Implant fracture of modular revision stems is a major complication after total hip arthroplasty revision (rTHA). Studies looking at specific modular designs report fracture rates of 0.3% to 0.66% whereas fractures of monobloc designs are only reported anecdotally. It is unclear whether the overall re-revision rate of modular designs is higher and if, whether stem fractures or other revision reasons are responsible for this elevation. All revisions within 5 years after implantation of a revision stems (n. 0. =13,900; n. 5. =2506) were analysed using Cox regression with design (modular: n=17, monobloc: n=27), BMI, Sex and Elixhauser Score as independent variables. One stage and two stage revisions were analysed separately (1-stage: modular n= 7,102; monobloc n= 4,542; 2-stage: 1,551 / 704). The revision volume of the hospitals was also considered (low: <20 revisions, medium: 21–50 revisions, high: >50 revisions). For the 1-stage revisions, the re-revision risk after 4 years was 14,3% [13.2%, 15.5%] for monobloc and 17.4% [16.40%, 18.40%] for modular stems (p< 0.001). Stem fracture was the reason for re-revision in 2.4% of the modular (fracture rate 0.42%) and 0.6% of the monobloc revisions. The difference in re-revision rates between the designs was mainly due to differences in dislocation and stem loosening. For the 2-stage revisions, the revision risks for either design were similar (21.7% [18,5%, 25.4%] vs. 23.0% [20.8%, 25.4%]; p=0.05). Patient characteristics influenced the comparison between the two designs in the 1-stage group but very little in the 2-stage group. Modular revision stem fractures only contribute very minor to re-revision risk. In 2-stage revisions, no difference in overall re-revision rates between designs was observed. This might indicate that the differences observed for 1-stage procedures are due to differences between the patient cohorts, not reflected by the parameters available or surgeon choice

The advent of modular implants aims to minimise morbidity associated with revision of hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) to reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSR) by allowing retention of the humeral stem. This systematic review aimed to summarise outcomes following its use and reasons why modular humeral stems may be revised. A systematic review of Pubmed, Medline and EMBASE was performed according to PRISMA guidelines of all patients undergoing revision of a modular hemiarthroplasty or TSA to RSR. Primary implants, glenoid revisions, surgical technique and opinion based reports were excluded. Collected data included demographics, outcomes and incidence of complications. 277 patients were included, with a mean age of 69.8 years (44-91) and 119 being female. Revisions were performed an average of 30 months (6-147) after the index procedure, with the most common reason for revision being cuff failure in 57 patients. 165 patients underwent modular conversion and 112 underwent stem revision. Of those that underwent humeral stem revision, 18 had the stem too proximal, in 15 the stem was loose, 10 was due to infection and 1 stem had significant retroversion. After a mean follow up of 37.6 months (12-91), the Constant score improved from a mean of 21.8 to 48.7. Stem revision was associated with a higher complication rate (OR 3.13, 95% CI 1.82-5.39). The increased use of modular stems has reduced stem revision, however 40% of these implants still require revision due to intra-operative findings. Further large volume comparative studies between revised and maintained humeral stems post revision of modular implants can adequately inform implant innovation to further improve the stem revision rate

Subsidence remains a concern when utilizing modern tapered fluted titanium (TFT) femoral stems and may lead to leg length discrepancy, impingement, instability and failure to obtain stem osseointegration. This study aims to compare stem subsidence across three modern TFT stems. Our secondary aim was to investigate the influence of bicortical contact or ‘scratch fit’ on subsidence, as well as the role of intraoperative imaging in maximizing this bicortical contact and preventing stem subsidence. A retrospective review of 271 hip arthroplasties utilizing modern TFT stems in a single institution was performed. Three stem designs were included in the analysis: one monoblock TFT stem (n=91) and two modular TFT stems (Modular A [n=90]; Modular B [n=90]). Patient demographics, Paprosky femoral bone loss classification, bi-cortical contact, utilization of intra-operative imaging and stem subsidence (comparison of initial post-operative radiograph to the latest follow up radiograph - minimum three months) were recorded. There was no statistically significant difference in the amount of subsidence between the three stems (Monoblock: 2.33mm, Modular A: 3.43mm, Modular B: 3.02mm; p=0.191). There was no statistical difference in subsidence >5mm between stems (Monoblock: 9.9%, Modular A: 22.2%, Modular B: 16.7%). Subgroup analysis based on femoral bone loss grading showed no difference in subsidence between stems. Increased bicortical contact was strongly associated with reduced subsidence (p=0.004). Intra-operative imaging was used in 46.5% (126/271) of cases; this was not correlated with bicortical contact (p=0.673) or subsidence (p=0.521). Across all groups, only two stems were revised for subsidence (0.7%). All three modern TFT stems were highly successful and associated with low rates of subsidence, regardless of modular or monoblock design. Surgeons should select the stem that they feel is most clinically appropriate

