Extracellular matrix (ECM) mechanical cues guide healing in tendons. Yet, the molecular mechanisms orchestrating the healing processes remain elusive. Appropriate tissue tension is essential for tendon homeostasis and tissue health. By mapping the attainment of tensional homeostasis, we aim to understand how ECM tension regulates healing. We hypothesize that diseased tendon returns to homeostasis only after the cells reach a mechanically gated exit from wound healing. We engineered a 3D mechano-culture system to create tendon-like constructs by embedding patient-derived tendon cells into a collagen I hydrogel. Casting the hydrogel between posts anchored in silicone allowed adjusting the post stiffness. Under this static mechanical stimulation, cells remodel the (unorganized) collagen representing wound healing mechanisms. We quantified tissue-level forces using post deflection measurements. Secreted ECM was visualized by metabolic labelling with non-canonical amino acids, click chemistry and confocal microscopy. We blocked cell-mediated actin-myosin contractility using a ROCK inhibitor (Y27632) to explore the involvement of the Rho/ROCK pathway in tension regulation. Tissue tension forces reached the same homeostatic level at day 21 independent of post compliance (p = 0.9456). While minimal matrix was synthesized in early phases of tissue formation (d3-d5), cell-deposited ECM was present in later stages (d7-d9). More ECM was deposited by tendon constructs cultured on compliant (1Nm) compared to rigid posts (p = 0.0017). Matrix synthesized by constructs cultured on compliant posts was less aligned (greater fiber dispersion, p = 0.0021). ROCK inhibition significantly decreased tissue-level tensional forces (p < 0.0001). Our results indicate that tendon cells balance matrix remodeling and synthesis during tissue repair to reach an intrinsically defined “mechanostat setpoint” guiding tension-mediated exit from wound healing towards homeostasis. We are identifying specific molecular mechanosensors governing tension-regulated healing in tendon and investigate the Rho/ROCK system as their possible downstream pathway

Aims

Accurate identification of the ankle joint centre is critical for estimating tibial coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of the current study was to leverage artificial intelligence (AI) to determine the accuracy and effect of using different radiological anatomical landmarks to quantify mechanical alignment in relation to a traditionally defined radiological ankle centre.

Aims

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) is theoretically more accurate for component positioning than TKA performed with mechanical instruments (M-TKA). Furthermore, the ability to incorporate soft-tissue laxity data into the plan prior to bone resection should reduce variability between the planned polyethylene thickness and the final implanted polyethylene. The purpose of this study was to compare accuracy to plan for component positioning and precision, as demonstrated by deviation from plan for polyethylene insert thickness in measured-resection RA-TKA versus M-TKA.

Introduction. Acetabular component orientation is an important determinant of outcome following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although surgeons aim to achieve optimal cup orientation, many studies demonstrate their inability to consistently achieve this. Factors that contribute are pelvic orientation and the surgeon's ability to correctly orient the cup at implantation. The goal of this study was to determine the accuracy with which surgeons can achieve cup orientation angles. Methods. In this in vitro study using a calibrated left and right sawbone hemipelvis model, participants (n=10) were asked to place a cup mounted on its introducer giving different targets. Measurements of cup orientation were made using a stereophotogrammetry protocol to measure radiographic inclination and operative anteversion (OA). A digital inclinometer was used to measure the intra-operative inclination (IOI) which is the angle of the cup introducer relative to the floor. First, the participant stated his or her preferred IOI and OA and positioned the cup accordingly. Second, the participant had to position the cup parallel to the anteversion of the transverse acetabular ligament (TAL). Third, the participant had to position the cup at IOI angles of 35°, 40° and 45°. Fourth, the participant used the mechanical alignment guide (45° of IOI and 30° of OA) to orient the cup. Each task was analysed separately and subgroup analysis included left versus right side and hip surgeons versus non-hip surgeons. Results. For the first task, hip surgeons preferred smaller IOI and larger OA than non-hip surgeons, but there was no significant difference in accuracy between both groups. When aiming for TAL, both surgeon groups performed similar, but accuracy on the non-dominant side was significantly better compared with the dominant side (mean deviation 0.6° SD 2.4 versus −2.6° SD 2.3) (p=0.004). When aiming for a specific IOI target of 35°, 40° or 45°, non-hip surgeons outperformed hip surgeons (mean deviation form target IOI 1.9° SD 2.7 versus −3.1° SD 3.8) (p<0.0001) with less variance (p=0.03). Contrary to version, accuracy on the dominant side was significantly better compared with the non-dominant side (mean deviation −0.4° SD 3.4 versus −2.1° SD 4.8). When using a mechanical guide, surgeons performed similar (0.6° SD 1.2 versus −0.4° SD 2.1 for inclination p=0.11 and −0.5° SD 2.6 versus −1.8° SD 3.3 for version p=0.22) and these values did not differ significantly from the actual IOI and OA of the mechanical guide. When using a mechanical guide, there was no difference in accuracy between the dominant and non-dominant side. Conclusion. There was no difference in accuracy between hip surgeons and non-hip surgeons when they aimed for their preferred IOI and OA or used a mechanical guide. When aiming for a specific IOI target, non-hip surgeons outperformed hip surgeons. Hip surgeons overestimate IOI and underestimate OA, presumably because this helps to achieve the desired radiographic cup orientation. Regarding accuracy, the non-dominant side was better for version and the dominant side for inclination. When aiming for a specific IOI and OA target, using a mechanical guide is significantly better than freehand cup orientation

