This review provides a concise outline of the advances made in the care of patients and to the quality of life after a traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) over the last century. Despite these improvements reversal of the neurological injury is not yet possible. Instead, current treatment is limited to providing symptomatic relief, avoiding secondary insults and preventing additional sequelae. However, with an ever-advancing technology and deeper understanding of the damaged spinal cord, this appears increasingly conceivable. A brief synopsis of the most prominent challenges facing both clinicians and research scientists in developing functional treatments for a progressively complex injury are presented. Moreover, the multiple mechanisms by which damage propagates many months after the original injury requires a multifaceted approach to ameliorate the human spinal cord. We discuss potential methods to protect the spinal cord from damage, and to manipulate the inherent inhibition of the spinal cord to regeneration and repair. Although acute and chronic SCI share common final pathways resulting in cell death and neurological deficits, the underlying putative mechanisms of chronic SCI and the treatments are not covered in this review.
We performed a systematic review of the literature to determine the safety and efficacy of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) compared with bone graft when used specifically for revision spinal fusion surgery secondary to pseudarthrosis. The MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were searched using defined search terms. The primary outcome measure was spinal fusion, assessed as success or failure in accordance with radiograph, MRI or CT scan review at 24-month follow-up. The secondary outcome measure was time to fusion.Objectives
Methods
Mesenchymal stem-cell based therapies have been
proposed as novel treatments for intervertebral disc degeneration,
a prevalent and disabling condition associated with back pain. The
development of these treatment strategies, however, has been hindered
by the incomplete understanding of the human nucleus pulposus phenotype
and by an inaccurate interpretation and translation of animal to
human research. This review summarises recent work characterising
the nucleus pulposus phenotype in different animal models and in
humans and integrates their findings with the anatomical and physiological
differences between these species. Understanding this phenotype
is paramount to guarantee that implanted cells restore the native
functions of the intervertebral disc. Cite this article:
