Prosthetic joint infections (PJI) are one of the most devastating complications of joint replacement surgery. They are associated with significant patient morbidity and carry a significant economic cost to treat. The management of PJI varies from antibiotic suppression, debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) procedures through to single/multiple stage revision procedures. Concerns have been raised recently in relation to the rising number of revision arthroplasty procedures that are being undertaken in relation to infection. This database aims to collect data on all PJIs that have been managed in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) region. This will allow us to investigate the microbial trends, outcomes of surgical intervention and patient outcomes within our local population.

This database will incorporate diagnostic, demographic, microbiological and treatment information in relation to local PJI cases. The data will be collated from the local infectious diseases database, hospital medical records, and where available the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Data.

The first 100 cases of PJI were assessed. 76% were defined as being acute. 56% of the patients received antibiotics prior to their diagnosis however only 3% were culture negative. 89% were monomicrobial and 11% polymicrobial. The intended management strategy was a DAIR in 38% of patients and a 2-stage revision in 12% of cases. The intended management strategy was successful in 46% of the patients.

The ACT is uniquely placed to analyze and create a local PJI database. This will allow us to guide further treatment and local guidelines in terms of management of these complex patients.

Intramedullary Nailing is now accepted as the standard treatment for most femoral diaphyseal fractures. Most intramedullary nails are designed for proximal and distal locking with screws. We describe our experience with the Brooker Wills femoral nail. This nail is unique as distal fixation is achieved with as transverse fixator deployed through slots in the nail, a concept first enunciated by deCamargo in 1952. The fins of the fixator pierce the distal cortex when deployed thereby conferring rotational stability. The entire nail (including the proximal and distal fixation devices) can be inserted through a single proximal incision in the skin.

We treated 17 patients with femoral shaft fractures using this system. 93% of the patients were males. Motor vehicle accidents accounted for 80 % of the fractures. Most fractures involved the middle third of the femur (54%), followed by distal third (33%) and proximal third (13%). 67 % of the fractures showed Winquist and Hansen Grade 3 or 4 comminution.

All the nailings were performed in the supine position. Static locking was done in 16 cases. Post operative weight bearing was individualized with 86% of the patients bearing full weight before the end of 16 weeks. The average time to full weight bearing was 14 weeks.

The mean time to union was 17.1 weeks, with proximal, middle and distal third fractures showing average healing times of 19, 15.6 and 18.8 weeks respectively. All the fractures united. There was one case of delayed union. Intra-operative complications included–inability to deploy the distal fixator in one case and unwinding of the reamer in another case. There was one case of superficial infection where a patient developed a sinus over the metallic fin of the distal fixation device, which had penetrated the cortex. This healed after the distal fixation device was removed. There was one case of proximal nail migration, but the fracture went onto union with some limb shortening.

Results were evaluated using the scoring system devised by Sanders etal (1991). The functional criteria in their scoring system include- knee flexion, presence of pain, femur deformity, walking distance, stair climbing and pre injury functional status. We achieved excellent results in 53% of patients, good- 27%, fair–13 % and poor-7%.

We feel that the main advantage of the Brooker Wills Nail is the ease of distal locking. This saves time and also leads to lower level of radiation exposure, as the image intensifier is sparingly used for distal locking. In fact, this nail is an attractive option in centres which lack an image intensifier. We achieved good results with this nailing system and feel that it is an acceptable alternative to other nailing systems with conventional locking systems with screws.

Introduction: Historically, it has been accepted that the pain associated with arthritis of the hip is usually located in the groin, anterior and lateral thigh with occasional radiation to the anterior knee. Patients complaining of thigh pain that extends below the knee are often considered to have a degenerative lumbar spine as the cause for their lower limb symptoms and total hip replacement (THR) may not be offered.

Following review of data regarding the preoperative distribution of pain in 2000 patients attending for hip replacement, it was noted that 40% of these patients had complained of pain at or below the knee.