Aims

This study aimed to evaluate implant survival of reverse hybrid total hip arthroplasty (THA) at medium-term follow-up.

Aims

Accurate placement of the acetabular component is essential in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to determine if the ability to achieve inclination of the acetabular component within the ‘safe-zone’ of 30° to 50° could be improved with the use of an inclinometer.

INTRODUCTION. Acetabular cup malpositioning has been implicated in instability and wear-related complications after total hip arthroplasty. Although computer navigation and robotic assistance have been shown to improve the precision of implant placement, most surgeons use mechanical and visual guides to place acetabular components. Authors have shown that, when using a bean bag positioner, mechanical guides are misleading as they are unable to account for the variability in pelvic orientation during positioning and surgery. However, more rigid patient positioning devices may allow for more accurate free hand cup placement. To our knowledge, no study has assessed the ability of rigid devices to afford surgeons with ideal pelvic positioning throughout surgery. The purpose of this study is to utilize robotic-arm assisted computer navigation to assess the reliability of pelvic position in total hip arthroplasty performed on patients positioned with rigid positioning devices. METHODS. 100 hips (94 patients) prospectively underwent total hip Makoplasty in the lateral decubitus position from the posterior approach; 77 stabilized by universal lateral positioner, and 23 by peg board. After dislocation but prior to reaming, one fellowship trained arthroplasty surgeon manually placed the robotic arm parallel to both the longitudinal axis of the patient and the horizontal surface of the operating table, which, if the pelvis were oriented perfectly, would represent 0 degrees of anteversion and 0 degrees of inclination. The CT-templated computer software then generated true values of this perceived zero degrees of anteversion and inclination based on the position of the robot arm registered to a preoperative pelvic CT. Therefore, variations in pelvic positioning are represented by these robotic navigation generated values. To assure the accuracy of robotic measurements, cup anteversion and inclination at times of impaction were recorded and compared to those calculated via the trigonometric ellipse method of Lewinnek on standardized 3 months postoperative X-rays. RESULTS. Mean alteration in anteversion and inclination values were 1.7 degrees (absolute value 5.3 degrees, range −20 – 20 degrees) and 1.6 degrees (absolute value 2.6 degrees, range −8 – 10 degrees) respectively. 22% of anteversion values were altered by >10 degrees; 41% by > 5 degrees. There was no difference between positioners (p=0.36) and regression analysis revealed that anteversion differences were correlated with BMI (p=0.02). Robotic navigation acetabular cup anteversion (mean 21.8 degrees) was not different from postoperative X-ray anteversion (mean 21.9 degrees)(p=0.50), nor was robotic navigation acetabular cup inclination (mean 40.6 degrees) different from postoperative X-ray inclination (mean 40.5 degrees)(p=0.34). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION. Rigid pelvic positioning devices present 5 to 20 degrees of variability in acetabular cup orientation, particularly with regards to anteversion. Compounding this with 20 degree safe zones and prior author demonstrations that human error is prone to 10 degrees of anteversion inaccuracy in a fixed pelvis model, there is a clear need to pay particular attention to anatomic landmarks or computer assisted techniques to assure accurate acetabular cup positioning. Patient positioning by itself should not be trusted

Aims

Our aim was to report survivorship data and lessons learned with the Corail/Pinnacle cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) system.

