained. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and a Cox regression model with adjustment for age, sex, localisation (hip or knee) and type of prosthesis (primary or revision) were used to calculate infection-free survival rates and adjusted risk ratios (HRs) of the risk of treatment failure. Treatment failure was defined as any reoperation or suppression treatment with antibiotics due to prolonged infection. Results. Among the included 238 PJIs, 40 rifampicin-resistant staphylococci [93% Coagulase Negative Staphylococci (CoNS)] and 29 treatment failures were identified. The proportion of rifampicin resistant agents decreased from 25% in 2010–2015 to 12% in 2016–2020. The 2-year infection-free survival rates were 79.0% (95% CI 0.66–0.92) for the rifampicin resistant and 90% (95% CI 0.86–0.94) for the rifampicin sensitive group. Patients with PJI caused by rifampicin resistant bacteria had a significantly higher risk of treatment failure than those caused by sensitive bacteria (HR 2.5; 95% CI 1.0–6.2). Conclusions. The incidence of PJI caused by rifampicin resistant staphylococci decreased in Uppsala, Sweden over the past 20 years. PJI caused by rifampicin-resistant staphylococci has a two-fold risk for treatment failure compared to PJI caused by rifampicin-sensitive staphylococci, which stresses the importance of retaining rifampicin resistance low. Additionally, the increased risk of treatment failure when PJI is caused by a rifampicin-resistant bacteria warrants consideration of a more conservative treatment strategy