Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing has been introduced recently, due to its potential advantages of biomechanics and biotribology. However, a number of problems have been identified from clinical retrievals, including significant elevation of wear when the implant is mal-positioned. Our hypothesis is that implant mal-position and micro-lateralisation can result in edge contact, leading to increases in wear. The aim of this study was to investigate the combined effect of cup position and micro-lateralisation on the contact mechanics of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing prosthesis, in particularly to identify conditions which resulted in edge contact.

Finite element (FE) method was used. A generic metal-on-metal hip resurfacing prosthesis was modelled. The bearing diameters of the femoral head and acetabular cup components were 54.49mm and 54.6mm respectively, with a diametral clearance between the head and the cup of 0.11mm. The resurfacing components were implanted into a hemi-pelvic hip joint bone model and all the materials in the FE model were assumed to be homogenous, isotropic and linear elastic (Udofia et al 2007). The FE models consisted of approximately 80,000 elements, which were meshed in I-DEAS (Version 11, EDS, USA) and solved using ABAQUS (Version 6.7-1, Dassault Systèmes). For this study, the femoral component was fixed with an inclination angle of 45° and an anteversion angle of 10°. The orientation of the acetabular cup was varied, using inclination angles of 35° and 65°, and anteversion angles between −10° to 30°. Contact at the bearing surface between the cup and femoral head was modelled using frictionless surface-based elements, simulating a fully lubricated situation, as coefficients of friction less than 0.1 would not have appreciable effects on the predicted contact mechanics. The femoral component was fixed into the femur (except the guide pin) using PMMA cement with an average thickness of approximately 1mm. The other contact interfaces in the FE model (cup/acetabulum, cement/bone and cement/femoral component) were all assumed to be rigidly bonded. The hip joint model was loaded through a fixed resultant hip joint contact force of 3200N, and was applied through medial, anterior muscle forces and subtrochanteric forces to simulate the mid-to-terminal stance phase (approximately 30% – 50%) of the gait cycle (Bergmann et al., 1993). Micro-lateralisation was modelled through displacing the femoral head laterally, up to 0.5mm, relative the centre of the cup.

Edge contact was detected once the inclination angle became greater than 65°. The effect of ante-version was to further shift the contact area towards the edge of the cup, nevertheless no edge contact was found for ante-version angles up to 25° and inclination angles below 55°. However, when the micro-lateralisation was introduced, edge contact was detected at a much smaller inclination angle. For example, even with a micro-lateralisation of 0.5 mm, edge contact occurred at an inclination angle of 45°. This study highlights the importance of surgical techniques on the contact mechanics and tribology of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing and potential outcome of these devices.

Clinical reports of surgical intervention options, such as spacers or hemi-arthroplasties, particularly for treatment of young arthritic patients, have been poor [1]. Knowledge of the tribology of the cartilage-prosthesis interaction of these devices would potentially provide an insight to the reasons for the premature failure of these devices and the development of more appropriate intervention treatment solutions for arthritic patients. Frictional studies of articular cartilage have been reported, using simple pin-on-plate geometric configurations [2], which do not accurately represent the geometric and stress conditions in the natural joint. A more representative model, based on the medial compartment of the knee joint has been developed in the Part 1 of this study [3] for the pre-clinical tribological testing the natural joint and their related arthroplasty devices. Bearing geometry is an important consideration in limiting wear, as shown in congruous meniscal knee replacement, which exhibited lower wear rates than incongruous designs [4,5]. The aim of this study was to use a unicompartmental hemi-arthroplasty model to examine the effect of tibial conformity and stress on the friction and wear of articular cartilage.

Experiments were conducted in an anatomic pendulum friction simulator (SimSol, UK) using the medial femoral condyle of a bovine knee joint articulating against two conforming stainless steel (316L) tibial plates (R=50mm and 100mm). A simplified physiologic knee loading profile was applied represent both low loading and much higher physiological loading conditions, with peak load between 259N – 1.5kN). Tests were conducted in 25% bovine serum and run for 3600 and 300 cycles under the low and high loading conditions respectively. The motion was cycled at 1Hz with amplitude between −10°–13.1°. Cartilage wear was assessed qualitatively from surface roughness measurements using a surface profile using a surface profilometer (Taylor Hobson, UK). The friction and wear of cartilage articulating against the conforming tibial plates were compared to a positive control flat tibial plate model [3]. The conforming plate models were found to produce significantly lower cartilage friction and surface damage (μ=0.022–0.035, Ra=0.136–0.145μm) than the flat plate model (μ=0.078, Ra=2.70μm). No damage on the cartilage surface was observed under low loads, however, under higher, more physiological loading cartilage friction increased (μ=0.08) in the conforming plate model, with a significant surface damage. An anatomic unicompartmental knee joint model has been developed to successfully examine the effect of counterface conformity on cartilage friction and wear for pre-clinical testing of a hemi-arthroplasty device. Counterface conformity was shown to significantly reduce cartilage friction and wear. This was attributed to the increased surface area and reduced stresses experienced in comparison to an incongruent bearing articulation.

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty is a conservative procedure that is becoming an increasingly popular option for young arthritic patients most likely to undergo a secondary procedure in their lifetime. The stability of the acetabular component is of particular concern in these patients who show an increased risk of failure of the cemented acetabular cups in conventional total hip replacements. The purpose of this study was to examine the initial stability of a cementless interference press-fit acetabular cup used in hip resurfacing arthroplasty and implanted into ‘normal’ versus poor quality bone. Also examined was the effect of the press-fit procedure on the contact mechanics at the cup-bone interface and between the cup and femoral head.

A finite element (FE) model of the DUROM resurfacing (Zimmer GmbH) was created and implanted anatomically into the hip joint, which was loaded physiologically through muscle and subtrochanteric forces.

The FE models included: a line-to-line, 1mm and 2mm interference press-fit cup. Also considered were two FE models based on the 1mm press-fit cups, in which the material properties of the cancellous and cortical bone tissues were reduced by 2 and 4 times, to represent a reduction in bone quality as seen with age or disease.

Increasing the cup-bone interference resulted in a sig-nificant reduction in implant micromotion. All the pressfit models showed predicted cup-bone micromotion below 50 micrometers. This would ensure adequate initial stability and encourage secondary fixation through bone in-growth. The predicted acetabular stresses were found to increase with the amount of press-fit, however, there was no suggestion of a fracture. These stresses would further contribute to securing the cup.

Reducing the bone quality showed an increase in the predicted micromotion and increased bone strain. Micromotion was below 50 micrometers, but the predicted compressive bone stresses, necessary for additional implant fixation, was reduced. This implied that poor quality bone would provide unsuitable support medium for the implant. The bearing surface contact mechanics were little affected by the amount of pressfitting.