The August 2024 Wrist & Hand Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Methotrexate shows potential in reducing pain for hand osteoarthritis with synovitis; Circumferential casting versus plaster splinting in adult distal radius fractures: the CAST study findings; Surgery shows superior long-term success for Dupuytren contracture compared to needle fasciotomy and collagenase injection; Evolving trends in surgical management of wrist arthritis: a decade-long national analysis; Mid-term outcomes of three commonly used surgical reconstructions for scapholunate instability; SLAC and SNAC: what is the evidence for treatment?; Steroids for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis?; When is it safe to return to driving after distal radius fracture fixation? A prospective study.

Aims

The primary aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of recruiting and retaining patients to a patient-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing corticosteroid injection (CSI) to autologous protein solution (APS) injection for the treatment of subacromial shoulder pain in a community care setting. The study focused on recruitment rates and retention of participants throughout, and collected data on the interventions’ safety and efficacy.

Background. The PATH-2 trial found no evidence of a benefit of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) injection versus a placebo after Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) at six-months. ATR often leave longer-term functional deficiencies beyond six-months. This study aim is to determine if PRP affect tendon functional outcomes at two-years after rupture. Study design. Randomised multi-centre two-arm parallel-group, participant- and assessor-blinded, superiority trial. Methods. Adults with acute ATR managed non-surgically were recruited in 19 UK hospitals from 2015 to 2019. Exclusions were insertion or musculotendinous injuries, leg injury or deformity, diabetes, haematological disorder, corticosteroids and anticoagulation therapy. Participants were randomised via an online system 1:1 to PRP or placebo. Primary outcome was Achilles Tendon Rupture Score (ATRS) at two-years. Secondary outcomes were pain, Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS), SF-12 and re-rupture. Assessors were blinded. Intention-to-treat and Compliance Average Causal effects (CACE) analyses were carried out. Consistency of effects across subgroups age, BMI, smoking and gender were assessed using Forest plots. Pearson's correlation was used to explore ATRS correlation with blood and growth factors. Results. 216/230 (94%) participants completed the 6-months follow-up were contacted. 182/216 (84%) completed the two-year follow-up. Participants were aged mean 46 (SD 13.0), 57 female/159 male. 96% received the allocated intervention. Two-years ATRS scores were 82.2 (SD 18.3) in the PRP group (n=85) and 83.8 (SD 16.0) in the placebo group (n=92). There was no evidence of a difference in the two-years ATRS (adjusted-mean difference −0.752 95%CI −5.523 to 4.020, p=0.757), or in any secondary outcome, and no re-rupture between at two-years. Neither PRP cellular or growth factors correlated with the two-year ATRS. Conclusion. PRP did not improve patient-reported function or quality of life two-years after acute Achilles tendon rupture, compared with placebo, indicating that PRP offers no patient benefit in the longer term

The June 2024 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Reverse versus anatomical total shoulder replacement for osteoarthritis? A UK national picture; Acute rehabilitation following traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation (ARTISAN): pragmatic, multicentre, randomized controlled trial; acid for rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials; Metal or ceramic humeral head total shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of data from the National Joint Registry; Platelet-rich plasma has better results for long-term functional improvement and pain relief for lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials; Quantitative fatty infiltration and 3D muscle volume after nonoperative treatment of symptomatic rotator cuff tears: a prospective MRI study of 79 patients; Locking plates for non-osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures in the long term; A systematic review of the treatment of primary acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis.

Aims. Intra-articular (IA) injection may be used when treating hip osteoarthritis (OA). Common injections include steroids, hyaluronic acid (HA), local anaesthetic, and platelet-rich plasma (PRP). Network meta-analysis allows for comparisons between two or more treatment groups and uses direct and indirect comparisons between interventions. This network meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy of various IA injections used in the management of hip OA with a follow-up of up to six months. Methods. This systematic review and network meta-analysis used a Bayesian random-effects model to evaluate the direct and indirect comparisons among all treatment options. PubMed, Web of Science, Clinicaltrial.gov, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to February 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which evaluate the efficacy of HA, PRP, local anaesthetic, steroid, steroid+anaesthetic, HA+PRP, and physiological saline injection as a placebo, for patients with hip OA were included. Results. In this meta-analysis of 16 RCTs with a total of 1,735 participants, steroid injection was found to be significantly more effective than placebo injection on reported pain at three months, but no significant difference was observed at six months. Furthermore, steroid injection was considerably more effective than placebo injection for functional outcomes at three months, while the combination of HA+PRP injection was substantially more effective at six months. Conclusion. Evidence suggests that steroid injection is more effective than saline injection for the treatment of hip joint pain, and restoration of functional outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(6):532–539

