Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are among the most common and debilitating knee injuries in professional athletes with an incidence in females up to eight-times higher than their male counterparts. ACL injuries can be career-threatening and are associated with increased risk of developing knee osteoarthritis in future life. The increased risk of ACL injury in females has been attributed to various anatomical, developmental, neuromuscular, and hormonal factors. Anatomical and hormonal factors have been identified and investigated as significant contributors including osseous anatomy, ligament laxity, and hamstring muscular recruitment. Postural stability and impact absorption are associated with the stabilizing effort and stress on the ACL during sport activity, increasing the risk of noncontact pivot injury. Female patients have smaller diameter hamstring autografts than males, which may predispose to increased risk of re-rupture following ACL reconstruction and to an increased risk of chondral and meniscal injuries. The addition of an extra-articular tenodesis can reduce the risk of failure; therefore, it should routinely be considered in young elite athletes. Prevention programs target key aspects of training including plyometrics, strengthening, balance, endurance and stability, and neuromuscular training, reducing the risk of ACL injuries in female athletes by up to 90%. Sex disparities in access to training facilities may also play an important role in the risk of ACL injuries between males and females. Similarly, football boots, pitches quality, and football size and weight should be considered and tailored around females’ characteristics. Finally, high levels of personal and sport-related stress have been shown to increase the risk of ACL injury which may be related to alterations in attention and coordination, together with increased muscular tension, and compromise the return to sport after ACL injury. Further investigations are still necessary to better understand and address the risk factors involved in ACL injuries in female athletes.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(2):94–100.

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of graft-tunnel mismatch (GTM) when performing anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using bone-patella tendon-bone (BPTB) grafts and anteromedial portal drilling. Beginning in November 2018, 100 consecutive patients who underwent ACLR by two sports fellowship-trained, orthopedic surgeons using BPTB autograft and anteromedial portal drilling were prospectively identified. The BPTB graft dimensions and the femoral tunnel distance, tibial tunnel distance, intra-articular distance, and total distance were measured. Surgeons determined the depth and angle of tunnels based on the patella tendon graft length dimensions in each case. After passage of the graft, the distance from the distal graft tip to the tibial cortex aperture was measured. GTM was defined as the need for additional measures to obtain satisfactory tibial graft fixation (< 1 5e20 mm of bone fixation). The incidence of mismatch was 6/100 (6%). Five cases involved the graft being too long, with the tibial bone plug protruding excessively from the tibial tunneld4/5 had a patella tendon length ? 50 mm. Three cases were managed with femoral tunnel recession, and two were treated with a free bone plug technique. One patient with a patella tendon length of 35 mm had a graft that was too short, with the tibial bone plug recessed in the tibial tunnel. Of patients whose tibial tunnel distance was within 5 mm of the patella tendon length, only 1/46 (2%) patients had mismatch, whereas 5/54 (9%) of patients who had >5 mm difference had mismatch. The incidence of grafttunnel mismatch after anatomic ACLR using BTPB and anteromedial portal drilling in this study is 6%. To limit the occurrence of GTM where the graft is too long, surgeons should drill tibial tunnel distances within 5 mm of the patella tendon length

Objectives

This study investigated the biomechanical performance of decellularized porcine superflexor tendon (pSFT) grafts of varying diameters when utilized in conjunction with contemporary ACL graft fixation systems. This aimed to produce a range of ‘off-the-shelf’ products with predictable mechanical performance, depending on the individual requirements of the patient.