Failure of internal fixation of intertrochanteric fractures is associated with delayed union or malunion resulting in persistent pain and diminished function. We evaluated 15 elderly patients treated with a tapered, fluted, modular, distally fixing cementless stem. At an average follow up of 2.86 years, mean Harris hip score improved from 35.90 preoperatively to 83.01 (P < 0.01). Fourteen stems had stable bony ingrowth and one stem was loose. Distal fixation with a tapered fluted modular cementless stem allows stable fixation with good functional outcome in a reproducible fashion in this challenging cohort of patients

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate serum metal levels in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a conventional compared to a modular dual-mobility bearing. Patients undergoing primary THA for osteoarthritis were randomized to receive either a modular dual-mobility or conventional polyethylene bearing. All patients received the same titanium acetabular and femoral component and a ceramic femoral head. Serum metal levels were drawn pre-operatively then annually for a minimum of two years postoperatively. An a priori power analysis determined that 40 patients (20 per cohort) were needed to identify a clinically relevant difference in serum cobalt of 0.35 ng/ml (ppb) at 90% power. Forty-six patients were randomized to a modular dual-mobility (n=25) or conventional bearing (n=21) with 40 at a minimum follow-up of two years. No differences in serum cobalt (mean 0.14 ppb [range, 0.075–0.29] vs. 0.20 ppb [range, 0.075–0.57], p=0.39) or chromium levels (mean 0.14 ppb [range, 0.05–0.50] vs. 0.12 ppb [range, 0.05–0.35], p=0.65) were identified between the modular dual-mobility and conventional cohorts, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in serum Co or Cr at two years postoperatively in subjects implanted with a ceramic head and this particular dual mobility bearing in comparison to a ceramic head and a conventional acetabular component. While modest expected elevations in serum Co and Cr were observed in the dual mobility group, in no case did the Co level exceed the laboratory reference range nor the threshold of one part per billion that has been associated with adverse local tissue reactions to mechanically-assisted crevice corrosion

Aim. Studies have shown that retention of antibiotic cement spacer in selected elderly patients with low functional demand represents a viable option for periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) treatment. 1,2. . The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy in infection treating among modular taylored preformed and hand-made antibiotic spacers. Our hypothesis is that modular tailored preformed spacer provides a better rate of infection resolution, better radiological and functional outcomes compared to hand-made spacers. Materials and methods. We identified 48 patients treated with antibiotic cement spacer for shoulder chronic infection between 2015 and 2021 in our institution; (13 hand-made spacers and 35 modular tailored preformed spacers). We collected data about comorbidities, associated microorganism, infection resolution, clinical and radiographic evaluation. Results. The mean age at surgery was 63.2 years, (45.8% female − 54.2% male), mean BMI 28.3. The mean time of infection diagnosis after first surgery was 30 months; (31.2% infection after ORIF in proximal humeral fractures, 68.8% PJI after shoulder arthroplasty). The main pathogens were Propionibacterium Acnes (37.5%), Staphylococcus Epidermidis (29.2%), Staphylococcus Aureus (16.7%), negative intraoperative coltures (14.6%), Enterococcus (4.17%), Pseudomonas Aeruginosa (4.17%). The mean time of antibiotic spacer retention was 18 months: 23 patients (47.9%) underwent second stage surgery for prosthesis implantation; 2 removed the spacer because of spacer dislocation, 2 died during follow up; while 21 patients still hold the antibiotic spacer (17 patients in treatment with prefabricated spacers and 4 with self-constructed spacer). The mean value for clinical assessment for patients with modular tailored preformed spacer were: Constant Score 34 – QuickDASH 40 – SST 33 – ASES Score 66 – VAS 2. Patients treated with hand-made spacer registered the following scores: Constant Score 20 – QuickDASH 51 – SST 25 – ASES Score 38 – VAS 6. Two patients presented fracture of the spacer (one hand-made spacer and one tailored preformed). Conclusions. According to our data patients treated with modular tailored preformed antibiotic spacer show better functional outcomes. Patients are more likely to retain the spacer as a permanent implant, avoiding the risks of a second stage surgery in those low-demanding patients, achieving a reasonable satisfying quality of shoulder motion without pain

