Background. It has become increasingly important to conduct studies assessing clinical outcomes, reoperation rates, and revision rates to better define the indications and efficacy of lumbar spinal procedures and its association with symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration (sASD). Adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) is defined as the radiographic change in the intervertebral discs adjacent to the surgically treated spinal level. SASD represents adjacent segment degeneration which causes pain or numbness due to post-operative spinal instability or nerve compression at the same level. The most common reason for early reoperation and late operation is sASD, therefore is in our best interest to understand the causes of ASD and make steps to limit the occurrence. Method. A comprehensive literature search was performed selecting Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective or prospective studies published up to December 2023. Meta-analysis was performed on 38 studies that met the inclusion criteria and included data of clinical outcomes of patients who had degenerative disc disease, disc herniation, radiculopathy, and spondylolisthesis and underwent lumbar fusion or motion-preservation device surgery; and reported on the prevalence of ASD, sASD, reoperation rate, visual analogue score (VAS), and Oswestry disability index (ODI) improvement. Results. When compared to fusion surgery, a significant reduction of ASD, sASD and reoperation was observed in the cohort of patients that underwent motion-preserving surgery. Conclusion. Dynamic fusion constructs are treatment options that may help to prevent sASD. Conflicts of interest. This research was funded by Paradigm Spine. Sources of funding. Paradigm Spine

Aims

The optimal procedure for the treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of anterior cervical ossified posterior longitudinal ligament en bloc resection (ACOE) with posterior laminectomy and fusion with bone graft and internal fixation (PTLF) for the surgical management of patients with this condition.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a painful and disabling chronic condition that constitutes a major challenge to health care worldwide. There is currently no cure for OA and the analgesic pharmaceuticals available do not offer adequate and sustained pain relief, often being associated with significant undesirable side effects. Another disease associated with degenerating joints is Intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) which is a leading cause of chronic back pain and loss of function. It is characterized by the loss of extracellular matrix, specifically proteoglycan and collagen, tissue dehydration, fissure development and loss of disc height, inflammation, endplate sclerosis, cell death and hyperinnervation of nociceptive nerve fibers. The adult human IVD seems incapable of intrinsic repair and there are currently no proven treatments to prevent, stop or even retard disc degeneration. Fusion is currently the most common surgical treatment of symptomatic disc disease. However, radiographic follow-up studies have revealed that many patients develop adjacent segment disc degeneration due to altered spine biomechanics. The development of safe and efficacious disease modifying OA drugs (DMOADs) that treat pain and inflammation in joints will improve our ability to control the disease. I addition, a biologic treatment of IVDD is desirable. This presentation will provide an overview of recent advances and future prospects of a multimodal biologic treatment of OA, and IVDD. We will focus on Link N, a naturally occurring peptide representing the N terminal region of link protein and the first 1–8 residues of Link N (short Link N, sLN) responsible for the biologic therapy in question

Aims. Whether to perform hybrid surgery (HS) in contrast to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) when treating patients with multilevel cervical disc degeneration remains a controversial subject. To resolve this we have undertaken a meta-analysis comparing the outcomes from HS with ACDF in this condition. Methods. Seven databases were searched for studies of HS and ACDF from inception of the study to 1 September 2019. Both random-effects and fixed-effects models were used to evaluate the overall effect of the C2-C7 range of motion (ROM), ROM of superior/inferior adjacent levels, adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), heterotopic ossification (HO), complications, neck disability index (NDI) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Odom’s criteria, blood loss, and operating and hospitalization time. To obtain more credible results contour-enhanced funnel plots, Egger’s and Begg’s tests, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were performed. Results. In total, 17 studies involving 861 patients were included in the analysis. HS was found to be superior to ACDF in maintaining C2-C7 ROM and ROM of superior/inferior adjacent levels, but HS did not reduce the incidence of associated level ASD. Also, HS did not cause a higher rate of HO than ACDF. The frequency of complications was similar between the two techniques. HS failed to achieve more favourable outcomes than ACDF using the NDI, VAS, JOA, and Odom’s scores. HS did not show any more advantages in operating or hospitalization time but did show reduction in blood loss. Conclusion. Although HS maintained cervical kinetics, it failed to reduce the incidence of ASD. This finding differs from previous reports. Moreover, patients did not show more benefits from HS with respect to symptom improvement, prevention of complications, and clinical outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(8):981–996

Intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration plays a major role in low back pain which is the leading cause of disability. Current treatments in severe cases require surgical intervention often leading to adjacent segment degeneration. Injectable hydrogels have received much attention in recent years as scaffolds for seeding cells to replenish disc cellularity and restore disc properties and function. However, they generally present poor mechanical properties. In this study, we investigated several novel thermosensitive chitosan hydrogels for their ability to mimic the mechanical properties of the nucleus pulposus (NP) while being able to sustain the viability of NP cells, and retain proteoglycans. CH hydrogels were prepared by mixing the acidic chitosan solution (2% w/v) with various combinations of three gelling agents: sodium hydrogen carbonate (SHC) and/or beta-glycerophosphate (BGP) and/or phosphate buffer (PB) (either BGP0.4M, SHC0.075M-BGP0.1M, SHC0.075M-PB0.02M or SHC0.075M-PB0.04M). The gelation speed was assessed by following rheological properties within 1h at 37°C (strain 5% and 1Hz). The mechanical properties were characterized and compared with that of human NP tissues. Elastic properties of the hydrogels were studied by evaluating the secant modulus in unconfined compression. Equilibrium modulus was also measured, using an incremental stress-relaxation test 24h after gelation in unconfined compression (5% strain at 5%/s followed by 5min relaxation, five steps). Cells from bovine IVD were encapsulated in CH-based gels and maintained in culture for 14 days. Cytocompatibility was assessed by measuring cell viability, metabolism and DNA content. Glycosaminoglycan (GAG) synthesis (retained in the gel and released) was determined using DMMB assay. Finally injectability was tested using human cadaveric discs. Unconfined compression confirmed drastically enhanced mechanical properties compared to conventional CH-BGP hydrogels (secant Young modulus of 105 kPa for SHC0.075PB0.02 versus 3–6 kPa for BGP0.04). More importantly, SHC0.075PB0.02 and SHC0.075BGP0.1 hydrogels exhibited mechanical properties very similar to NP tissue. For instance, equilibrium modulus was 5.2±0.6 KPa for SHC0.075PB0.02 and 8±0.8 KPa for SHC0.075BGP0.1 compared to 6.1±1.7 KPa for human NP tissue. Rheological properties and gelation time (G′=G″ after less than 15 s at 37°C, and rapid increase of G') of these hydrogels also appear to be adapted to this application. Cell survival was greater than 80% in SHC0.075BGP0.1 and SHC0.075PB0.02 hydrogels. Cells encapsulated in the new formulations also showed significantly higher metabolic activity and DNA content after 14 days of incubation compared to cells encapsulated in BGP0.4 hydrogel. Cells encapsulated in SHC0.075BGP0.1 and SHC0.075PB0.02 produced significantly higher amounts of glycosaminoglycans (GAG) compared to cells encapsulated in SHC0.075PB0.04 and BGP0.4 hydrogels. The total amount of GAG was higher in SHC0.075BGP0.1 hydrogel compared to SHC0.075PB0.02. Interestingly, both the SHC0.075BGP0.1 and SHC0.075PB0.02 hydrogels retained similar amounts of GAG. Injectability through a 25G syringe, filling of nuclear clefts and good retention in human degenerated discs was demonstrated for SHC0.075PB0.02 hydrogel. SHC0.075BGP0.1 appears to be a particularly promising injectable scaffold for IVD repair by providing suitable structural environment for cell survival, ECM production and mechanical properties very similar to that of NP tissue

Aims

The aim of this study was to determine the influence of developmental spinal stenosis (DSS) on the risk of re-operation at an adjacent level.