Introduction. In total hip arthroplasty (THA), a high radiographic inclination angle (RI) of the acetabular component has been linked to an increased dislocation rate, liner fracture, and increased wear. In contrast to version, we have more proven boundaries when it comes to a safe zone for angles of RI. Although intuitively it seems easier to achieve a target RI, most studies demonstrate a lack of accuracy and the trend towards a high RI with all surgical approaches when using a freehand technique or a mechanical guide. This is due to pelvic motion during surgery, which can be highly variable. The current study had two primary aims, each with a different primary outcome. The first aim was to determine how accurate a surgeon could obtain the target operative inclination (OI) during THA when using a cementless cup using a digital protractor. The second aim was to determine how accurate a surgeon can estimate the target OI to obtain a RI of 40° based on the patient's hip circumference as demonstrated in a previous study. Methods. In this prospective study, we included 200 consecutive patients undergoing uncemented primary THA in the lateral decubitus position using a posterior approach. Preoperatively, the surgeon determined the target OI based on the patient's hip circumference (22.5°, 25°, 27.5° or 30°). Intraoperatively, the effective OI was measured with the aid of a digital inclinometer after seating of the acetabular component. Six weeks postoperatively anteroposterior pelvic radiographs were made and two evaluators, blinded to the effective OI, measured the RI of the acetabular component. The safe zone for inclination was defined as 30°-45° of inclination. Results. The mean difference between the target OI and the effective OI of the acetabular component was −0.7° SD 1.4 (95% CI −0.9° to −0.5°). The difference between the target and effective OI was less than 1° in 108 patients (54%), less than 2° in 160 patients (80%) and less than 3° in 186 patients (93%). In 14 patients (7%) the difference was 3°-5°. The mean RI was 37.9° SD 4.7 (95% CI 37.2° to 38.5°). The mean difference between the RI and effective OI was 11.5° SD 4.7 (95% CI 10.8° to 12.1°). Overall, 188 cups (94%) were within the inclination safe zone. When analysing the RI outliers, 1 could have be avoided if a better target OI was chosen and 2 could have been avoided if the difference between the target and effective OI would have been smaller. For the remaining 9 outliers (75%) the difference between the RI and effective OI was in the upper and lower 7. th. percentile, indicating more or less than average motion of the pelvis in these patients. Discussion and Conclusions. When using a digital protractor, the mean difference between the target OI and the effective OI of the acetabular component was less than 3° in 93% and less than 5° in all patients. The use of a digital protractor allows surgeons to accurately implant the acetabular component in the desired OI in a cheap and easy way. By adjusting the target OI based on the patient's hip circumference, 94% of the acetabular components were placed within an inclination safe zone of 30°-45°. Most outliers were caused by more of less than average intraoperative pelvic motion