Purpose: Few reports are available at minimum 15 year follow-up of cemented modular cruciate retaining TKA, especially where all polyethylene patella components were utilized. This paper addresses the questions “What is the durability of cemented modular cruciate retaining TKA with all polyethylene patella components at 15 years?” and “Did modular tibial trays demonstrate their utility in terms of the potential for less costly and less complex revisions?”. Method: 101 Press Fit Condylar TKA’s were performed consecutively over a 27 month interval and followed prospectively for a minimum of 15 years. The average age at surgery was 72 years. Clinical Knee Society scores, need for revision, radiographic evidence of loosening, and osteolysis were recorded. All patients were recalled at 5 year intervals. Results: At minimum 15 year follow-up, 34 patients with 45 knees were living and 40 patients with 54 knees were deceased (one patient [2 knees] was lost to follow-up). 81% of living patients had 15 year radiographs. 6 knees were revised (all related to wear and osteolysis). Average Knee Society clinical scores only deteroriated from 92 points to 89 points between 10 and 15 years. Conclusion: This cemented modular CR TKA performed well at 15 years with only 6% of knees requiring revision. All revisions occurred after 10 years and were related to wear and osteolysis. 2/3 of the revisions could be salvaged without tibial component revision in this closely followed series. Hopefully these results can be improved with better wear-resistant designs and better quality polyethylene. Especially into the second decade, patients with modular tibial tray TKA constructs should be closely followed to optimize their utility allowing less costly and less complex revisions in cases with polyethylene wear

The vast majority of total hip replacements (THR) implanted today enable modularity by means of a tapered junction; based on the Morse taper design introduced for cutting tools in the 19. th. Century . 1. Morse-type tapers at the head-stem junction provide many benefits, key for a successful surgical outcome such as wider component selection and restoration of better biomechanics . 2. However, moving from mono-block to modular designs has not been without its issues. Fluid ingress and motion at the interface has led to a complex multifactorial degradation mechanism better known as fretting-corrosion . 3. Fretting-corrosion products created at the junction are commonly associated with adverse local tissue reactions . 4. . There is a wide variation in the taper junction of THR differing quite significantly from Morse's original design. Performance of the taper junction has been found to vary with different designs . 5,6. However, there is still a lack of common understanding of what design inputs makes a ‘good’ modular taper interface. The aim of this study was to better understand the links between implant design and fretting-corrosion initially focussing on the role of angular mismatch between male and female taper. A combination of experimental approaches with the aid of computational models to assist understanding has been adopted. A more descriptive understanding between taper design, engagement, motion and fretting-corrosion will be developed. Three different sample designs were created to represent the maximum range of possible angular mismatches seen in clinically available THR modular tapers (Matched: 0.020 ±0.002 °, Proximal: 0.127 ±0.016 °, Distal: −0.090 ±0.002 °). Head-stem components were assembled at 2 kN. Motion and fretting-corrosion at the interface was simulated under incremental uniaxial sinusoidal loading between 0.5–4 kN at 8 intervals of 600 cycles. The different types of motions at the interface was measured using a developed inductance circuit composed of four sensing coils, digital inductance converter chip (LDC1614, Texas Instruments, US) and microcontroller (myRIO, National Instruments, US). Fretting-corrosion was measured using potentiostatic electrochemical techniques with an over potential of +100 mV vs OCP (Ivium, NL). Complimentary finite element (FE) models were created in Ansys (Ansys 19.2, US). Under uniaxial loading, the ‘matched’ modular taper assemblies corroded most and allowed the greatest pistoning motion due to a seating action. ‘Distal’ and ‘proximal’ engaged modular tapers showed reduced corrosion and seating when compare to the ‘matched’ components. However the kinetics of corrosion and motion were interface dependent. It is hypothesized, and complimented by FEA analysis, that lower initial contact stress in the ‘matched’ modular tapers allows for greater subsidence and depassivation of the oxide layer and higher corrosion. ‘Matched’ modular tapers allowed less rotational and toggling motions compared to mismatched tapers, suggesting a reduced mismatch might perform better once the heads have seated over time. Future work involves tests conducted under a surgically relevant impaction force and physiological loading kinematics to develop this descriptive link between taper design, engagement and performance

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate serum metal ion levels in patients undergoing THA with either a standard or modular dual-mobility bearing. Patients undergoing primary THA for osteoarthritis were randomized to receive either a modular dual-mobility or a standard polyethylene bearing. All patients received the same titanium acetabular and femoral component and a ceramic femoral head. Only patients without a prior history of metal implants in their body were eligible for inclusion, thus isolating serum metal ions to the prosthesis itself. Serum metal ion levels were drawn pre-operatively and at 1 year postoperatively. Power analysis determined that 40 patients (20 in each group) were needed to identify a clinically relevant difference in serum cobalt of 0.35 ng/ml (ppb) at 90% power assuming a pooled standard deviation of 0.31 ppb and alpha=0.05; an additional 30% were enrolled to account for potential dropouts. 53 patients were enrolled, with 22 patients in the modular dual-mobility group and 20 in the standard cohort with data available at one-year. No differences in the serum cobalt (0.17 ppb [range 0.07 to 0.50] vs. 0.19 ppb [range 0.07 to 0.62], p = 0.51) or chromium levels (0.19 ppb [range 0.05 to 0.56] vs. 0.16 ppb [range 0.05 to 0.61], p = 0.23) were identified. At 1 year postoperatively, no differences in serum cobalt or chromium levels were identified with this design of a modular dual mobility bearing when compared to a standard polyethylene bearing