We proposed to prospectively investigate the severity and location of pain in patients attending for THR and assessed how this distribution of pain altered following surgery. We also proposed to examine the distribution of radiological wear preoperatively and assess if there is any relationship between localisation of pain, and the severity or distribution of the radiological wear pattern.

Methods: 200 consecutive patients undergoing primary THR completed a questionnaire regarding the location and severity of their pain. Pain was localised to one or more of nine areas extending from low back to the foot. The localisation of pain was quantified as to severity using a visual analogue score. Questionnaires were completed both 4 weeks preoperatively and subsequently at a 3-month review clinic.

All patients underwent a standardised preoperative AP and Lateral x-ray. The AP film was divided into three areas, and the lateral film was divided into 5 areas. Each zone was assessed as to the severity of wear pattern and graded from 1–3 (no change in joint space, decreased joint space, femoral or acetabular destruction).

Results: The 200 patients complained of pain in a total of 980 areas preoperatively and 105 areas postoperative. 70% of the patients had complete relief of all pain at 3 months. The most common area of pain identified by patients was to the anterior aspect of the knee (82%), followed by pain at the greater trochanter and groin. 55% patients complained of pain extending to below the knee, mostly over the anterolateral aspect of the leg. Only 7% of these patients continued to complain of any below knee pain postoperatively, and all of these patients still had some relief of their below knee pain at review.

With regard to the frequencies and severity of x-ray changes, zone-1 (34%) was most commonly severely damaged with femoral and/or acetabular destruction in the AP film, with the anterior and anterolateral areas being most commonly affected areas in the lateral film (20% and 19% respectively).

When the distributions and severities of x-ray changes were correlated with the distribution of pain localised pre and postoperatively we were unable to show any association between the degree of radiological wear in any one zone and the locatin of pain identified by the patient. In fact, there was a normal distribution to the severity of radiological damage between each of the zones and localisation of pain in any of the 9 areas.

Conclusions: A significant number of patients who require hip arthroplasty have pain extending below the knee. This pain is frequently relieved following THR. The commonest area of sever hip joint wear with loss of femoral or acetabular bone is antero-superiorly. It is important to recognise this during surgery, such that action can be taken to ensure appropriate reaming such that subsequent correct tissue tension and leg lengths are achieved. We are unable to show any relationship between area of pain and area of radiological degeneration. We believe that patients who complain of pain in their back, buttock or thigh, which extends below the knee, can still benefit from total hip replacement. Patients who attend complaining of low back pain with radiation of pain down their leg should have their hips as well as their lumbar spine examined and imaged. Careful consideration should be taken before labelling the paid as being referred from degenerative back disease.

Introduction: Historically, it has been accepted that pain associated with arthritis of the hip is usually located in the groin and thigh with radiation to the anterior knee. However pain below the knee, and into the foot was not believed to be associated with arthritis of the hip. Patients complaining of thigh pain that extends below the knee are often considered to have a degenerative lumbar spine as the cause for their lower limb symptoms, and hip arthroplasty may not be offered. We examined the severity and location of pain in patients attending for arthroplasty and assessed how this altered following surgery.

Methods: 200 consecutive patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty completed a questionnaire regarding the location and severity of pain in the leg and also an Oxford hip score to assess functionality. These were completed approximately 4 weeks preoperatively and again at a 3-month review clinic.

Results: 57% (114/200) of patients complained of pain below their knee preoperatively. Only 9% (10/114) of these patients continued to complain of pain postoperatively, and of these patients their mean pain score decreased by 44% (9 to 5). Only 1% (2/200) of all patients complained solely of pain in the knee or more distally, and both of these had complete relief of pain 3 months postoperatively.

Conclusion: A significant number of patients with degenerative hip disease have pain below the knee. Patients who complain of pain in their back, buttock or thigh, which extends below the knee, may still benefit from total hip replacement. Careful consideration should be taken before labelling the pain as being referred from degenerative back disease.