Background. The current orthopaedic literature demonstrates a clear relationship between acetabular component positioning, polyethylene wear and risk of dislocation following Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). Problems with edge loading, stripe wear and squeaking are also associated with higher acetabular inclination angles, particularly in hard-on-hard bearing implants. The important parameters of acetabular component positioning are depth, height, version and inclination. Acetabular component depth, height and version can be controlled with intra-operative reference to the transverse acetabular ligament. Control of acetabular component inclination, particularly in the lateral decubitus position, is more difficult and remains a challenge for the Orthopaedic Surgeon. Lewinnek et al described a ‘safe zone’ of acetabular component orientation: Radiological acetabular inclination of 40 ± 10° and radiological anteversion of 15 ± 10°. Accurate implantation of the acetabular component within the ‘safe zone’ of radiological inclination is dependent on operative inclination, operative version and pelvic position. Traditionally during surgery, the acetabular component has been inserted with an operative inclination of 45°. This assumes that patient positioning is correct and does not take into account the impact of operative anteversion or patient malpositioning. However, precise patient positioning in order to orientate acetabular components using this method cannot always be relied upon. Hill et al demonstrated a mean 6.9° difference between photographically simulated radiological inclination and the post-operative radiological inclination. The most likely explanation was felt to be adduction of the uppermost hemipelvis in the lateral decubitus position. The study changed the practice of the senior author, with target operative inclination now 35° rather than 40° as before, aiming to achieve a post-operative radiological inclination of 42° ± 5°. Aim. To determine which of the following three techniques of acetabular component implantation most accurately obtains a desired operative inclination of 35 degrees:. Freehand. Modified (35°) Mechanical Alignment Guide, or. Digital inclinometer assisted. Methods. 270 patients undergoing primary uncemented THA were randomised to one of the three methods of acetabular component implantation. Target operative inclination for all three techniques was 35°. Operative inclination was measured intra-operatively using both a digital inclinometer and stereophotogrammetric system. For both the freehand and Mechanical Alignment Guide implantation techniques, the surgeon was blinded to intra-operative digital inclinometer readings. Results. The freehand implantation technique had an operative inclination range of 25.2 – 43.2° (Mean 32.9°, SD 2.90°). The modified (35°) Mechanical Alignment Guide implantation technique had an operative inclination range of 29.3 – 39.3° (Mean 33.7°, SD 1.89°). The digital inclinometer assisted technique had an operative inclination range of 27.5 – 37.5° (Mean 34.0°, SD 1.57°). Mean unsigned deviation from target 35° operative inclination was 2.92° (SD 2.03) for the freehand implantation technique, 1.83° (SD 1.41) for the modified (35°) Mechanical Alignment Guide implantation technique and 1.28° (SD 1.33) for the digital inclinometer assisted technique. Conclusions. When aiming for 35° of operative inclination, the digital inclinometer technique appears more accurate than either the freehand or Mechanical Alignment Guide techniques. In order to improve accuracy of acetabular component orientation during Total Hip Arthroplasty, the surgeon should consider using such a technique

Introduction. Operative inclination (OI) is defined as the angle between the acetabular axis and the sagittal plane. With the patient in the true lateral decubitus position, this corresponds to the angle formed between the handle of the acetabular component inserter and the theatre floor intra-operatively. Patients/Materials & Methods. The primary study aim was to determine which method of acetabular component insertion most accurately allows the surgeon to obtain a target OI of 35o. 270 consecutive patients undergoing cementless THA were randomised to one of three possible methods for acetabular component implantation:. 1. Freehand,. 2. 35o mechanical alignment guide (MAG), or. 3. Digital inclinometer assisted. Two surgeons participated. Target OI was 35o in all cases. OI was measured using a digital inclinometer. For the freehand and MAG cases, the surgeon was blinded to inclinometer readings intra-operatively. Results. Freehand: OI 25.2 – 43.2o. Mean deviation from target 2.92o. 35o MAG: OI 29.3 – 39.3o. Mean deviation from target 1.83o. Inclinometer assisted: OI 27.5 – 37.5o. Mean deviation from target 1.28o. Overall, when comparing mean deviation from target OI, a statistically significant difference between both the Freehand/Inclinometer group and Freehand/MAG group was demonstrated (p<0.001). A statistically significant difference between the Inclinometer/MAG groups was also demonstrated (p<0.023). Discussion. Both the 35o MAG and digital inclinometer assisted methods provided a considerably narrower OI range when compared to the freehand method. Though the range was similar for both the 35o MAG and digital inclinometer assisted methods, the SD was smaller in the inclinometer assisted group. Conclusion. The novel method of using a digital inclinometer to control operative inclination appears to be more accurate than both the freehand and mechanical alignment guide methods and may help further optimise acetabular component orientation

A high radiographic inclination angle (RI) contributes to accelerated wear and has been associated with dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). With freehand positioning of the acetabular component there is a lack of accuracy, with a trend towards a high radiographic inclination angle. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the use of a digital protractor to measure the operative inclination angle (OI) could improve the positioning of the acetabular component in relation to a ‘safe zone’.

