Periprosthetic hip-joint infection is a multifaceted and highly detrimental outcome for patients and clinicians. The incidence of prosthetic joint infection reported within two years of primary hip arthroplasty ranges from 0.8% to 2.1%. Costs of treatment are over five-times greater in people with periprosthetic hip joint infection than in those with no infection. Currently, there are no national evidence-based guidelines for treatment and management of this condition to guide clinical practice or to inform clinical study design. The aim of this study is to develop guidelines based on evidence from the six-year INFection and ORthopaedic Management (INFORM) research programme. We used a consensus process consisting of an evidence review to generate items for the guidelines and online consensus questionnaire and virtual face-to-face consensus meeting to draft the guidelines.Aims
Methods
Our rural orthopaedic service has undergone service restructure during the COVID-19 pandemic in order to sustain hip fracture care. All adult trauma care has been centralised to the Royal Shrewsbury Hospital for assessment and medical input, before transferring those requiring operative intervention to the Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital. We aim to review the impact of COVID-19 on hip fracture workload and service changes upon management of hip fractures. We reviewed our prospectively maintained trust database and National Hip Fracture Database records for the months of March and April between the years 2016 and 2020. Our assessment included fracture pattern (intrascapular vs extracapsular hip fracture), treatment intervention, length of stay and mortality.Aims
Methods
High failure rates of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty implants have highlighted the need for more careful introduction and monitoring of new implants and for the evaluation of the safety of medical devices. The National Joint Registry and other regulatory services are unable to detect failing implants at an early enough stage. We aimed to identify validated surrogate markers of long-term outcome in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). We conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating surrogate markers for predicting long-term outcome in primary THA. Long-term outcome was defined as revision rate of an implant at ten years according to National Institute of Health and Care Excellence guidelines. We conducted a search of Medline and Embase (OVID) databases. Separate search strategies were devised for the Cochrane database and Google Scholar. Each search was performed to include articles from the date of their inception to June 8, 2015.Objectives
Methods
There is a high rate of mortality in elderly
patients who sustain a fracture of the hip. We aimed to determine
the rate of preventable mortality and errors during the management
of these patients. A 12 month prospective study was performed on
patients aged >
65 years who had sustained a fracture of the hip.
This was conducted at a Level 1 Trauma Centre with no orthogeriatric
service. A multidisciplinary review of the medical records by four
specialists was performed to analyse errors of management and elements
of preventable mortality. During 2011, there were 437 patients aged
>
65 years admitted with a fracture of the hip (85 years (66 to
99)) and 20 died while in hospital (86.3 years (67 to 96)). A total
of 152 errors were identified in the 80 individual reviews of the
20 deaths. A total of 99 errors (65%) were thought to have at least
a moderate effect on death; 45 reviews considering death (57%) were thought
to have potentially been preventable. Agreement between the panel
of reviewers on the preventability of death was fair. A larger-scale
assessment of preventable mortality in elderly patients who sustain
a fracture of the hip is required. Multidisciplinary review panels
could be considered as part of the quality assurance process in
the management of these patients. Cite this article
