Aims

Given the possible radiation damage and inaccuracy of radiological investigations, particularly in children, ultrasound and superb microvascular imaging (SMI) may offer alternative methods of evaluating new bone formation when limb lengthening is undertaken in paediatric patients. The aim of this study was to assess the use of ultrasound combined with SMI in monitoring new bone formation during limb lengthening in children.

Introduction. Sheffield Children's Hospital specialises in limb lengthening for children. Soft tissue contracture and loss of range of motion at the knee and ankle are common complications. This review aims to look at therapeutic techniques used by the therapy team to manage these issues. Materials & Methods. A retrospective case review of therapy notes was performed of femoral and tibial lengthening's over the last 3 years. Included were children having long bone lengthening with an iIntramedullary nail, circular frame or mono-lateral rail. Patients excluded were any external fixators crossing the knee/ankle joints. Results. 20 tibial and 25 femoral lengthening's met the inclusion criteria. Pathologies included, complex fractures, limb deficiency, post septic necrosis and other congenital conditions leading to growth disturbance. All patients had issues with loss of motion at some point during the lengthening process. The knee and foot/ankle were equally affected. Numerous risk factors were identified across the cohort. Treatment provided included splinting, serial casting, bolt on shoes, exercise therapy, electrical muscle stimulation and passive stretching. Conclusions. Loss of motion in lower limb joints was common. Patients at higher risk were those with abnormal anatomy, larger target lengthening's, poor compliance or lack of access to local services. Therapy played a significant role in managing joint motion during treatment. However, limitations were noted. No one treatment option gave preferential outcomes, selection of treatment needed to be patient specific. Future research should look at guidelines to aid timely input and avoid secondary complications

Aims

As an alternative to external fixators, intramedullary lengthening nails (ILNs) can be employed for distraction osteogenesis. While previous studies have demonstrated that typical complications of external devices, such as soft-tissue tethering, and pin site infection can be avoided with ILNs, there is a lack of studies that exclusively investigated tibial distraction osteogenesis with motorized ILNs inserted via an antegrade approach.

Introduction. At Sheffield Children's Hospital, treatment of leg length discrepancy is a common procedure. Historically, this has been done with external fixators. With the development in intramedullary technology, internal nails have become the preferred modality for long bone lengthening in the adolescent population. However, it is important to review whether this technology practically reduces the known challenges seen and if it brings any new issues. Therefore, the aim of this review is to retrospectively evaluate the therapeutic challenges of 16 fit-bone intramedullary femoral lengthening's at Sheffield Children's Hospital between 2021–2022. Materials & Methods. The international classification of function (ICF) framework was used to differentiate outcomes. The patient's therapy notes were retrospectively reviewed for themes around structural, activity and participation limitation. The findings were grouped for analysis and the main themes presented. Results. There were 8 males, mean age 17.4 years (range 17–18) and 8 females, mean age 15.9 years (range 14–18). 5 right and 11 left femurs were lengthened. Underlying pathology varied amongst the 16 patients. All patients went into a hinged knee brace post operatively. Structural limitations included: pain, fixed flexion deformity of the knee, loss of knee flexion, quadriceps muscle lag, muscle spasms and gluteal weakness. The primary activity limitation was reduced weight bearing with altered gait pattern. Participation limitations included reduced school attendance and involvement in activities with peers. Access to Physiotherapy from local services varied dramatically. Five of the cohort have completed treatment. Conclusions. Anecdotally, intramedullary femoral lengthening nails have perceived benefits for families compared to external fixators in the adolescent population. However, there remain musculoskeletal and psychosocial outcomes requiring therapeutic management throughout the lengthening process and beyond. Therefore, quantifying these outcomes is essential for measuring the impact on each patient for comparison. To interpret these themes, we need to evaluate the outcomes objectively, this was not done consistently in this review. Future research should look at outcome measures that are sensitive to all aspects of the ICF. With an aim of improving the therapeutic treatment provided and the overall outcome for the children treated

Aims

Distraction osteogenesis (DO) is a useful orthopaedic procedure employed to lengthen and reshape bones by stimulating bone formation through controlled slow stretching force. Despite its promising applications, difficulties are still encountered. Our previous study demonstrated that pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) treatment significantly enhances bone mineralization and neovascularization, suggesting its potential application. The current study compared a new, high slew rate (HSR) PEMF signal, with different treatment durations, with the standard Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved signal, to determine if HSR PEMF is a better alternative for bone formation augmentation.

Aims

Limb-lengthening nails have largely replaced external fixation in limb-lengthening and reconstructive surgery. However, the adverse events and high prevalence of radiological changes recently noted with the STRYDE lengthening nail have raised concerns about the use of internal lengthening nails. The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of radiological bone abnormalities between STRYDE, PRECICE, and FITBONE nails prior to nail removal.