We measured the radiographic inclination angles of 200 consecutive uncemented primary THAs. In the first 100 the component was introduced freehand and in the second 100 a digital protractor was used to measure the operative inclination angle.

The mean difference between the operative and the radiographic inclination angles (∆RI–OI) in the second cohort was 12.3° (3.8° to 19.8°). There was a strong correlation between the circumference of the hip and ∆RI–OI. The number of RI outliers was significantly reduced in the protractor group (p = 0.002).

Adjusting the OI, using a digital protractor and taking into account the circumference of the patient’s hip, improves the RI significantly (p < 0.001) and does not require additional operating time.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B:603–610.

Summary. A specialised 3D- printed scaffold, combined with fillers and bioactive molecules, can be designed and characterised to demonstrate the efficacy of synthetic, off-the-shelf and custom fabricated scaffolds for the repair of long bone defects. Introduction. Using specialised three-dimensional (3-D) printing technology, combined with fillers and bioactive molecules, 3-D scaffolds for bone repair of sizable defects can be manufactured with a level of design customization that other methods lack. Hydroxyapatite (HA)/Beta-Tri-Calcium Phosphate (β -TCP) scaffold components may be created that provide mechanical strength, guide osseo- conduction and integration, and remodel over time. Additionally, research suggests that bone morphogenic protein (BMP) stimulates growth and differentiation of new bone. Therefore, we hypothesise that with the addition of BMP, HA- β -TCP scaffolds will show improved regeneration of bone over critical sized bone defects in an in vivo model. Patients & Methods. Scaffolds were implanted in six New Zealand White rabbits with a 10mm radial defect for 2 and 8 weeks. The scaffolds, made from 15% HA: 85% β-TCP, were designed using ROBOCAD design software and fabricated using a 3-D printing Robocast machine. Scaffolds were sintered at 1100°C for 4 hours with a final composition of 5% HA: ∼95% β-TCP. Micro-CT, histological analysis, and nanoindentation were conducted to determine the degree of new bone formation and remodeling. Results. Reconstructed microCT images show increased bone formation, remodeling, and integration in HA/ β -TCP-BMP scaffolds compared to virgin HA/ β -TCP scaffolds. Histological analysis showed increased bone formation but decreased osteoconduction in HA/ β -TCP-BMP scaffolds. Nanoindentation showed no effect of BMP on hardness nor elastic modulus of bone formed on the scaffolds. Discussion/Conclusions. HA/ β -TCP scaffolds with/without BMP are highly biocompatible and can successfully augment and accelerate the regeneration and remodeling of bone in critically sized long bone defects in a rabbit model. However, the data in this study show both improvement and detriment with the addition of BMP. Therefore, further studies must be performed. Ideally, eventual translation of this research to humans would eliminate the need for allograft and/or autograft in large bony defects and allow for a customizable 3D scaffold material relative to patient needs

The orientation of the acetabular component can influence both the short- and long-term outcomes of total hip replacement (THR). We performed a prospective, randomised, controlled trial of two groups, comprising of 40 patients each, in order to compare freehand introduction of the component with introduction using the transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) as a reference for anteversion. Anteversion and inclination were measured on pelvic radiographs.

With respect to anteversion, in the freehand group 22.5% of the components were outside the safe zone versus 0% in the transverse acetabular ligament group (p = 0.002). The mean angle of anteversion in the freehand group was 21° (2° to 35°) which was significantly higher compared with 17° (2° to 25°) in the TAL group (p = 0.004). There was a significant difference comparing the variations of both groups (p = 0.008).

With respect to inclination, in the freehand group 37.5% of the components were outside the safe zone versus 20% in the TAL group (p = 0.14). There was no significant difference regarding the accuracy or variation of the angle of inclination when comparing the two groups.

The transverse acetabular ligament may be used to obtain the appropriate anteversion when introducing the acetabular component during THR, but not acetabular component inclination.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:312–18.

