To test the hypothesis that: CERAMENT[™]|G (C-G) would improve new bone growth and decrease infection rate after debridement as compared with 1) CERAMENT|BONE VOID FILLER (CBVF) and 2) no void filler in a rat osteomyelitis model.

72 Sprague Dawley rats were injected with 1.5 × 10∧6 CFU of S. aureus into a drill hole in the right tibia. After 3 weeks, the osteomyelitic defect was debrided, and filled with either: 1) C-G (n=32), 2) CBVF (n=20), or 3) nothing (n=20). 6 weeks after the second surgery, 20 rats from each group were sacrificed and the right tibias were harvested. A long-term group (n=12) of C-G treated rats were also sacrificed at 6 months after the second surgery. The tissues were sonicated and the colony forming units in the sonicate were quantified by serial dilutions and culture. MicroCT was used to quantify the new bone growth (BV/TV) in the debrided osteomyelitic void. Histological samples were analyzed for the presence of a neutrophil response by a blinded pathologist.

(*: p<0.05)

Positive cultures in:

○ 30% of animals treated with CBVF

Neutrophil reaction in:

○ 35% of animals treated with CBVF

The BV/TV in:

○ C-G treated rats was 24% greater than CBVF treated rats (*)

Animals sacrificed at 6 months which were treated with C-G did not have any evidence of infection by culture or histology. The bone mass of the implanted limb was higher than the contralateral (non-operated) side.

CERAMENT|G decreased the rate of infection and increased new bone growth as compared with both CBVF and no void filler in a debrided osteomyelitic environment. Animals treated with C-G at 6 months showed no evidence of infection and retained a higher bone mass relative to the contralateral (non-operated) side.

This study supports the use of CERAMENT|G as a readily available void filler which could be used in osteomyelitic environments after debridement.

Summary Statement

The modulation of both quantity and quality of peri-implant bone with either PTH or loading may be viable options to improve implant fixation and patient outcomes.

A strong bone-implant interface is essential for successful joint replacement surgery. This study investigated the differences in bone surrounding and within a porous titanium implant after single or combined treatment with two anabolic bone therapies: intermittent parathyroid hormone (teriparatide) and mechanical loading. Porous titanium implants were inserted bilaterally on the distal lateral femurs of rabbits. The right implant was loaded daily (1 MPa, 50 cycles/day) while the left implant was not. Rabbits received daily PTH injections (20 ug/kg) or saline vehicle. Periprosthetic cancellous bone 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mm below the implant surface, bone at the 0.25 mm bone-implant interface and total bone within each implant were examined using tissue-level analyses (quantitative backscattered electron microscopy), cellular analyses (immunohistochemistry staining of osteoblasts with procollagen-1 and TRAP staining of osteoclasts), and shear testing (implant-bone interface).

Statistical significance was determined using GEE models (p<0.05). For tissue located 0.5 mm below the implant, significant increases in bone area per total area (BA/TA) were observed with PTH treatment (56%) and with loading (27%). Further, an 18% increase in mineralization density with PTH treatment and a 20% increase in mineralization density with loading was found. Loading effects were not present beyond the 0.5 mm periprosthetic region, but PTH significantly increased BA/TA 2.0 mm below and mineralization density 1.0 mm below the implant. Tissue-level changes were supported by increases in osteoblast activity 0.5 mm below the implant with PTH (79%) and loading (34%), as well as by minimal osteoclast changes. At the 0.25 mm implant-bone interface PTH and loading increased BA/TA (16% and 23%, respectively), but only loading increased mineralization density (7%). Further, total integrated bone area was increased 35% with PTH.

Both PTH and loading enhanced the mechanical integrity of the implant-bone; shear strength increased 34% and 60%, respectively. Although combined treatment was not synergistic, both PTH and loading individually enhanced the amount and mineralization density of bone at the implant interface and immediately below the interface, thereby increasing the mechanical strength of the metal-bone interface. This research suggests that modulation of both quantity and quality of peri-implant bone may be viable options to improve implant fixation and patient outcomes.

The influence of controlled mechanical loading on osseointegration was investigated using an in vivo device implanted in the distal lateral femur of five male rabbits. Compressive loads (1 MPa, 1 Hz, 50 cycles/day, 4 weeks) were applied to a porous coated titanium cylindrical implant (5mm diameter, 2mm width, 75% porosity, 350ìm average pore diameter) and the underlying cancellous bone.. The contralateral limb served as an unloaded control. MicroCT scans at 28 μm resolution were taken of a 4 × 4mm cylindrical region of interest that included cancellous bone below the implant. A scanning electron microscope with a backscattered electron (BSE) detector was used to quantify the percent bone ingrowth and periprosthetic bone in undecalcified sections through the same region of interest. A mixed effects model was used to account for the correlation of the outcome measures within rabbits.. The percent bone ingrowth was significantly greater in the loaded limb (19 +/− 4%) compared to the unloaded control limb (16 +/− 4%, p=0.016) as measured by BSE imaging. The underlying cancellous periprosthetic tissue bone volume fraction was not different between the loaded (0.26 +/− 0.06) and unloaded control limb (0.27 +/− 0.07, p=0.81) by microCT. BSE imaging also showed no difference in the percent area of periprosthetic bone (27 +/− 10% loaded vs. 23 +/− 10% unloaded, p=0.25). Cyclic mechanical loading significantly enhanced bone ingrowth into a titanium porous coated surface compared to the unloaded controls.

Introduction: Influence of beta-blockers against fracture is controversial. Role of beta-blockers in fracture treatment not explored.

Objective: to analyze influence of propranolol, a beta-blocker, on fracture healing in a mouse model.

Materials and Methods: Fracture and intramedullary nailing on right femur of 8 week, male C57BL/6 mice. Daily propranolol in drinking water: 0 (control), 4 (low dose) and 20 (high dose) mg/kg 3 week: microcomputed tomography (microCT), histological analyses 6 week: microCT, mechanical testing N = 5 üC 9/group Statistics: two-way ANOVA. Á = 0.05.

Results: From 3 to 6 weeks, callus volume and bone mineral content (BMC) decreased, and tissue mineral density increased significantly in control groups. Callus volume and BMC decreased significantly in low dose groups. No significance in high dose groups. No significance with treatment. At 3 weeks, callus area and woven bone percentage not different with treatment. At 6 weeks, ultimate torque not different with treatment or fracture. Within the control groups, twist at ultimate torque significantly lower in fractured bones. Torsional rigidity increased significantly in fractured bones, but not different with treatment.

Discussion: Most studies based on population observation or manipulation of sympathetic signaling using intact animal bones. The current fracture model may have created neural damage, thereby interrupting the sympathetic pathway and negating its regulation of bone metabolism. Whether neural signaling is compromised by fracture treatment requires further study and may be critical to the action of beta-blockers in bone.