Aims. Our aim was to perform a meta-analysis of the outcomes of revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, comparing the use of different types of graft. Materials and Methods. A search was performed of Medline and Pubmed using the terms “Anterior Cruciate Ligament” and “ACL” combined with “revision”, “re-operation” and “failure”. Only studies that reported the outcome at a minimum follow-up of two years were included. Two authors reviewed the papers, and outcomes were subdivided into autograft and allograft. Autograft was subdivided into hamstring (HS) and bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB). Subjective and objective outcome measures were analysed and odds ratios with confidence intervals were calculated. Results. A total of 32 studies met the inclusion criteria. Five studies used HS autografts, eight reported using BPTB autografts, two used quadriceps tendon autografts and eight used various types. Seven studies reported using allografts, while the two remaining used both BPTB autografts and allografts. Overall, 1192 patients with a mean age of 28.7 years (22.5 to 39) and a mean follow-up of 5.4 years (2.0 to 9.6) were treated with autografts, while 269 patients with a mean age of 28.4 years (25 to 34.6) and a mean follow-up of 4.0 years (2.3 to 6.0) were treated with allografts. Regarding allografts, irradiation with 2.5 mrad was used in two studies while the graft was not irradiated in the seven remaining studies. Reconstructions following the use of autografts had better outcomes than those using allograft with respect to laxity, measured by KT-1000/2000 (MEDmetric Corporation) and the rates of complications and re-operations. Those following the use of allografts had better mean Lysholm and Tegner activity scores compared with autografts. If irradiated allografts were excluded from the analysis, outcomes no longer differed between the use of autografts and allografts. Comparing the types of autograft, all outcomes were similar except for HS grafts which had better International Knee Documentation Committee scores compared with BPTB grafts. Conclusion. Autografts had better outcomes than allografts in revision ACL reconstruction, with lower post-operative laxity and rates of complications and re-operations. However, after excluding irradiated allografts, outcomes were similar between autografts and allografts. Overall, the choice of graft at revision ACL reconstruction should be on an individual basis considering, for instance, the preferred technique of the surgeon, whether a combined reconstruction is required, the type of graft that was previously used, whether the tunnels are enlarged and the availability of allograft. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:714–23

We examined the association of graft type with the risk of early revision of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in a community-based sample. A retrospective analysis of a cohort of 9817 ACLRs recorded in an ACLR Registry was performed. Patients were included if they underwent primary ACLR with bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft, hamstring tendon autograft or allograft tissue. Aseptic failure was the main endpoint of the study. After adjusting for age, gender, ethnicity, and body mass index, allografts had a 3.02 times (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.93 to 4.72) higher risk of aseptic revision than bone–patellar tendon–bone autografts (p < 0.001). Hamstring tendon autografts had a 1.82 times (95% CI 1.10 to 3.00) higher risk of revision compared with bone–patellar tendon–bone autografts (p = 0.019). For each year increase in age, the risk of revision decreased by 7% (95% CI 5 to 9). In gender-specific analyses a 2.26 times (95% CI 1.15 to 4.44) increased risk of hamstring tendon autograft revision in females was observed compared with bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft. We conclude that allograft tissue, hamstring tendon autografts, and younger age may all increase the risk of early revision surgery after ACLR.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:623–8.

Injuries to the infra-patella branch of the saphenous nerve on harvesting Bone-Patella Tendon-Bone (BPB) autograft commonly cause anterior knee pain. The purpose of this study is to investigate the possibility of harvesting a good BPB graft without injury to the nerve by using double mini-incision.

Twelve adult cadaveric knees, with two vertical incisions of 25mm, one over the inferior pole of the patella, and the other over the tibial tuberosity were prepared. The tibial bone block was harvested, with preservation of the para-tendon, making a subcutaneous tunnel proximally and stripped to dissect the middle 1/3 of the patella tendon. The graft was then detached after harvesting the patella bone block, and examined for size and quality. The knees were finally dissected to check the relationship of the incisions with the infra-patella branch, and see if it was injured.

All BPB grafts were found to have good tendon qualities of average 9.5mm in width. The tibial bone plug is of average 25mm in length and 10mm in width, while the patella bone plug is of average 22mm in length & 9mm in width. All 12 knees have 2 infra-patella branches, with the proximal branch running at averaged distance of 23mm distal to the proximal incision, while the distal branch lying at averaged distance of 11mm proximal to the distal incision. 2 out of the 12 distal branches were injured by the distal incision.

Double-mini incision allows harvesting of a consistently good quality BPB graft with preservation of the infra-patella branch of the saphenous nerve.

