Aims

Although there are various pelvic osteotomies for acetabular dysplasia of the hip, shelf operations offer effective and minimally invasive osteotomy. Our study aimed to assess outcomes following modified Spitzy shelf acetabuloplasty.

Aims

Abduction bracing is commonly used to treat developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) following closed reduction and spica casting, with little evidence to support or refute this practice. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of abduction bracing after closed reduction in improving acetabular index (AI) and reducing secondary surgery for residual hip dysplasia.

Aims

Brace treatment is the cornerstone of managing developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), yet there is a lack of evidence-based treatment protocols, which results in wide variations in practice. To resolve this, we have developed a comprehensive nonoperative treatment protocol conforming to published consensus principles, with well-defined a priori criteria for inclusion and successful treatment.

Aims

The aim of this study was to evaluate the epidemiology and treatment of Perthes’ disease of the hip.

Aims

Perthes’ disease is a condition leading to necrosis of the femoral head. It is most common in children aged four to nine years, affecting around one per 1,200 children in the UK. Management typically includes non-surgical treatment options, such as physiotherapy with/without surgical intervention. However, there is significant variation in care with no consensus on the most effective treatment option.

Aims

Open reduction is required following failed conservative treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The Ludloff medial approach is commonly used, but poor results have been reported, with rates of the development of avascular necrosis (AVN) varying between 8% and 54%. This retrospective cohort study evaluates the long-term radiographic and clinical outcome of dislocated hips treated using this approach.

Aims

The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between Salter’s criteria and Kalamchi’s classification of avascular necrosis in patients treated for developmental dysphasia of the hip (DDH).

Aims

The influence of identifiable pre-operative factors on the outcome of eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy (ERAO) is unknown. We aimed to determine the factors that might influence the outcome, in order to develop a scoring system for predicting the prognosis for patients undergoing this procedure.

Aims. This study compared the long-term results following Salter osteotomy and Pemberton acetabuloplasty in children with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). We assessed if there was a greater increase in pelvic height following the Salter osteotomy, and if this had a continued effect on pelvic tilt, lumbar curvature or functional outcomes. Patients and Methods. We reviewed 42 children at more than ten years post-operatively following a unilateral Salter osteotomy or Pemberton acetabuloplasty. We measured the increase in pelvic height and the iliac crest tilt and sacral tilt at the most recent review and at an earlier review point in the first decade of follow-up. We measured the lumbar Cobb angle and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Harris hip scores were collected at the most recent review. Results. During the first decade of follow-up, there was a greater increase in pelvic height in the children who had a Salter osteotomy (Salter, 10.1%; Pemberton, 4.3%, p < 0.001). The difference in the increase in pelvic height was insignificant at the most recent review (Salter, 4.4%; Pemberton, 3.1%, p = 0.249). There was no significant difference between the two groups for the lumbar Cobb angle, (Salter, 3.1°; Pemberton, 3.3°, p = 0.906). A coronal lumbar curve was seen in 41 children (97%), 30 of these had a compensatory curve. Sacral tilt was the radiographic parameter for pelvic imbalance that correlated most with the lumbar Cobb angle (Pearson correlation co-efficient 0.59). The Harris hip score and SF-36 were good and showed no differences between the two groups. Conclusion. In the long-term, we found no difference in the functional results or pelvic imbalance between Salter osteotomy and Pemberton acetabuloplasty in the management of children with DDH. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1145–50

Successful management of late presenting hip dislocation in childhood is judged by the outcome not just at skeletal maturity but well beyond into adulthood and late middle age. This review considers different methods of treatment and looks critically at the handful of studies reporting long-term follow-up after successful reduction.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:729–33.

Salter innominate osteotomy is an effective reconstructive procedure for the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), but some children have a poor outcome at skeletal maturity. In order to investigate factors associated with an unfavourable outcome, we assessed the development of the contralateral hip. We retrospectively reviewed 46 patients who underwent a unilateral Salter osteotomy at between five and seven years of age, with a mean follow-up of 10.3 years (7 to 20). The patients were divided into three groups according to the centre–edge angle (CEA) of the contralateral hip at skeletal maturity: normal (> 25°, 22 patients), borderline (20° to 25°, 17 patients) and dysplastic (<  20°, 7 patients). The CEA of the affected hip was measured pre-operatively, at eight to nine years of age, at 11 to 12 years of age and at skeletal maturity. The CEA of the affected hip was significantly smaller in the borderline and dysplastic groups at 11 and 12 years of age (p = 0.012) and at skeletal maturity (p = 0.017) than in the normal group. Severin group III was seen in two (11.8%) and four hips (57.1%) of the borderline and dysplastic groups, respectively (p < 0.001). . Limited individual development of the acetabulum was associated with an unfavourable outcome following Salter osteotomy. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1419–23

The June 2014 Children’s orthopaedics Roundup. 360 . looks at: plaster wedging in paediatric forearm fractures; the medial approach for DDH; Ponseti – but not as he knew it?; Salter osteotomy more accurate than Pemberton in DDH; is the open paediatric fracture an emergency?; bang up-to-date with femoral external fixation; indomethacin, heterotopic ossification and cerebral palsy hips; lengthening nails for congenital femoral deformities, and is MRI the answer to imaging of the physis?

