Introduction: Ankle fractures are common in trauma practice. Traditional teaching has been to use two screws for medial malleolar fixation to achieve better rotational control. However, the evidence for this is limited. This study compares the outcome following either one or two screws for medial malleolar fracture fixation.

Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of case notes and x-rays of all medial malleolar fracture fixations performed between 2002 to 2007. Two groups were formed (group-I and group-II) depending upon the use of either one or two screws, respectively.

Both groups were age and sex matched. Besides patient demographics, fracture pattern according to Dennis–Webber classification, orientation of the medial malleolar fracture, position of screw in relation to fracture, post-operative fracture displacement and union (bony and clinical) were assessed. Patients were also contacted to assess whether they had returned to their pre-injury level of activities.

Results: There were total of 76 patients (group-I had 37 and group-II had 39 patients). The majority were females with age range between 19 and 84 years with involvement of the right ankle mostly.

In group-I, 15 patients had bi-malleolar Dennis-Webber type B fractures, 9 had bi-malleolar Dennis-Webber type C and 10 had tri-malleolar fractures. 3 had uni-malleolar fracture.

In group-II, 20 patients had bi-malleolar Dennis-Webber type B fractures, 9 had bi-malleolar Dennis-Webber type C fractures and there were 5 tri-malleolar fractures. 5 had uni-malleolar fracture.

The fracture orientation in both the groups was mostly horizontal than oblique and the screw placement was at an angle to the fracture in the majority of cases in both of them.

There was no significant difference between the two groups, in terms of clinical union, post-operative fracture displacement and return of patients to their pre-injury level of activity.

Conclusion: Medial malleolar fractures can be efficiently fixed with one screw only, which does not increase the risk of post-operative fracture fragment displacement, compared to using two screws.

Introduction: Hallux valgus is a common presentation at the elective orthopaedic clinics. Patients complain of pain and deformity of the big toe. Treatment is aimed at improving the cosmesis and alleviating pain in the fore foot.

This study assesses the pre and post-operative pedal pressures during stance phase of dynamic gait cycle to identify objective biomechanical factors which influence the final outcome.

Materials and Methods: This is a prospective study, approved by the local research and ethics committee, in which 17 feet were assessed with moderate to severe hallux valgus. Distal-L and Scarf osteotomies were performed for moderate and severe deformities, respectively.

Pedobarography was performed before and 8 months after surgery, on an average. Sole was divided into eight segments i.e. heel, midfoot, lateral forefoot, central forefoot, medial forefoot, II–V toes, hallux and total sole area. Variables compared were contact area, peak pressure, mean pressure and contact time. Manchester-Oxford foot questionnaire (MOXFQ) was used to assess the clinical disability. The inter-metatarsal and metatarso-phalengeal angles were measured radiographically. Both clinical and radiological assessments were performed pre and post-operatively.

Results: 11 had distal-L and 6 had Scarf osteotomies. There were significant improvements in all the three domains of the subjective MOXFQ questionnaire i.e. walking/standing (p 0.013), pain (p 0.001) and social limitation (p 0.002).

The inter-metatarsal angle reduced from 15 to 7 (p 0.001) and the metatarso-phalengeal angle reduced from 32 to 9 (p 0.001).

There was significant reduction in heel contact area (p 0.002), the medial forefoot (p 0.030) and II – V toes (p 0.048) contact time.

Conclusion: Both distal-L and Scarf osteotomies resulted in significant improvements in clinical and radiographic outcome. Although there was reduction in heel contact area and medial forefoot contact time, there were no significant changes in pedal pressures at 8 months postoperatively.

Purpose of study: To assess the effect of 18-month waiting list, on the subsequent requirement of knee arthros-copy.

Materials and methods: Medical records of 310 patients with knee pain, who had been placed on the non-urgent arthroscopy waiting list in 2003, were assessed. Diagnoses and the grade of doctor placing the patients on the list were also noted. The percentages of patients undergoing surgery as planned, as well as of those being cancelled were looked at.

Results: 61% of patients underwent knee arthroscopy as planned. 12% considered their symptoms insignificant as to require operation. 11% wanted a later operation date because of personal reasons, 7% had their surgery privately or had been expedited through the waiting list scheme because of deterioration in their condition but remained on NHS waiting list, and 9% patients had their surgeries postponed because of other medical reasons.

Conclusion: For a group of patients having been placed on an 18-month waiting list for knee arthroscopy, 40% did not subsequently have surgery within the NHS setting, as planned initially.