Aims

Ankle fracture is one of the most common musculoskeletal injuries sustained in the UK. Many patients experience pain and physical impairment, with the consequences of the fracture and its management lasting for several months or even years. The broad aim of ankle fracture treatment is to maintain the alignment of the joint while the fracture heals, and to reduce the risks of problems, such as stiffness. More severe injuries to the ankle are routinely treated surgically. However, even with advances in surgery, there remains a risk of complications; for patients experiencing these, the associated loss of function and quality of life (Qol) is considerable. Non-surgical treatment is an alternative to surgery and involves applying a cast carefully shaped to the patient’s ankle to correct and maintain alignment of the joint with the key benefit being a reduction in the frequency of common complications of surgery. The main potential risk of non-surgical treatment is a loss of alignment with a consequent reduction in ankle function. This study aims to determine whether ankle function, four months after treatment, in patients with unstable ankle fractures treated with close contact casting is not worse than in those treated with surgical intervention, which is the current standard of care.

Aims

A core outcome set for adult, open lower limb fracture has been established consisting of ‘Walking, gait and mobility’, ‘Being able to return to life roles’, ‘Pain or discomfort’, and ‘Quality of life’. This study aims to identify which outcome measurement instruments (OMIs) should be recommended to measure each core outcome.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(6):590–592.

Aims

Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) and revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) are complex procedures with higher rates of re-revision, complications, and mortality compared to primary TKA and THA. We report the effects of the establishment of a revision arthroplasty network (the East Midlands Specialist Orthopaedic Network; EMSON) on outcomes of rTKA and rTHA.

Aims

Open lower limb fracture is life-changing, resulting in substantial morbidity and resource demand, while inconsistent outcome-reporting hampers systematic review and meta-analysis. A core outcome set establishes consensus among key stakeholders for the recommendation of a minimum set of outcomes. This study aims to define a core outcome set for adult open lower limb fracture.

Aims

The aim of this study was to develop a core outcome set of what to measure in all future clinical research on hand fractures and joint injuries in adults.

Aim. Culture negative (CN) prosthetic joint infections (PJI) account for approximately 10% of all PJIs and present significant challenges for clinicians. We aimed to explore the significance of CN PJI within a large prospective cohort study, and to compare their characteristics and outcomes with culture positive cases. Methods. The Prosthetic joint Infection in Australia and New Zealand Observational (PIANO) study is a prospective, binational, multicentre observational cohort study conducted at 27 hospitals between July 2014 and December 2017. We compared baseline characteristics and outcomes of all patients with culture negative (CN) prosthetic joint infection (PJI) from the PIANO cohort with culture positive (CP) cases. “Treatment success” was defined as absence of clinical or microbiological signs of infection, no need for ongoing antibiotics, and no need for revision or resection arthroplasty since the end of the initial treatment. We also describe PJI diagnostic criteria in the CN cohort and apply internationally recognised PJI diagnostic guidelines. Results. Of the 650 patients eligible for inclusion, 55 (8.5%) were CN and 595 were CP. Compared with the CP cohort, CN patients were more likely to be female [32 (58.2%) vs 245 (41.2%); p=0.02], involve the shoulder joint [5 (9.1%) vs. 16 (2.7%); p=0.03] and have a lower mean C-reactive protein (142 mg/L vs. 187 mg/L; p=0.02). Overall, outcomes were superior in CN patients, with culture negativity an independent predictor of treatment success at 24 months (aOR 3.78; 95%CI 1.65 – 8.67). Of the 55 CN cases meeting Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) diagnostic criteria, 45 (82%) met European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) criteria (probable or definite) and 39 (71%) met the 2013 Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. Conclusions. Culture negativity is an independent predictor of treatment success in PJI. It is unclear whether this is because some of them are not actually infections, or for other reasons such as lower bacterial load or earlier effective antibiotic treatment. Diagnostic criteria for PJI vary substantially in their sensitivity, with MSIS criteria being the least sensitive. Acknowledgements. This work is being presented on behalf of the broader PIANO investigators and the Australasian Society for Infectious Diseases Clinical Research Network. The PIANO study received seed funding from Heraeus Medical and the John Hunter Hospital Charitable Trust Fund

Aims

A pragmatic multicentre randomized controlled trial, UK FROzen Shoulder Trial (UK FROST), was conducted in the UK NHS comparing the cost-effectiveness of commonly used treatments for adults with primary frozen shoulder in secondary care.

Introduction

There is widespread variation in the management of rare orthopaedic disease, in a large part owing to uncertainty. No individual surgeon or hospital is typically equipped to amass sufficient numbers of cases to draw robust conclusions from the information available to them. The programme of research will establish the British Orthopaedic Surgery Surveillance (BOSS) Study; a nationwide reporting structure for rare disease in orthopaedic surgery.