The December 2013 Children’s orthopaedics Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Long term-changes in hip morphology following osteotomy; Arthrogrypotic wrist contractures are surgically amenable; Paediatric femoral lengthening over a nail; Current management of paediatric supracondylar fractures; MRI perfusion index predictive of Perthes’ progression; Abduction bracing effective in residual acetabular deformity; Hurler syndrome in the spotlight; and the Pavlik works for femoral fractures too!

Purpose of the study. This study aims to evaluate the use of closed reduction of hips with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and medial open reduction of these hips as a subsection of closed reduced hips. Methods. The study was a retrospective analysis of treatment of 30 children with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). These children were taken from a consecutive series of children treated over a period from June 2000 to 2011 with closed reduction by a single surgeon. The ages at the time of diagnosis were between 1 day and 13 months (mean 5.25 weeks). Included in this series are 7 patients treated with medial open reduction, all done with the Ludloff approach. Follow up of these patients was from 8 months to 12 years (mean 5 years). All patients needing secondary procedures were noted. The X- rays were evaluated for percentage acetabulum cover in patients over the age of 8 and improvement of the acetabular index in all these patients. Results. 4 children needed secondary procedures. 1 child of the closed reduction group developed avascular necrosis of the femoral head that was treated with a Salter osteotomy and a further 2 needed secondary open reductions after redislocation following initial closed reduction. One child with bilateral open medial reductions had a Salter osteotomy 6 years after the initial treatment was done. 26 of the children had good outcomes with improvement of the acetabular angles, percentage acetabular cover and pain free independent ambulation. The average acetabular index improved from 37.5° to 23.3°. Conclusion. Closed reduction of DDH hips is a good treatment modality. Early treatment allows for acetabular and femoral development. There are minimal secondary procedures necessary after closed reduction, and open medial reduction does not increase the complication rate. NO DISCLOSURES

The December 2012 Children’s orthopaedics Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: whether arthrodistraction is the answer to Perthes’ disease; deformity correction in tarsal coalitions; ultrasound used to predict pain in Osgood-Schlatter’s disease; acetabular tilt; hip replacement for juvenile arthritis sufferers; whether post-operative radiographs are needed for supracondylar fractures; intra-articular local anaesthetic following supracondylar fracture fixation; and limb deformity.

The management of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) requiring open reduction between 12 and 18 months of age is controversial. We compare the outcome of medial approach open reduction (MAOR) versus delayed anterior open reduction with Salter osteotomy in such patients. 17 consecutive patients who underwent MAOR aged 12–20 months were reviewed (mean follow-up of 40 months, range 6–74). This group was compared to 15 controls who underwent anterior reduction and Salter osteotomy aged 18–23 months (mean follow-up of 44 months, range 14–134). 13 of the 17 (76%) MAOR patients required subsequent Salter osteotomy at a mean of 22 months post-reduction, with a further 2 patients under follow-up being likely to require one. Acetabular index improved from 42 (32–50, SD − 5.5) to 16 (7–24, SD − 4.5) in the MOAR group after Salter osteotomy compared to an improvement of 40 (30–53, SD − 6) to 13 (4–24, SD − 5) in the control group (p>0.05). Acetabular index at last follow-up was within normal limits in 15 of 17 (88%) MAOR patients. All patients in the control group had acetabular indices (or centre-edge angles of Wiberg) within the normal range. There was 1 subluxation (7%) in the control group. There were 6 cases (33%) of post-operative avascular necrosis (5 Kalamchi & MacEwen Grade I, 1 Grade 2) in the MAOR group and 6 (40%) in the control group (5 Grade 1, 1 Grade 4). All of the MAOR patients had good or excellent clinical results according to McKay's criteria, compared to 14 out of 15 (93%) controls. This study suggests that MAOR or delayed open reduction and Salter osteotomy is a reasonable treatment for children with DDH presenting between the ages of 12 and 18 months. However, the majority of MAORs are likely to require a subsequent Salter osteotomy

