EFFECT OF IMPLANT POSITION AND MICRO-LATERALISATION ON THE CONTACT MECHANICS OF METAL-ON-METAL HIP RESURFACING PROSTHESIS

Abstract

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing has been introduced recently, due to its potential advantages of biomechanics and biotribology. However, a number of problems have been identified from clinical retrievals, including significant elevation of wear when the implant is mal-positioned. Our hypothesis is that implant mal-position and micro-lateralisation can result in edge contact, leading to increases in wear. The aim of this study was to investigate the combined effect of cup position and micro-lateralisation on the contact mechanics of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing prosthesis, in particularly to identify conditions which resulted in edge contact.

Finite element (FE) method was used. A generic metal-on-metal hip resurfacing prosthesis was modelled. The bearing diameters of the femoral head and acetabular cup components were 54.49mm and 54.6mm respectively, with a diametral clearance between the head and the cup of 0.11mm. The resurfacing components were implanted into a hemi-pelvic hip joint bone model and all the materials in the FE model were assumed to be homogenous, isotropic and linear elastic (Udofia et al 2007). The FE models consisted of approximately 80,000 elements, which were meshed in I-DEAS (Version 11, EDS, USA) and solved using ABAQUS (Version 6.7-1, Dassault Systèmes). For this study, the femoral component was fixed with an inclination angle of 45° and an anteversion angle of 10°. The orientation of the acetabular cup was varied, using inclination angles of 35° and 65°, and anteversion angles between −10° to 30°. Contact at the bearing surface between the cup and femoral head was modelled using frictionless surface-based elements, simulating a fully lubricated situation, as coefficients of friction less than 0.1 would not have appreciable effects on the predicted contact mechanics. The femoral component was fixed into the femur (except the guide pin) using PMMA cement with an average thickness of approximately 1mm. The other contact interfaces in the FE model (cup/acetabulum, cement/bone and cement/femoral component) were all assumed to be rigidly bonded. The hip joint model was loaded through a fixed resultant hip joint contact force of 3200N, and was applied through medial, anterior muscle forces and subtrochanteric forces to simulate the mid-to-terminal stance phase (approximately 30% – 50%) of the gait cycle (Bergmann et al., 1993). Micro-lateralisation was modelled through displacing the femoral head laterally, up to 0.5mm, relative the centre of the cup.

Edge contact was detected once the inclination angle became greater than 65°. The effect of ante-version was to further shift the contact area towards the edge of the cup, nevertheless no edge contact was found for ante-version angles up to 25° and inclination angles below 55°. However, when the micro-lateralisation was introduced, edge contact was detected at a much smaller inclination angle. For example, even with a micro-lateralisation of 0.5 mm, edge contact occurred at an inclination angle of 45°. This study highlights the importance of surgical techniques on the contact mechanics and tribology of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing and potential outcome of these devices.