Background. The controversy concerning the benefits of unisegmental cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) over anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is still open because some randomised clinical trial (RTC) comparing ACDF with CDA have been highly inconclusive. Most of these studies mixed disc prosthesis with dissimilar kinematic characteristics. To date, a compilation of the clinical and radiologic outcomes and adverse events of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) compared with a single cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) design, the Bryan disc has partially accomplished. Methods. This is a systematic review of RCTs with level I-II evidence. Only RCTs reporting clinical outcomes were included in this review. After a search on different databases including PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Ovid MEDLINE, a total of 10 RCTs out of total 51 studies were entered in the study. RTC's were searched from the earliest available records in 2005 to December 2014. Results. Five studies were Level I, and five were Level II. Out of a total of 1101 patients, 562 patients were randomly assigned into the Bryan arthroplasty group and the remaining 539 patients into the ACDF group. The mean follow-up was 30.9 months. Patients undergoing CDA had lower Neck Disability Index, and better SF-36 Physical component scores than ACDF patients. Patients with Bryan CDA had also less radiological degenerative changes at the upper adjacent level. Overall adverse events were twice more frequent in patients with ACDF. The rate of revision surgery including both adjacent and index level were slightly higher in patients with ACDF, showing no statistically significant difference. Conclusions. This review of evidence level I-II RCTs comparing clinical and radiological outcomes of patient undergoing Bryan arthroplasty or ACDF indicated a global superiority of the Bryan disc. The impact of both surgical techniques on the cervical spine (radiological spine deterioration and/or complications) was more severe in patients undergoing ACDF. However, the rate of revision surgeries at any cervical level was equivalent for ACDF and Bryan arthroplasty. These data suggest that even though the loss of motion has a determinant influence in the development of degenerative changes in ACDF cases, these kinematic factors do not imply a higher rate of symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration requiring surgery. Level of Evidence. Level I

Aims

In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the Mobi-C implant in cervical disc degeneration, a randomised study was conducted, comparing the Mobi-C prosthesis arthroplasty with anterior cervical disc fusion (ACDF) in patients with single level cervical spondylosis.

The June 2015 Spine Roundup360 looks at: Less is more in pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis; Paracetamol out of favour in spinal pain but effective for osteoarthritis; Local wound irrigation to reduce infection?; Lumbar facet joint effusion: a reliable prognostic sign?; SPORT for the octogenarian; Neurological deterioration following traumatic spinal cord injury; PROMS in spinal surgery

INTRODUCTION:. As a consequence from cervical arthroplasty, spine structural stiffness, loading and kinematics are changed, resulting in issues like adjacent segment degeneration and altered range of motion. However, complex anatomical structures and lack of adequate precision to study the facet joint (FJ) segmental motion in 3D have prevented proper quantitative analyses. In the current study, we investigate the innovative use of a local coordinate system on the surface of the superior articular process of the caudal vertebral body in order to analyze FJ segmental motion using CT-based 3D vertebral models in flexion/extension. METHODS:. CT images were obtained from six patients (2F/4M, mean age: 53 y.o.) with cervical degenerative disc disease in neutral, flexion and extension positions. CT data was used to create subject-specific surface mesh models of each vertebral body. From these, mean normal vectors were calculated for all FJ surfaces and posterior walls from C3/4 down to C6/7 (Fig. 1). The global coordinate system (x, y, z) corresponds to the CT scanner. Within this system, a new local coordinate system (u, v, w) was set on the centroid of each FJ surface (Fig. 1), where the u-, v-, and w- axes correspond to the normal-to-the-FJ, right-left and cranio-caudal directions, respectively. In flexion/extension, translations in mm were calculated as differences in the FJ centroid position and rotations were calculated in degrees as angular differences of the vector of the opposing surface in flexion/extension. Results are presented as mean ± SD. Differences within vertebral levels and left/right FJs were sought using 1- or 2-way ANOVA, respectively. RESULTS:. The flexion/extension segmental motion was described in its six degrees-of-freedom. Among the three translations, the largest movement was observed in the cranio-caudal direction (u = −0.22 ± 0.47 mm, v = 0.11 ± 0.89 mm, w = −2.06 ± 1.60 mm); while the three rotations about the (u, v, w) axes showed a dominant rotation about the v-axis (u = −0.41 ± 4.42°, v = −5.12 ± 5.61°, w = −0.01 ± 2.71°). Comparing translational and rotational motions by cervical level, movements at C6/7 were shown to be smaller than those at the other levels (p < 0.05) (Figs. 2, 3). There were no significant differences in the movement of the FJ between left and right sides (p > 0.05). DISCUSSION:. A key finding of this study was that along with the expected translation in the w-axis, there was rotation about the v-axis consistent with the overall neck flexion-to-extension motion. If the rotation about the v-axes were negligible, the FJ motion could be considered as a pure translation (sliding), but the data suggests otherwise. This finding supports the hypothesis of a rolling-sliding type of facet segmental motion that might be influenced by the facet surface curvature. Future studies will focus on analyses of the changes in FJ gap with motion and characterization of the facet surfaces' curvature and congruence. SIGNIFICANCE: An innovative look into flexion/extension motion from the FJ point of view describes FJ segmental motion as a sliding-rolling motion instead of the traditional concept of sliding-only mechanism