Purpose of study. The management of developmental hip dysplasia requiring open reduction between 12 and 18 months of age is controversial. We compare the outcome of medial approach open reduction (MAOR) versus anterior open reduction with Salter osteotomy (delayed until the child is of sufficient size) in such patients. Patients and methods. 19 consecutive patients who underwent MAOR aged 12-22 months were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 3.5 years (range: 1.0-6.2). This group was compared to 14 patients who underwent anterior reduction and Salter osteotomy aged 18-23 months (mean follow-up 4.1 years). Results. There was 1 mild subluxation and 1 re-dislocation in the MAOR group. The anterior reduction group had 2 mild subluxations. 14 of the 19 (74%) MAOR patients required subsequent Salter osteotomy at a mean of 22 months post-reduction, with another 2 patients under follow-up being likely to require one. There were 4 cases (21%) of post-operative avascular necrosis in the MAOR group (Kalamchi and MacEwen grade I) and 7 cases (50%) in the anterior reduction group. All patients had good or excellent clinical results according to the McKay criteria. Acetabular index at last follow-up was within normal limits in 16 of 19 (84%) MAOR patients; 2 of the 3 with abnormal acetabular indices had not (yet) undergone Salter osteotomy. All patients in the anterior reduction group had acetabular indices (or centre-edge angles of Wiberg) within the normal range. Conclusion. This study suggests that MAOR is a reasonable treatment for children presenting with developmental dysplasia of the hip between the ages of 12 and 18 months requiring open reduction. However, the majority are likely to require a subsequent Salter osteotomy

Method. The anteroposterior pelvic radiographs of 84 children (87 hips with developmental dysplasia) seen between 1995 and 2004 were reviewed retrospectively. Each radiograph was photographed digitally and converted to the negative using Microsoft Photo Editor. Arthrograms were also assessed at the time of femoral head reduction. The acetabular index (AI) and femoral head deformity were assessed. Acetabular response was measured using the AI at 6 and 12 months post-reduction. Results. Mean age at presentation was 11 months for the closed reduction group, versus 19 months for those with an arthrographic soft tissue obstruction requiring open reduction. Additionally, the average age of the children that underwent open reduction who later required a Salter osteotomy was 27 ± 3 months compared to an average of 14 ± 1.5 months for those who did not. The acetabular response was maximal during the first 6 months following treatment. Closed reduction (24 hips) gave comparable results to open reduction (63 hips), although the initial AI was greater in those requiring open reduction (39.5 ± 6.3° versus 36.1 ± 4.6°). Using two separate Bonferroni pairwise comparisons revealed no statistical difference in response between closed and open reduction. Arthrography revealed that hips requiring open reduction were more deformed, with spherical femoral heads in 29% as opposed to 68% in the closed reduction group. The AI was also slightly less (36.6 ± 3.2°) when the femoral head was spherical in comparison to those hips with an aspherical femoral head (38.0 ± 6.6°). Conclusion. Age at presentation and femoral head deformity therefore influence the outcome of reduction, but the acetabular index improves to a similar degree whether closed or open reduction is required

Purpose: Iatrogenic acetabular retroversion is a known complication after pelvic osteotomy leading to persistent hip pain and increasing risk of subsequent osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study is to document the incidence of acetabular retroversion and signs of impingement in patients who have had a Salter pelvic osteotomy in childhood. Method: Twenty eight patients (32 hips) had a Salter Osteotomy between 1980 and 1999, 16 were lost to follow-up. Of the 12 studied, eight had a diagnosis of DDH and four had Legg Calve Perthes. Clinical assessment for the presence of the impingement sign, range of motion and leg length discrepancy was done as well as functional scores. AP pelvic radiographs were taken to assess acetabular retroversion (cross-over or ischial sign), osteoarthritis using the Tonnis grade, center-edge and Tonnis angles. Results: The mean age of the sample was 17.25 years (SD=7.27) with a mean follow-up of 10.56 years (SD=6.27). Impingement sign was positive in seven patients (58.3%). Nine out of the 12 had acetabular retroversion. Nine had Tonnis grade 1, two Tonnis grade 2, and one had a Tonnis grade 3. Mean center edge and Tonnis angles were 26° (SD=16.43) and 9.09° (SD=6.49), respectively. There was no correlation between presence of acetabular retroversion with Tonnis grade (p=.700), hip pain (p=.317) or impingement sign (p=.621). Conclusion: Retroversion is highly prevalent (69.2%) in patients who underwent a Salter pelvic osteotomy for a childhood hip disease. Although acetabular retroversion is a known cause of impingement in adulthood, our patient cohort was too small to detect a significant impact on the functional scores