Episodic, or bundled payments, is a concept now familiar to most in the healthcare arena, but the models are often misunderstood. Under a traditional fee-for-service model, each provider bills separately for their services which creates financial incentives to maximise volumes. Under a bundled payment, a single entity, often referred to as a convener (maybe the hospital, the physician group, or a third party) assumes the risk through a payer contract for all services provided within a defined episode of care, and receives a single (bundled) payment for all services provided for that episode. The time frame around the intervention is variable, but defined in advance, as are included and excluded costs. Timing of the actual payment in a bundle may either be before the episode occurs (prospective payment model), or after the end of the episode through a reconciliation (retrospective payment model). In either case, the defined costs over the defined time frame are borne by the convener.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1280–5.

Background. Assessment of functional outcome after total hip arthroplasty (THA) often involves subjective patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) whereas analysis of gait allows more objective assessment. The aims of the study were to compare longitudinal changes of WOMAC function score and ambulatory gait analysis after THA, between patients with low and high self-reported levels of physical function. Methods. Patients undergoing primary THA (n=36; m/f=18/18; mean age=63.9; SD=9.8yrs; BMI=26.3 SD=3.5) were divided in a high and low function group, on their preoperative WOMAC function score. Patients were prospectively measured preoperatively and 3 and 12 months postoperatively. WOMAC function scores 0–100) were compared to inertial sensor based ambulatory gait analysis. Results. WOMAC function scores significantly improved in both low and high groups at 3 months postoperatively whereas gait parameters only improved in with a low pre-operative function. Between 3 and 12 months postoperatively, function scores had not significantly further improved whereas several gait parameters significantly improved in the low function group. WOMAC function scores parameters were only moderately correlated (Spearman's r = 0.33–0.51). Discussion. In routine longitudinal assessment of physical function following THA, ambulatory gait analysis can be supplementary to WOMAC. As gait significantly improved during the first 3 months and following 9 months after THA in patients with a low preoperative level of physical function only, assessment of more demanding tasks than gait may be more sensitive to capture functional improvement in patients with high preoperative function. Acknowledgements. This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Programme Grants for Applied Research programme (RP-PG-0407-10070). The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. The research team acknowledges the support of the NIHR, through the Comprehensive Clinical Research Network

Background. Total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) are usually effective at relieving pain; however, 7–23% of patients experience chronic post-surgical pain. These trials aimed to investigate the effect of local anaesthetic wound infiltration on pain severity at 12 months after primary THR or TKR for osteoarthritis. Methods. Between November 2009 and February 2012, 322 patients listed for THR and 316 listed for TKR were recruited into a single-centre double-blind randomised controlled trial. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive local anaesthetic infiltration and standard care or standard care alone. Participants and outcomes assessors were masked to group allocation. The primary outcome was pain severity on the WOMAC Pain scale at 12 months post-surgery. Analyses were conducted using intention-to-treat and per-protocol approaches. Ethics approval was obtained from Southampton and South West Hampshire Research Ethics Committee. Results. In the hip trial, patients in the intervention group had significantly less pain at 12 months post-operative than patients in the standard care group (differences in means 4.74; 95% CI 0.95, 8.54; p=0.015), although the difference was not clinically significant. Post-hoc analysis found that patients in the intervention group were more likely to have none to moderate pain than severe pain at 12 months than those in the standard care group (odds ratio 10.19; 95% CI 2.10, 49.55; p=0.004). In the knee trial, there was no strong evidence that the intervention influenced pain severity at 12 months post-operative (difference in means 3.83; 95% CI −0.83, 8.49; p=0.107). Conclusions. In conclusion, routine use of infiltration could be beneficial in improving long-term pain relief for some patients after THR. Level of evidence. Randomised controlled trial. Funding. This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) in England under its Programme Grants for Applied Research programme (RP-PG-0407-10070). The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. The research team acknowledge the support of the NIHR, through the Comprehensive Clinical Research Network

Hip fracture is a common injury associated with high mortality, long-term disability and huge socio-economic burden. Yet there has been relatively little research into best treatment, and evidence that has been generated has often been criticised for its poor quality. Here, we discuss the advances made towards overcoming these criticisms and the future directions for hip fracture research: how co-ordinating existing national infrastructures and use of now established clinical research networks will likely go some way towards overcoming the practical and financial challenges of conducting large trials. We highlight the importance of large collaborative pragmatic trials to inform decision/policy makers and the progress made towards reaching a consensus on a core outcome set to facilitate data pooling for evidence synthesis and meta-analysis. . These advances and future directions are a priority in order to establish the high-quality evidence base required for this important group of patients. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:875–9

Trauma and orthopaedics is the largest of the surgical specialties and yet attracts a disproportionately small fraction of available national and international funding for health research. With the burden of musculoskeletal disease increasing, high-quality research is required to improve the evidence base for orthopaedic practice. Using the current research landscape in the United Kingdom as an example, but also addressing the international perspective, we highlight the issues surrounding poor levels of research funding in trauma and orthopaedics and indicate avenues for improving the impact and success of surgical musculoskeletal research.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B:1578–85.

The aim of this study was to review the role of clinical trial networks in orthopaedic surgery. A total of two electronic databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) were searched from inception to September 2013 with no language restrictions. Articles related to randomised controlled trials (RCTs), research networks and orthopaedic research, were identified and reviewed. The usefulness of trainee-led research collaborations is reported and our knowledge of current clinical trial infrastructure further supplements the review. Searching yielded 818 titles and abstracts, of which 12 were suitable for this review. Results are summarised and presented narratively under the following headings: 1) identifying clinically relevant research questions; 2) education and training; 3) conduct of multicentre RCTs and 4) dissemination and adoption of trial results. This review confirms growing international awareness of the important role research networks play in supporting trials in orthopaedic surgery. Multidisciplinary collaboration and adequate investment in trial infrastructure are crucial for successful delivery of RCTs.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2014;3:169–74.

The CONnective TIssue CAncers NETwork to integrate European Experience in Adults and Children (CONTICANET) is dedicated to improve the outcome of connective tissue cancers in adults, adolescents and children. Funded by the European Commission’s Sixth Framework Program (FP6-018806), this Network of Excellence kicked off in February 2006 for a five-year period. Ten work packages are grouped around the themes of “Integration” “Common research programme” and “Dissemination of excellence”. A consortium of 24 different organisations – cancer centres, academic institutions, patient advocacy groups and private enterprises – hailing from 9 countries (Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Slovenia, UK), including > 250 researchers, is involved in collaborative research efforts that will help propagate excellence in the field. Improving the management of these tumours will come out the following outputs of the network activities:. Epidemiology. Molecular characterisation and nosological classification. Understanding the deviations of medical practices and initiating corrective strategies. Identifying new molecular targets and targeted treatments. Promoting clinical research on very rare subtypes. Addressing specific age (paediatrics, adolescents) or condition (Recklinghausen) group issues. Organisation of the collection and storage of biological samples. Standardisation of their management. Identification of centres of excellence for pathological and biological management and clinical management, and the scientific promotion of shared and multidisciplinary research programs. In addition, CONTICANET will integrate the expertise from other networks through collaborations, such as clinical research networks (EORTC, National sarcoma groups), other networks (EUROBONET, networks on rare tumors and paediatric/adolescent tumors). Afyer 5 years a legal entity will continue to spread excellence in several directions: enlarging the network with academic and private organisations; continuing to enhance relations with EMEA, health authorities, patients advocacy groups, cancer leagues. Together, we aim to a European research foundation able to support integrated research actions and make available new treatments in these diseases

We have reviewed the data from our regional Bone Tumour Registry on patients with osteosarcoma diagnosed between 1933 and 2004 in order to investigate the relationship between survival and changes in treatment. There were 184 patients with non-metastatic appendicular osteosarcoma diagnosed at the age of 18 or under. Survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves, and multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox regression proportional hazards model.

The five-year survival improved from 21% between 1933 and 1959, to 62% between 1990 and 1999. During this time, a multi-disciplinary organisation was gradually developed to manage treatment. The most significant variable affecting outcome was the date of diagnosis, with trends in improved survival mirroring the introduction of increasingly effective chemotherapy. Our experience suggests that the guidelines of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence on the minimum throughput of centres for treatment should be enforced flexibly in those that can demonstrate that their historical and contemporary results are comparable to those published nationally and internationally.

There have been major changes in practice in Orthopaedics and Anaesthetics in Britain over recent years. The Royal College of Anaesthetists in Britain in its document on the provision of paediatric services stated that the anaesthetic service for children should be led by consultants who anaesthetise children regularly. This has affected the range of conditions that Orthopaedic Surgeons in District General Hospitals have been able to operate. The Children’s Orthopaedic Group in the North West Region of England was surveyed in 1996 and 2001. Age limits for elective procedures and the range of procedures performed were analysed. The orthopaedic procedures looked at were for scoliosis, DDH / Dysplasia, Perthes’ disease, CTEV, Leg lengthening and genu varum/valgum. The demographic map of the region was studied. This highlighted the variation in Children’s Orthopaedic Services in the region. Some large population centres had minimal Paediatric Orthopaedic Services. In 1996, 91% of non children’s hospitals could perform elective surgery on children under 1 compared to 60% in 1996. The average minimum age for elective surgery in District General Hospitals increased from 8.5 months in 1996 to 17 months in 2001. Baseline services are needed at each DGH to support the paediatric units. These services should include gait abnormalities, conservative treatment of CTEV, postural problems, straight forward cerebral palsy, assessment of hip instability and Perthes disease. Paediatric physiotherapists and Community Paediatricians may be involved in this aspect of care as part of the Multidisciplinary team. A hub and spoke regional service may be required where paediatric orthopaedic specialists undertake outreach clinics in District General Hospitals in order to assess more complex problems such as resistant CTEV, DDH and complex Cerebral Palsy. Such a system already exists in other specialities such as paediatric neurology. Clinical networks may improve service standards

The Instructional Lecture will emphasise the advantages of multidisciplinary management for musculoskeletal tumours, which have produced marked improvement in survival rates in the past 10–15 years. The roles and contributions of individual team members in relation to the overall coordinated approach, which can be provided from a single Specialist Centre, or as a managed Clinical Network. Clinical examples will be used to illustrate the advantages of this approach to the clinical management of these uncommon and challenging conditions. These will include aggressive benign giant cell tumour, malignant osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma with pathological fracture, and a malignant fibrous histiocytoma of soft tissue