Background. Disability and slow return to sport and work after tendon rupture are major challenges. Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) is an autologous supraphysiological concentration of platelets from whole blood that has demonstrated positive cellular and physiological effects on healing in laboratory conditions but evidence from adequately powered robust clinical trials is lacking. We aimed to determine the clinical efficacy of PRP for treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture. Methods. In a placebo-controlled, participant- and assessor-blinded, trial at 19 NHS hospitals we randomly assigned 230 adults starting acute Achilles rupture non-surgical management to PRP injection or dry-needle insertion (placebo) to the rupture gap under local anaesthetic. Patients with confounding or contraindicated concurrent medical conditions were excluded. The primary outcome was muscle-tendon function, assessed by the limb symmetry index (LSI, uninjured limb/injured limb × 100, higher scores better) of the work (Joules) performed during the heel-rise endurance test at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes were: Achilles Tendon Rupture Score (ATRS, 0–100, higher scores better), quality of life (SF-12), pain, and goal attainment. Trial registration: ISRCTN54992179. Results. Participants were aged mean 46 years and 57 (25%) were female. 103/114 (90%) of the PRP group and all (n=116) in the placebo group received allocated treatment. At 24 weeks, mean LSI was 34.4 for the PRP group and 38.8 for placebo (adjusted mean difference −4.4 95% CI −11.2 to 2.5, n=201) and ATRS was mean 65.2 PRP vs 65.8 (adjusted mean difference −0.6, 95% CI −4.9 to 3.7, n=224). There were no differences between groups in the other secondary outcomes. Conclusion. We found no evidence of PRP efficacy for improving muscle-tendon function or patient-reported recovery after acute Achilles tendon rupture. Our findings challenge the increasing global use of PRP for acute tendon injury and indicate that robust evaluations are required in other applications

Biofabrication is a popular technique to produce personalized constructs for tissue engineering. In this study we combined laponite (Lap), gellan gum (GG) with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) aiming to enhance the endothelial regeneration through the synergistic effects of their individual properties. Laponite has the ability to form porous three-dimensional networks mimicking the extracellular matrix structure, and PRP delivery of growth factors stimulates the endothelial cell proliferation and migration, offering a composite bioink for cell growth and support. The sustained release of these growth factors from the GG-laponite-PRP composite material over time provides a continuous source of stimulation for the cells, leading to more effective tissue engineering strategies for endothelial tissue regeneration. Four blend compositions comprising 1% w/v GG and 0.5 or 1% w/v Lap and 25% v/v PRP were combined with Wharton jelly mesenchymal stem cells (WJ-MSCs) and bioprinted into vessel-like structures with an inner diameter of 3 mm and a wall thickness of 1 mm. Stress/strain analysis revealed the elastomeric properties of the hydrogels with Young modulus values of 10 MPa. Increasing the Lap concentration led to a non-significant decrease of swelling ratio from 93 to 91%. Live/dead assay revealed cell viability of at least 76%, with the 0.5%Lap-GG viability exceeding 99% on day 21. Gradual increase of glycosaminoglycans accumulation and collagen production indicate promotion of ECM formation. The expression and membranous localization of PECAM-1 from day 7 and the granular intracellular localization of vWF after 2 weeks demonstrate in vitro endothelial functionality. In vivo subcutaneous implantation indicated the absence of any adverse immunological reactions. The results reveal the expression of both vWF and PECAM-1 by WJ-MSCs entrapped in all four construct compositions with significantly higher expression of vWF in the presence of PRP

Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP), either rich (L-PRP) or poor (P-PRP) of leukocytes, is frequently used as an anti-inflammatory and regenerative tool in osteoarthritis (OA). PRP contains proteins but not genes as it is derived from megakaryocytes. Proteomics but not metabolomics of PRP was recently studied. Metabolomics is a field of ‘omics’ research involved in comprehensive portrayal of the small molecules, metabolites, in the metabolome. These small molecules can be endogenous metabolites or exogenous compounds found in an organism (1). Our aim was to determine the difference between L-PRP and P-PRP. A cross-sectional clinical study was designed in six recreational male athletes between the ages of 18 and 35 years. 3 mL P-PRP and 3 mL -LPRP was prepared from 60 mL of venous blood after treating with 9 mL of sodium citrate and centrifugation at 2.700 rpm for 10 min. Half of the prepared PRP's were frozen at −20°C for a week. Fresh and frozen samples were analyzed at the Q-TOF LC/MS device after thawing to room temperature. Untargeted metabolomic results revealed that the metabolomic profile of the L-PRP and P-PRP were significantly different from each other. A total of 33.438 peaks were found. Statistically significant (p<0.05) peaks were uploaded to the MetaboAnalyst 5.0 platform. Exogenous out of 2.308 metabolites were eliminated and metabolites found significant for our study were subjected to pathway analysis. Steroid biosynthesis, sphingolipid metabolism and metabolism of lipid pathways were affected. In the L-PRP samples, Nicotinamide riboside (FC: 2.2), MHPG (FC: 3.0), estrone sulfate (FC: 7.5), thiamine diphosphate (FC: 2.0), leukotriene E4 (FC: 7.5), PC(18:1 (9Z)e/2:0) (FC: 9.8) and Ap4A (FC: 2.1) were higher compared to P-PRP. C24 sulfatide (FC: −11.8), 3-hexaprenyl-4,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (FC: −2.8) metabolites were furthermore lower in P-PRP. Clinical outcomes of PRP application should consider these metabolic pathways in future studies (2)