The December 2013 Spine Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Just how common is lumbar spinal stenosis?; How much will they bleed?; C5 palsy associated with stenosis; Atlanto-axial dislocations revisited; 3D predictors of progression in scoliosis; No difference in outcomes by surgical approach for fusion; Cervical balance changes after thoracolumbar surgery; and spinal surgeons first in space.

In a retrospective cohort study we compared the clinical outcome and complications, including dysphagia, following anterior cervical fusion for the treatment of cervical spondylosis using either a zero-profile (Zero-P; Synthes) implant or an anterior cervical plate and cage. A total of 83 patients underwent fusion using a Zero-P and 107 patients underwent fusion using a plate and cage. The mean follow-up was 18.6 months (sd 4.2) in the Zero-P group and 19.3 months (sd 4.1) in the plate and cage group. All patients in both groups had significant symptomatic and neurological improvement. There were no significant differences between the groups in the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and visual analogue scores at final follow-up. The cervical alignment improved in both groups. There was a higher incidence of dysphagia in the plate and cage group on the day after surgery and at two months post-operatively. All patients achieved fusion and no graft migration or nonunion was observed.

When compared with the traditional anterior cervical plate and cage, the Zero-P implant is a safe and convenient procedure giving good results in patients with symptomatic cervical spondylosis with a reduced incidence of dysphagia post-operatively.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:543–7.

Neck pain can be caused by pressure on the spinal cord or nerve roots from bone or disc impingement. This can be treated by surgically decompressing the cervical spine, which involves excising the bone or disc that is impinging on the nerves or widening the spinal canal or neural foramen. Conventional practise is to fuse the adjacent intervertebral joint after surgery to prevent intervertebral motion and subsequent recompression of the spinal cord or nerve root. However fusion procedures cause physiological stress transfer to adjacent segments which may cause Adjacent Segment Degeneration (ASD), a rapid degeneration of the adjacent discs due to increased stress. ASD is more likely to occur in fusions of two or more levels than single level fusions and is more common where there is existing degeneration of the adjacent discs, which is not unusual in people over 30 years of age. Partial dynamic stabilisation, which generally involves a semi-rigid spinal fixation, allows a controlled amount of intervertebral motion (less than physiological, but more than fusion) to prevent increased stress on the adjacent segments (potentially preventing ASD) whilst still preventing neural recompression. Partial dynamic stabilisation is suitable for treating spinal instability after decompression as well as certain degenerative instabilities and chronic pain syndromes. Dynamic stabilisation and semi-rigid fixation systems for the spine are typically fixated posteriorly. However, choice of posterior surgical stabilisation techniques in the cervical spine is limited due to the size of the osseous material available for fixation and the close proximity of the neural structures and the vertebral artery. Posterior dynamic stabilisation systems for stabilisation of the lumbar spine often use the pedicle as an anchor point. Using the pedicle of the cervical spine as an anchor point is technically difficult because of its small size, angulation and proximity to neurovascular structures. Therefore, one of the main challenges to provide stabilisation in the cervical spine is the limitations of the anatomy. This presentation will introduce a novel spinal implant (patent pending) which is proposed for the cervical spine to provide partial dynamic stabilisation in the C3 to T1 region from a posterior approach. The implant is a single unit with a safe and technically simple insertion technique into the lateral masses. The implant uses a simple mechanism to allow limited intervertebral motion at each instrumented level. It is hoped that the simplicity of the device and removing the need to provide a bone graft anteriorly may reduce the cost of the procedure compared to traditional fusion and competing surgeries

The February 2013 Spine Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: complications with anterior decompression and fusion; lumbar claudication and peripheral vascular disease; increasing cervical instability in rheumatoids; kyphoplasty; cervical stenosis; exercise or fusion for chronic lower back pain; lumbar disc arthroplasty and adjacent level changes; and obese disc prolapses.