Introduction:. One of the primary goals in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is restoration of the mechanical alignment. The accuracy of conventional mechanical alignment guides and computer-assisted navigation systems has been extensively studied. The purpose of this study is to assess the accuracy of a hand-held accelerometer-based navigation system for TKA. Methods:. Fifty three patients undergoing TKA utilizing the KneeAlign system (OrthAlign Inc, Aliso Viejo, CA) (Figure 1) were performed by two surgeons. Intraoperative data including tourniquet time, device assembly time, and resection times were recorded. Target alignment goals were 0° femoral, tibial, and overall mechanical coronal alignment and 3° femoral flexion and posterior tibial slope. Coronal/sagittal alignment of the implant and the mechanical axis were measured by two independent observers on full length (54 inch) postoperative hip to ankle radiographs. Results:. Average femoral coronal alignment was 0.29° varus ± 2.2° with 13% of patients exceeding 3° of varus/valgus. Average tibial coronal alignment was 0.25° valgus ± 1.4° with 4% of patients exceeding 3° of varus/valgus. Average femoral flexion angle was 87.2° and the average tibial posterior slope was 2.8° ± 1.8 °. Average postoperative mechanical axis was 0.2° varus ± 2.1°with 13% of patients exceeding 3° of varus/valgus (Figure 2). The average time to completion of femoral and tibial resection was 4.8 and 4.6 minutes, respectively, with an overall tourniquet time of 62 minutes. Conclusion:. The KneeAlign system was accurate for reestablishing the mechanical axis and the femoral and tibial component alignment in TKA without increasing surgical time. Accuracy was better for tibial than femoral resection, but overall superior to mechanical alignment guides and comparable to computer-assisted navigation

Introduction. Traditional methods of component positioning in total hip replacement (THR) utilize mechanical alignment guides which estimate position relative to the plane of the operating room table. However, variations in pelvic tilt alter the relationship between the anatomic plane of the pelvis and that of the table such that components placed in optimal position relative the table may not land within the classic anatomic “safe zone” described by Lewinnek. It has been suggested that navigation software should incorporate adjustments for the degree of pelvic tilt. Current imageless navigation software has this capability, however there is a paucity of data regarding the accuracy of this technology. Purpose. We aimed to assess the accuracy of intra-operative pelvic tilt adjusted anteversion measurements as compared to unadjusted measurements. Methods. 6-week post-operative Anteroposterior Pelvis radiographs from 27 consecutive primary THR were measured utilizing Ein-Bild-Roentgen-Analyse (EBRA-Cup®) hip analysis software (Figure 1) and a cross-table lateral radiograph (Figure 2). Inclination and anteversion values were recorded and direction of version was confirmed by assessment of cross-table lateral images. Values were compared with intra-operative measurements obtained via BrainLab® imageless navigation. Pelvic tilt adjusted and unadjusted anteversion measurements were recorded. Mean measurement error and standard error of the mean were determined and Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated. Results. Navigated component inclination correlated with EBRA-Cup® derived inclination measurements (r = 0.4308, p = 0.02) with a mean error of 3.8°. Similarly, pelvic tilt adjusted anteversion correlated with EBRA-Cup® derived measurements (r = 0.65, p < 0.001). The mean difference between anteversion measurements was 3.58° and the standard error of the mean was 0.58°. 24 of 27 patients had <6° of difference between the two measurements. Post-operative component position correlated more closely with pelvic tilt adjusted anteversion than with unadjusted values (r = 0.3, p = 0.12). As expected, this was most pronounced in patients with greater than 10 degrees of pelvic tilt (mean error of 11.2° vs. 4.5°). Conclusions. Imageless navigation based anteversion measurements are more accurate when adjusted for pelvic tilt