Degenerative disc disease, associated to low back pain, afflicts more than 50% of humans, and represents a major healthcare problem, especially for the pathology initiation. Current treatments range from conservative strategies to more invasive surgical techniques, such as disc removal and vertebral fusion. In the Intervertebral Disease (IVD) the nucleus pulposus (NP) degeneration is a key factor for the pathology initiation. Several tissue engineering approaches aiming to restore the appropriate NP cell (NPCs) and matrix content, were attempted by using adult stromal cells either from bone marrow or adipose tissue, chondrocytes, notochordal cells and more recently also pluripotent stem cells. However, none was fully satisfactory since the NP acid and a-vascularized environment appeared averse to the implanted heterologous cells. Several studies demonstrated the efficacy of platelet derivatives such as platelet rich plasma (PRP) in promoting the regeneration of connective tissues. We investigated the efficacy of PRP on NPCs proliferation and differentiation with the goal to propose the direct stimulation of resident cells (stimulation of endogenous cells – less invasive surgical procedure) or the implantation of NPCs expanded in vitro in the presence of PRP as therapeutic agents in IVD degeneration. NPCs were isolated from small fragments of NP explants, cultivated in medium supplemented with PRP or FCS (standard condition control) and characterized by FACS analysis for the expression of the typical mesenchymal stem cells markers CD34, CD44, CD45, CD73, CD90 and CD105. NPCs cultured in PL showed a phenotypic profile like the cells cultured in FCS. However, compared to NPCs expanded in the presence of FCS, NPCs expanded in PRP showed a much better proliferation and differentiation capacity. NPCs differentiation was evaluated by the cell ability to produce an organized metachromatic cartilaginous matrix, confirmed by the positive immunohistochemical staining for chondrogenic markers

Various approaches have been implemented to enhance bone regeneration, including the utilization of autologous platelet-rich plasma and bone morphogenetic protein-2. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of Marburg Bone Bank-derived bone grafts in conjunction with platelet-rich plasma (PRP), recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2), and zoledronic acid (ZA) on osteogenesis within rabbit bone defects. Methodology. Bone defects (5mm in diameter) were created in the femurs of 96 male rabbits. The animals were allocated into five groups: (1) bone graft + PRP (BG + PRP), (2) bone graft + 5μg rhBMP-2 (BG + rhBMP-2), (3) bone graft + 5μg ZA (BG + ZA), (4) bone graft + 10μg rhBMP-2 + 5μg ZA (BG + rhBMP-2 + ZA), and (5) bone graft (BG). Marburg Bone Bank-processed human femoral head allografts were utilized for bone grafting. The rabbits were euthanized at 14-, 30-, and 60-days post-surgery, and their femurs underwent histopathological and histomorphometric assessments. Results. Histomorphometric analysis revealed significantly enhanced de novo osteogenesis within the bone allografts in the BG + PRP and BG + rhBMP-2 groups compared to the BG, BG + ZA, and BG + rhBMP-2 + ZA groups at 14 and 30 days (p < 0.05). However, on day 60, the BG + rhBMP-2 group exhibited elevated osteoclastic activity (early resorption). The local co-administration of ZA with thermally treated grafts impeded both bone graft resorption and new bone formation within the bone defect across all time points. The addition of ZA to BG + rhBMP-2 resulted in diminished osteogenic activity compared to the BG + rhBMP-2 group (p < 0.000). Conclusion. The study findings indicated that the combination of PRP and rhBMP-2 with Marburg bone grafts facilitates early-stage osteogenesis in bone defect healing. Incorporating ZA into the thermally treated bone graft hinders both graft resorption and de novo bone formation

Aims

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nanoparticles secreted by all cells, enriched in proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids related to cell-to-cell communication and vital components of cell-based therapies. Mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC)-derived EVs have been studied as an alternative for osteoarthritis (OA) treatment. However, their clinical translation is hindered by industrial and regulatory challenges. In contrast, platelet-derived EVs might reach clinics faster since platelet concentrates, such as platelet lysates (PL), are already used in therapeutics. Hence, we aimed to test the therapeutic potential of PL-derived extracellular vesicles (pEVs) as a new treatment for OA, which is a degenerative joint disease of articular cartilage and does not have any curative or regenerative treatment, by comparing its effects to those of human umbilical cord MSC-derived EVs (cEVs) on an ex vivo OA-induced model using human cartilage explants.