Introduction. Modular neck (MN) components in total hip arthroplasty (THA) offer intraoperative flexibility, but adverse local tissue reactions (ALTR) due to tribocorrosion at modular junctions are a potential complication of such designs. Serum ion levels and metal artifact reduction sequence (MARS) MRI are used to assess ALTR following modular THA. This study investigates serum ion levels and MARS MRI findings in a series of hips with MN components and differing articulating surfaces. Methods. We retrospectively evaluated a cohort of 184 primary THAs in 159 patients implanted with a dual modular femoral stem by one surgeon from 2005–2013. 121 THAs had a cobalt-chromium neck component and non-metal-on-metal articulation, while 63 THAs had a titanium neck component and metal-on-metal (MoM) articulation. Serum ion levels were recorded for all patients. MARS MRI scans were read by musculoskeletal-trained radiologists. Pseudotumor grade and location were measured. Results. Serum cobalt levels as a function of time post-operatively demonstrated no correlation. In THAs with non-MoM articulation, pseudotumors were visualized in 13 of 54 (24.1%) initial MARS MRIs performed 1–40 months post-operatively compared to 5 of 67 (7.5%) performed 41–120 months post-operatively (p=0.02), and findings typically remained consistent across multiple MARS MRI scans. Pseudotumors were generally located lateral to the hip joint in hips with non-MoM articulation compared to anteromedial following MoM arthroplasty. In the cobalt-chrome MN group, cobalt levels were elevated in 11 of 20 (55%) of patients with pseudotumor compared to 15 of 19 (79%) in the MoM group. Conclusion. Generation of ALTR leading to pseudotumor formation is a concern with cobalt-chrome MN designs. Psuedotumor characteristics differ between patients with cobalt-chrome designs versus MoM articulation. Normal serum ion levels did not exclude the presence of a pseudotumor and routine MARS MRI should be included in follow-up of patients with cobalt-chromium MN prostheses

Introduction. Numerous fixation modalities can be used for various indications, including deformity correction, trauma, infection, and non-union. The Modular Rail System (MRS) is a well-tolerated apparatus that is a viable option for patients who do not want a circular frame or for whom internal fixation is not appropriate due to poor soft tissues/co-morbidities. This case series evaluates the outcomes of the use of the MRS in our centre. Materials and Methods. Cases were identified from a prospectively gathered database. Data were collected including indication for treatment, frame duration, complications and treatment outcome. Eighteen eligible cases were identified (mean age 26, range 8–71). The MRS was sited in the femur in 14 cases, the tibia in three and the fibula in one. In nine cases, a circular frame was sited on the tibia below a femoral MRS. Frames were removed at an average of 20 weeks (range 7–31). Results. Eight complications occurred in six patients including fracture following removal (2), premature union (2), deep infection (1), scar complications (1), pin exchange (1) and non-union (1). 17/18 patients achieved their treatment goal and a satisfactory clinical outcome. Conclusions. We have demonstrated the use of the MRS in both trauma and elective practice and have found it to be well tolerated in our cohort of patients, particularly the paediatric and elderly populations. This case series demonstrates that, with the correct patient selection, the MRS is a versatile adjunct for use in limb reconstruction cases

Tapered fluted grit-blasted modular stems have now become established as a successful method of femoral revision. The success of these stems is predicated on obtaining axial stability by milling the femur to a cone and then inserting the tapered prosthesis into that cone. Torsional stability is gained by flutes that cut into the diaphysis. By having modular proximal segments of different lengths, the leg length, offset, and anteversion can be adjusted after the distal stem is fixed. This maximises the chance for the stem to be driven into the canal to whatever level provides maximum stem stability. Modular fluted tapered stems have the potential benefits of being made of titanium and hence being both bone friendly and also having a modulus of elasticity closer to that of bone. They have a well-established high rate of fixation. Drawbacks include the risk of fracture of modular junctions and tapers, and difficulty of extraction. The indications for the use of these implants vary among surgeons, but the implants are suitable for use in a wide variety of bone loss categories. Non-modular fluted tapered stems also can gain excellent fixation, but are less versatile and in most practices are used for selected simpler revisions. Results from a number of institutions in North America and Europe demonstrate high rates of implant fixation. In a recently published paper from Mayo Clinic, the 10-year survivorship, free of femoral aseptic loosening revision, of a modular fluted tapered stem was 98% and the stem performed well across a wide range of bone deficiencies. The technique of implantation will be described in a video during the presentation