INTRODUCTION. While standard instrumentation tries to reproduce mechanical axes based on mechanical alignment guides, a new “shape matching” system derives its plan from kinematic measurements using pre-operative MRIs. The current study aimed to compare the resultant alignment in a matched pair cadaveric study between the Shape Match and a standard mechanical system. METHODS. A prospective series of Twelve (12) eviscerated torso's were acquired for a total of twenty four (24) limb specimens that included intact pelvises, femoral heads, knees, and ankles. The cadavers received MRI-scans, which were used to manufacture the Shape Match cutting guides. Additionally all specimen received “pre-operative” CT-scans to determine leg axes. Two (2) investigating surgeons performed total knee arthroplasties on randomly chosen sides by following the surgical technique using conventional instruments. On the contralateral sides, implantation of the same prosthesis was done using the Kinematic Shape Match Cutting Guides. A navigation system was used to check for leg alignement. Implant alignement was determined using post-operative CT-scans. For statistical analysis SPSS was used. RESULTS. In measurements using the navigation system, the overall alignment of the leg showed no significant differences between the two tested systems. This was also found in the CT-Measurements. In the Shape Match group the difference between the planned and the final implantation regarding overall limb alignment ranged between −0,5° (valgus) and 6° varus (p=0,518; CI −1,97°/1,05°). The leg alignement in the conventional group ranged between −2,5° and 13° varus (p=0,176; CI −4,93°/1,02). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION. As expected, the two compared system employ different alignment strategies, which reflected in variations of the combinations of the three-dimensional component position on the femur and the tibia. These different strategies result in overall leg alignment that compares well between the two different methods, with fewer outliers in the Shape Match group

Many factors can negatively impact acetabular component positioning including poor visualization, increased patient size, inaccuracies of mechanical guides, and inconsistent precision of conventional instruments and techniques, and changes in patient positioning. Improper orientation contributes to increased dislocation rates, leg length discrepancies, altered hip biomechanics, component impingement, acetabular component migration, bearing surface wear, and pelvic osteolysis thus affecting revision rates and long-term survivorship. Despite the established definitions of acetabular safe zones, recent analysis of U.S. Medicare THA data found dislocation rates during the first six months to be 3.9% for primary surgeries and 14.4% for revision surgeries. Accurate and precise acetabular component orientation during initial THA is an increasingly important factor in decreasing revision THA; a recent report cites instability and dislocation as the primary cause of revision accounting for 22.5% of cases. Larger femoral heads and alternative bearing couples are less tolerant of variation in acetabular orientation and thus are poor substitutes for proper acetabular component placement. Variability in acetabular orientation has been reported to have both an inter-surgeon and an intra-surgeon component; pre-surgical templating combined with intraop-erative measurements is subject to inconsistencies and errors. Current methods for determining acetabular orientation include preoperative imaging such as CT scans, intraoperative imaging such as plain radiographs and fluoroscopy, and intraoperative anatomical tests. Combining the concepts of patient-specific morphology (PSM) and quantitative technologies (QuanTech) such as computer-assisted navigation (CAN) has the potential to maximise range of motion and to further improve acetabular component orientation through improved accuracy and precision. PSM refers to the practice of allowing the form and structure of the patient’s hip joint to guide surgical reconstruction and component placement thus creating an individualised and more accurate “target zone”; unlike “safe zones,” PSM does not rely on averages. Although gross anatomic changes may make it difficult to use PSM, certain structures may be used as guide-posts for orientation, alignment, and stability in most patients. At present, there are three options when considering anatomic landmarks as guides for acetabular component placement: bony landmarks, soft tissue landmarks, or a combination. QuanTech has been shown to increase the precision of component placement by reducing intra-surgeon deviation. Some pitfalls of current CAN techniques result from maintaining camera line of sight during surgery, registration process, and pin placement. Performing THA using smaller incisions can impose additional complications as well as risks for errors in component positioning; QuanTech has the potential to provide greater visualization and precision, thus decreasing the impact of those constraints. THA has become one of the most common and successful orthopaedic procedures; its efficacy at relieving pain and its ability to help patients have improved quality of life is without dispute yet results continue to vary with inter-surgeon and intra-surgeon differences. As the population needing THA increases, the prevalence of complications and problems will increase, even if the percentage of complications decreases. Coupling PSM with QuanTech such as CAN may allow the surgeon to decrease variability and more consistently implant THA components based on each patient’s individualized requirements. The goal of combining PSM and CAN is to further reduce inter-and intra-surgeon variation, thereby decreasing outliers, complications, and revision rates, and possibly narrowing the gap between specialist and generalist. More accurate and precise acetabular component orientation correlates with better hip biomechanics, translating into better function, fewer dislocations, fewer impingements, maximized safe range of motion, less wear, and therefore less aseptic loosening and improvements in survivorship of primary THA. Decreasing revision rates, combined with the benefits listed above, could translate into increased THA survivorship, improved patient satisfaction, and decreased economic burden on the entire healthcare system