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been demonstrated to benefit a variety of disciplines. But there exists heterogeneity in results obtained due to lack of standardization of the preparation protocols employed in them. We aim to identify and standardize a preparation protocol for PRP with maximum recovery of platelets to obtain reproducible results across studies. Blood samples were collected from 20 healthy volunteers. The double spin protocol of PRP preparation was analyzed for variables such as centrifugal acceleration, time, and volume of blood processed and final product utilized. The final PRP prepared was investigated for platelet recovery, concentration, integrity, and viability. We noted maximum platelet recovery (86-99%) with a mean concentration factor of 6-times baseline, with double centrifugation protocol at 100xg and 1600xg for 20 minutes each. We also noted that 10 ml of blood in a 15 ml tube was the ideal volume of blood to be processed to maximize platelet recovery. We demonstrated that the lower 1/3rd is the ideal volume to be utilized for clinical application. We did not note a loss of integrity or viability of the platelets in the final product from the above-said protocol. Preparation of PRP by the double spin protocol of 10 ml of blood at 100xg and 1600xg for 20 minutes each in a 15ml tube and using the lower 1/3rd of the final product demonstrated consistent high platelet recovery (86-99%) and concentration (6x) without disturbing the platelet integrity or viability

We performed this systematic overview on the overlapping meta-analyses that analyzed autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as an adjuvant in the repair of rotator cuff tears and identify the studies which provide the current best evidence on this subject and generate recommendations for the same. We conducted independent and duplicate electronic database searches in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects on September 8, 2021, to identify meta-analyses that analyzed the efficacy of PRP as an adjuvant in the repair of rotator cuff tears. Methodological quality assessment was made using Oxford Levels of Evidence, AMSTAR scoring, and AMSTAR 2 grades and used the Jadad decision algorithm to generate recommendations. 20 meta-analyses fulfilling the eligibility criteria were included. The AMSTAR scores of the included studies varied from 6–10 (mean:7.9). All the included studies had critically low reliability in their summary of results due to their methodological flaws according to AMSTAR 2 grades. The initial size of the tear and type of repair performed do not seem to affect the benefit of PRPs. Among the different preparations used, leucocyte poor (LP)-PRP possibly offers the greatest benefit as a biological augment in these situations. Based on this systematic overview, we give a Level II recommendation that intra-operative use of PRPs at the bone-tendon interface can augment the healing rate, reduce re-tears, enhance the functional outcomes and mitigate pain in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

The April 2023 Knee Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Does bariatric surgery reduce complications after total knee arthroplasty?; Mid-flexion stability in total knee arthroplasties implanted with kinematic alignment: posterior-stabilized versus medial-stabilized implants; Inflammatory response in robotic-arm-assisted versus conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty; Journey II bicruciate stabilized (JII-BCS) and GENESIS II total knee arthroplasty: the CAPAbility, blinded, randomized controlled trial; Lifetime risk of revision and patient factors; Platelet-rich plasma use for hip and knee osteoarthritis in the USA; Where have the knee revisions gone?; Tibial component rotation in total knee arthroplasty: CT-based study of 1,351 tibiae.

The February 2023 Research Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Clinical and epidemiological features of scaphoid fracture nonunion; Routine sterile glove and instrument change at the time of abdominal wound closure to prevent surgical site infection (ChEETAh); Characterization of genetic risk of end-stage knee osteoarthritis treated with total knee arthroplasty; Platelet-rich plasma or autologous blood injection for plantar fasciitis; Volume and outcomes of joint arthroplasty; The hazards of absolute belief in the p-value laid bare.