Modern modular revision stems employ tapered conical (TCR) distal stems designed for immediate axial and rotational stability with subsequent osseo-integration of the stem. Modular proximal segments allow the surgeon to achieve bone contact proximally with eventual ingrowth that protects the modular junction. The independent sizing of the proximal body and distal stem allows for each portion to obtain intimate bony contact and gives the surgeon the ability precisely control the femoral head center of rotation, offset, version, leg length, and overall stability. The most important advantage of modular revision stems is versatility - the ability to manage ALL levels of femoral bone loss (present before revision or created during revision). Used routinely, this allows the surgeon to quickly gain familiarity with the techniques and instruments for preparation and implantation and subsequently master the use for all variety of situations. This also allows the operating room staff to become comfortable with the instrumentation and components. Additionally, the ability to use the stem in all bone loss situations eliminates intra-operative shuffle (changes in the surgical plan resulting in more instruments being opened), as bone loss can be significantly under-estimated pre-operatively or may change intra-operatively. Furthermore, distal fixation can be obtained simply and reliably. Paprosky 1 femoral defects can be treated with a primary-type stem for the most part. All other femoral defects can be treated with a TCR stem. Fully porous coated stems also work for many revisions but why have two different revision stem choices available when the TCR stems work for ALL defects?. The most critical advantage is the ability to separate completely the critical task of fixation from other important tasks of restoring offset, leg length, and stability. Once fixation is secured, the surgeon can concentrate on hip stability and on optimization of hip mechanics (leg length and offset). The ability to do this allows the surgeon to maximise patient functionality post-operatively. Modular tapered stems have TWO specific advantages over monolithic stems in this important surgical task. The proximal body size and length can be adjusted AFTER stem insertion if the stem goes deeper than the trial. Further, proximal/distal bone size mismatch can be accommodated. The surgeon can control the diameter of the proximal body to ensure proper bony apposition independent of distal fitting needs. If the surgeon believes that proximal bone ingrowth is important to facilitate proximal bone remodeling, modular TCR stems can more easily accomplish this. The most under-appreciated advantage is the straightforward instrumentation system that makes the operation easier for the staff and the surgeon, while enhancing the operating room efficiency and reducing cost. Also, although the implant itself may result in more cost, most modular systems allow for a decrease in inventory requirements, which make up the cost differential. One theoretical disadvantage of modular revision stems is modular junction fracture, which can happen if the junction itself is not protected by bone. Ensuring proximal bone support can minimise this problem. Once porous ingrowth occurs proximally, the risk of junction fracture is eliminated. Even NON-modular stems fracture when proximal bone support is missing. Another theoretical issue is modular junction corrosion but this not a clinical one, since both components are titanium. One can also fail to connect properly the two parts during surgery

The use of cementless acetabular components is currently the gold standard for treatment in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Porous coated cups have a low modulus of elasticity that enhances press-fit and a surface that promotes osseointegration. Monoblock acetabular cups represent a subtype of uncemented cup with the liner moulded into the metal shell, minimizing potential backside wear and eliminating the chance of mal-seating. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term clinical and radiographic performances of a modular cup with that of a monoblock cup, with particular interest in the advent of lucent lines and their correlation with clinical outcomes. In this multi-surgeon, prospective, randomized, controlled trial, 86 patients undergoing unilateral THA were recruited. Participants were randomized to either a porous-coated, modular metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) acetabular component (n=46) or a hydroxyapatite (HA)- and titanium-coated monoblock shell with ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearing (n=42). The porous-coated cup had an average pore size of 250 microns with an average volume porosity of 45%, whereas the monoblock shell had an average pore size of 300 microns with an average volume porosity of 48% and a HA coating thickness of 80 nm. There were no baseline demographic differences between both groups regarding sex, age, body mass index (BMI), or American Society of Anaesthesia (ASA) class (p>0.05). All of the sockets were under-reamed by 1 mm. Radiographs and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Hip Score, were available for evaluation at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. A radiolucent distance between the cup and acetabulum of ≥0.5 mm was defined as gap if it was diagnosed from outset or as radiolucency if it had sclerotic edges and was found on progressive x-ray analyses. Thirty-two gaps (69%) were found in the modular cup group and 28 (6%) in the monoblock one (p=0.001). Of the former, 17 filled the gaps whereas 15 turned into a radiolucency at final assessment. Of the latter, only 1 of the gaps turned into a radiolucency at final follow-up (p 0.05) in both groups. Only the porous-coated cup was an independent predictor of lucent lines (OR:0.052, p=0.007). No case underwent revision surgery due to acetabular loosening during the study period. Only 2 cases of squeaking were reported in the CoC monoblock shell. Both porous-coated modular and hydroxyapatite-coated monoblock cups showed successful clinical results at short-term follow-up, however, the former evidenced a significantly higher rate of radiolucent line occurrence, without any association with PROMs. Since these lines indicate the possibility of future cup loosening, longer follow-up and assessment are necessary