Purpose: The purpose of this clinical trial was to investigate the accuracy of a novel method for computer-assisted distal radius osteotomy, in which computer-generated patient-specific plastic guides were used for intra-operative guidance. Our hypothesis was that these guides combine the accuracy and precision of computer-assisted techniques with the ease of use of mechanical guides. Method: In a consecutive series of 9 patients we tested the accuracy of the proposed method. Prior to surgery, CT scans were obtained of both radii and ulnae in neutral rotation. Three-dimensional virtual models for both the affected and unaffected radius and ulna were created. The models of the unaffected radius and ulna were reflected to serve as a template for the correction. Custom-made software was used to plan the correction. The locations of the distal and proximal drill holes for the plate were saved and the locations of the distal holes before the osteotomy were determined. The design of a patient-specific instrument guide was calculated, into which a mirror image of intra-operative accessible bone structure of the distal radius was integrated. This allowed for unique positioning of the guide intra-operatively. For each planned drill location a guidance hole was incorporated into the guide. A plastic model of the guide was created using a rapid prototyping machine. Intra-operatively, a conventional incision was made and the guide was positioned on the distal end of the radius. The surgeon drilled the holes for the plate screws into the intact radius. The guide was removed and the surgeon performed the osteotomy using the conventional technique and shaved the bone from the distal radius fragment to accommodate the plate. Using the pre-drilled holes the plate was affixed to the distal radius fragment. The distal fragment was reduced until the proximal screw holes in the plate aligned with the pilot holes in the bone. To analyze the accuracy of the intra-operative procedure we compared the post-operative alignment of the radius with the planned alignment. A lateral and an A/P digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) of the plan were calculated. These DRRs were used to evaluate the radial inclination, the volar tilt and the ulnar variance of the planned alignment. Post-operative lateral and A/P X-Rays were used to determine the same three post-operative radiographic indices. The post-operative values were compared with the planned values. Results: We found an average deviation for the radial inclination of 0.5°(StDev 1.8), for the volar tilt of 0.7°(StDev 2.3), and for the ulnar variance of 0.8mm (StDev 1.9). Conclusion: These results show that the computer-generated instrument guides accurately achieved the planned alignment. The guides were easy to integrate into the surgical workflow and eliminated the need for intra-operative fluoroscopy for guidance of the procedure

Orientation of the native acetabular plane as defined by the transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) and the posterior labrum was measured intra-operatively using computer-assisted navigation in 39 hips. In order to assess the influence of alignment on impingement, the range of movement was calculated for that defined by the TAL and the posterior labrum and compared with a standard acetabular component position (abduction 45°/anteversion 15°).

With respect to the registration of the plane defined by the TAL and the posterior labrum, there was moderate interobserver agreement (r = 0.64, p < 0.001) and intra-observer reproducibility (r = 0.73, p < 0.001). The mean acetabular component orientation achieved was abduction of 41° (32° to 51°) and anteversion of 18° (−1° to 36°). With respect to the Lewinnek safe zone (abduction 40° ±10°, anteversion 15° ±10°), 35 of the 39 acetabular components were within this zone. However, there was no improvement in the range of movement (p = 0.94) and no significant difference in impingement (p = 0.085).

Alignment of the acetabular component with the TAL and the posterior labrum might reduce the variability of acetabular component placement in total hip replacement. However, there is only a moderate interobserver agreement and intra-observer reliability in the alignment of the acetabular component using the TAL and the posterior labrum. No reduction in impingement was found when the acetabular component was aligned with the TAL and the posterior labrum, compared with a standard acetabular component position.