Aims. To determine whether platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection improves outcomes two years after acute Achilles tendon rupture. Methods. A randomized multicentre two-arm parallel-group, participant- and assessor-blinded superiority trial was undertaken. Recruitment commenced on 28 July 2015 and two-year follow-up was completed in 21 October 2019. Participants were 230 adults aged 18 years and over, with acute Achilles tendon rupture managed with non-surgical treatment from 19 UK hospitals. Exclusions were insertion or musculotendinous junction injuries, major leg injury or deformity, diabetes, platelet or haematological disorder, medication with systemic corticosteroids, anticoagulation therapy treatment, and other contraindicating conditions. Participants were randomized via a central online system 1:1 to PRP or placebo injection. The main outcome measure was Achilles Tendon Rupture Score (ATRS) at two years via postal questionnaire. Other outcomes were pain, recovery goal attainment, and quality of life. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. Results. A total of 230 participants were randomized, 114 to PRP and 116 to placebo. Two-year questionnaires were sent to 216 participants who completed a six-month questionnaire. Overall, 182/216 participants (84%) completed the two-year questionnaire. Participants were aged a mean of 46 years (SD 13.0) and 25% were female (57/230). The majority of participants received the allocated intervention (219/229, 96%). Mean ATRS scores at two years were 82.2 (SD 18.3) in the PRP group (n = 85) and 83.8 (SD 16.0) in the placebo group (n = 92). There was no evidence of a difference in the ATRS at two years (adjusted mean difference -0.752, 95% confidence interval -5.523 to 4.020; p = 0.757) or in other secondary outcomes, and there were no re-ruptures between 24 weeks and two years. Conclusion. PRP injection did not improve patient-reported function or quality of life two years after acute Achilles tendon rupture compared with placebo. The evidence from this study indicates that PRP offers no patient benefit in the longer term for patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(11):1256–1265

Abstract. Introduction. This study aimed to assess the effect of PRP on knee articular cartilage content (thickness and/or volume) and establish if there is a correlation between changes in cartilage and clinical outcomes in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Methodology. A systematic review was performed following the Cochrane methodology. Studies were included if they reported on cartilage content with MRI or Ultrasound before and after the injection. A random-effects model meta-analysis was performed. Results. 11 studies (n=786) from 1,453 records met the inclusion criteria, with five (n=444) being RCTs. The PRP treatment protocol varied widely. Follow-up ranged from 6–12 months. Eight studies reported increase in cartilage content in the PRP group as compared to control (four showing significant difference). In meta-analysis: PRP treatment was not associated with a significant increase in cartilage thickness in medial and lateral femoral condyle, or in the overall cartilage content (4 studies, n=187, Hedges’ g: 0.079; 95%CI: 0.358-0.516; p=0.723). Meta-analysis of 3 RCTs (n=112) showed no significant difference in increasing cartilage content overall with PRP injections compared with no PRP (Hedges’ g: 0.217; 95%CI: -0.177 – 0.611; P=0.281). There was no correlation between changes in cartilage and clinical outcomes following PRP treatment. Conclusion. Treatment of knee osteoarthritis with PRP is not associated with a significant increase in articular cartilage content and any effect on cartilage is not associated with better clinical outcomes. A multi-centre, adequately powered RCT, with a standardized preparation / administration protocol assessing long-term effect of PRP in knee osteoarthritis is needed to guide clinical care

Aims. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) intra-articular injections may provide a simple and minimally invasive treatment for early-stage knee osteoarthritis (OA). This has led to an increase in its adoption as a treatment for knee OA, although there is uncertainty about its efficacy and benefit. We hypothesized that patients with early-stage symptomatic knee OA who receive multiple PRP injections will have better clinical outcomes than those receiving single PRP or placebo injections. Methods. A double-blinded, randomized placebo-controlled trial was performed with three groups receiving either placebo injections (Normal Saline), one PRP injection followed by two placebo injections, or three PRP injections. Each injection was given one week apart. Outcomes were prospectively collected prior to intervention and then at six weeks, three months, six months, and 12 months post-intervention. Primary outcome measures were Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and EuroQol five-dimension five-level index (EQ-5D-5L). Secondary outcomes included visual analogue scale for pain and patient subjective assessment of the injections. Results. A total of 102 patients were recruited. The follow-up period was 12 months, at intervals of six weeks, 12 weeks, six months, and 12 months. KOOS-Total significantly improved in all groups at these time intervals compared to pre-injection. There was an improvement in EQ-5D-5L index scores in saline and single injection groups, but not in the multiple injection group. Comparison of treatment groups showed no additional beneficial effect of single or multiple PRP injections above that displayed in the saline injection group. Subjective patient satisfaction and recommendation of treatment received demonstrated a similar pattern in all the groups. There was no indication of superiority of either single or multiple PRP injections compared to saline injections. Conclusion. There is no evidence that single or multiple PRP had any additional beneficial effect compared to saline injection up to 12 months, follow-up after treatment of early stage symptomatic OA of the knee. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(6):663–671