Introduction. Porous coated cups have a low modulus of elasticity that enhances press-fit and a surface that promotes osseointegration as well as permitting modularity. Monoblock ceramic acetabular cups represent a subtype of uncemented cup permitting the use of large femoral heads. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term clinical and radiographic performances of both cups. Methods. This was a prospective RCT of 86 unilateral THA patients (M: 40, F: 48; mean age: 59.5 ± 10.6) randomized to either a porous-coated, modular metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) acetabular component (pore size 250µm, 45% mean volume porosity)(n=46) or a hydroxyapatite (HA) and titanium-coated monoblock shell with ceramic-on-ceramic(CoC) bearing (pore size 300µm, 48% mean volume porosity & 80nm HA coating thickness)(n=42). All sockets were under-reamed by 1 mm. Two-year radiographs and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) were available. Results. Thirty-two (69%) and 28 (6%) gaps were found in modular cup and monoblock groups, respectively (p=0.001). For the modular, 17 filled the gaps, whereas 15 turned into radiolucency; for the monoblock, 1 of the gaps turned into radiolucency at final follow-up (p<0.001). Complete shell-to-bone contact without radiolucent lines was seen in 30 (65%) porous-coated cups and in 41 (98%) HA shells (p<0.001). There were no associations between presence of lucent lines and PROMs (mHHS, WOMAC and UCLA) (p>0.05) in both groups. Modular cup group was an independent predictor of developing lucent lines (OR: 19.1, p= 0.007). No case underwent revision surgery due to acetabular loosening. There were 2 cases of squeaking in CoC monoblock shell with no functional limitations. Conclusion. Both cups showed successful clinical results at short-term follow-up; however, the porous-coated modular evidenced a significantly higher rate of radiolucent line occurrence, without any association with PROMs. Since these lines indicate the possibility of future cup loosening, longer follow-up is necessary. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Abstract. Introduction. Choosing a hinged implant in the revision knee arthroplasty (rTKA) setting is challenging and limited data on implant performance exists. We present the survivorship and reason for failure in rTKA performed at our institution using the LINK hinge prosthesis, predominantly the cemented modular Endo-Model prosthesis. Methodology. 260 consecutive revision knee cases performed between 2012 and 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. Mean follow up was 27 months (range 0 to 107). Survivorship was analysed in Stata using a Log Rank test to compare performance in patients stratified according to age (≥80 years old (76 cases), 70–79 years (104 cases) and ≤70 years (80 cases). Results. 53 patients died and 48/207 (23%) cases in 40 patients underwent re-revision. Reasons for re-revision were aseptic loosening (21), infection (12), instability (4), extensor failure (1), stiffness (1), fracture (1) and other (8). Loosening was seen in the femur (8), tibia (5), and both the femur and tibia (8). Sub-group analysis of patients according to age showed a significantly higher failure rate in younger patients (6 failures (8%) in patients ≥80, 27 failures (26%) in 70–79 and 15 (19%) in ≤70 (p = 0.02). Failure in patients ≤70 was predominantly due to aseptic loosening (8/15). Conclusion. Here we report a significantly higher rate of LINK hinge prostheses failure in patients <70 undergoing rTKA. Consent should consider the risk of re-revision in this patient group