The December 2012 Spine Roundup. 360. looks at: the Japanese neck disability index; adjacent segment degeneration; sacroiliac loads determined by limb length discrepancy; whether epidural steroids improve outcome in lumbar disc herniation; spondylodiscitis in infancy; total pedicle screws; and iliac crest autograft complications

Introduction. The degeneration of the adjacent segment in lumbar spine with spondylodesis is well known, though the exact incidence and the mechanism is not clear. Several implants with semi rigid or dynamic behavior are available to reduce the biomechanical loads and to prevent an adjacent segment disease (ASD). Randomized controlled trials are not published. We investigated the biomechanical influence of dynamic and semi rigid implants on the adjacent segment in cadaver lumbar spine with monosegmental fusion (MF). Materials and Methods. 14 fresh cadaver lumbar spines were prepared; capsules and ligaments were kept intact. Pure rotanional moments of ±7.5 Nm were applied with a Zwick 1456 universal testing machine without preload in lateral bending and flexion/extension. The intradiscal pressure (IDP) and the range of motion (ROM) were measured in the segments L2/3 and L3/4 in following situations: in the native spine, monosegmental fusion L4/5 (MF), MF with dynamic rod to L3/4 (Dynabolt), MF with interspinous implant L3/4 (Coflex), and semi rigid fusion with PEEK rod (CD Horizon Legacy) L3-L5. Results. Under flexion load all implants reduced the IDP of segment L2/L3, whereas the IDP in the segment L3/4 was increased using interspinous implants in comparison to the other groups. The IDP was reduced in extension in both segments for all semi rigid or dynamic implants. Compared under extension to the native spine the MF had no influence on the IDP of the adjacent disc. The rod instrumentation (Dynabolt, PEEK rod) lead to a decreased IDP in lateral bending tests. The ROM in L3 was reduced in all groups compared to the native spine. The dynamic and semi rigid stabilization in the segment L3/4 limited the ROM more than the MF. Discussion. The MF reduced the ROM in all directions, whereas the IDP of the adjacent segment remained unaffected. The support of the adjacent segment by semi rigid and dynamic implants decreased the IDP of both segments in extension mainly. This fact is an agreement with other studies. Compared to our data, no significant effect on the adjacent levels was observed. Interestingly, in our study, the IDP of the adjacent segment is unaffected by MF. The biomechanical influence in the view of an ASD could be comprehended, but is not completely clear. The fact of persistent IDP in the adjacent segment suggests that MF has a lower effect on the adjacent segment degeneration as presumed. Biomechanical studies with human cadaver lumbar spines are limited and depend on age and degenerative situation. The effect on supporting implants on adjacent segment disease in lumbar spine surgery has to be investigated in clinical long term studies

The aim of most new implants for cervical disc replacement is to maintain or restore function. The Dynamic Cervical Implant (DCI(tm), Paradigm Spine) aims at combining the advantages of the gold standard fusion technique with the motion preservation philosophy. DCI has a limited motion: it works like a shock absorbing spring and may help to slow down adjacent segment degeneration. Between 2007 and 2009 we selected 79 patients aged 32 to 73 years for treatment with DCI at either one or two levels (10 patients). Indications were radiculopathies (n=45), axial pain (n=4) or spondylotic spinal stenosis (n=30) with out chronic myelopathy. Patients are followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Disc surgery was performed at C3/C4 (n=2), C4/5 (n=6), at C5/6 (n=43), C6/7 (n=37) and at C7/T1 (n=1). In flexion/extension radiographs motion rapidly increased after surgery. However, 5 of 19 treated levels were fused (seen at 6 or 12 months). After implant footprint was changed and larger sizes were provided only 2 of 67 segments fused. Still 96% of the patients rated their clinical result as excellent or good. There were no implant related complications or revision surgery. Disc replacement with DCI is a new strategy that is positioned in between anterior cervical fusion and disc prosthesis. Clinical results are as good as in anterior cervical fusion. Adjacent segment protection must be judged in future follow-ups. We were able to show that the change of implant footprint has significantly reduced fusion rate