Aims

This study aims to enhance understanding of clinical and radiological consequences and involved mechanisms that led to corrosion of the Precice Stryde (Stryde) intramedullary lengthening nail in the post market surveillance era of the device. Between 2018 and 2021 more than 2,000 Stryde nails have been implanted worldwide. However, the outcome of treatment with the Stryde system is insufficiently reported.

Aims

The STRYDE nail is an evolution of the PRECICE Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System, with unique features regarding its composition. It is designed for load bearing throughout treatment in order to improve patient experience and outcomes and allow for simultaneous bilateral lower limb lengthening. The literature published to date is limited regarding outcomes and potential problems. We report on our early experience and raise awareness for the potential of adverse effects from this device.

Aims

The management of a significant bony defect following excision of a diaphyseal atrophic femoral nonunion remains a challenge. We present the outcomes using a combined technique of acute femoral shortening, stabilized with a long retrograde intramedullary nail, accompanied by bifocal osteotomy compression and distraction osteogenesis with a temporary monolateral fixator.

Objectives

Distraction osteogenesis (DO) mobilises bone regenerative potential and avoids the complications of other treatments such as bone graft. The major disadvantage of DO is the length of time required for bone consolidation. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been used to promote bone formation with some good results.

Management of bone defects is a common surgical challenge encountered following any high energy trauma. Femur fractures with bone loss account for 22% of all the fractures with bone loss/defect, and 5% to 10% of distal femur fractures are open injuries. It was estimated in 2008, that, more than 4.5 million open fractures occur annually in India. In this retrospective study, patients who received bone allograft from our tissue bank between May 2012 and September 2015 were analysed. Of the 553 allografts issued, at that point in time, 26 were used in patients who underwent reconstruction for distal Femur fractures primarily. Fractures with defect or bone loss from 12 cc (1cm) to 144 cc (12cm) were treated with either Internal or External fixation and bone allograft. Morcellised cancellous, or a cortical strut, were used to fill or reconstruct the defect or void. The radiological outcome in terms of fracture union was assessed and Knee society score was used to assess the functional outcome. Complications such as non- union, infection, stiffness and need of revision or additional procedures were also assessed. Osseous consolidation was achieved in all the 26 patients with a Median time of 24 weeks (16 to 60). The Median Functional Knee Society Score was 80, indicating satisfactory functional outcome. Infection was noted in one patient, but it was not attributed to the allograft. Additional minor procedures like bone marrow infiltration, corticotomy for bone lengthening were required in 10 patients. Our studycomprises the largest group of patients treated primarily with Allograft to reconstruct or fill the void of bone loss encountered with distal Femur fracture. Reconstruction of massive bone defects, in patients of distal Femur fractures, with bone allograft, shows encouraging results. The surgeon can achieve the goal of restoring form and function of these difficult injuries in a single stage and the technique will provide the freedom to reconstruct the bony defect up to 150 cc (12 cm length) and recreate the anatomy to near normal. This allows for early mobilisation of patients and restoration of their daily routine at the earliest

The June 2014 Oncology Roundup. 360 . looks at: Infection still a problem in endoprosthetic reconstruction; massive allografts not as successful as we perhaps think; curopsy for aneurysmal bone cysts?; lengthening prosthesis: days are numbered; new WHO classification in brief; proximal tumours and fluid levels: bad news; infection is predictable in orthopaedic oncology; psychosocial support key in oncological outcomes

Purposes of the study. To assess safety, lengths gained, frame time and perform cost analysis of the technique of submuscular plating to the femur and tibia following distraction osteogenesis. Introduction. Since 2005 we have performed submuscular plating to the femur and tibia after distraction osteogenesis in order to shorten time in external fixator. Aim. To assess safety, lengths gained, frame time and perform cost analysis. Methods. Retrospective analysis using notes and digital radiographs, with cost codes for 2011 prices. Patients. 23 patients (14 male), mean age 11 (range 4 to 17). 14 diagnosed as congenital longitudinal deficiency. Total 37 bones lengthened (14 femur and tibia, 7 tibia only, 2 femur only). Ilizarov fixator most commonly used for tibia, LRS fixator for femur. Results. Mean length gained 68 mm per patient, 43 mm per bone. Mean frame time 121 days. Fixator index 0.59 months/cm per patient, 0.90 months/cm per bone. Mean cost £20100 per patient, £12500 per bone, £2800 per cm length. Cost attributable to plating £5100 per patient, £3300 per bone. Complications: 5/24 had pinsite infections, 2/24 required tendon releases, 1/24 had deformity, 1/24 sustained a fracture proximal to femoral plate. No deep infections. Conclusions. Plating after lengthening is a safe procedure with no deep infections. The frame time is low (0.6 months/cm per patient) but increases overall costs by an extra £5000

Aims and methods. We present a review of our use of the Ilizarov apparatus in a non-acute NGO hospital in Cambodia specialising in limb reconstruction. Frames are applied without on table image intensification. A retrospective case-note analysis of Ilizarov apparatus use for all indications was conducted. 53 frames were applied between November 2005 and October 2011. Indications for application were chronic open fracture, osteomyelitis, fracture malunion, infective and non-infective non-union, bone lengthening, primary bone tumour resection, ankle fusion, congenital deformity or pseudarthrosis, chronic hip dislocation, or a combination of the above. Results. Median delay in presentation was 104 weeks for all indications (range 4–864). Median treatment length was 21 weeks (3–76). The most frequent complication was pin-site infection. This occurred in 18 patients (34%). Return to theatre occurred in 21 patients (40%). Indications were frame adjustment, pin addition or removal, addition of bone graft or re-osteotomy. Failure of union occurred in three patients. These rates are comparable with those published in both Asian and Western literature. Conclusions. Our data demonstrate the versatility of the Ilizarov apparatus and its importance in limb reconstruction in a developing world setting. Our centre relies on it as a cost-effective tool for traditional and novel indications. In our centre the apparatus is applied without x-ray control and is maintained without a dedicated outreach pin-site care programme. Despite this our complication rates are comparable with western literature. We therefore recommend it as a safe and cost-effective tool for use in other developing world settings

Aims. Since 2005 we have performed submuscular plating to the femur and tibia after distraction osteogenesis in selected cases in order to shorten the time in external fixator. The aim was to assess safety, lengths gained, frame time and perform cost analysis. Methods. Retrospective analysis using notes and digital radiographs, with cost codes for 2011 prices. 23 patients (14 male), mean age 11 (range 4 to 17) were analysed. 14 were diagnosed as congenital longitudinal deficiency. Total 37 bones lengthened (14 femur and tibia, 7 tibia only, 2 femur only). Ilizarov fixator most commonly used for tibia, LRS fixator for femur. Results. Mean length gained 68mm per patient, 43mm per bone. Mean frame time 121 days, with mean 75 days of lengthening, and mean 46 days between the cessation of lengthening and the plating procedure. Fixator index 0.59 months/cm per patient, 0.90 months/cm per bone. Mean cost £20100 per patient, £12500 per bone, £2800 per cm length. Cost attributable to plating £5100 per patient, £3300 per bone. Complications: 5/24 had pinsite infections, 2/24 required tendon releases, 1/24 had deformity, 1/24 sustained a fracture proximal to femoral plate. No deep infections. In terms of patient satisfaction, families of patients who had also undergone a prior lengthening with frame only, 80% preferred plate after lengthening. Conclusions. Plating after lengthening is a safe procedure with no deep infections. The frame time is low (0.6 months/cm per patient) but increases overall costs by an extra £5000 per patient. There is room to improve the fixator index further if the time between cessation of lengthening and the plating procedure (currently 46 days) is shortened

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of three-dimensional camera technology when monitoring deformity correction by an Ilizarov frame and to compare it to manual measurements. Methods and Results. A model consisting of an Ilizarov frame built around an artificial tibia and fibula was used with retro-reflective markers placed on the frame and bones to allow for the positions of each to be detected by the camera system. Measurements made by the camera system were compared to measurements taken manually. In the assessment of frame lengthening, the camera system average error was 2% (SD 2%) compared to 7% (SD 6%) for manual measurement. In the assessment of bone lengthening, the camera system average error was 4% (SD 4%) compared to 34% (SD 8%) for manual measurement. The technology also demonstrated good accuracy in the measurement of angular deformity changes. Conclusion. The results of this study demonstrate that the measurement of deformity correction with three-dimensional infra-red camera technology is superior to manual measurements in a model of deformity correction. This method could replace or greatly reduce x-ray exposure in monitoring deformity correction post-operatively