Revision hip surgery is about simplification. As such, a single revision stem makes sense. The most important advantage of Tapered Conical Revision (TCR) stem is versatility - managing ALL levels of femoral bone loss (present before revision or created during revision). The surgeon and team quickly gain familiarity with the techniques and instruments for preparation and implantation and subsequently master its use for a variety of situations. This ability to use the stem in a variety of bone loss situations eliminates intraoperative shuffle (changes in the surgical plan resulting in more instruments being opened), as bone loss can be significantly underestimated preoperatively or may change intraoperatively. Furthermore, distal fixation can be obtained simply and reliably. Paprosky 1 femoral defects can be treated with a primary-type stem for the most part. All other femoral defects can be treated with a TCR stem. Fully porous coated stems also work for many revisions but why have two different revision stem choices available when the TCR stems work for ALL defects?. TCR stems can be modular or monolithic but there are common keys to success. First and foremost, proper exposure is essential to assess bone defects and to safely prepare the femur. An extended osteotomy is often useful. Reaming distally to prepare a cone for fixation of the conical stem is a critical requirement to prevent subsidence (true for all revision stems). Restoration of hip mechanics (offset, leg length and stability) is fundamental to the clinical result. TCR stems have instrumentation and techniques that ensure this happens, since all this occurs AFTER distal stability is achieved. Modular TCR versions have some advantages. The proximal body size and length can be adjusted AFTER stem insertion if the stem goes deeper than the trial. Any proximal/distal bone size mismatch can be accommodated. If the surgeon believes that proximal bone ingrowth is important to facilitate proximal bone remodeling, modular TCR stems can more easily accomplish this. Further, proximal bone contact and osseointegration will protect the modular junction from stress and possible risk of fracture. Monolithic TCR versions also have some advantages. Modular junction mechanical integrity cannot accommodate smaller bone sizes. Shorter stem lengths are not available in modular versions, and shorter TCR stems are an option in many revision cases. The possibility of modular junction corrosion is eliminated and fracture of the stem at that junction, of course, is not possible. The monolithic stem option is less expensive as well. Consider Modular TCR stems in your learning curve, if you feel proximal bone osseointegration is important and if proximal/distal size mismatch is present. Consider Monolithic TCR stems after your learning curve to reduce cost, when a short stem works, and if a small stem is needed. Both Modular and Monolithic stems can be used for ALL cases with equal quality of result

Introduction. Dual modular hip prostheses were introduced to optimize the individual and intra-surgical adaptation of the implant design to the native anatomics und biomechanics of the hip. The downside of a modular implant design with an additional modular interface is the potential susceptibility to fretting, crevice corrosion and wear [1–2]. The purpose of this study was to characterize the metal ion release of a modular hip implant system with different modular junctions and material combinations in consideration of the corrosive physiological environment. Methods. One design of a dual modular hip prosthesis (Ti6Al4V, Metha®, Aesculap AG, Germany) with a high offset neck adapter (CoCrMo, CCD-angle of 130°, neutral antetorsion) and a monobloc prosthesis (stem size 4) of the same implant type were used to characterize the metal ion release of modular and non-modular hip implants. Stems were embedded in PMMA with 10° adduction and 9° flexion according to ISO 7206-6 and assembled with ceramic (Biolox® delta) or CoCrMo femoral heads (XL-offset) by three light impacts with a hammer. All implant options were tested in four different test fluids: Ringer's solution, bovine calf serum and iron chloride solution (FeCl3-concentration: 10 g/L and 114 g/L). Cyclic axial sinusoidal compressive load (Fmax = 3800 N, peak load level of walking based on in vivo force measurements [3]) was applied for 10 million cycles using a servohydraulic testing machine (MTS MiniBionix 370). The test frequency was continuously varied between 15 Hz (9900 cycles) followed by 1 Hz (100 cycles). The metal ion concentration (cobalt, chromium and titanium) of the test fluids were analysed using ICP-OES and ICP-MS at intervals of 0, 5·105, 2·106 and 10·106 cycles (measuring sensitivity < 1 µg/L). Results. Due to the additional modular interface between stem and neck adapter the total metal ion release of the modular hip endoprosthesis system increased significantly and is comparable to the coupling of a monobloc stem and a CoCrMo femoral head (Fig. 1). The application of ceramic femoral heads reduced the total cobalt and chromium release in the stem-head taper interface of non-modular and modular stems. In comparison between the four test fluids could be observed that lower pH-values and higher FeCl3-concentrations increased the metal ion release (Fig 2). In contrast, the use of bovine calf serum decreased the metal ion release of modular junctions due to the presence of proteins and other organic components. Discussion. For testing hip implants with proximal femoral modularity according to ISO and ASTM standards, sodium chloride solutions are frequently used to determine the fatigue strength and durability of the stem-neck connection. The present study illustrate that the expansion of standard requirements of biomechanical testing and the use of alternative test fluids is necessary to simulate metal ion release by electro-chemical processes. A promising approach is the use of adapted iron-chloride solutions (10 g/L FeCl3, pH 2) to evaluate the susceptibility of modular hip junctions to fretting, crevice and contact corrosion