Introduction: This biomechanical study evaluates the consequences of a mid-third BPTB-autograft excision on patellofemoral biomechanics and knee kinematics. Of particular interest was the potential role of a BPTB-autograft excision on postoperative anterior knee pain in ACL replacement surgery. Methods: Isokinetic knee extension from 120 of flexion to full extension was simulated on 9 human knee cadaver specimens (5 male, 4 female, average age at death 43 years). Joint kinematics was evaluated by ultrasound sensors (CMS 100TM, Zebris, Isny, Germany), and retro-patellar contact pressure was measured using a thin-film resistive ink pressure system (K-ScanTM 4000, Tekscan, Boston). All data were taken before and after excision of a mid-third BPTB-autograft. Results: Following excision of a mid-third patella tendon autograft we found a significant (p< 0.05) proximalization of the patella (average: 0.5 mm) and a significant decrease of patella flexion in the sagittal plane (average: 1). Patella tilt, -rotation (frontal plane), -translation (medial/lateral) and tibiarotation (external-/internal), -axis (varus-/valgus position) remained unchanged. Patellofemoral contact pressure and -area decreased significantly near knee extension (p< 0.05). Conclusions: We conclude that an excision of a mid-third patella tendon autograft results in a lengthening of the tendon with a proximalization of the patella. As the patellofemoral pressure decreases and the patella remains centralized, postoperative anterior knee pain following ACL-replacement using a BPTB autograft can not be explained by the results of our study

The choice of graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction remains controversial. A systematic review was performed to compare bone-patella tendon-bone and 4-strand hamstring grafts. Medline (1966 onwards), EMBASE (1980 onwards) and the Cochrane database were searched retrieving 6312 possible articles but only 6 studies fulfilled all the inclusion criteria. To be included, the study had to be prospective, randomised or quasi-randomised, comparing 4SHS and central third BPTB autografts, inserted using an arthroscopically assisted technique and have a minimum 2-year follow up for all patients. These studies recruited 526 patients and 475 were followed for at least 2 years with 235 patients receiving a bone-patella tendon-bone graft and 240 receiving a 4-strand hamstring graft. Overall, there was a greater chance of extension loss (p=0.007) and a trend towards increased patellofemoral joint pain (p=0.09) with a patella tendon graft. With a 4-strand hamstring graft there is a greater loss of hamstring power (p=0.008) and a trend towards an increased chance of a pivot shift > 1 (p=0.12). There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of lachman testing, chance of returning to the same level of sport, clinical knee scores, graft ruptures or other complications

The choice of graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction remains controversial. A systematic review was performed to compare bone-patella tendon-bone and 4-strand hamstring grafts. Medline (1966 onwards), EMBASE (1980 onwards) and the Cochrane database were searched retrieving 6312 possible articles but only 6 studies fulfilled all the inclusion criteria. To be included, the study had to be prospective, randomised or quasirandomised, comparing 4SHS and central third BPTB autografts, inserted using an arthroscopically assisted technique and have a minimum 2-year follow up for all patients. These studies recruited 526 patients and 475 were followed for at least 2 years with 235 patients receiving a bone-patella tendon-bone graft and 240 receiving a 4-strand hamstring graft. Overall, there was a greater chance of extension loss (p=0.007) and a trend towards increased patellofemoral joint pain (p=0.09) with a patella tendon graft. With a 4-strand hamstring graft there is a greater loss of hamstring power (p=0.008) and a trend towards an increased chance of a pivot shift > 1 (p=0.12). There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of lachman testing, chance of returning to the same level of sport, clinical knee scores, graft ruptures or other complications

Aim: To confirm previous studies and reports of tunnel widening following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. To report the medium term behaviour and the effect of tunnel widening on the clinical results. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the ACL database comparing BPTB autograft versus HT autograft and interference screw fixation was carried out. All procedures were performed by the same surgeon using an identical endoscopic, single-incision, surgical technique and a single method of fixation (7 x 25mm Titanium RCI screws). Patients who had a radiographic series at two and five years were included in the study. All patients had an isolated ACL injury. Patients underwent a continuous follow up evaluation including clinical examination IKDC, Lysholm knee score and KT-1000 man max testing. Tibial tunnel widening was calculated from lateral radiographs digitalised and corrected for magnification. The tunnel shape was classified according to Peyrache. Results: The median HT tunnel area increased significantly for the first two years (p = 0.00) and was unchanged from two to five years. The median PT tunnel area decreased significantly during the first two years (p = 0.03), and decreased again from two to five years (p = 0.02). A significant difference in tunnel shape existed between HT and PT groups (p = 0.00). Conclusion: Tibial tunnel widening was confirmed in 79% of HT and 24% of PT ACL reconstructions utilising a single Titanium RCI screw fixation in each. Graft choice was shown to influence tibial tunnel shape; 21% of HT developed a cavity shape and 29% of PT exhibited tunnel disappearance. All patients with a decrease in tunnel area had a negative pivot shift. This was significantly different from the tunnel-widening group