Introduction. Since 2001 we use the flexible intramedullary nailing (FIN) in bone lengthening in children. This study estimates results of EF+FIN association considering the duration of external fixation and complications. Materials and Methods. Since 2001 we performed 294 bone lengthenings (338 segments of UL and LL) in 250 children 3 to 16 years old (11.01±0.23 in average). The length discrepancy was congenital in 163 cases, the sequelae of trauma or osteomyelitis were observed in 87 patients. In group I (195 cases) the Ilizarov fixator alone was applied, in group II the Ilizarov fixator (91 cases) or TSF® (8cases) were combined with FIN. The healing index was compared between the groups of the same etiology with similar type of distraction osteosynthesis. The date of consolidation corresponded to the day of removal of the external fixator, while intramedullary nails remained in place thus protecting the bone. Healing index was calculated by relating the duration of wearing of the external fixator (in days) and the amount of lengthening (in cm). Results. Reduction of the healing index is noted in each compared category. Thus, in congenital shortening in monofocal distraction osteosynthesis of the femur the healing index decreased from 29.8 (group I) to 20.4 days per cm, in bifocal tibial lengthening from 22.7 (group I) to 16.3d/cm (group II), in humeral lengthening – from 30.2 to 21.3 d/cm. In fact, it appears that the association of the external fixator of the Ilizarov type or TSF® with FIN allows to reduce the healing index significantly: in 12 of 16 compared categories the reduction of the index was from 20% to 40% or from 4.0 to 19.1 days per cm. In group I four cases of deep infection of soft tissues, 2 osteomyelitis, 21 fractures or deformities after frame removal were manifested. In group II – onlyone case of deformation after frame removal, absence of severe infectious complications, 8 cases of migration of the intramedullary wires. Discussion. FIN creates an elastic and resistant system during the lengthening. We even suggest that it stimulates the formation considering an apparent decrease of the healing index. On the other hand, the elasticity of nails prevents secondary fractures or deformations after frame removal. Conclusion. Combination of the circular EF and FIN in limb lengthening in children significantly decreases the duration of external fixation and the amount of severe infections and fractures

Internal lengthening devices in the femur lengthen along the anatomical axis, potentially creating lateral shift of the mechanical axis. We aimed to determine whether femoral lengthening along the anatomical axis has an inadvertent effect on lower limb alignment. Isolated femoral lengthening using the Intramedullary Skeletal Kinetic Distractor was performed in 27 femora in 24 patients (mean age 32 years (16 to 57)). Patients who underwent simultaneous realignment procedures or concurrent tibial lengthening, or who developed mal- or nonunion, were excluded. Pre-operative and six-month post-operative radiographs were used to measure lower limb alignment. The mean lengthening achieved was 4.4 cm (1.5 to 8.0). In 26 of 27 limbs, the mechanical axis shifted laterally by a mean of 1.0 mm/cm of lengthening (0 to 3.5). In one femur that was initially in varus, a 3 mm medial shift occurred during a lengthening of 2.2 cm.

In a normally aligned limb, intramedullary lengthening along the anatomical axis of the femur results in a lateral shift of the mechanical axis by approximately 1 mm for each 1 cm of lengthening.

We report our experience of a humanitarian mission to treat the earthquake victims of October 2005 in Pakistan. The team with their equipment, in two periods of four and ten days respectively, treated 26 fractures in 25 patients with the Ilizarov frame and principles. There were 21 III B open fractures and three Tscherne III closed fractures. Seventeen fractures were infected with discharging pus and non-viable bone. Injuries were treated aggressively using different Ilizarov techniques of reconstruction surgery. All but two open fractures required a plastic surgical procedure for wound cover. Three months post-operatively eight out of thirteen fractures which had been treated in the first four days of the visit were healed and corticotomy for bone lengthening, performed during the second 10 days period visit. All wounds have remained clean with no evidence of superficial or deep infection. Limb lengthening procedures are planned for the rest of the patients

We present our experience of forearm lengthening in children with various conditions performed by a single surgeon between 1995 and 2009. A total of 19 children with a mean age of 9.8 years (2.1 to 15.9) at the time of surgery had 22 forearm lengthenings using either an Ilizarov/spatial and Ilizarov circular frame or a monolateral external fixator. The patients were divided into two groups: group A, in whom the purpose of treatment was to restore the relationship between the radius and the ulna, and group B, in whom the objective was to gain forearm length. The mean follow-up after removal of the frame was 26 months (13 to 53).

There were ten patients (11 forearms) in group A with a mean radioulnar discrepancy of 2.4 cm (1.5 to 3.3) and nine patients (11 forearms) in group B. In group A, the mean lengthening achieved was 2.7 cm (1.0 to 5.5), with a lengthening index of 11.1 weeks/cm. Equalisation or overcorrection of the discrepancy was achieved in seven of 11 forearms, but lengthening was only partially successful at preventing subluxation or dislocation of the radial head. In group B, the mean lengthening achieved was 3.8 cm (1.9 to 6.8), with a lengthening index of 7.25 weeks/cm. Common complications in both groups were pin-site infection and poor regenerate formation.

Forearm lengthening by distraction osteogenesis is a worthwhile procedure in children that can improve cosmesis and function, particularly in patients with shortening of both radius and ulna.