The goals of revision total hip on the femoral side are to achieve long term stable fixation, improve quality of life and minimise complications such as intra-operative fracture or dislocation. Ideally these stems will preserve or restore bone stock. Modular titanium stems were first introduced in North America around 2000. They gained popularity as an option for treating Paprosky 3B and 4 defects. Several studies at our institution have compared the modular titanium stems with monoblock cobalt chromium stems. The main outcomes of interest were quality of life. We also looked at complications such as intra-operative fracture and post-operative dislocation. We also compared these 2 stems with respect to restoration or preservation of bone stock. In two studies we showed that modular titanium stems gave superior functional outcomes as well as decreased complications compared to a matched cohort of monoblock cobalt chromium stems. As mentioned one of the initial reasons for introduction of these stems was to address larger femoral defects where failure rates with monoblock cobalt chromium stems were unacceptably high. We followed a group of 65 patients at 5–10 years post-revision with a modular fluted titanium stem. Excellent fixation was obtained with no cases of aseptic loosening. However, there were 5 cases of fracture of the modular junction. Due to concerns of fracture of the modular junction more recently, at our institution we have switched to almost 100% monoblock fluted titanium stems. We recently reviewed our first 100 cases of femoral revision with monoblock stem. Excellent fixation was achieved with no cases of aseptic loosening. Quality of life outcomes were similar to our previous reported series on modular tapered titanium stems. Both monoblock and modular fluted titanium stems can give excellent fixation and excellent functional outcomes. This leaves a choice for the surgeon. For the low volume revision surgeon modular tapered stems are probably the right choice. Higher volume surgeons or surgeons very comfortable with performing femoral revision may want to consider monoblock stems. If one is making the switch it would be easiest to start with a simple case. Such a case would be one that can be done through an endofemoral approach. In this the greater trochanter is available as the key landmark for reaming. After the surgeon is comfortable with this system more complex cases can easily be handled with the monoblock stem. In summary, both modular and monoblock titanium stems are excellent options for femoral revision. As one becomes more familiar with the monoblock stem it can easily become your workhorse for femoral revision. At our institution, we introduced a monoblock titanium stem in 2011. It started out at 50% of cases and now it is virtually used in almost 100% of revision cases

Introduction. Improper seating during head/stem assembly can lead to unintended micromotion between the femoral head and stem taper—resulting in fretting corrosion and implant failure. There is no consensus—either by manufacturers or by the surgical community—on what head/stem taper assembly method maximizes modular junction stability in total hip arthroplasty (THA). A 2018 clinical survey found that orthopedic surgeons prefer applying one strike or three, subsequent strikes when assembling head/stem taper. However, it has been suggested that additional strikes may lead to decreased interference. Additionally, the taper surface finish—micro-grooves—has been shown to affect taper interference and may be influenced by assembly method. Objective. The objective of this study was to employ a novel, micro-grooved finite element (FEA) model of the hip taper interface and assess the role of head/stem assembly method—one vs three strikes—on modular taper junction stability. Methods. A two-dimensional, axisymmetric model representative of a CoCrMo femoral head taper and Ti6Al4V stem taper was created using median geometrical measurements taken from over 100 retrieved implants. Surface finish—micro-grooves—of the head/stem taper were modeled using a sinusoidal function with amplitude and period corresponding to median retrieval measurements of micro-groove height and spacing, respectively (“smooth” stem taper: height=2µm, spacing=50µm; “rough” stem taper: height=11µm, spacing=200µm; head taper: height=2µm, spacing=50µm). All models had a 3’ (0.05°), proximal-locked angular mismatch between the tapers. To simulate modular assembly during surgery, multiple dynamic loads (4kN, 8kN, and 12kN) were applied to the femoral head taper as either one or three sequence of strikes. The input load profile (Figure 1) used for both cases was collected from surgeons assembling an experimental setup with a three-dimensional load sensor. Models were assembled and meshed in ABAQUS Standard (v 6.17) using four-node linear hexahedral, reduced integration elements. Friction was modeled between the stem and head taper using surface-to-surface formulation with penalty contact (µ=0.2). A total of 12 implicit, dynamic simulations (3 loads x 2 assembly sequences x 2 stem taper surface finishes) were run, with 2 static simulations at 4kN for evaluating inertial effects. Outcome variables included contact area, contact pressure, equivalent plastic strain, and pull-off force. Results. As expected, increasing assembly load led to increased contact area, pressures, and plasticity for both taper finishes. Rough tapers exhibited less total contact area at each loading level as compared to the smooth taper. Contact pressures were relatively similar across the stem taper finishes, except the 3-strike smooth taper, which exhibited the lowest contact pressures (Figure 2) and pull-off forces. The models assembled with one strike exhibited the greatest contact pressures, pull-off forces, and micro-groove plastic deformation. Conclusion. Employing 1-strike loads led to greater contact areas, pressures, pull-off forces, and plastic deformation of the stem taper micro-grooves as compared to tapers assembled with three strikes. Residual energy may be lost with subsequent assembly strikes, suggesting that one, firm strike maximizes taper assembly mechanics. These models will be used to identify the optimal design factors and impaction method to maximize stability of modular taper junctions. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly